Indiana is shit?

[BSmack]

How does it feel to be shit Hoosiers?

[Charles De Mar]

Uh oh..........

Sin,
Hitlery

Make us a song about Pikkkkles. Sort of a rap, kid rock thing. Use that batman on drugs noise. Have DC script up a Youtube video


TIA



PS, dont forget to go fuck yourself

[Charles De Mar]

You people will reach for the lowest common demoninator.

a 16 year old clip that's probably highly edited and taken out of context.

No wonder the Republican party has shit the bed in all the governors elections and congressional seating last cycle.

fuckheads.

[indyfrisco]

No Youtube access at work. What was the context?

[Tom In VA]

No Youtube access at work. What was the context?

Indiana

[Charles De Mar]

You people will reach for the lowest common demoninator.

a 16 year old clip that's probably highly edited and taken out of context.

No wonder the Republican party has shit the bed in all the governors elections and congressional seating last cycle.

fuckheads.

shit, i can't keep this straight as a troll. I so fucking despise the democrats....LOLLLOLOLOL

[indyfrisco]

Anyone got the direct link?

[Tom In VA]

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... oered.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Apparently it's a doctored video, Charles wins the prize. It was snippet taken from a movie called "The War Room" .

I just spoke to D.A. Pennebaker, the director of "The War Room," who said his film had been doctored to produce a widely-viewed YouTube clip.

In a clip from his film on the 1992 Clinton campaign, posted to YouTube today, Clinton advisor Mickey Kantor is -- according to subtitles -- seen referring to Indianans with an expletive and to his colleague George Stephanopolous with a racial slur.

"He does not say that. He does not say that," said Pennebaker, after viewing the clip.

He said the initial expletive referred to the anticipated reaction in the Bush White House to the fact that Ross Perot's polling numbers were holding strong.

"What he says is he’s surprised Perot’s numbers are holding," said Pennebaker in a brief phone interview. "He says they must be shi**ing in the White House."

The second expletive, he said, appeared to have been entirely fabricated, with new audio dubbed onto the original movie.

Pennebaker appeared surprised and amused by the video.

"A thousand people saw that film in theaters and didn't think" the second expletive had been used, he said. "It's very clearly understandable. It's not like it was in Bulgarian."

[BSmack]

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... oered.html

Apparently it's a doctored video, Charles wins the prize. It was snippet taken from a movie called "The War Room" .

Funny that Pennebaker's alibi differs from Kantor's. Maybe they should check with each other before they start lying?

[BSmack]

Here's what Pennebaker says.

"He does not say that [n-word]. He does not say that," said Pennebaker, after viewing the clip.

He said the initial expletive [shit] referred to the anticipated reaction in the Bush White House to the fact that Ross Perot's polling numbers were holding strong.

"What he says is he’s surprised Perot’s numbers are holding," said Pennebaker in a brief phone interview. "He says they must be shi**ing in the White House."

This is what Kantor says.

"Indiana was not even on our radar screen," he said, "And I was talking about the polling and not the people... If you look at The War Room, this is not the way Carville or George interpreted my statement. This is frankly libelous."

Look like the same explanation to you?

[BSmack]

You're right. Clinton "did not have sexual relations with that woman", either.

Hillary wants to play from the Rove playbook? Oh well, she better learn to play defense.

BTW, I was a Tsongas guy during the 92 primaries. I voted for Bill in the general as the "lesser of 2 evils", a world view I carried through in 96, 00 and 04. But no more. If Obama doesn't win, I will be voting for Mike Gravel. Fuck picking the "lesser" of the evils. If the two major parties don't reflect my views, I'll be going elsewhere.

A new article from ABC News.

Kantor comments caused controversy back in 93

[Charles De Mar]

They fuxxed the link...that was fast.

[BSmack]

They fuxxed the link...that was fast.

I'm sure that a DMCA request was filed with the folks at You Tube. The clip is from "The War Room", which is a copyrighted work. Of course I'm certain that more than a few folks saved a copy before it was yanked.

[Charles De Mar]

[
Hillary wants to play from the Rove playbook? Oh well, she better learn to play defense.

BTW, I was a Tsongas guy during the 92 primaries. I voted for Bill in the general as the "lesser of 2 evils", a world view I carried through in 96, 00 and 04. But no more. If Obama doesn't win, I will be voting for Mike Gravel. Fuck picking the "lesser" of the evils. If the two major parties don't reflect my views, I'll be going elsewhere.

A new article from ABC News.

Kantor comments caused controversy back in 93

Considering your resume of supporting losing candidates for the last nearly two decades it's not suprising you are now left with the idiotic option of 'throwing your vote away'.

Vote 2 party or stay home.

[BSmack]

Considering your resume of supporting losing candidates for the last nearly two decades it's not suprising you are now left with the idiotic option of 'throwing your vote away'.

Vote 2 party or stay home.

I can think of no more effective way to "throw my vote away" than to vote for someone who does not reflect my views.

[Charles De Mar]

Considering your resume of supporting losing candidates for the last nearly two decades it's not suprising you are now left with the idiotic option of 'throwing your vote away'.

Vote 2 party or stay home.

I can think of no more effective way to "throw my vote away" than to vote for someone who does not reflect my views.

Unless you yourself ran for election, NO one candidate would ever reflect your views in particular and by defination they certainly wouldn't emulate the collective views of a voting block. Certainly, not a voting block worthy of electing your tard. Goddam.


It's a 2 party system, pretty fucking simple paradigm. It's probably best that you toss off.

[BSmack]

Unless you yourself ran for election, NO one candidate would ever reflect your views in particular and by defination they certainly wouldn't emulate the collective views of a voting block. Certainly, not a voting block worthy of electing your tard. Goddam.

When I say "reflect my views" I obviously don't mean "reflect my views 100% of the time". Only a simple minded fucktard could ever make that construction.

It's a 2 party system, pretty fucking simple paradigm.

Funny that when I step in the booth I see other parties on the ballot. Are they not supposed to be there?

[Dinsdale]

All these responses, and not one trying to refute the "Indiana is shit" thing...

Ponderous.

[Charles De Mar]

When I say "reflect my views" I obviously don't mean "reflect my views 100% of the time". Only a simple minded fucktard could ever make that construction.

Yet you did...



Funny that when I step in the booth I see other parties on the ballot. Are they not supposed to be there?


You really don't understand this stuff, do you? Wait till we get to the part about a plurality, your head will esplode like Pikkle at a Village People backstage party

[Rack Fu]

I thought this was a review of the new Indiana Jones movie.

Carry on.

[OCmike]

All these responses, and not one trying to refute the "Indiana is shit" thing...

Ponderous.

It was refuted by the guy who made the movie and discussed a few posts above yours. Walk into the party with a boner in your sweatpants, much?

[Dinsdale]

Walk into the party with a boner in your sweatpants, much?

Miss context much?

Your response is so fucking stupid in fact, that I'm not even going to point out how stupid it is.