stick a fork in Obama because he's done

trev · Post by **trev** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:28 am

Thanks Geraldo.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:19 am

George bush doesn't care about Black people.

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:46 am

Hope he wins the nomination and this takes him and the party down.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 12:59 pm

Well, he quit his church so logically he'll divorce his wife, all for the future of America, of course.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:04 pm

Jsc810 wrote:The talking heads will have fun with this tomorrow.

But it really doesn't change much. Now McCain will beat Clinton instead of Obama.

Why isn't this already on YouTube? What's the delay?

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:13 pm

Sounds far-fetched. We'll see.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:15 pm

I would lose money if I bet on this video existing and being authentic.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:37 pm

Uh, wow.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:45 pm

As I recall, the tapes of Trinity United services have been freely available to all for quite some time. I find it more than a little surprising that Hillary's people wouldn't have leaked such a potentially fatal tape a long time ago.

My guess, this tape will be very heavily edited if it is released at all.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:51 pm

Sounds like a lot of hype. But I am concerned about the future of the DNC.

Applying the rules they've set for everyone else, Farakhan's endorsement of Obama doesn't bode well for their future.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:01 pm

McCain will receive endorsements from the ultra right, just as Obama will receive endorsements from people like Farrakhan. Each side will try to use this against the other - so call it a wash.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:06 pm

Tom In VA wrote:Sounds like a lot of hype. But I am concerned about the future of the DNC.

Applying the rules they've set for everyone else, Farakhan's endorsement of Obama doesn't bode well for their future.

Obama was asked about this during the Ohio debate. He both rejected and denounced Farakhan at that time.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:11 pm

BSmack wrote: Obama was asked about this during the Ohio debate. He both rejected and denounced Farakhan at that time.

Doesn't work for Republicans. Remember, I said "Applying the rules they've [The DNC] set for everyone else".

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:27 pm

Obama is far from the far left. I know it is serviceable to portray him there - that's the point of my post - but it's not true.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:45 pm

Tom In VA wrote:
BSmack wrote: Obama was asked about this during the Ohio debate. He both rejected and denounced Farakhan at that time.
Doesn't work for Republicans. Remember, I said "Applying the rules they've [The DNC] set for everyone else".

I don't recall the DNC "setting rules" for preacher endorsements. Link?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:53 pm

BSmack wrote:
I don't recall the DNC "setting rules" for preacher endorsements. Link?

They have most certainly set "rules" based on endorsements. Why even you yourself said that the Klans endorsement of Reagan "sealed the deal" in terms of the perception that Republicans are racist. While he didn't seek the endorsement and rejected it, he' was and the Republican party still held accountable.

So while Obama has not sought (allegedly) the endorsement of Farakhan and rejected it - it's still his and not only should HE be held accountable but the Democratic Party should be held accountable for a very very long time. At least twenty years or so.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:03 pm

Tom In VA wrote:They have most certainly set "rules" based on endorsements. Why even you yourself said that the Klans endorsement of Reagan "sealed the deal" in terms of the perception that Republicans are racist. While he didn't seek the endorsement and rejected it, he' was and the Republican party still held accountable.

So while Obama has not sought (allegedly) the endorsement of Farakhan and rejected it - it's still his and not only should HE be held accountable but the Democratic Party should be held accountable for a very very long time. At least twenty years or so.

Nice try Tom. Last I checked, I was not on the DNC. Nor was the GOP or Reagan "held accountable" for their deliberate racist pandering.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:09 pm

June 2, 2008
Michelle Obama Denounces Whitey

Though still unconfirmed, the persistent rumors that recordings have been made of Michelle Obama denouncing "Whitey" are becoming ever more concrete. MyTownTalks even has a partial transcript:

Once again, the white man keeps us down, what's up with Whitey, Why'd he attack Iraq, Why'd he let Katrina happen, Why'd he leave millions of children behind. This is the legacy the white man gives us.

Whitey is so evil, he not only oppresses genocidal socialist dictators, he even causes bad weather. What won't Whitey do to keep the rest of the world down?

This does sound like something the affirmative action Ivy League millionaire would screech to the applause of her husband's mindless swarms of roach-like supporters.

Putting militant bigots in charge would be a change, all right.

http://caosblog.com/7968" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:12 pm

Oh, and sending out the surrogates to call it a "dirty GOP trick" isn't exactly a strong denial, btw

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:14 pm

BSmack wrote:Nice try Tom. Last I checked, I was not on the DNC. Nor was the GOP or Reagan "held accountable" for their deliberate racist pandering.

Oh, so only YOU hold the GOP in disregard as it pertains to race because of Nixon and as you said "the Klans endorsement of Reagan sealed the deal".

Why wouldn't you apply the same rule to Obama ?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:18 pm

Cuda wrote:Once again, the white man keeps us down, what's up with Whitey, Why'd he attack Iraq, Why'd he let Katrina happen, Why'd he leave millions of children behind. This is the legacy the white man gives us.

From that link.

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2008/6/1/235757/2325" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Dude better pony up with a tape before this shit backfires on him.

