Cast your hypothetical vote, for president, today:

[RadioFan]

Here's where my vote would go:

Giuliani v. Clinton: Giuliani

Romney v. Clinton: Clinton

Thompson v. Clinton: Tossup (worst-case scenario), leaning toward Thompson, currently

Giuliani v. Obama: Giuliani

Romney v. Obama: Obama

Thompson v. Obama: Obama

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

You lucky, lucky people.

What an enormous wealth of candidates you have.

Here's another option:

Blow your brains out v. Move to Canada

[Ace]

Here's where my vote would go:

Giuliani v. Clinton: Giuliani

Romney v. Clinton: Clinton

Thompson v. Clinton: Tossup (worst-case scenario), leaning toward Thompson, currently

Giuliani v. Obama: Giuliani

Romney v. Obama: Obama

Thompson v. Obama: Obama

Good to see ideology and political ideals dont guide your vote.

[Mikey]

Blow your brains out v. Move to Canada

That would be a seriously tough choice.

[BSmack]

Blow your brains out v. Move to Canada

I have nothing against Canada. But I love where I am. And both of your options would involve relocation. So I'll have to pass.

Anyway, here goes.

Giuliani v. Clinton: Clinton
Romney v. Clinton: Clinton
Thompson v. Clinton: Clinton
Giuliani v. Obama: Obama
Romney v. Obama: Obama
Thompson v. Obama: Obama

That being said, I'd rather see Edwards get the Democratic nod.

[Dinsdale]

Giuliani v. Clinton: Paul

Romney v. Clinton: Paul

Thompson v. Clinton: Paul

Giuliani v. Obama: Paul

Romney v. Obama: Paul

Thompson v. Obama: Paul



Of course, we can't completely discount Neil Diamond's write-in campaign yet.

[Terry in Crapchester]

Giuliani v. Clinton: Clinton
Romney v. Clinton: Clinton
Thompson v. Clinton: Clinton
Giuliani v. Obama: Obama
Romney v. Obama: Obama
Thompson v. Obama: Obama

That being said, I'd rather see Edwards get the Democratic nod.

Second. On all of the above.

[Cuda]

Giuliani v. Clinton: Paul

Romney v. Clinton: Paul

Thompson v. Clinton: Paul

Giuliani v. Obama: Paul

Romney v. Obama: Paul

Thompson v. Obama: Paul



Of course, we can't completely discount Neil Diamond's write-in campaign yet.

That gets a rack.

Too bad the Guns & Dope Party has gone bust. EDIT: the URL is back up http://www.maybelogic.com/gunsanddopeparty/
("Every Man a Tsar"... or was it "Every Tsar an Ostrich"?) EDIT: it was BOTH

Also: "Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action."

&

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined,
but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a
status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them,
which would include their own government."

both by-- George Washington

[BSmack]

Blow your brains out v. Move to Canada

Looks like Harper's starting to crack down on potheads up north. Not so sure I want to move there anymore if it's just going to be USA North.

Reversing earlier moves to decriminalize marijuana use, Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada announced new legal and spending measures against drug use and distribution on Thursday.

[battery chucka' one]

Giuliani v. Clinton: Giuliani

Romney v. Clinton: Romney

Thompson v. Clinton: Thompson

Giuliani v. Obama: Toss-up but leaning Giuliani. How much do we really know about Obama, as yet? I don't know much about the guy. He doesn't seem to answer prodding/harder questions very well.

Romney v. Obama: Romney

Thompson v. Obama: Thompson

[Mister Bushice]

Here's another option:

Blow your brains out v. Move to Canada

No discernible difference there.

[upstart]

I waiting for Newt to jump in

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

Reversing earlier moves to decriminalize marijuana use, Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada announced new legal and spending measures against drug use and distribution on Thursday.

..."the government would spend about $64 million"...


Whoah...that's showing 'em.

Sincerely,




BTW, Smackie spends more than that on Rizlas. Weekly.

[poptart]

Here's where my vote would go:

Giuliani v. Clinton: Giuliani

Romney v. Clinton: Clinton

Thompson v. Clinton: Tossup (worst-case scenario), leaning toward Thompson, currently

Giuliani v. Obama: Giuliani

Romney v. Obama: Obama

Thompson v. Obama: Obama

If you place a vote for any of the above (or Gore, Newt, ... whoever) then you deserve the America that you'll continue to get.
Circling faster .......

Dins gets it.

[Dinsdale]

Giuliani

Isn't just a fucking bald-face liar, but he revels in it.


Giuliani claims that he was at the Ground Zero site "as often, if not more, than most workers.... I was there working with them. I was exposed to exactly the same things they were exposed to. So in that sense, I'm one of them."


