better recruit a QB Tressel

TheJON · Post by **TheJON** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:35 am

Said it last year after seeing Pryor play a couple times. Dude is NOT a QB. He is HORRIBLE. He cost them that game. Put him at WR. He is never going to be a quality QB. Who the fuck was scouting this kid out of HS? He has no ability to pick up a blitz and he's not a consistent passer. Who the fuck had the bright idea in HS of putting this kid at QB? I'm sure he threw for a billion yards in HS but his coach should have said "dude I'm sorry you don't have the skill set to play QB at a high level, so we're going to put you at WR where you will be a star". Now Barkley......I know his numbers weren't great but that kid is going to be a star. Time to chalk Pryor up as a bust a la Ron Powlus.

M Club · Post by **M Club** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:00 am

forcier > pryor

go hawks!

TheJON · Post by **TheJON** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:04 am

M Club wrote:forcier > pryor

go hawks!

Best. Post. Of. The. Day. (even though you're being a jackass!)

I don't think there's any doubt about it that your little mvscal is already a better QB than a 2nd year starter. Ohio State wins by 2 TD's today with Forcier.

TheJON · Post by **TheJON** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:05 am

What the fuck??

W I G G E R autochanges to "mvscal"???

Gay.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:06 am

M Club wrote:forcier > pryor

Absolutely.

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:57 am

M Club wrote:forcier > pryor

go hawks!

thats cause Forcier is from Southern California

M Club · Post by **M Club** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:57 am

good take, .m2.

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:08 am

Forcier definitely outshown Pryor or Barkley today. Pryor is still an athlete trying to play qb and Tressel doesn't even get much out of Pryor's athleticism. He isn't even much of an option guy and he should be the heart of the rushing-attack.

TheJON · Post by **TheJON** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:13 am

Danimal wrote:Forcier definitely outshown Pryor or Barkley today. Pryor is still an athlete trying to play qb and Tressel doesn't even get much out of Pryor's athleticism. He isn't even much of an option guy and he should be the heart of the rushing-attack.

Agreed. It really seems like he's using Pryor the way he used Krenzel. Makes no sense.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:39 am

Danimal wrote:Forcier definitely outshown Pryor or Barkley today. Pryor is still an athlete trying to play qb and Tressel doesn't even get much out of Pryor's athleticism. He isn't even much of an option guy and he should be the heart of the rushing-attack.

Excellent point. The kid is even bigger and faster than VY, and he's an equally shitty passer, so why isn't Tressell using him like Mack used VY?

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:50 am

TheJON wrote:What the fuck??

W I G G E R autochanges to "mvscal"???

Gay.

Dude, listen to him speak, he's purebread Cali whiteboy. Sorry to dissapoint.

T1B

better recruit a QB Tressel

better recruit a QB Tressel

Re: better recruit a QB Tressel

Re: better recruit a QB Tressel

Re: better recruit a QB Tressel

Re: better recruit a QB Tressel

Re: better recruit a QB Tressel

Re: better recruit a QB Tressel

Re: better recruit a QB Tressel

Re: better recruit a QB Tressel

Re: better recruit a QB Tressel

Re: better recruit a QB Tressel