The president has his head up his @ss -- what's new?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:58 am

Quick 9 second video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u68hvxxuQQw

Amazing how B.O. habitually becomes THE most clueless dumbfuck on planet earth ... whenever being THE most clueless dumbfuck on planet earth suits his purposes.

Great hire, America.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:15 pm

It's another way of saying "no comment". Utterly and totally not newsworthy.

Have you any clue as to how completely desperate you dittochumps are looking?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:22 pm

poptart wrote:

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:47 pm

A "no comment" is a no comment.

A "Gee, I don't know know jack fucking shit ... again" is not a no comment.

You voted for the dumbfuckingshit, yeah, but raise YOUR game and stop acting like a dumbfuckingshit.

I'm an independent, not a dittochump.

Nice whiff.

Won't be long before the bottom falls out on this assclown and his approval ratings sink verrah badly.

Take that to the bank.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:19 pm

... says it all:

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:46 am

Cuda wrote:... says it all:

yeah, what the fuck was he thinking shaking hands with someone that doesn't think much of america....

sincerely

look they even have matching jammies

the Bush administration tried to isolate Chavez for the last 8 years....how'd that work out? It was an unmitigated disaster. Why are you and your ilk so afraid of pursuing diplomatic overtures?

the definition of insanity is repeating the same behavior and expecting different results....

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:02 am

Felix wrote:
Cuda wrote:... says it all:
yeah, what the fuck was he thinking shaking hands with someone that doesn't think much of america....

sincerely

look they even have matching jammies

Hey, you forgot about me.

Sin,

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:05 am

mvscal wrote:
Please outline in specific detail the continous steps taken over the last 8 years to "isolate" Chavez.

Top-secret documents from the CIA and State Department obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests showed the Bush administration had prior knowledge of and was complicit in the 2002 coup against Chavez and provided over $30 million in funding aid to opposition groups to help pull it off. Chavez was ousted for all of two days until the vast majority of the Venezuelan population reversed it.

The Bush Administration worked for years to have Venezuela declared a state sponsor of terror, which would have imposed numerous economic sanctions against the country. In 2006, the Bush Administration created a new classification in the war on terror and Venezuela is the only country listed-which is for not cooperating with the war on terrorism. Venezuela is now sanctioned and prohibited from buying arms that have been manufactured in the US or use US parts. The Bush administration can’t really explain what this new classification is, and why Venezuela in the only country accused under it. The official statement was "All the countries on the list are state sponsors of terrorism" even though the US has never classified Venezuela as a terrorist nation (although, as noted, the Bush White House tried numerous times).

In 2007 alone, the Bush White House participated in the following isolationist tactics against Chavez and the Venezuelan government; in November, the Bush White House conspired with Colombia to halt mediation efforts with the FARC-EP for the release of 45 hostages including three US contractors….they repeatedly denied Venezuela's extradition request for Luis Posada Carriles who's wanted for outstanding crimes in spite of a legally-binding extradition treaty between the countries dating since 1923 (which they subsequently rectified by finally sending Carriles back to Venezuela)….Condi Rice accused Chavez of "assaulting democracy in Venezuela and destroying his own country economically and politically"….National Intelligence Director John Negroponte accused Chavez of being "among the most stridently anti-American leaders anywhere in the world trying to undercut US influence in Venezuela, in the rest of Latin America, and elsewhere internationally”.

The Bush administration conducted diplomatic terrorism against the Chavez government, which included sanctions against Venezuela for stuff they simply made up....they claimed Venezuela is not collaborating on stopping drug trafficking, which is simply not true (as a US State Department report shows that from 1998 - 2005 Venezuela's drug seizures rose from 8.6 to 20.2 tons of cocaine and Venezuela was second only to Colombia in the total amount of drugs seized in South America). It also included another sanction....for trafficking in persons. But there's not a shred of evidence that the Venezuelan government is not doing everything in its power to prevent human trafficking.

In 2006, the government created a new classification in the war on terror and Venezuela is the only country listed -which is for not cooperating with the war on terrorism. Venezuela is now sanctioned and "prohibited from buying arms that have been manufactured in the US or use US parts. When pressed, the Bush administration can’t really explain what this new classification is, and why Venezuela in the only country accused under it. It can only say " All the countries on the list are state sponsors of terrorism" even though the US has never classified Venezuela as a terrorist nation (although they tried numerous times).

If that isn't isolationism, I'd like you to explain exactly what it is

Please cite, again in specific detail, the nature of this "unmitigated disaster."

