If you think the Patriots will win the SB you're a dumbass

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:42 pm

mvscal wrote:
Neely8 wrote: So who are the far superior teams the Pats will be facing?

San Diego? Indy? Dallas? Cleveland? Pittsburgh?

Yes, all of those teams are far superior to the Jets. Time to wake the fuck up and face facts. Your cheating shit team peaked in September.

They do have that in common. They are all far superior to the Jets. Well the Squeelers did lose to the Jets, but I will concede that they are a better team. They all have something else in common too....

San Diego---Sept 16th--38-10 Pats Win!!
Cleveland---Oct 7th--34-17 Pats Win!!
Dallas---Oct 14th--48-27 Pats Win!!
Indy---Nov 4th--24-20 Pats Win!!
Pittsburgh---Dec 9th--34-13 Pats Win!!

Boy for a team that peaked in September they sure have beaten some good teams throughout the year. 34 points against the #1 defense in Dec wasn't too shabby either....

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff · Wed Dec 26, 2007 7:38 pm

It appears that they will go 16-0. I don't think the Giants give too much of a shit about this game.

Looks like the Steelers or Chargers will go to Foxboro for the divisional playoff game. That should be a pretty easy win for New England either way.

Colts in the AFC title game will be the loss, or Dallas in the Super Bowl. I'd like to "call it" and pick one of those games as the disaster game, but all I can say is, it will be one of those games. So, we know that the Pats will get to at least 17-0 before losing.

basically what we are looking at here is a modern version of the Run and Shoot, which is easy to catch up to. The Patriots fans are petrified to admit this. This was a disasterous idea....to go to the Run N Shoot, as opposed to having a balanced attack. That's how the Patriots won three Super Bowls. This new Houston Oilers shit is going to fail come playoff time. Plus, their defense is no better than those Oilers/Falcons teams of the late 80s.

Even Wade Phillips can figure out how to stop it.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:11 pm

Neely8 wrote: San Diego---Sept 16th--38-10 Pats Win!!
Cleveland---Oct 7th--34-17 Pats Win!!
Dallas---Oct 14th--48-27 Pats Win!!
Indy---Nov 4th--24-20 Pats Win!!
Pittsburgh---Dec 9th--34-13 Pats Win!!

I'm curious....

what were the Patsies rushing totals in those games....

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:47 pm

Felix wrote:
Neely8 wrote: San Diego---Sept 16th--38-10 Pats Win!!32 Rushes for 144 Yards or 4.5 yards per carry
Cleveland---Oct 7th--34-17 Pats Win!!32 Rushes for 147 yards or 4.6 yards per carry
Dallas---Oct 14th--48-27 Pats Win!!29 Rushes for 75 yards or 2.6 yards per carry
Indy---Nov 4th--24-20 Pats Win!!28 Rushes for 105 yards or 3.8 yards per carry
Pittsburgh---Dec 9th--34-13 Pats Win!!9 Rushes for 22 Yards or 2.4 yards per carry
I'm curious....

what were the Patsies rushing totals in those games....

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:33 pm

Neely8 wrote:San Diego---Sept 16th--38-10 Pats Win!!32 Rushes for 144 Yards or 4.5 yards per carry
Cleveland---Oct 7th--34-17 Pats Win!!32 Rushes for 147 yards or 4.6 yards per carry
Dallas---Oct 14th--48-27 Pats Win!!29 Rushes for 75 yards or 2.6 yards per carry
Indy---Nov 4th--24-20 Pats Win!!28 Rushes for 105 yards or 3.8 yards per carry
Pittsburgh---Dec 9th--34-13 Pats Win!!9 Rushes for 22 Yards or 2.4 yards per carry

they seem to have gotten worse as the season rolled on......better hope for decent weather....

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:41 pm

Felix wrote:
Neely8 wrote:San Diego---Sept 16th--38-10 Pats Win!!32 Rushes for 144 Yards or 4.5 yards per carry
Cleveland---Oct 7th--34-17 Pats Win!!32 Rushes for 147 yards or 4.6 yards per carry
Dallas---Oct 14th--48-27 Pats Win!!29 Rushes for 75 yards or 2.6 yards per carry
Indy---Nov 4th--24-20 Pats Win!!28 Rushes for 105 yards or 3.8 yards per carry
Pittsburgh---Dec 9th--34-13 Pats Win!!9 Rushes for 22 Yards or 2.4 yards per carry
they seem to have gotten worse as the season rolled on......better hope for decent weather....

The Pats last two games:

Vs Jets--35 Rushes for 131 yards or 3.7 yards per carry.
Vs Miami--25 Rushes for 196 yards or 7.8 yards per carry.

A nice article by Len Pasquarelli about the Pats run game today on ESPN.com

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/s ... id=3170864

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:52 pm

Neely8 wrote:
The Pats last two games:

Vs Jets--35 Rushes for 131 yards or 3.7 yards per carry.
Vs Miami--25 Rushes for 196 yards or 7.8 yards per carry.

both teams suck monkey testicles.....unfortunately, New England isn't going to run into them in the playoffs.....