In fact, I think it's a little too late. At this point, he best have a tape, if not there's an awfully big turd about to roll down the hill on top of him.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:22 pm

Just to reiterate: the Obigot campaign isn't denying the story- just claiming it's a "dirty GOP trick".

They're not denying it because they clearly know there's a chance a tape exists.

JayDuck · Post by **JayDuck** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:24 pm

Cuda wrote:
Once again, the white man keeps us down, what's up with Whitey, Why'd he attack Iraq, Why'd he let Katrina happen, Why'd he leave millions of children behind. This is the legacy the white man gives us.

We've been hearing about this tape, without seeing it, for far too long to sound like anything but bullshit to me.

If we ever actually get it, it will probably just be "Why'd he" from that above script, by itself, which sounds identical to "whitey"

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:31 pm

Yeah. The right one is giving his O-Face as he reams dick up your ass.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:32 pm

The Big Pickle wrote:
Is there really any difference between these two????

Yes. One is a very attractive (physically) human female and the other is a gorilla whose sex is indiscernable from the picture.

Glad I could help.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:12 pm

JayDuck wrote:
If we ever actually get it, it will probably just be "Why'd he" from that above script, by itself, which sounds identical to "whitey"

Clearly, you're reading the DemocRat talking points

JayDuck · Post by **JayDuck** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:45 pm

Cuda wrote:
JayDuck wrote:
If we ever actually get it, it will probably just be "Why'd he" from that above script, by itself, which sounds identical to "whitey"
Clearly, you're reading the DemocRat talking points

Actually, I've never visited that site and have no idea that it existed and I didn't vote for Obama.

I've been hearing about this video for a long time, however, which makes me highly dubious of its authenticity. The "Why'd he", "Whitey" connection seems fairly obvious in the transcript that is listed. To be honest, it seemed fishy the first time I heard Michelle Obama was ranting about "Whitey" in the first place as I could have sworn that "Whitey" slang died off in decades ago in the first place. I believe its been "The man" since the 90's. It would have been just as odd, or fishy, to me if I heard rumors of Michelle Obama throwing around "Honkey" at white people. Not from a matter of whether or not she has racially motivated opinions, but for the simple fact that I don't believe that people that even have those ideas use that terminology anymore.

But then you see a transcript pop up with "Why'd he" littered through it and its not hard to put 2 and 2 together.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:50 pm

How would this differ from Wille Horton or the Swift Boat Affair? Shit on the wall and see how long it sticks

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:56 pm

You of all people might want to come up with some different imagery, PUS

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:20 pm

Mebbe - if I gave a fat fukken rat cock

Q, West Coast Style · Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:44 pm

The Big Pickle wrote:

That's why.

Sincerely,

Trinity United Church

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:05 pm

That's why what Q ?

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:36 pm

DemocRat operative, Bob Bechel (you know... the guy who wrote a check to a hooker a couple years ago) claims the Whitey tape exists, and that the Obigot campaign even has a copy- which would explain why they trotted out the "why'd-e" spin instead of trying to deny the whole thing.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:48 pm

The Big Pickle wrote:Today is the day that things are going to get interesting for the Dumbcratic Party. I'm praying for MASSIVE chaos, civil disobedience, race riots, culture clashes and eventually Civil War. So grab a beer and watch the fireworks and be thankful that you live in this horribly exciting turbulant time.

Is the "Day of the Ropes" coming Pickle ?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:58 pm

The Big Pickle wrote:Sorry, I'm NOT familiar with that term. Is this something that I, as a KKK White Supremacist should be aware of???

Why of course, that's the day when the KKK/White Supremacists will enact revenge against all blacks and the white folk that aren't into the whole "blacks are inferior" lie.

How ironic, a Democrat elected who happens to be black triggers a Civil War and the resurgence of the Democratic National Pastime - lynching.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:59 pm

The Big Pickle wrote:Today is the day that things are going to get interesting for the Dumbcratic Party. I'm praying for MASSIVE chaos, civil disobedience, race riots, culture clashes and eventually Civil War.

Yea, you and Charles Manson.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:02 pm

The Big Pickle wrote:
Tom In VA wrote:
against all blacks and the white folk that aren't into the whole "blacks are inferior" lie.

What lie? :?

You're a Republican?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:08 pm

BSmack wrote:
The Big Pickle wrote:
Tom In VA wrote:
against all blacks and the white folk that aren't into the whole "blacks are inferior" lie.

What lie? :?
You're a Republican?

Bwahaha, mine was better. More historically accurate as well. Nanny nanny, boo boo.

BTW: CNN is confirming Clinton will concede the Delegate race. Congrats on your horse selection. Looks like it's over.

JayDuck · Post by **JayDuck** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:09 pm

June 1, 12:06 PM EST-

In the next 48 hours, we're told to watch for a video of Michelle Obama preaching from the pulpit in what some are calling a rant about "whitey." Those who have seen it report that it's going to rock Barack Obama's campaign worse than the videos of his pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, when he said, among other things, "God damn America!"

Any minute now...

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:22 pm

Well now CNN is unconfirming the fact they confirmed the fact Clinton is going to concede.

She's out tonight. That's my bet.