He's gained enormous respect with anti-American countries such as Iran, giving him more credence than he rightly deserves....again, why antagonize the leader of the country that is our 4th leading oil supplier, even if you don't like the guy (apparently Bush doesn't like being called an asshole in public)....why are you so afraid of him? Last year, Venezuela spent about 3 billion dollars on defense, compared to our 600 to 700 billion spent on defense....what is it about Hugo Chavez that elicits such fear in the right....

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:29 am

mvscal wrote:I'm must missing the "unmitigated disaster" part. Would you mind highlighting that bit for me?

I'm thinking it might be the letting Chavez return to power after the coup- although that was probably more the work of that other fucking dumb Chimpy Administration momback, Colin Powell.

Oh, and the Venezuelan people had next to nothing to do with returning Chavez to power- those who weren't indifferent to the coup were celebrating it. He was brought back on orders from the US State Dept.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:39 am

mvscal wrote: Not sell oil?

of course not, China can use all he can sell

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:53 pm

mvscal wrote:The oil market doesn't work that way, dumbfuck.

of course it doesn't

the question still remains, why was the Bush Administration so terrified of Chavez that it was necessary for them to go to the lengths they did to try and undermine his presidency? Why did they feel the need to make shit up about him and Venezuela and do everything they could to perpetuate the idea that Venezuela was some sort of a terrorist state?

why the antagonistic approach? While they might not like his politics, he's pretty popular in his own country....just accept that fact, accord him a certain amount of respect, and move on-don't you think that would be in the United States best interest?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Tue Apr 28, 2009 6:05 pm

mvscal wrote:
Felix wrote:the question still remains, why was the Bush Administration so terrified of Chavez
You are assuming facts not in evidence. Terrified? No. Mildly irritated? OK.

Chavez is a scummy pimp. If we can cheaply fuck with him and make his life miserable...why shouldn't we?

Arguing with Feeldicks...how quaint...

Please, I didn't mean to interrupt...continue...~giggle~...

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Tue Apr 28, 2009 6:42 pm

Martyred wrote:
...~giggle~...

hey shorty, if it weren't for the blind stupidity of bco, you'd probably be a lock for my sig

what fucking self-respecting dude writes like that?

er....never mind

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:23 am

I'm an independent, not a dittochump.

Then why are you appropriating the rhetoric of the dittochumps?

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:20 am

Just to see if he can hook a lunker like you on his trot line with week old chum bait.

Damn 'tart, that's some nasty ass fish you caught. You need to check those lines more often.

Throw it back.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:53 pm

PSUFAN wrote:Then why are you appropriating the rhetoric of the dittochumps?

I've trashed Bush by saying some of the same things Rachel Maddow said.

I don't tow anybody's line.

I call 'em as I see 'em.

It's just my opinion that Obama is THE worst president of my lifetime.
Virtually every step of the way in his first 100+ days, he has taken the country the wrong direction.
Disasterous dumbfuckery.

How any working adult American can support this guy is a mystery to me.

Heads ought to be coming out of asses fairly soon, though.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:12 pm

poptart wrote:

It's just my opinion that Obama is THE worst president of my lifetime.
Virtually every step of the way in his first 100+ days, he has taken the country the wrong direction.
Disasterous dumbfuckery.

You're not even an American anymore so why the fuck do you care

How any working adult American can support this guy is a mystery to me.

Heads ought to be coming out of asses fairly soon, though.

deficits don't matter.....mvscal told me as much when Bush was spending money like a New Orleans whore....he stated it so many times that he convinced me....deficits don't matter so don't worry

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 7:18 pm

mvscal wrote:Small, temporary deficits don't matter. Large, permanent deficts certainly do.

so go ahead and provide me anything that would indicate Bush's deficits were intended to be small and temporary.....when you and I had this discussion about a year ago, I told you they were a fucking disaster and you said they didn't matter.....but now, when democrats incur deficits, this is the end of humanity as we know it....

Just admit that you are a cocksucking partisan hack who will drop to his knees and gum any nutsack with a Democrat label.

I've never said I agreed with the deficits that Obama is running up, although I kind of understand what it is he's trying to accomplish

I've said it before, we'll certainly get a lot more bang for our buck with Obama than we ever did with Bush

where was your outrage when Bush was lining the pockets of his buddies with his 700 billion dollar bailout just before he left office?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:42 pm

A federal deficit of any amount ought to be a rarity.

The Bush deficit was atrocious.

But what Obama and his democratic buddies have done to the American people is off the charts brutality.

If Felix "understands what they are doing," he may as well paste an I SUCK DEMOCRATIC COCK sign on his forehead.