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:55 pm

Felix wrote:
Neely8 wrote:
The Pats last two games:

Vs Jets--35 Rushes for 131 yards or 3.7 yards per carry.
Vs Miami--25 Rushes for 196 yards or 7.8 yards per carry.

both teams suck monkey testicles.....unfortunately, New England isn't going to run into them in the playoffs.....

Well in that article you can see that for the 15 games they have played so far they are 10th in
ov erall rushing at like 120 yards per game. 10th also in yards per carry at 4.2. Not a bad sampling to say that the Pats can and do run the ball.....

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:58 am

While not excellent, the Pat's running game is .... sufficient.
As Neely cited, they're 10th in the league in rushing yds.

I'd be more concerned about my team's ability to stop the run if I was Pats fan.
4.4 yds per carry allowed is well below average -- 26th in the league.

Then again, last year's Champs, the Colts, were dead last in both rushing yds allowed and yds per carry allowed -- 5.3.
YIKES!!

I'd consider last year's Super Bowl winning team to be very much an abberation though, with those defensive numbers.
You just don't find championship teams doing that poorly against the run.
It's truly very stunning.

Even the '99 Rams, considered a 'soft' team that just slung it all over the place, were 1st in the league in rushing yds allowed and 5th in yds per carry allowed -- 3.6.

Ultimately I believe three factors will contribute to NE losing in the playoffs.

- failure to stop the run
- extra pressure due to being undefeated and trying to run the table
- officiating

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:43 am

It's a good point.
The guy brings a LOT to the table, and particularly in the run-stopping dept.

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff · Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:06 am

Trust me, they WILL lose in the playoffs. I guarantee that they will win Sunday and that they will win in two weeks vs. whoever they play in the Div. round, but they are fucked against either the Colts or the Cowboys.

Qbert · Post by **Qbert** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 6:10 am

poptart wrote: Ultimately I believe factor will contribute to NE losing in the playoffs.
- officiating

poppy.....that HAS to be your BEST :xxxl: in quite some time!

Happy New Year!

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:39 pm

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:but they are fucked against either the Colts

without Freeney, I don't think Indy can get pressure on Brady unless they bring linebackers and/or d-backs....if they do that, Brady will carve up the Indy D.....

or the Cowboys.

the game is four quarters, not two.....

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff · Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:31 am

I am shocked that they got this far. Guess they were fortunate to not have to play the Colts.

I still think there is something in the air about this game and this season and that the Giants are a team on a mission. The only thing about them that is questionable is the secondary, but they've been playing pretty well lately.

Dan Patrick was on the Letterman show last night and said he thinks New York will win the Super Bowl. He gave some good takes as to why they would win, too.

We'll see. If the Patriots end up 19-0 I'll look like a dumbass.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:39 am

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:If the Patriots end up 19-0 I'll look like a dumbass.

Too late, fucko.

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff · Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:29 pm

I think what people don't realize here is how suspect the Patriots defense is. I think it's good for the GIants that Plax is getting all the attention, because under the radar, Brandon Jacobs will run WILD in this game. And that Bradshaw dude has the potential for a fluke game. The Patriots can't match his speed, and he can easily get a fluke 80 yard run.

I watched Eli Manning carve up the Packers solid secondary in blueass clod weather, and I just see him moving the chains left and right in this game. The Patriots linebacking corps will look VERY old when all is said in done. They will be gasping for air in the 3rd quarter. Giants 30, Patriots 24 is my prediction.

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:16 pm

Well you have been right about everything so far so why would you be wrong in your Super Bowl prediction??

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:23 am

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:I think what people don't realize here is how suspect the Patriots defense is. I think it's good for the GIants that Plax is getting all the attention, because under the radar, Brandon Jacobs will run WILD in this game. And that Bradshaw dude has the potential for a fluke game. The Patriots can't match his speed, and he can easily get a fluke 80 yard run.

I watched Eli Manning carve up the Packers solid secondary in blueass clod weather, and I just see him moving the chains left and right in this game. The Patriots linebacking corps will look VERY old when all is said in done. They will be gasping for air in the 3rd quarter. Giants 30, Patriots 24 is my prediction.

Sig bet?

Wannabet? · Post by **Wannabet?** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:28 pm

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:I am shocked that they got this far. Guess they were fortunate to not have to play the Colts.

Why? So the Patriots could beat them.....again? Up until last year Manning was the Patriots' bitch.

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:We'll see. If the Patriots end up 19-0 I'll look like a dumbass.

You already do, I don't know why the Patriots have to win another game to prove it.

BTW RACK ME for getting in early and loading up on the Giants at +14.5. I think the Patriots will still win but it'll be a seven point game.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:25 am

Wannabet? wrote:loading up on the Giants at +14.5. I think the Patriots will still win but it'll be a seven point game.

watching the line drop it's obvious the majority are of the same opinion.....

me, I think this will be one of those NE statement games.....

Patriots roll

NE-38
Gnats-20

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff · Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:50 am

Looks like I'm the only one who's not a dumbass!

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:07 am

mvscal wrote:

18 and 1 and it doesn't mean shit. Suck on that, chowd douchebags.

