Chiefs over duhs again ... hohum

kcdave · Post by **kcdave** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 3:04 am

another raiduh beat down week starts now.

Since 1990, the Chiefs hold a 27-8 win ratio over the duhs, including winning the last 8. Subtract Chucky, (Only good coach the duhs have had in 20+ years) it would even be worse.

Chiefs 21
duhs 9, 10 penalties, 2 int's, 1 fumble, qb sacked 6 times.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 3:09 am

You know, we haven't lost to those perrenial losers since '02.....it's almost not even worth discussing anymore.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:16 am

Since 1990 Oakland has won 4 division titles, KC has won 3.
Oakland has won 6 playoff games, KC has won 2.
Oakland has played in 3 AFC Championship Games and 1 Super Bowl, KC has played in 1 and 0.

Currently, KC is 3-3 and Oakland is 2-3.
This will be a big division game for both teams.

The past doesn't interest me right now.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:27 pm

kcdave wrote:another raiduh beat down week starts now.

Since 1990, the Chiefs hold a 27-8 win ratio over the duhs, including winning the last 8. Subtract Chucky, (Only good coach the duhs have had in 20+ years) it would even be worse.

Chiefs 21
duhs 9, 10 penalties, 2 int's, 1 fumble, qb sacked 6 times.

..sure you're not talking about the Bolts vs. Duhs Dave?...check the stats from Sundays game in San Diego.

Duhs..8 penalties, 2 int's, 2 fumbles, QB sacked 6 times

kcdave · Post by **kcdave** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:28 am

BWA! CM, just goes to show the duh's will lay down for anyone.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:12 am

poptart wrote: The past doesn't interest me right now.

Just keep telling yourself that the past doesn't matter. You'll have another opportunity to so next week, and the week after, and the week after... lather, rinse, repeat.

It's hard to even work up a decent semblance of hatred for the 'duhs anymore, and that saddens me.

Same old, same old. Chiefs run the streak to 9 straight.

KC - 24
Oak - 20

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:56 am

LJ will roll up at least 150 against the Duhs.

Jordan might go for 100 or more, but the Raiders may not put up even 100 passing yards.

KC wins the turnover battle 4-2 and the game 24-14.

Does this entitle me to post on Sunday night?

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:57 am

According to Wags it does.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:17 am

If the Raiders don't put forth their best performance they can lose this game.

Figures to be a very physical game with both teams wanting to control things w/the running game.
Might possibly see a few 8, 10, 12 play drives.

Oakland should have G. Warren back this week, and maybe D. Burgess will be healthy enough for more than just the spot-duty he was able to give v. SD.
It's not like the defense can use these guys or anything.

I see Oakland doing more with their running game than KC.
That, plus home field, ought to be enough to get the Raiders over the top.

Rushing Yards
Oakland - 153
Kansas City - 105

Score
Oakland - 22
Kansas City - 17

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Fri Oct 19, 2007 5:02 am

Marcus Allen wrote:If the Raiders don't put forth their best performance they can lose this game.

Sin,

poptart wrote:Oakland should have G. Warren back this week, and maybe D. Burgess will be healthy enough for more than just the spot-duty he was able to give v. SD.
It's not like the defense can use these guys or anything.

The Raydahs are 26th in total defense, 24th in points allowed (25.6 a game) and 27th in the league with seven sacks in five games....yeah, I'd say they could use those guys back.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Oct 19, 2007 5:42 am

A number of NFL teams can play sub-par ball and still easily get over on a team the likes of KC.

Not Oakland.

Raider Loco · Post by **Raider Loco** » Fri Oct 19, 2007 2:47 pm

Usually you don't have must win games this early in the season but for the Silver and Black it's a must win game at home vs. a division opponent. The Queefs are the perfect team to do that to and get this rivalry back on track. The Bronco loss was close and the San Diego game was a winnable game even though it seemed one sided this team does not give up.

G.Warren has not practiced all week and most likely be a no go for Sunday's game, Terrell Sands did absolutly nothing in his place last week and Sapp needs to go on a binge and gain the 35lbs to push the line back. That being said the best way to stop LJ with our D-line is to keep the offense on the field and feed the 3 headed monster of Jordon, Rhodes, and Fargas the ball and have a few long drives.

