Taco Tech hammering Longhorns

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:09 am

Wow - I had really under rated Tech.

How in the hell did Nebraska take them to OT?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:11 am

Texas is getting snuffed.

So far now answer either on offense or defense.

Tech is damn fun to watch.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:15 am

Leach is scary if he get's your d-backfield playing tentative, they'll light you up.

orcinus · Post by **orcinus** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:15 am

Tech is a nasty team at home.

Jeckyl usually comes back when they travel, though.

orcinus · Post by **orcinus** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:18 am

If they could play in Lubbock twelve times a season, you'd be right, Counselor.

Where's Hiesman Over troll when you need him?

campinfool · Post by **campinfool** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:27 am

Texas is getting it handed to them in all phases of the game. I can't believe all the dropped balls by Texas so far. I guess the press clippings finally made it to their head. They evidently believed all the hype surrounding the #1 ranking.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:32 am

Still a long way to go and Texas may yet come back. They've done it before against Leach.

But I will say Texas home cooking has been berry good to them thus far. This is their first true test on the XII road (CU doesn't count).

Looks to me like they came in too impressed with themselves and thought Tech was beneath them.

Should Tech hold on, they've still got both OU and OSU on their schedule. The carnage that ensues should be something to behold.

It's doubtful that any XII team shall escape this gauntlet unscathed.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:42 am

Herbstreit just loves to hear himself talk.

what Tech has figured out is UT almost never throw the ball more than 15-20 yards down the field. Cosby will get one, but the % play is press up with the safeties.

orcinus · Post by **orcinus** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:44 am

Lubbock is always a house of horrors, John-John ... doesn't really matter who's playing there or what they're rated at the time.

Big XII South is a meatgrinder.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:09 am

War Wagon wrote:Looks to me like they came in too impressed with themselves and thought Tech was beneath them.

I'm really sure that's the case, you pencil-dicked dumbfuck. Any other laughable observations to pull out of your ass tonight?

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:11 am

Need this one to stay the way it is and then OU to beat Tech

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:16 am

Screw_Logic, the 'tard romper room is right down the hall. Can you manage the walk, or do you need an escort?

If you don't think Texas came in over confident, then you are the complete fool I already knew you to be.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:25 am

SoCalTrjn wrote:Need this one to stay the way it is and then OU to beat Tech

What you "need" is to realize that USC isn't even remotely a part of the MNC discussion. They play in absolutely the worst BCS conference and the committee that oversees that designation should look into contracting the PAC 10.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:34 am

That fuggin' place is loud.

RumpleForeskin · Post by **RumpleForeskin** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:37 am

I'm getting a chuckle out of the handful dumbfucks (Sup JSC and Wags) that don't have the slightest clue of what they are jabbering about.

Gald to see Wags calling out someone on falty logic when he started the thread off by comparing Tech's struggle with Nebraska to their dominance over Texas thus far. You fucking idiot, not every game is going to turn out the way it appears on paper before hand. See Georgia v Florida.

And JSC, Tech is fucking nails at home, especially during primetime. Just ask OU last year. Just because they are dominant in one fucking game at home against a legit opponent doesn't make them invincible.

Idiots.

orcinus · Post by **orcinus** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:40 am

Agreed, Rumps.

This is the biggest game in the history of their program.

Tech is a good team masquerading as a juggernaut tonight, and it the fact Texas looks completely flustered is certainly helping their cause.

Lubbock is a hell-hole in every sense of the word.

Not surprised here at all.

.m2 · Post by **.m2** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:44 am

Jsc810 wrote:
War Wagon wrote:What you "need" is to realize that USC isn't even remotely a part of the MNC discussion.
I think you're right, with USC having a ceiling of #4, behind the champs of the SEC, Big 12, and the Big 10.

You two idiot's are made for each other.

You both don't know shit about College Football.

Missouri lost to a team (Oklahoma state) that went down to the wire with the worst team in College football.

Oklahoma State 25-13 late in the 4th quarter to Washington State!!!

Just about EVERY team in the PAC 10 has put AT LEAST 60 points on Washington State.... and if 'Furd would've scored just 2 more points (58-0) it would have been EVERY TEAM in the PAC 10 putting at least 60 on that shit team.

The Big 12 is a shit conference that hasn't played ANYBODY other than TCU in a OOC game.

the truth

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:52 am

RumpleForeskin wrote:I'm getting a chuckle out of the handful dumbfucks (Sup JSC and Wags) that don't have the slightest clue of what they are jabbering about.

Gald to see Wags calling out someone on falty logic when he started the thread off by comparing Tech's struggle with Nebraska to their dominance over Texas thus far. You fucking idiot, not every game is going to turn out the way it appears on paper before hand. See Georgia v Florida.

Florida's romp over Georgia shouldn't have been a surprise to anyone who knows a damn thing about CFB.

And Nebraska taking Tech to OT in Lubbock most certainly raised questions about their bona-fides. That, after having their asses handed to them by Mizzou in Lincoln.

And it's "faulty" you "fucking idiot".

What fucking planet are you living on?

Dumbass.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:54 am

rhymenocerous wrote:Agreed, Rumps.

