![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
And the Eagles defense is suddenly swiss cheese against the Ravens or Steelers? No offense but I'd stack the Eagles D up against the Ravens or Steelers at this point in the season.Tom In VA wrote:Well clearly the 'Burgh D is no joke.
I hope the Steelers win, mostly because B'More irritates me, and the winner of the AFC Final will be the winner of the Super Bowl.
As compelling as a Warner or McNabb victory might be in terms of stories, I don't see either NFC team being able to handle 'Burgh's or B'More's defense.
So, Good Luck 'Burgh.
Not a fucking chance in hell. Cerrato and the whole Portis being butt-buddies with Danny Boy means this franchise is in deep shit for a while. I felt just as confident when I heard McCain say the fundamental of our economy are strong as I did when Cerrato said the Skins have a good foundation for the future? What foundation? The team is absolutely horrible at the line of scrimmage. That is no foundation at ALL.Tom In VA wrote:I hope Dan Snyder takes notice.
I'll buy your argument about the potent Steelers offense over Flaco at this point. To his credit, Flacco hasn't turned the ball over and that's been the best thing he's done thus far. However, statistically I wouldn't say he's on a roll as much as I'd say he's managing the game well and recognizing he doesn't need to force anything offensively knowing his defense isn't going to give up anything on their side.Tom In VA wrote:Jim,
No, the Eagles D is more than competent - one of the top three if I'm not mistaken - the other two slots occupied by B'More and the Steelers.
The problem, as I see it, is that Flacco is on a roll right now AND the Steelers offense is generally more potent than Philly's.
Having no vested interest at all, since the Eagles are NFC East, I'm inclined to root for them to win - plus I like McNabb and Westbrook.
The "Warner" story would be another novelty. As one aged vet - Favre - crashes and burns, the other who was washed up - Warner - rises to the occasion to be Cinderella Story Part 2. That shit sells copy.
The realist in me says neither NFC team stands a chance.
My most potent observation in all of this, as a Redskin fan, is that of all the highly successfully teams in the playoffs this year there is one common denominator. Not one of them have Vinny Cerato as a GM. I hope Dan Snyder takes notice. Else the Redskins and their fans, will continue to be bystanders making highly successful objective takes on message boards like this.
I long for the MYOPIA that comes with my team being in the mix, Jim, I just don't have that luxury right now.
Tom In VA wrote:No, the Eagles D is more than competent - one of the top three if I'm not mistaken - the other two slots occupied by B'More and the Steelers.
Nothing new to see. Carry on.Dinsdale wrote:Not really making much of a point here
No, fucktard. I asked Ucunt if he, specifically, told his employers he was interviewing for other jobs. No doubt reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Eat shit.Dinsdale wrote:Unlike you, whose excellent "points" have included "why would he tell his team he was interviewing with a different team"?
Stay down, tard. This would have been a great time for you to shut the fuck up.
To be fair the Eagles D also played against the Browns, Cincy, Pitt and Baltimore. The team that put up the most points was the Ravens in a game that got McNabb benched. In the first 2 matchup against the Cowboys and Giants the Eagles let up a 41 and 36 points respectively but were much more effective the 2nd time they played.Dinsdale wrote:Tom In VA wrote:No, the Eagles D is more than competent - one of the top three if I'm not mistaken - the other two slots occupied by B'More and the Steelers.
Just some food for thought...
The Ravens and Steelers put up those defensive numbers against the likes of Cleveland, Cincy, and... Baltimore and Pittsburg. The Eagles did it against the Giants and Cowboys.
If the stats were somehow weighted for "stregth of opponents' offense," they might read differently.
Not really making much of a point here, just stirring the waiting-til-the-weekend pot.
Screw_Michigan wrote:No, fucktard. I asked Ucunt if he, specifically, told his employers he was interviewing for other jobs. No doubt reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Eat shit.
jiminphilly wrote: I'll buy your argument about the potent Steelers offense over Flaco at this point. To his credit, Flacco hasn't turned the ball over and that's been the best thing he's done thus far. However, statistically I wouldn't say he's on a roll as much as I'd say he's managing the game well and recognizing he doesn't need to force anything offensively knowing his defense isn't going to give up anything on their side.
The fan in me wants to see an all-PA Super Bowl but I think the Ravens would be an easier match-up for the Eagles if they make it to the Super Bowl. The Eagles played all 3 of these team in the regular season, beating 2 of them and based on how one each of these teams is playing now, you have to throw out those results. I think both Conference games would be classics.
How did that "joke" offense look to you?mvscal wrote:The point that has to be made is how each defense is going to play NEXT WEEK. How they are playing NOW is every bit as meaningless as how they played 10 weeks ago.
There is no dominant team left (not that there were any in the first place). Any team left is capable of humilating or being humiliated by any of the others.
I would, too.jiminphilly wrote:No offense but I'd stack the Eagles D up against the Ravens or Steelers at this point in the season.
Absolutey.poptart wrote:The Eagle defense is NASTY.
Look at the points they've given up the last 6 games.
@ NYG 11
@ Minnesota 14
Dallas 6
@ Washington 10
Cleveland 10
@ NYG 14
They're freaking snuffing people OUT.
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.
mvscal wrote:I can see at least one reason:RadioFan wrote:I see no reason whatsoever they don't shut Arizona down like Koreans at a dog buffet.
He is a two time NFL MVP and did win a Superbowl. That didn't happen by accident. Kurt Warner can fuck you up. Will he? Who knows?
Dawkins admits that he has no idea why Carolina didn't double-team Fitzgerald and he should never have been wide open on so many plays.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Hmm, so this is what agreeing with mvscal is like. Weird.mvscal wrote:I can see at least one reason:
He is a two time NFL MVP and did win a Superbowl. That didn't happen by accident. Kurt Warner can fuck you up. Will he? Who knows?
Me.Jay in Phoenix wrote:Who the hell knows what's coming?
I like the way you think Tom.Tom In VA wrote:Me.Jay in Phoenix wrote:Who the hell knows what's coming?
Pittsburgh vs. Philly in the Super Bowl.
Okay, okay, I don't really know, but that's the shot I'm calling.
Look at the bright side. You’ve still got Casey Rabach to build around. :wink:Screw_Michigan wrote:Not a fucking chance in hell. Cerrato and the whole Portis being butt-buddies with Danny Boy means this franchise is in deep shit for a while. I felt just as confident when I heard McCain say the fundamental of our economy are strong as I did when Cerrato said the Skins have a good foundation for the future? What foundation? The team is absolutely horrible at the line of scrimmage. That is no foundation at ALL.Tom In VA wrote:I hope Dan Snyder takes notice.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim