so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

RIP scritti.

Moderator: scritti

Post Reply
King Crimson
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 8978
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor

so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by King Crimson »

sure, there's the working class brit brixton punk/reggae thing....but 90% of their tunes aren't "punk" in the sense of Crass or even the early the Fall. London Calling is a pop record, not exactly Zen Arcade or 1983's Suicidal Tendencies LP.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

If you were around when London Calling broke, you'd know why The Clash are considered punk.



Do you consider Fats Domino "rock and roll", because he sure doesn't sound like the MC5.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by BSmack »

What I love about The Clash is their ability to confound those who would categorize them. You hear "White Riot" and they're a punk band. You listen to "Bankrobber" and they're a bunch of white kids playing around with dub music. "Wrong Em' Boyo"? Well now they're ska. And of course "Rock The Casbah" or "Train In Vain" sounds like a new wave pop band of the era.

Categorizing The Clash? Good luck. :lol:
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
King Crimson
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 8978
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor

Re: so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by King Crimson »

i was around when LC "broke"...as you see above i've listed two LP's that were released in the early 80's about the same time as LC. i like the Clash, it ain't that, i just think the "punk" label has more to do with their working class identity than the actual tunes.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

King Crimson wrote:...i just think the "punk" label has more to do with their working class identity than the actual tunes.
In Thatcher's Britain, working class identity was a punk rock stance of sorts.

I dunno...hard to explain.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
socal
Prepare to qualify!
Posts: 2800
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: The LBC

Re: so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by socal »

Not hard to explain. They were well positioned as a left leaning, antiestablishment band against Thatcher's England.

I think in part they're given a punk label given who they started playing with in the early days. The Sex Pistols and the Ramones don't get any more "conventional" in punk rock circles.
Van wrote:Kumbaya, asshats.
R-Jack wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:So why did you post it?
Yes, that just happened.
King Crimson
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 8978
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor

Re: so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by King Crimson »

the last two posts are kind of what i was angling for, but didn't really phrase it as well.

right on, guys.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 4226
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by Dr_Phibes »

Talking Heads are always thrown into the equation in any big television sum up. Never really got that either.
User avatar
socal
Prepare to qualify!
Posts: 2800
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: The LBC

Re: so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by socal »

Dr_Phibes wrote:Talking Heads are always thrown into the equation in any big television sum up. Never really got that either.
Stopped making sense?

:lol:
Van wrote:Kumbaya, asshats.
R-Jack wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:So why did you post it?
Yes, that just happened.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by BSmack »

Dr_Phibes wrote:Talking Heads are always thrown into the equation in any big television sum up. Never really got that either.
Just about any band in the late 70s that didn't sound like Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, The Stones or the Bee Gees and/or came from New York/London got lumped in as "punk".
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
Baby Bitch
Posts: 2882
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:29 am
Location: Tempe, AZ

Re: so, why are the Clash considered a "punk rock" band?

Post by MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan »

Rancid sucks (and the Clash sucked too)

"Keys, woman!"
Post Reply