Game has sold out and it's going to be loud and crazy!

Raiders 24
Queefs 13

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:51 pm

Don't forget RaydahFan, you'll more than likely have to account for this guy as well:

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:13 pm

Offensively, kc has LJ and an aging and overrated Tony G. Thats it. Mike Huff will shut down TG like he pretty much did on Gates last week. (Huff did such a great job of shutting down Gates last week, they had to rely on that whiney bitch - LT). G Warren has to remind himself he's not with those limpdicks in CO and get back on the field.

A more balanced Raiders' offense will control T.O.P.

Raiders - 31
pussy farts - 10

sig bets?

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:25 pm

thanks marcus.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:17 pm

Raider Loco wrote: Game has sold out and it's going to be loud and crazy!

So the game won't be blacked out in Choakland like it normally is, which is nice in that it will keep the crime down for at least a few hours whilst the 'duh faithful chug their 40's indoors.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:51 pm

Sirfindafold wrote:Offensively, kc has LJ and an aging and overrated Tony G. Thats it.

Really? Did they trade away Dwayne Bowe and I wasn't notified?

Mike Huff will shut down TG like he pretty much did on Gates last week. (Huff did such a great job of shutting down Gates last week, they had to rely on that whiney bitch - LT). G Warren has to remind himself he's not with those limpdicks in CO and get back on the field.

A more balanced Raiders' offense will control T.O.P.

Raiders - 31
pussy farts - 10

sig bets?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Raydah James thought that was a seriously myopic take.

Oh, and NO Raydah defender has EVER "shut down" Tony G., OK Sport?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:41 am

Bowe and Tony G will be a challenge for the Raider secondary.
D. Burgess 'healthy' and coming strong off the edge on Huard ought to help matters considerably for a team that's been lacking in QB pressure.
I'm not that worried about Oakland getting burned through the air.
More concerned about the Raider ability to stop the run.
5.4 yds per rush given up so far.
Ridiculously bad for a unit that was, coming into the season, supposed to be TEH shit.

Struggling v. the run will be a season-long problem for Oakland, IMO.
They just don't have it up front in the middle of the line.
Sapp was never a BIG guy to begin with, and now with the weight loss he looks downright smallish in there.
G. Warren's condition is suspect.
T. Sands has been a disappointment.
T. Kelly can't provide that much in the middle of the line.
Oakland is also lacking a safety who is consitently providing excellent run support.
Huff is improving overall, but the need a REAL hitter at safety to go along w/him, IMO.

DT and safety are big off-season priorities for the Raiders.

But I'm just not very impressed with KC's run game.
The line doesn't get it done, so I don't think Oakland will get raped that badly v. the run in this game.

Loco is right that this is a BIG game for the Raiders.
I don't know about it being a 'must' win game, because it's only week 6, but 0-3 in the division would bring on a LOT of negativity.

Let's just say the Raiders could use a win here very much.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:47 am

Mikey wrote: Does this entitle me to post on Sunday night?

Only if you have a note from your mother.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:01 pm

Tart hit the nail on the head with our D........although I do disagree with you strongly about Tommy Kelly-he has been the one shining star on our defensive line and was the reason we beat cleveland.

When the question is "How can a defense that was top 3 in the league last year drop so far this year with the same players?", the painfully obvious answer is "Rob. Fucking. Ryan." Son of Buddy is an absolute dumbfuck of a DC who is wasting our kickass young talent by not blitzing them more often.........I mean, Thomas Howard runs a fucking 4.4 40 for christ sakes. Once that fat sack of shit is curbed for a coherent coordinator, our D will be back to being a top 5 squad again.

This week, the D will do just enough.

Raiders-27

Spotting Queefs-24

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:13 pm

...Duhs pull it out on a pick and return by Awesomewa!

Duhs...27
Quiefs..24

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 1:26 am

The raider defense looked pretty good last year, but I think people overrated them.
Truth is that opposing teams went to a 'turtle' offense v. our defense because, due to the historic futility of our own offense, all they needed was about 10 pts to win a game.
Nobody attacked our defense last year -- they didn't have to.
So our stats looked great.