Good on him.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:52 pm

Felix wrote: I've never said I agreed with the deficits that Obama is running up, although I kind of understand what it is he's trying to accomplish

List of accomplishments so far:

Bankrupting the U.S. treasury for future generations.

I've said it before, we'll certainly get a lot more bang for our buck with Obama than we ever did with Bush

How's that? Other than lining the pockets of AIG execs and their banker buddy ilk, where's this "bang for the buck" coming from and when's it supposed to start? Before or after GM declares bankrupcy?

where was your outrage when Bush was lining the pockets of his buddies with his 700 billion dollar bailout just before he left office?

Bush approved a bill that a Democrat controlled Congress sent to his desk. In hindsight, that was foolish, but he didn't want the utter implosion of the economy to be his lasting legacy and he thought he was doing the right thing.

So even with the benefit of that hindsight, what does Obama do? Keeps right on doing what Bush did, multiplied many times.

But it's ok if Obama does it more than Bush because whatever Obama does = good and whatever Bush did = bad.

Do you not see why 90% of the posters here think you're a cunt?

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:52 am

mvscal wrote:The oil market doesn't work that way, dumbfuck.

It does when it's nationalised.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:54 am

Do you know why the"socialism" tag bounces off Obama so laughably? It's because the American working people actually want socialism and see nothing in the sort coming from Obama, despite the Wacky Right's lunatic howling.

You'll end up face first in a mass grave with a DHS bullet in the back of your dome before you ever get universal health care.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:55 am

Dr_Phibes wrote:
mvscal wrote:The oil market doesn't work that way, dumbfuck.
It does when it's nationalised.

Kick his ass, comrade-poster Phibes.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:02 am

well he's either just being combative and obnoxious or doesn't seem to grasp that nationalisation renders the market impotent.

or he really thinks they're fucking with Chavez cuz they're really really cool and got nuthin better to do.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:05 am

Nothing will be given to us, Phibes. We must occupy the factories.

Means of production, man. Means of production.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:26 am

does too.

neener neener, neener

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:47 am

War Wagon wrote:
But it's ok if Obama does it more than Bush because whatever Obama does = good and whatever Bush did = bad.

wags, you're absolutely right on that point....pretty much everything Bush and the rest of the cabal was designed to line their pockets and the pockets of their buddies....Obama is more concerned with cleaning up the disaster that Bush and his idiotic policies left behind....but nothing new there, the whole Republican philosophy has always been based on letting somebody clean up after them...is it any wonder they've lost almost any voice in the future of this country.....last years elections were a stunning referendum on the fact that the american people have had enough....

oh, and don't presume to speak for anybody but yourself you fucking redneck genesplice

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:28 am

Felix wrote:Obama is more concerned with cleaning up the disaster that Bush and his idiotic policies left behind

lol

He has no such concern.

He counts on simpletons such as you.

Everyone has their role.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:34 am

Felix wrote:
...the whole Republican philosophy has always been based on letting somebody clean up after them...is it any wonder they've lost almost any voice in the future of this country.....last years elections were a stunning referendum on the fact that the american people have had enough....

Oh, ok..

You are stunningly naive and ill-informed.

Like I told PSU, make your time. You've got about 18 months or so to roll in the slop before another conservative mandate gets stamped and delivered.

4 years of a liberal scum sucking Congress and then another 12 years of adult supervision once the pendulum swings back.

Seems fair enough to me. Enjoy your 15 minutes.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:23 pm

Whitey Shitstain wrote:12 years of adult supervision

Call it what you will, but GOP dominance is anything BUT adult supervision, asswipe.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:24 pm

War Wagon wrote:
You are stunningly naive and ill-informed.

wags, I've forgotten more about politics than you'll ever know. You're a shit-kicking redneck from the most backward state in the union (except maybe for Mississippi). You do nothing but regurgitate the talking points of the right that you probably get from wingnuts like Sean Hannity

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:13 pm

Martyred wrote: We must occupy the factories.

You're going to Mexico?

Maybe you should wait a few weeks, Comrade, until this flu thingie plays itself out

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:43 pm

Felix wrote:
War Wagon wrote:
You are stunningly naive and ill-informed.

wags, I've forgotten more about politics than you'll ever know. You're a shit-kicking redneck from the most backward state in the union (except maybe for Mississippi). You do nothing but regurgitate the talking points of the right that you probably get from wingnuts like Sean Hannity

Missouri is backwards, and this coming from a potato farmer from Idaho?