He was there for a grand total of 29 hours over three months.

Not even just a run-of-the-mill lie... no, that's an extra-large supersized lie, which should be offensive to... everyone.


His stellar judgement resulted in him putting the Office of Emergency Management in the World Trade Center. Hey Rudy, maybe you're not so good with New York history, so I'll help... uhm, the WTC was the target of a terrorist attck in 1993. It was kind of a big deal at the time. Sorry you never heard about it. Of course, when questioned about this decision, Rudy, OF COURSE, tossed someone else under the bus for it. I guess he doesn't really understand how responsibility and accountability works in the governmental hierarchy... yup, good presidential material, right there.


So, PubWhore is more than willing to take credit for the positives that he had nothing to do with, yet is more than willing to pass the buck when he fucks up.

Yet some of you complete fucking tards will endorse him, despite him being a KNOWN flagrant liar. And then you'll have the gall to complain about the government, even though you fully endorsed dishonesty and corruption, and didn't demand any better.


I feel sorry for anyone who is that easily mislead, and is such a coward they refuse to stand up to the good old boys network.

[BSmack]

..."the government would spend about $64 million"...

Whoah...that's showing 'em.

Sincerely,



BTW, Smackie spends more than that on Rizlas. Weekly.

64 million is like 1 million per Canadian eh?

Plus, thanks to the Idiot In Chief here, the Canadian dollar is actually worth 64 million. I know you're used to your currency being worth 2/3 of an American dollar, but those days are long gone. If this continues the NHL may decide to relocate back to Winnipeg.

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

If this continues the NHL may decide to relocate back to Winnipeg.

Go Jets, go!

[Terry in Crapchester]

Isn't just a fucking bald-face liar, but he revels in it.


Giuliani claims that he was at the Ground Zero site "as often, if not more, than most workers.... I was there working with them. I was exposed to exactly the same things they were exposed to. So in that sense, I'm one of them."


He was there for a grand total of 29 hours over three months.

Not even just a run-of-the-mill lie... no, that's an extra-large supersized lie, which should be offensive to... everyone.


His stellar judgement resulted in him putting the Office of Emergency Management in the World Trade Center. Hey Rudy, maybe you're not so good with New York history, so I'll help... uhm, the WTC was the target of a terrorist attck in 1993. It was kind of a big deal at the time. Sorry you never heard about it. Of course, when questioned about this decision, Rudy, OF COURSE, tossed someone else under the bus for it. I guess he doesn't really understand how responsibility and accountability works in the governmental hierarchy... yup, good presidential material, right there.


So, PubWhore is more than willing to take credit for the positives that he had nothing to do with, yet is more than willing to pass the buck when he fucks up.

Yet some of you complete fucking tards will endorse him, despite him being a KNOWN flagrant liar. And then you'll have the gall to complain about the government, even though you fully endorsed dishonesty and corruption, and didn't demand any better.

Sounds an awful lot like a rerun of a President I'm only too familiar with. That's the last thing we need.

[poptart]

Hasn't Ghouliani already had two do-overs in marriage?

You don't get do-overs when you step in the oval office.

Aside from that, the last thing we need in the oval office is another liberal.


This guy is a serious 'tard.

No joke.

[Cuda]

Sounds an awful lot like a rerun of a President I'm only too familiar with. That's the last thing we need.

Bill's not running, his "wife" is, but your point is well taken

[battery chucka' one]

My problem with Giuliani isn't that he cheated on his wife while mayor. Politicians are often dogs. That's understood. My issue derives on his brashness about it. Crap. At least lie to me about your affair. Let's try to pretend that you accept what you're doing (cheating) is wrong. Even Bill Clinton understood this. Hence, the lies about Monica. Craziness.

[poptart]

You sure about that?

When you get married you make a vow -- in front of maybe hundreds, ... perhaps thousands of family, friends, associates -- PROMISING to honor your chosen mate, and to keep yourself sexually faithful to that mate.

Ghouliani has twice broken that promise.


That's a 'tard, my friend.

[Dinsdale]

Simply cheating on your wife isn't anyone else's business.

Shut your fucking hole, you traitor.


Sin
Ken Star, American Revolutionary

[Screw_Michigan]

Aside from that, the last thing we need in the oval office is another liberal.

yeah because we all know the last eight years have been filled with peace and prosperity, you fucking idiot.

[trev]

A no to everyone on your list.

A maybe for Romney or Thompson

[Screw_Michigan]

They've been quite prosperous for me.

Piss off, tard.

[poptart]

Aside from that, the last thing we need in the oval office is another liberal.

yeah because we all know the last eight years have been filled with peace and prosperity, you fucking idiot.

