...media bias??

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:08 pm

..I caught three different network newscasts last evening....while the less than venerable Governor of New York managed to grab the lead story on all three stations, not once did I hear his party affiliation mentioned...humm, just wonderin

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:11 pm

..I caught three different network newscasts last evening...

...not one of them mentioned the 8 Americans killed in Iraq on Monday.

...humm, just wonderin.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:50 pm

Martyred wrote:..I caught three different network newscasts last evening...

...not one of them mentioned the 8 Americans killed in Iraq on Monday.

...humm, just wonderin.

...actually that was page two, but did get coverage nontheless. Also mentioned was the fact that roadside bombings in Iraq were down fromm 77 in Feb last year to 33 this Feb...or there abouts.

..who was it that said the "push" isn't working?

bbqjones · Post by **bbqjones** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:08 pm

ChargerMike wrote: ..who was it that said the "push" isn't working?

its called "serge".

even mgdubyo knows that.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:22 pm

ChargerMike wrote: Also mentioned was the fact that roadside bombings in Iraq were down fromm 77 in Feb last year to 33 this Feb...

Roadside bombings are down because you're paying the insurg...errr...concerned local citizens* to NOT bomb you.

* Seriously, that's what the State Department is calling the "former" Sunni resistance now. Look it up.

Terry in Crapchester · Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:46 am

...media bias??

While we're on this topic . . .

Strange that Tim Russert took Obama to task over Farrakhan's endorsement of him, but the entire media is almost completely silent about McCain's endorsement from John Hagee . . .

Yep, strange indeed.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:05 pm

Not sure who that pos is, terry as my work firewall blocked it, btu, the reason that Farrakan is mentioned is that someone who is close to barak (his pastor) has spoken well of Farrakan in the past.

Can you link me to someone close to McCain who is also close to that guy?

Also, Obama was very hesitant in his condemnation of farrakan.

Terry in Crapchester · Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:00 pm

smackaholic wrote:Also, Obama was very hesitant in his condemnation of farrakan.

He stated that he "denounced and rejected" Farrakhan. How much less hesitant can you be?

And speaking of media bias, let's not forget this one . . .

Fair and balanced, my hairy ass.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:11 pm

rack bbqjones, bw

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:50 pm

Martyred wrote:..I caught three different network newscasts last evening...

...not one of them mentioned the 8 Americans killed in Iraq on Monday.

...humm, just wonderin.

That means that it will only take another 250+ years of this to catch up to the casualty rate of the first 15 minutes of our sorry American asses freeing Europe on Omaha Beach!

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:59 pm

SunCoastSooner wrote: That means that it will only take another 250+ years of this to catch up to the casualty rate of the first 15 minutes of our sorry American asses freeing Europe on Omaha Beach!

Glad to see you justifying the unnecessary death of any members of the military.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:29 pm

Martyred wrote:
SunCoastSooner wrote: That means that it will only take another 250+ years of this to catch up to the casualty rate of the first 15 minutes of our sorry American asses freeing Europe on Omaha Beach!
Glad to see you justifying the unnecessary death of any members of the military.

So getting rid of Hitler was a bad idea as well?

Props on your consistancy.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:29 pm

Saddam = Hitler ?

Nice logic there, Isidore.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:42 pm

Martyred wrote:Saddam 2003= Hitler 1936?

Who do you miss more-Baldwin or Chamberlain?

And you were the one who called the Normandy invasion 'UNNECESSARY'.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:44 pm

No, saddam doesn't equal hitler.

Are you insinuating that it is neccessary to allow someone to become as powerful as hitler before bitchslapping him?

If we had slapped that pos down sometime around 1936, it would have been a hell of a lot less costly.

Some of us learned at that time that a little pre-emptive bitchslapping can be a good thing.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:17 am

I had no idea Saddam was going to invade Poland.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:18 am

smackaholic wrote:No, saddam doesn't equal hitler.

Are you insinuating that it is neccessary to allow someone to become as powerful as hitler before bitchslapping him?

If we had slapped that pos down sometime around 1936, it would have been a hell of a lot less costly.

Some of us learned at that time that a little pre-emptive bitchslapping can be a good thing.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:21 am

Dr_Phibes wrote:I had no idea Saddam was going to invade Poland.

What part of 1936 don't you get, dolt?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:22 am

smackaholic wrote:.

Some of us learned at that time that a little pre-emptive bitchslapping can be a good thing.

Osama "pre-emptively bitchslapped" you on 9/11.

He snuck up behind you, kicked you in the ass and ran back to his cave, leaving you to spend immense fortune and blood
on a wild goose chase. That was his intention all along, and you dopes fell for it.

How's that for pre-emptive bitchslapping, you dumbass.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:31 am

Martyred wrote:
smackaholic wrote:.

Some of us learned at that time that a little pre-emptive bitchslapping can be a good thing.
Osama "pre-emptively bitchslapped" you on 9/11.

He snuck up behind you, kicked you in the ass and ran back to his cave, leaving you to spend immense fortune and blood
on a wild goose chase. That was his intention all along, and you dopes fell for it.

So Normandy was 'unnecessary' because Hitler never bombed Pearl Harbor?

Fuck off, Nazi bitch.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:33 am

Europe wasn't your problem until you made it your problem...

...and strangling Japan and Germany's economies sure made it your problem.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:47 am

Diogenes wrote: What part of 1936 don't you get, dolt?

the part that it's not 1936.

and it hasn't been for quite some time.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:44 am

mvscal wrote:They were just sitting there minding their own business.
.

