How Low Will The Dow Go?

.m2 · Post by **.m2** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:51 am

Maybe some of the financial geniuses of T1b can give us some insight as to whether anyone should sink money into equities at this time.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:21 am

Your guess is as good as mine. All I know is that GE actually cut its dividends. That was the only reason I held onto it, now it looks like a bad idea.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:03 pm

5100.

Jerkovich · Post by **Jerkovich** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:05 pm

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:32 pm

Are we using 'price is right' rules for guessing?

I'll bid 4500. I think the bottom will be sometime this fall.

If Obama comes to his senses and realizes that full blown socialism won't work this time either, I might bet back into the 5 figures by the end of his term. Ofcourse he will call 'bode by pointing out that the market doubled under his watch.

Mikey, I think you'd do well to hold onto GE, having ridden it this far. It really is a very diversified company that should get it's shit together once they sack the fukker running it now. Not that he could have avoided it's drop.

BTW, what was GE's share price before it flopped?

warren · Post by **warren** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:45 pm

If the Kenyan gets his way, there will be no market komrades.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:51 pm

warren wrote:If the Kenyan gets his way, there will be no market komrades.

You really are a stupid cunt.

Jerkovich · Post by **Jerkovich** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:56 pm

I thought the nog was Indonesian.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:06 pm

haha

RACK R-Jack!

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:01 pm

This thread should be a PM to KC Scott

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:49 pm

I read somehwere that Obama is a Van Halen fan and so far he does seem borderline insane so I'm going to go with 5150.

Stan Fukkken Pickle · Post by **Stan Fukkken Pickle** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:53 pm

Van wrote:I read somehwere that Obama is a Van Halen fan and so far he does seem borderline insane so I'm going to go with 5150.

I say lower....

How about 2112?

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:55 pm

Might have seen bottom..Barney Fag says they are going to change the mark to mark accounting and a few other talking cum mouths and made some statements...that the market seems to like, this morning anyway..

Osama seems to have hit the wall in convincing his chosen people to do anything. But O and Fag need to get private business working again..who are they going to tax to pay for all the votes...errr...handouts to the social misfortunate's..

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:22 pm

Stan Fukkken Pickle wrote:

How about 2112?

We are the priests...of the Temples Of Geithner...

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:49 pm

Van wrote:I read somehwere that Obama is a Van Halen fan and so far he does seem borderline insane so I'm going to go with 5150.

Why stop there? Might as well go to 1984.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:51 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:1984

Good times.

Sin,
NASDAQ

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:03 pm

Indy, I'll see your 1984...

Dude, I got that beat...

Look, assholes, I get it. The market is tanking. Fuck off...

RJ · Post by RJ » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:03 pm

R-Jack wrote:4501

RACK

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:12 pm

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:14 pm

Indy, a blank screen?

Okay, that's deep. I concede.

:)

(Edit: Ah, now there's the "Wipeout" video...)

Okay...

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:45 pm

A better take on Wipeout by the Ventures.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:46 pm

R-Jack wrote:4501

fukker!

If I was on price is right and somebody did the +1 bid on me, I would fight them, right there.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:50 pm

scuse me while I go

for a moment and quote myself.

smackaholic wrote:Mikey, I think you'd do well to hold onto GE, having ridden it this far. It really is a very diversified company that should get it's shit together once they sack the fukker running it now. Not that he could have avoided it's drop.

BTW, what was GE's share price before it flopped?

Uhh, sorry mikey, I had my old and really old guys mixed up.

Same question to wolfie.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:04 pm

This is it! We've reached the bottom! So...start buying!

GOSD · Post by **GOSD** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:10 pm

mvscal wrote:
.m2 wrote:Maybe some of the financial geniuses of T1b can give us some insight as to whether anyone should sink money into equities at this time.
"On the other hand, what you're now seeing is profit and earning ratios are starting to get to the point where buying stocks is a potentially good deal if you've got a long-term perspective on it."