Bush is not a conservative ..... idiot.

[Dinsdale]

Bush is quite possibly the most "liberal" president in American history.


The now-invalid Constitution out front should have told you.

[Shine]

Giuliani v. Clinton: Paul

Romney v. Clinton: Paul

Thompson v. Clinton: Paul

Giuliani v. Obama: Paul

Romney v. Obama: Paul

Thompson v. Obama: Paul

If I could only give a RACK to one post in the history of the message boards dating back to SCIII, this would be that post.

[Dinsdale]

Oh, the groundswell for Paul almost has a grassroots feel to it.

Hell, the only campaigning I've seen besides stupid PR appearances by the candidates has been for Paul, which has been going on for months and months. It's actually startling how much support Paul has here in Hippyland (although the impression people have of Oregon being some ultra-liberal state isn't that accurate, although it's starting to lean that way with all of the transplants).


Dude is straight blowing up around here. Don't count him out just yet.

[battery chucka' one]

Oh, the groundswell for Paul almost has a grassroots feel to it.

Hell, the only campaigning I've seen besides stupid PR appearances by the candidates has been for Paul, which has been going on for months and months. It's actually startling how much support Paul has here in Hippyland (although the impression people have of Oregon being some ultra-liberal state isn't that accurate, although it's starting to lean that way with all of the transplants).


Dude is straight blowing up around here. Don't count him out just yet.

lol

Sorry, but this post was way too funny. I heard Paul in his fullest for the first time Tuesday. He's a whiner. Plain and simple. He has no real solutions. Just a laundry list of complaints. And you're going to vote for him. Sad, son, sad.

[Mikey]

He has no real solutions.

This, coming from someone who thinks Fred "The Hammer" Thompson is the answer to all our problems is just about hilarious.

[battery chucka' one]

He has no real solutions.

This, coming from someone who thinks Fred "The Hammer" Thompson is the answer to all our problems is just about hilarious.

Who says he's the answer to ALL our problems? When is the government ever the answer to our problems? I swear, you're like a 12 year old who thinks he's politically savvy. Have you learned to wipe your own nose yet or is that what you're looking for in a president? Incredible. You attack candidates who actually might solutions in favor of those who desire to just create more problems (sans solutions). Hilarity is truly your forte'.

[BSmack]

You attack candidates who actually might solutions in favor of those who desire to just create more problems (sans solutions).

First day with the new Babelfish? What language did you try to translate that from?

[battery chucka' one]

You attack candidates who actually might be able to provide solutions in favor of those who desire to merely create more problems (sans solutions).

First day with the new Babelfish? What language did you try to translate that from?

Please tell me you didn't know what I was saying. I'm doing about fifty different things right now. However, here it is in its edited state.

[BSmack]

You attack candidates who actually might be able to provide solutions in favor of those who desire to merely create more problems (sans solutions).

First day with the new Babelfish? What language did you try to translate that from?

Please tell me you didn't know what I was saying. I'm doing about fifty different things right now. However, here it is in its edited state.

Maybe instead of doing 50 things poorly, you should try to do one thing well.

Just sayin.

[battery chucka' one]

First day with the new Babelfish? What language did you try to translate that from?

Please tell me you didn't know what I was saying. I'm doing about fifty different things right now. However, here it is in its edited state.

Maybe instead of doing 50 things poorly, you should try to do one thing well.

Just sayin.

And still, you answer no criticisms leveled at your boy Paul. Way to go. Not unexpected. Keep as you are. That's where you do the least damage.

[Terry in Crapchester]

They've been quite prosperous for me.

Piss off, tard.

You are aware that the Bush Administration has been paying people to post their talking points on various message boards on the interwebs while posing as ordinary citizens?

I have little doubt, within that context, that mvscal is on the level here.

[Dinsdale]

your boy Paul.

Giuliani v. Clinton: Clinton
Romney v. Clinton: Clinton
Thompson v. Clinton: Clinton
Giuliani v. Obama: Obama
Romney v. Obama: Obama
Thompson v. Obama: Obama

Way to go. Not unexpected.

[Mikey]

He has no real solutions.

This, coming from someone who thinks Fred "The Hammer" Thompson is the answer to all our problems is just about hilarious.

Who says he's the answer to ALL our problems? When is the government ever the answer to our problems? I swear, you're like a 12 year old who thinks he's politically savvy. Have you learned to wipe your own nose yet or is that what you're looking for in a president? Incredible. You attack candidates who actually might solutions in favor of those who desire to just create more problems (sans solutions). Hilarity is truly your forte'.

Uh....dumbass.

You just attacked Paul for having "no real solutions", and then claim to like Thompson for the very same reason.

Nice try anyway.