Are you drunk?

Don't take it out on your kid.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:54 am

.m2 wrote: Oklahoma State 25-13 late in the 4th quarter to Washington State!!!
]

this is completely untrue and about as "selective" a stat as you can get. it was 25-13 early in the 4th after wazzou scored and OSU scored the final 14 points.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... 0808300066

orcinus · Post by **orcinus** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:56 am

War Wagon wrote:
rhymenocerous wrote:Agreed, Rumps.
Are you drunk?

:doh:

Next question?

War Wagon wrote:
Don't take it out on your kid.

Yikes. :?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:58 am

War Wagon wrote:Screw_Logic, the 'tard romper room is right down the hall. Can you manage the walk, or do you need an escort?

If you don't think Texas came in over confident, then you are the complete fool I already knew you to be.

How about TT flat out being the superior team? Did that every cross your dilapidated mind? Of course not, you're a fucking idiot. Broad generalizations that you have absolutely no basis for, no surprise coming from your dumbfuck ass.

If only you could be a victim of a shotgun blast to the dome.

.m2 · Post by **.m2** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:59 am

King Crimson wrote:
.m2 wrote: Oklahoma State 25-13 late in the 4th quarter to Washington State!!!
this is completely untrue and about as "selective" a stat as you can get.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... 0808300066

Look moron.... I can't help it... if you cant read!!!

As much as you don't want it to be true.... it was 25-13 late in the 4th quarter of that game!

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:00 am

King Crimson wrote:
.m2 wrote: Oklahoma State 25-13 late in the 4th quarter to Washington State!!!
]
this is completely untrue and about as "selective" a stat as you can get. it was 25-13 early in the 4th after wazzou scored and OSU scored the final 14 points.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... 0808300066

mtool making ponderous claims?

No way!

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:02 am

.m2 wrote:
King Crimson wrote:
.m2 wrote: Oklahoma State 25-13 late in the 4th quarter to Washington State!!!
this is completely untrue and about as "selective" a stat as you can get.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... 0808300066

Look moron.... I can't help it... if you cant read!!!

As much as you don't want it to be true.... it was 25-13 late in the 4th quarter of that game!

look at the boxscore. so late in the 4th Q, OSU scored twice after Wazzou made 25-13...and the Cougs were never within 1 score in the game after the first 10 minutes. that's a great argument you have there.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:03 am

Screw_Michigan wrote: If only you could be a victim of a shotgun blast to the dome.

sig material.

Nice meltdown, dipshit.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:05 am

rhymenocerous wrote:
Yikes. :?

Bad edit. I blame Rumps.

orcinus · Post by **orcinus** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:08 am

War Wagon wrote:
rhymenocerous wrote:
Yikes. :?
Bad edit. I blame Rumps.

Always a good call.

.m2 · Post by **.m2** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:08 am

If you only have a 12 point lead against Washington State in the 4th quarter..... you suck beyond belief.

You can't spin it any other way.

The Big 12 is an OVERRATED..... shit conference.

Play somebody.... then get back to me.

the truth

dotdotdot · Post by **dotdotdot** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:11 am

It ain't over yet, gang.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:12 am

.m2 wrote: The Big 12 is an OVERRATED..... shit conference.

Play somebody.... then get back to me.

Like who?

Maryland?

or Cal?

campinfool · Post by **campinfool** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:15 am

I can't beleive some moron is trying to make a comparison to an Oklahoma State margin of victory in the first week of the season. Back to the game in question. I thought Texas was done for, but I guess the defense got a serious ass chewing at the half becasue they have done a decent job holding off Tech in the 2nd half. Wish Colt could have that pick 6 back, but I guess a 91 yarder will make up for it.

.m2 · Post by **.m2** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:17 am

War Wagon wrote:
.m2 wrote: The Big 12 is an OVERRATED..... shit conference.

Play somebody.... then get back to me.
Like who?

Maryland?

or Cal?

Cal and Maryland would beat Missouri to a pulp.

Who has Misery beaten ?

Didn't your shit team... almost lose to Baylor today ???

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:20 am

.m2 wrote:If you only have a 12 point lead against Washington State in the 4th quarter..... you suck beyond belief.

You can't spin it any other way.

The Big 12 is an OVERRATED..... shit conference.

Play somebody.... then get back to me.

the truth

nice backtrack/revision.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:28 am

campinfool wrote:I can't beleive some moron is trying to make a comparison to an Oklahoma State margin of victory in the first week of the season.

A 26 point margin of victory, but it was 25-13 in the 4th... :roll:

It's mtool, what'd you expect? Looks like we have a whole cadre of mtools in house tonight. It's like that shooting gallery game at the penny arcade when I was kid.

Too many rich targets.

dotdotdot · Post by **dotdotdot** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:40 am

This is getting exciting.

dotdotdot · Post by **dotdotdot** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:41 am

Texas left TT a lot of time. I don't like this.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:41 am

Nice comeback.

Can Tech score?

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:46 am

WOW!!!!

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:47 am

RACK Tech.

UnRACK the idiot fans.

This is some of the lowest class bullshit I've ever seen a home crowd pull. Just embarassing.