Qbert · Post by **Qbert** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:24 am

I'm so furking GLAD that there is a New DRIVE!!!!!!! :bode:

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:59 am

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:Looks like I'm the only one who's not a dumbass!

RACK it!!

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:28 am

Qbert wrote:I'm so furking GLAD that there is a New DRIVE!!!!!!!

I'll bet, bro!

Damn. That one play, with about 1:20 left -- where Manning escapes a certain sack after being amid the chaos of the "pile" and scrambles, throws ... and then the catch 2008.

Holy. fuck.

Play. Of. The. Game.

That play defines this SB.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 7:32 am

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:Looks like I'm the only one who's not a dumbass!

poptart wrote:Ultimately I believe three factors will contribute to NE losing in the playoffs.

- failure to stop the run
- extra pressure due to being undefeated and trying to run the table
- officiating

I'm here.

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff · Mon Feb 04, 2008 1:58 pm

poptart, the officiating was pretty spotless last night.

I listed the Patriots clear deficiencies first in this thread and could see during the year that there was no way they were a championship team. Most called me ignorant. Who's the dumbass now?

And way to pussy out of the sig bet, Rev.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:03 pm

BALEE DAT!!

godzilla2002 · Post by **godzilla2002** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:07 pm

RadioFan wrote:
mvscal wrote:

18 and 1 and it doesn't mean shit. Suck on that, chowd douchebags.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:34 pm

godzilla2002 wrote:
RadioFan wrote:
mvscal wrote:

18 and 1 and it doesn't mean shit. Suck on that, chowd douchebags.

Degenerate · Post by **Degenerate** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:28 pm

poptart wrote:Ultimately I believe three factors will contribute to NE losing in the playoffs.

- failure to stop the run
- extra pressure due to being undefeated and trying to run the table
- officiating

You missed the part about the Pats running game. Oh wait, they don't have one. At least not when it matters.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:13 pm

Nice write-up by Michael Silver:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=m ... &type=lgns" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Belichick, what happened to you? The stunt you pulled at the end of Sunday's game, after Brady's fourth-down pass fell incomplete with one second remaining, was comically unnecessary and regrettable. Venturing all the way across the field to shake Coughlin's hand (and essentially ruining his rival's moment), then essentially saying "peace out" and leaving before the Giants' final kneel-down is something I might expect to see from an immature player – come to think of it, Randy Moss did the same thing as a member of the Minnesota Vikings in a loss to the Redskins at the end of the '04 regular season, as he was understandably skewered as a result. So were the nine Pistons who they left the court in the final minutes of a four-game Eastern Conference Finals sweep to the Chicago Bulls in 1991. Give Belichick credit for one thing: Consistency. He is both a bad winner and a lousy loser. From the celebrated blowoffs of Eric Mangini (in '06) and Tony Dungy (and '07) to the running-up-the-score episodes from earlier this season, the guy shows as much disrespect for his opponents in victory as he did in Sunday's rare defeat. Maybe he'd handle a tie better? I don't know, but I hope Belichick takes some time to reflect on how far over the edge of reasonable behavior he has gone over the past couple of seasons, and how needless it all is. We're talking about one of the greatest coaches of all time, and a guy who I know has great respect for the game of football. He should start acting like it again.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:58 pm

Felix wrote: Patriots roll

NE-38
Gnats-20

^^^^^^

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:01 pm

Felix wrote:
Felix wrote: Patriots roll

NE-38
Gnats-20
^^^^^^

I hope you enjoyed being wrong as much as the rest of us. The only people that could possibly be upset at the result of this year's Super Bowl are New Englanders, gamblers who made the wrong bet and front running douchebags like KFC Paul.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:18 pm

^^^ Nice sig

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:21 pm

BSmack wrote: [
I hope you enjoyed being wrong as much as the rest of us.

actually I did....I thought I wanted NE, but when the Giants scored with 35 seconds left I found myself kind of laughing.....

of course, I had nothing but the mental stability of the 72 dolphin team members in mind....

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:56 pm

poptart wrote:Ultimately I believe three factors will contribute to NE losing in the playoffs.

- failure to stop the run
- extra pressure due to being undefeated and trying to run the table
- officiating
Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:poptart, the officiating was pretty spotless last night.

Philistine posted this over on your 'main' board.

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=27384" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It's worth the 10 minutes of your time to watch it.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:29 pm

Wonder why Bellowchick isn't whining about this?

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:30 pm

Mister Bushice wrote:Wonder why Bellowchick isn't whining about this?

Because he doesn't coach the Chargers.....

DallasFanatic · Post by **DallasFanatic** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:47 pm

poptart wrote:
poptart wrote:Ultimately I believe three factors will contribute to NE losing in the playoffs.

- failure to stop the run
- extra pressure due to being undefeated and trying to run the table
- officiating
Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:poptart, the officiating was pretty spotless last night.
Philistine posted this over on your 'main' board.

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=27384" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It's worth the 10 minutes of your time to watch it.

The hell it was Tart. I'd like to punch somebody when I hear a reference to the Lynn Swann catch against the Cowboys. That ruined my day.