You don't know shit about politics, spudly... or much of anything else. Your talking points come from Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, and Bill Mayer... while I seldom if ever watch or listen to Hannity, O'reilly, or Beck. I read and watch the news and make my judgements based off facts. If I watch anything, it's Jon Stewart and Colbert on Comedy Central. At least they make me laugh.

If my talking points resemble those of Hannity, he's stealing my takes... or maybe he just has more common sense than a half baked potato.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri May 01, 2009 2:18 am

War Wagon wrote:
You don't know shit about politics

then by all means, I'd like you to explain in detail why you disagree with the Obama economic recovery plan, citing facts, figures and original thought on why you think his plan is the disaster you claim it to be....also, I'd like to see your thoughts on alternatives to the bail outs, his health care plan, his cap and trade program, and his rescinding of the torture program, giving me thoughtful analyses as to why you think the president (Bush) is above the law when it comes to this matter....and I'd like something thought provoking as opposed to some simplistic "he's savin lives" horseshit, which will be thoroughly stomped into the ground, should you choose to go down that path

now be original, and no copying from any of those right wing honks you cherish so deeply....I'll be scrutinizing your answers to make sure you're putting forth original thoughts....

any time your ready hoss

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri May 01, 2009 3:22 am

Felix wrote:...and his rescinding of the torture program...

good one!

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Fri May 01, 2009 3:31 am

Felix wrote:
War Wagon wrote:
You don't know shit about politics
then by all means, I'd like you to explain in detail why you disagree with the Obama economic recovery plan, citing facts, figures and original thought on why you think his plan is the disaster you claim it to be....also, I'd like to see your thoughts on alternatives to the bail outs, his health care plan, his cap and trade program, and his rescinding of the torture program, giving me thoughtful analyses as to why you think the president (Bush) is above the law when it comes to this matter....and I'd like something thought provoking as opposed to some simplistic "he's savin lives" horseshit, which will be thoroughly stomped into the ground, should you choose to go down that path

now be original, and no copying from any of those right wing honks you cherish so deeply....I'll be scrutinizing your answers to make sure you're putting forth original thoughts....

any time your ready hoss

What?

I'm not going to try to convince you of anything other than what you and I already know. You're a pathetic, sniveling bitch.

If you really want a clue, take a look at the Hippocratic oath.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri May 01, 2009 8:55 am

Felix, it is my understanding that Obama is a constitutional lawyer.

He's been in office now for just a little over 100 days and at every turn he has BLATANTLY shit all over the U.S. Constitution.

What is that all about??

You support that?

Other than a person being on heavy pharmaceuticals, I can see no logical reason why they would want to support such lawlessness from their ... ??leader??

He has no regard for the people.

No regard for you.

Let that sink in.

The role and limits of the federal government are spelled out in the Constitution.

Wakey.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri May 01, 2009 2:46 pm

War Wagon wrote:
What?

sig material right there bud...

I think that pretty much surmises the sum total of your political knowledge....thanks for trying though

Martyred wrote:
Felix wrote:...and his rescinding of the torture program...

good one!

so you're saying he hasn't put an end to the Bush policies of "enhanced interrogation" (torture)?

poptart wrote: He's been in office now for just a little over 100 days and at every turn he has BLATANTLY shit all over the U.S. Constitution.

I'm assuming you can provide examples of this

The role and limits of the federal government are spelled out in the Constitution.

Wakey.

what is it that you think he's trying to do? Do you actually think he's trying to harm this country on purpose? That would indicate that he's got a specific agenda and I'd like to hear what you think that agenda is. Do you think he's a socialist? Do you think he's a communist? Do you think he's a Marxist?

do you think he's marching toward a dictatorship?

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Fri May 01, 2009 4:52 pm

You might as well ask Feeldix to jump over the moon

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat May 02, 2009 2:40 am

Felix, the president's unconstitutional actions are numerous and you can do your own research into.
It's not difficult.

Was anyone given a realistic amount of time to READ the "stimulus" bill before being called to vote on it?
No.

It was an ... *EMERGENCY*

lol

The bill appropriates money to states, but requires states to comply with federal demands in order to receive the money.
Some of the demands of the fed violate STATE constitutions.

D'OH!!

Government ownership (nationalization) of U.S. banks is blatantly unconstitutional.
And on and on it goes, really ...

Look, as mvscal said, B.O. is all about consolidating his own power at the expense of the taxpayers ... at the expense of YOU.

The fact that you can't get enough bangs of his mushroom to the back of your throat isn't too damn funnay or anything.

You dope.