In 1936, Hitler hadn't yet attacked Stalin, so in Marty Red's eyes, that's the same as minding their own business.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:59 am

Cuda wrote:
mvscal wrote:They were just sitting there minding their own business.
.
In 1936, Hitler hadn't yet attacked Stalin, so in Marty Red's eyes, that's the same as minding their own business.

Actually he hadn't attacked anyone in '36. Except domesticly, of course. But he did go from subtly ignoring the Versailles treaty to stuffing it in France's and Britain's face by militarizing the Rhineland.

Sadaam didn't much believe in treaties either.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:50 am

Martyred wrote:Europe wasn't your problem until you made it your problem...

...and strangling Japan and Germany's economies sure made it your problem.

you should be ashamed of yourself, I don't know why you encourage them like this.

Terry in Crapchester · Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:23 pm

mvscal wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:Fair and balanced, my hairy ass.
Go fuck yourself, you retarded crybaby.

Which refutes my point, how, exactly? Yeah, that's what I thought, you cretinous Bushbot.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:16 pm

smackaholic wrote:Not sure who that pos is, terry as my work firewall blocked it, btu, the reason that Farrakan is mentioned is that someone who is close to barak (his pastor) has spoken well of Farrakan in the past.

Can you link me to someone close to McCain who is also close to that guy?

McCain himself is close to that guy. Did you not see McCain & Hagee's appearance together last week?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:18 pm

mvscal wrote:So if Fox puts a D after Foley's name, it's bias, but when a conservative black is called 'Ni...gger' on MSNBC, it's just a mistake.

Absolutely. The conservative black should be called an “Uncle Tom”.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:04 pm

So, Spitzer's idea of penance is to attempt to eat his own face?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:19 pm

Speaking of Hitler, a little quiz. Who made the following statements, Bush or Hitler?

1) "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland."
Bush or Hitler?

2) "My administration has focused the nation's resources on our highest priority - protecting our citizens and our homeland,"
Bush or Hitler?

3) "Not as tyrants have we come, but as liberators."
Bush Or Hitler?

4)“We come not as conquerors, but as liberators”
Bush or Hitler?

1) Hitler
2) Bush
3) Hitler
4)Bush

Nice job in the voting booths, tards.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:14 pm

mvscal wrote:Yeah, man. Bush is just like Hitler, man.

--Dumbfucks

Nah. Hitler was intelligent and charismatic.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:31 pm

So the Clintons are the new Hitlers?

Thanks for the update.

Now go ahead and get all the old FDR quotes that sound right out of the Communist Manifesto.

Better yet, just stick to spellcheck duties and STFU.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:58 pm

FUCK!!!!

I soooooo meant to take bets on how long it would take Dio to change a subject to include the name Clinton.

"Some dude had 800 dogs in a triplewide."

"What does that have to do with Bill Clinton?"

"Obama seems a little creepy, and he's an mvscal."

"I thought we were talking about Obama, not Bill Clinton."

Does it hurt to be this lame?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:00 am

Throw in a...

Party of Pétain

...and that's a wrap. Send craft services home. We'll shoot the additional footage tomorrow.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:40 am

Mace wrote:I mean, only a dumb fucking bottom feeding moron would think that there are other legitimate comparisons to the two men.

Wrong again.

Both overstepped their legal authority, used polarizing tactics to get other governmental officials on their side, and subsequently led their respective nations to economic collapse and severely undermined the citizens' civil liberties.

Actually, only a dumb fucking bottom feeding moron doesn't see the similarities, frankly.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 3:25 am

Actually, give Diogenes some credit.

He does keep his ear to the ground.. he pours through thousands of completely retarded op-eds that endorse the administration's foreign policy, so his empty head makes a perfect amplifier.

And he does reflect it fairly - neo-conservatism is some kind of fucked time machine that fluctuates wildly between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. Mix in a few jews suffering from a holocaust fixation and hey, presto - a complete foreign policy implosion.

In a weird way, Diogenes is running America.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:47 am

Dinsdale wrote:
Mace wrote:I mean, only a dumb fucking bottom feeding moron would think that there are other legitimate comparisons to the two men.

Wrong again.

Both overstepped their legal authority, used polarizing tactics to get other governmental officials on their side, and subsequently led their respective nations to economic collapse and severely undermined the citizens' civil liberties.

Leave FDR out of this.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:48 pm

mvscal wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:And speaking of media bias, let's not forget this one . . .

Fair and balanced, my hairy ass.

Eliot Spitzer (R) holds a news conference in New York City with his wife Silda by his side

AFP - Wednesday, March 12 12:48 pm New York Governor Eliot Spitzer (R) holds a news conference in New York City with his wife Silda by his side, on March 10. Spitzer came under mounting pressure to resign Tuesday, a day after the Democrat crusader once known as the "Sheriff of Wall Street" was linked to a prostitution ring.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080312/i ... ad981.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Way to kick your own ass again, you idiotic dickbag.

I think the (R) is just there to indicate that Eliot is the one on the right.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 3:16 pm

mvscal wrote: Actually Hitler led his respective nation out of economic collapse

For awhile, at least. The same could be said for Tojo and Roosevelt, and to some extent Truman, I suppose. World Wars tend to generate a thriving economy.

Rack Mace, btw.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:21 pm

War Wagon wrote: The same could be said for Tojo and Roosevelt

You do realize that there were TWO severe downturns in the US economy aftermeager periods of recovery during FDR's first 2 terms, don't you? It's far more reasonable to say that FDR prolonged the Depression than that he ended it

World Wars tend to generate a thriving economy.

You fucking moron, wars produce nothing- all they do is consume resources. The only thing worse than going to war is prolonging victory unnecessarily