(!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Post Reply
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?!

Post by Goober McTuber »

They’re not real.
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Re: Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?!

Post by Diogenes »

Maybe not. But they're real nice.

Coming soon to a Playboy near you...


Image
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Re: Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?!

Post by Diogenes »

Jsc810 wrote:I have conflicting thoughts about this.
Being a Playboy model isn't the same as prostitution. And she's already a lawyer, so it's a step up morally.
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Re: Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?!

Post by Diogenes »

Image



Not Bad for 44.
Last edited by Diogenes on Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
XXXL
Rainmaker
Posts: 651
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:38 am

Re: Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?!

Post by XXXL »

Most likely her phone will be ringing.......
Jerkovich
Please pay attention to Me
Posts: 1149
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:10 pm

Re: Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?!

Post by Jerkovich »

Diogenes wrote:Image



Not Bad for 44.
Take the air brushed effects out and you'll prefer nails in your eyes.
Image
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Re: Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?!

Post by Diogenes »

Jerkovich wrote:
Diogenes wrote:Not Bad for 44.
Take the air brushed effects out and you'll prefer nails in your eyes.
Not really. Judging by these pics (the ones on the left are her, though you'd probabbly prefer the ones on the right)...

Image

Image

Of course the Playboy pic is airbrushed. It's fucking Playboy. Everything is airbrushed even when the subject isn't in her mid-fourties.

Besides, you can always improvise if nessecary...


Image
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 4243
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Dr_Phibes »

Is this the internet version of the Diogenes mating call?
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Diogenes »

It's the internet version od Diogenes being bored.

Just say thank you and STFU.
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
User avatar
RadioFan
Liberal Media Conspirator
Posts: 7487
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:59 am
Location: Tulsa

Re: Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?!

Post by RadioFan »

Jerkovich wrote:Take the air brushed effects out and you'll prefer nails in your eyes.
This display of faggotry is quite disturbing.
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.
User avatar
Ana Ng
Typhoid Mary
Posts: 1328
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:59 am
Location: dupont pavilion

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Ana Ng »

She's kind of a pig.

I can see how that would be attractive though.

Scorned one too many times.
War Wagon wrote:There is a God and my tomato garden is proof of that.
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Diogenes »

cinderella_undercover wrote:She's kind of a pig.

So what? Lawyers are people too.

More or less.
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
User avatar
RadioFan
Liberal Media Conspirator
Posts: 7487
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:59 am
Location: Tulsa

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by RadioFan »

cinderella_undercover wrote:I can see how that would be attractive though.
Do tell. TIA.

Rack Dio, btw.

Let's face it, you holier-than-thou morons would cream your pants twice at the actual prospect of letting that 44-year-old hear your "story," in person. Are you kidding me?
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.
User avatar
Ana Ng
Typhoid Mary
Posts: 1328
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:59 am
Location: dupont pavilion

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Ana Ng »

RadioFan wrote:
cinderella_undercover wrote:I can see how that would be attractive though.
Do tell. TIA.
I was being sarcastic.

She looks like she'd be fun to smack around a little, though.

Maybe put a wrench or two up her snatch?


If you're into that sorta thing?
War Wagon wrote:There is a God and my tomato garden is proof of that.
User avatar
RadioFan
Liberal Media Conspirator
Posts: 7487
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:59 am
Location: Tulsa

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by RadioFan »

cinderella_undercover wrote:I was being sarcastic.
No way! You?
cinderella_undercover wrote:She looks like she'd be fun to smack around a little, though.
'swat I'm sayin.

Actually, she seems like a very attractive woman who was dissed, big-time, and is seriously seeking attention.

And no, I wouldn't put a wrench up her snatch. (That's kinda gross, btw.).

But I would seriously fuck her in the ass while you licked her pussy from below.
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.
User avatar
Ana Ng
Typhoid Mary
Posts: 1328
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:59 am
Location: dupont pavilion

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Ana Ng »

I can't say that THAT scenario excites me in the least.

How about if you fuck her in the ass, as I pour gasoline over you both and light a match?


Take it or leave it?
War Wagon wrote:There is a God and my tomato garden is proof of that.
User avatar
RadioFan
Liberal Media Conspirator
Posts: 7487
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:59 am
Location: Tulsa

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by RadioFan »

Actually, given that scenario, it would depend on how fast you light the match, of course.

And if you were licking her pussy.
































:lol:

You like me because I give you shit, Cindy, just like this woman is fucking with the public. Ridiculous, actually. But hey, if she wants to put her ass out there, I'm not going to complain.

Actually, I kinda like the fact that she seems to "upset" all of the "family values" crowd.

Dad, what's that billboard mean?

Bwaahhh!

Are you kidding me? RACK her for being provocative. Granted, she's probably a piece of work and will no doubt be on "Dr. Phil" in 6 months, but still ... I can't help my voyerism. And neither can anyone else in here, who's honest with themselves. Fuckers.
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.
User avatar
Ana Ng
Typhoid Mary
Posts: 1328
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:59 am
Location: dupont pavilion

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Ana Ng »

Ummmm, ya.


