Believe the Heupel wrote:QED.Adelpiero wrote:IF IF thats all im seeing from your bitter twat ass. what about the 2 dropped easy interceptions Pig Browns had??? If he catches them OU doesnt have 14 points on the board, thus MU is winning. see how that works dumbfuck.Believe the Heupel wrote: Wow, it's almost like ONLY Missouri's turnovers had any kind of effect on the game. Never mind that OU turned the ball over on their side of the field twice, without which Missouri would have never even been close. And it's not like Missouri didn't gain a ton of yards when they were down 17 with less than 2 minutes to go in the game. All these things count, though.
What it says about OU is that OU managed to win a game against Missouri's supposed best team in decades, and a Missouri fan's first thought was that OU is a bunch of cheaters. You know, instead of "Hey, great game."
you were actually arguing with"ctrl-copy ctrl-paste a take" Paul. way to go assfuck
they gained 80 yards while down 17. they went down and scored, funny, when you score a late cheapie, you tend to put up some yards. They had 300+ yards before the late turnovers.
I havent said one word about the game, hey fuckhead i expected them to lose, OU is a very good team, but to pull this 2nd tier shit is something that pussies do. Ive seen your bullshit in threads before, being a bitter cunt, then claiming you were drinking :m200l: And if it wasnt you and another OU fan(KU schedule thread) i could give a fuck, then your another bitter puss oozen cunt.
I didnt realize cramps were that bad, need some pamprin, cunt?
Good to see OUmo,Radio, king, and dit in here talking about the game and not being baited by KCPauls post, only a fucking idiot would be baited by his post, congrats on you being the only dillhole to fall on the sword.
If only Missouri had made plays, they would have won.
They didn't.
I'm stone-cold sober right now, AND can type coherently and Missouri is STILL a second-tier program. Get back to me when Missouri wins a conference championship in your lifetime. Based on the Mad-Lib-esque quality of your alleged "smack" there (insert compound dirty word, insert reference to vagina, noun, verb, etc.) I'm guessing you're significantly younger than the 38 you'd need to be to have witnessed the last time Missouri won something significant.
Funny, all you see is "if" and the word doesn't appear once in what I wrote that you quoted.
so this isn't a what if?
so claiming that if OU didnt turn the ball over it would of been a blow out? Wow, that really sounds like a what if, kinda like if your grandma had a dick, she would be your grandpa type of thing.Wow, it's almost like ONLY Missouri's turnovers had any kind of effect on the game. Never mind that OU turned the ball over on their side of the field twice, without which Missouri would have never even been close. And it's not like Missouri didn't gain a ton of yards when they were down 17 with less than 2 minutes to go in the game. All these things count, though.
What if Maclin takes that handoff, the play was wide open, he didnt, it was a fumble and a OU defensive TD a backbreaker, game over. See what ifs dont work.