Sincerely,

Odumbnigger

That Odumbnigger gets your mouth watering everytime he says something intelligent doesn't he, cockboy?

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:15 pm

R-Jack wrote:4501

4501, 4502 ... whatever it takes.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:26 am

I guess it moved a little bit in the wrong direction today.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:38 am

Good bye Bear, hello Bull. I've called Schwab already, but suddenly I feel as if I'm in an "A-Ha" video.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:48 am

Tom In VA wrote:Good bye Bear, hello Bull. I've called Schwab already, but suddenly I feel as if I'm in an "A-Ha" video.

So you putting the West Virginia (or was it Canada?) plans on hold?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:56 am

Of course. Ever since I've joined the Virginia Defense Force, I'm sworn to bring water to the National Guard of Virginia, I took an oath. In fact, I've been selected for the VaDF-SoG, that's "Special Operations Group". It's an honor and considered the most elite unit. We bring Lemon Flavored Perrier to the troops upon their return.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:20 am

Tom, you're from the "fake" Virginia, remember?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:34 am

Martyred wrote:Tom, you're from the "fake" Virginia, remember?

You've just blown the primary reason for the Lemon Flavor Perrier. When the shit hits the fan we want to support the 29th in defending Northern Virginia alone. Sheeez. Doesn't take a rocket scientist. Looks like the cover has been blown on "Operation Bubbly Hotel Duece Oscar".

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:40 am

^^^^^^^^
Tom, this could be you.

"Plains Of Abraham, here I come! YEEEEE-HAAAW!!!

socal · Post by **socal** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:23 am

Mikey wrote:I guess it moved a little bit in the wrong direction today.

Shake it three times, you're playing with yourself.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:18 am

socal wrote:
Mikey wrote:I guess it moved a little bit in the wrong direction today.
Shake it three times, you're playing with yourself.

Hell I just reach into my pants to play with myself.

.m2 · Post by **.m2** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:40 am

It could be up another 380 tomorrow. Or it could go down 380 tomorrow. Every day is a new day...

Pssst...

AIG created un-collateralized insurance policies guaranteeing Credit Default Swaps on mortgaged backed securities ... There was no money backing these instruments

Again, the term "(un)collateralized" means different things to different people. All insurance company guarantees are backed by the insurers general account.

As to where AIG's bailout money went, everyone knew it was going to go to AIG's counterparties, which were primarily large domestic and international banks.

Bush in his wisdom, hmmmmm, in his judgement decided not to let AIG collapse. With just months to go before the election and a heavy desire not to have another stain on his legacy, that decision was a political no-brainer. As to whether or not it was a wise thing to do for the nation, well that's another matter...

the truth

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:23 am

hey mods,

No point in banning sch an amusing tard, but, could you atleast lock up his font size altering abilities?

.m2 · Post by **.m2** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 2:58 am

mvscal wrote:
.m2 wrote:Again, the term "(un)collateralized" means different things to different people.
No, it doesn't. Unless of course you're asking people who don't know what the fuck they're talking about...such as wind chime hawking renfaire carnies.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, do you ?

Stick to mowing lawns and picking cotton... or what ever your people do.

Rack Fu · Post by **Rack Fu** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:12 am

mvscal wrote:
.m2 wrote:Again, the term "(un)collateralized" means different things to different people.
No, it doesn't. Unless of course you're asking people who don't know what the fuck they're talking about...such as wind chime hawking renfaire carnies.

He's an expert in uncollateralized mechanic's liens. Duh!

.m2 · Post by **.m2** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:22 am

Rack Fu wrote:
mvscal wrote:
.m2 wrote:Again, the term "(un)collateralized" means different things to different people.
No, it doesn't. Unless of course you're asking people who don't know what the fuck they're talking about...such as wind chime hawking renfaire carnies.
He's an expert in uncollateralized mechanic's liens. Duh!

"I wonder if my boss has finally figured out that I'm not
working on my reports but am instead posting on T1B ?"