We have some pretty good personel, and we're young.
We're just lacking a guy-or-two on the d-line and a guy at safety.

Ryan is Ryan, same as last year.
Kiffin is the new guy.
Why not blast him for the poor defense?

I dunno, just tossing that out there.

T. Sands' not doing his job at NT has hurt us.
Burgess' injury has hurt us.
W. Sapp being old and skinny has hurt us.

Bottom line is the defense needs to step it up.

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:01 am

Duhs 20

Chefs 17

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:50 am

RevLimiter wrote:Don't forget RaydahFan, you'll more than likely have to account for this guy as well:

This JUST IN: Priest was activated to the regular roster today.

Be afraid, RaydahFan. Be VERY afraid.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:14 am

Holmes impact is likely to be minimal, but maybe LJ will pull his head out his ass.

Sorry, 'duhfan. This won't be the game you get over. The Chiefs D will terrorize all day.

Chiefs 24
Raiders 13

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:35 pm

Hate to jock al-RaidaFan, but pop's take on this game is dead nuts, par uszhh'.

IMHO, this game is determined by several factors:

a) Can the 'duhs continue the momentum established by their running game in previous games, thus effectively controlling the clock?

2) Can the Chiefs establish an effective running game of their own on the road?

d) Trends. Think eight-straight losses possibly won't motivate the 'duhs? Mix in a sold-out Mausoleum and all bets are off....

Another consideration might be the effect - if any - the High Priest of Enigma holds on this game. Common sense suggests very minimal, but this guy is another country completely. A 40 yard sprint on a screen pass to determine the winning score wouldn't surprise me....

Match-ups aside, I gotta admit, point "d" troubles me the most. AlRaida has never lost 9 straight to an opponent. Ever. In their history.

That said...

*Sigh*

Chiefs 20
'duhs 16

Aaron in Tucson · Post by **Aaron in Tucson** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:06 pm

Raider Myopia checking in.

Fuck the Chefs!

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:19 pm

Curry DID NOT catch that ball...toss the fucking red flag Herm!!!

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:21 pm

Where the fuck ya been, Spewstained?

Good to see ya, brah!

Now die in a fire, you fuckin' Loser!

War Errrron!

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:38 pm

Watching the "Duhs attempt to master the intricacies of the forward pass is funny

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:40 pm

Bwa - Another football follies momnent for the "duhs on that punt return

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:50 pm

This Raider team fucking sucks cokk.

Un. Fucking. Watchable.

Wake me when JaMarcus finally gets the chance to turn this shit team around, and Alcula finally fucking dies from Kiffin slamming a wooden stake through his heart.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:24 pm

Raydah James wrote: Un. Fucking. Watchable.

Pretty much. These two offenses have both been equally "offensive".

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:16 pm

Fuckin' kickers.

From Stenerud, to Lowery, to Elliot, to the current useless single-digit shirt in the line-up.

The scourge of Kansas City football....

10-point swing.

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:43 pm

Two-pointer fails. Nice call, Herm.

Let's play some Defense!

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:11 pm

Good Lord.

Defense makes a play to preserve a 12-10 victory.

Dick Vermiel whare are ya now?!

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:13 pm

Same old fucking Raiders.

Nice assembly of "talent" you drafted and signed over the years there, Al.

This shit organization led by a shit owner will not get another dime out of my pocket until Al is fucking dead. Period.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:28 pm

Culpepper does what Culpepper does best...toss an INT at the WORST possible time.

BEAUTIFUL.

In other news, this game set back the evolution of pro football AT LEAST 30 years. Damn near unwatchable.

Oh well, I'll STILL take the win anyway....sucks for you RaydahFan.

AGAIN.

Buwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!

Raider Loco · Post by **Raider Loco** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:28 pm

The sun rises in the East and sets in the West. Death and Taxes. Raiders vs. the AFC West.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:14 am

Oh, BTW....the Kansas City Chiefs are looking DOWN on all you AFC West bitches now.

Bring on the lowly Donkeys.

T1B

Chiefs over duhs again ... hohum

Chiefs over duhs again ... hohum

Re: Chiefs over duhs again ... hohum