Image
War Wagon wrote:There is a God and my tomato garden is proof of that.
User avatar
RadioFan
Liberal Media Conspirator
Posts: 7487
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:59 am
Location: Tulsa

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by RadioFan »

Rack the Iron Man promo.

WAR Tony Stark.
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Diogenes »

RadioFan wrote:Actually, I kinda like the fact that she seems to "upset" all of the "family values" crowd.
Actually it's the local lawyers she's pissing off. Ruinning the 'integrity' of their profession and all.

Besides, it would be nice to be able to say you fucked a divorce attorney instead of the other way around.
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
Jerkovich
Please pay attention to Me
Posts: 1149
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:10 pm

Re: Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?!

Post by Jerkovich »

RadioFan wrote:
Jerkovich wrote:Take the air brushed effects out and you'll prefer nails in your eyes.
This display of faggotry is quite disturbing.
Coming from a faggot, I'll take this into consideration.

She's an old bitter cunt. No amount of airbrush can wipe that out.
Image
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Re: Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?!

Post by Diogenes »

Jerkovich wrote:
RadioFan wrote:
Jerkovich wrote:Take the air brushed effects out and you'll prefer nails in your eyes.
This display of faggotry is quite disturbing.
Being a faggot, I'll take this into consideration.
FTFY.

The only bitter cunt in sight is you, BTW.
Last edited by Diogenes on Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
Jerkovich
Please pay attention to Me
Posts: 1149
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:10 pm

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Jerkovich »

Nice show of faggotry, faggot.
Image
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Diogenes »

Jerkovich wrote:Nice show of faggotry, faggot.
Epic 'smack' there.

For a fag.
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Goober McTuber »

Nice hair-pulling contest, ladies.
User avatar
RadioFan
Liberal Media Conspirator
Posts: 7487
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:59 am
Location: Tulsa

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by RadioFan »

Diogenes wrote:Besides, it would be nice to be able to say you fucked a divorce attorney instead of the other way around.
Nice.
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

Diogenes wrote:
RadioFan wrote:Actually, I kinda like the fact that she seems to "upset" all of the "family values" crowd.
Actually it's the local lawyers she's pissing off. Ruinning the 'integrity' of their profession and all.
That was my thought. I suspect the local attorneys' disciplinary committee (whatever they call it in Illinois) will catch up to her eventually, and at a minimum, force her to take the billboards down. But it'll be a helluva ride for her before it gets to that point.
Besides, it would be nice to be able to say you fucked a divorce attorney instead of the other way around.
Can't speak to Illinois, but in New York, that's prohibited. The literal definition, anyway.

As for the figurative definition, New York requires that divorce clients receive at the outset, a statement of rights and responsibilities; itemized billing, at least once every sixty days; and mandatory fee arbitration if they want it. Divorce clients have a lot of protection that clients in other matters don't receive.

As for the main subject of this thread, I'd hit it. As would about 100% of the heterosexual males on this board.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Re: (!) Whoohoo! Anyone Need a Divorce Lawyer?! (!)

Post by Diogenes »

They've already taken them down-for having the wrong permits. Not that that will stop Ms. Fetman...
"Life's too short. Get a divorce," suggests the sexy billboard posted in one of Chicago's busiest sections of town, the Rush Street district. The provocative piece of advertising is the brainchild of Chicago divorce lawyer, Corri Fetman. Fetman, who right or wrong seems to like to tell it like it is, or at least how she thinks it is, says that the new ad has kept the phone ringing off the hook, though not always for the better. It seems that when it comes to this billboard, there are few lukewarm opinions, people either hate it or love it. Though the word on the street is that the ad's slogan has received far greater complaints than the pictures themselves.

Those who hate the ad, include area lawyers who feel that Fetman is attracting negative attention for a profession that doesn't seem to need any help attracting a negative response. Some critics have gone as far as to call the ad "sleazy." Others feel that the ad feeds on the vulnerable feelings of those contemplating a divorce. There are also those who view the billboard as promoting sex as a sport and trivializing the sanctity of marriage. While some groups who are advocates of family values believe that the ad is nothing less than a clever lie, one which neglects to give voice to the thousands of children whose lives are being torn apart through divorce.

For now, the city of Chicago has decided that the much talked about billboard needs to come down, though not for the reasons you might expect. According to Chicago city officials, the board was erected without the proper permits being secured, a no-no that did not escape the watchful eyes of city officials. Yet despite the temporary set back, an unrepentant Fetman plans on using more racy pictures in similar ads. One of her next billboard, may feature a woman in a dominatrix outfit, with the caption "Take Control. Get A Divorce."

will be pictured nude in Playboy come February, goes as far as including herself in one of her suggestive ads. She does however call the opportunity to pose for the magazine a "once in a lifetime opportunity." An opportunity that seems to parallel a secondary career as a columnist for Playboy.com, a site for which the 44 year old divorcee will be debuting as the new "Lawyer of Love."

While both Fetman and her ad might indeed provide a temptation for couples currently dissatisfied with marriage, it should be interesting to note that the divorce rate in this country has been steadily declining over the past three decades. There are also studies that show that the life span is shorter for couples who do not stay married. So you may want to think twice before taking Corri Fetman up on her ad. Like most temptations, it's probably better to just walk away from this one.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/articl ... tml?page=2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
Post Reply