Felix wrote:warren wrote:
Look RadioFarce, there are many Christians, such as myself, that can accept evolution
you and the Pope.....
I think he was directing his comments more toward the "God Created the Universe in Six Days" "Noah took ywo of every creature into the Ark" crowd.....
That's creationism, not ID.
Just because some of you either can't fathom the differance or wish to pretend there is none, doesn't make them the same.
ID doesn't presuppose that the cause was 'supernatural', just that there was one.88 wrote:I don't understand how anyone can argue, in good faith, that "Intelligent Design" has some connection to "science". It goes off the rails before it leaves the station. Intelligent Design proposes that something "supernatural" executed a plan to design the natural world. What the fuck kind of scientific theory is that? How do you test supernatural? By definition, something supernatural is beyond testing. And if it cannot be tested, then it is not science.
And spontaneous biogenesis and viable mutations creating new species are just as unprovable and unfalsifiable.
And unscientific.
Agreed.mvscal wrote:The theories regarding abiogenesis have absolutely nothing to do with evolution.
But the improbability of it occuring is an argument for intelligent design.
Space-time dilation, perhaps.Felix wrote:poptart wrote: so, how do you suppose the light from a galaxy that is 13 billion light years away reached earth in 6000 years....
Of course this has nothing to do with ID.