Buttsie, when you get done suckling on Vans grapesack, realize that you wrote some real bullshit there. Sorry, USC doesn't have more of a viewing audience than most of the top 10 combined. Where the fuck did you gleen that nugget from?Papa Willie wrote:Van wrote:'Spray, is USC significantly any more of a cash cow to the NCAA than Bama or OU? Why would USC be off-limits, but OU and Bama aren't? Those two are right there with USC, on the landscape of CF.
2 words, Van - "Television Money". USC has more of a viewing audience than most of the top 10 combined in any average year. Shit - USC is SoCal's pro team as well. Huge, huge, huge viewing audience. In fact - I can't think of a team with a bigger TV viewing audience.
Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
God, you're an idiot. Before Carroll and USC do? Do you realize you're conceding that SC will inevitably get busted with this take? Who gives a fuck when someone gets busted? It's not a competition.SoCalTrjn wrote:Slick Rick will land fUCLA in trouble and recieve sanctions before Carroll and USC do, bank on it.
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11683
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
Yeah but how many are beaners that care nothing about CFB? They'd rather watch the LA Galaxy than $C Football.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
Spray -- USC, though dominant on the football field and one of the "faces" of BTPCF, is not the biggest cash cow for the NCAA. Probably not even in the top 5.
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
USC is a bit of a cash cow for the west coast tv networks, but they're no more of a cash cow to the NCAA than any number of other programs. The NCAA isn't reaping all that excess tv network money, same as they're not reaping it from ND's deal.
USC was dominant before, and they got penalized by the NCAA. They're not above being penalized now, not if OU, Bama and Florida St aren't.
This argument that USC is somehow "off limits" to the NCAA will never hold water.
USC was dominant before, and they got penalized by the NCAA. They're not above being penalized now, not if OU, Bama and Florida St aren't.
This argument that USC is somehow "off limits" to the NCAA will never hold water.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
-
- Iowa State Grad
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:11 pm
- Location: Kinnick Stadium by day, Kauffman Stadium by night
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
He is right though. UCLA will get caught before USC there's no doubt about it. Just like USC hoops got caught before UCLA hoops ever will. But the problem is he is forgetting to say the only reason UCLA will be caught before USC.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:God, you're an idiot. Before Carroll and USC do? Do you realize you're conceding that SC will inevitably get busted with this take? Who gives a fuck when someone gets busted? It's not a competition.SoCalTrjn wrote:Slick Rick will land fUCLA in trouble and recieve sanctions before Carroll and USC do, bank on it.
-
- President of the USC hater club
- Posts: 3670
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:05 pm
- Location: On the golf course because......well, I'm the golf coach.
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
I'm pretty sure that locally in So. Cal and in the West $C is the cash cow for the networks. What other marquee program is there out here that ABC can put on TV late in the afternoon? I'm sure an $C game will draw more than any other pac-10 team or west coast, mountain west, team, so in a sense yes they are a cash cow because there really aren't any other teams that will get a big viewing audience.
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
Quite a few, but that's not the point. You said they have more of a viewing audience than most of the Top 10 combined.Papa Willie wrote: How many people live in SoCal?
Granted USC has a huge audience, maybe even the single largest, but it's quite a stretch to say they have more viewership than, let's say, Texas, Florida, and Ohio State combined... much less what might make up the moving target of the remainder of "most of the Top 10".
-
- Iowa State Grad
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:11 pm
- Location: Kinnick Stadium by day, Kauffman Stadium by night
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
No shit. Thanks Captain Obvious.Laxplayer wrote:I'm pretty sure that locally in So. Cal and in the West $C is the cash cow for the networks. What other marquee program is there out here that ABC can put on TV late in the afternoon? I'm sure an $C game will draw more than any other pac-10 team or west coast, mountain west, team, so in a sense yes they are a cash cow because there really aren't any other teams that will get a big viewing audience.
-
- President of the USC hater club
- Posts: 3670
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:05 pm
- Location: On the golf course because......well, I'm the golf coach.
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
My pleasure Pvt. Dumbfuck.No shit. Thanks Captain Obvious.
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
Not that many.Papa Willie wrote: How many people live in SoCal that understand English and don't worship soccer?
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
Re: Yet ANOTHER Violation By U$C? (LA Times article)
Fixed.IndyFrisco wrote:Yeah but how many are beaners that care nothing about CFB? They'd rather watch the Chivas USA than $C Football.
36 million in the state in 2008. More than half are in the south. Say 20 million? Most don't give a fuck. Still there's a significant number that do.Papa Willie wrote:How many people live in SoCal?
Van wrote:Kumbaya, asshats.
R-Jack wrote:Yes, that just happened.Atomic Punk wrote:So why did you post it?