Maybe nobody understands or remembers that many of the participants actually put a lot of time and effort into this stupid shit in an attempt to entertain the tard masses. The organizers of this debacle have put time in an ATTEMPT to make it tard proof. It's fun for a lot of old school posters who have been a part of this for years.
NOW, in a Peanut Gallery thread, you'll find brilliance such as this being posted by supposed non-partisan judges;
Sweet insider info, you fucking ass wipe. Dude, HH is a world-class smacker from the days when you and your ilk had yet discovered that you could slow "internet-funny" by simply ...... well ....... participating. What you did with that post could have been the equivalent of handing a full-grown man a pair of over-sized panties, a camera, a mirror and a dose of bad decision. Hey, I noticed that your name is Dog and that your avatar is a picture of a dog.Dog wrote:Holy Fuck, KN came out swinging. Little does he know that a certain judge :ahem: could slip a pic of KN to Headhunter, so his wytching skilz could be used.
One one hand, this one doesn't know any better. This fat bitch has about as much business judging a smackoff as she does a Lean Cuisine taste-off. OWNING a board is far easier than pwning a board. Sure, you and MigiBrow pay $9.99 a month to make friends, I get it. Feel poorly for you that you don't.Miss Conduct wrote:I want to give negative points to JSC for theiving my epoch troll bus wytch... booooooooooooo.
Oh and the pic of Jesse and the hot chick he brought to our Super Bowl party.
To summarize; these two dumb fucks couldn't tell a solid smack from a hyper drive emoticon posting button. Initially, I was a fan of selecting one judge from each board. You know, in fairness to all participants and what such. At this point, moving forward, I'd be in favor of selecting judges who don't fucking suck at all off this.