michigan cheats
Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc
-
- Iowa State Grad
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:11 pm
- Location: Kinnick Stadium by day, Kauffman Stadium by night
michigan cheats
Is this a joke? Wow. Holy fuck these refs had better be fired. How much did DickRod pay them?
Re: michigan cheats
maybe you can reference this thread after iowa loses.
Re: michigan cheats
worst call ever. official sees michigan player come up with ball and calls in an interception. it's too bad for iu that the replays aren't conclusive even though we all know better.Screw_Michigan wrote:Might just be the worst call I've seen in years.
at least you're happy: you get something to hate today.
Re: michigan cheats
i suppose there are degrees of hate. you should really find something you like, otherwise you're just going to spend your saturdays getting cock teased by the michigans of the world.
- Killian
- Good crossing pattern target
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: At the end of the pub with head in arms
Re: michigan cheats
Don't be such whiney cunts. IU stepped on their own dicks multiple times. The refs didn't force 4 fg's and 6 points on two UofM turnovers.
"Well, my wife assassinated my sexual identity, and my children are eating my dreams." -Louis CK
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 8978
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
- Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor
Re: michigan cheats
but they did give a losing team possession that changed the game. i love the "it's not one play" stoic play....what are you Oregon fan in your spare time? IU got screwed.Killian wrote:Don't be such whiney cunts. IU stepped on their own dicks multiple times. The refs didn't force 4 fg's and 6 points on two UofM turnovers.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
"
-
- Iowa State Grad
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:11 pm
- Location: Kinnick Stadium by day, Kauffman Stadium by night
Re: michigan cheats
The thing that makes this so pathetic is they reviewed it and still fucked it up. Not conclusive??? Are you joking? That's the most conclusive review EVER. Dual possession, ball goes to offense. Pathetic. College Fixedball. Its fantastic!
Re: michigan cheats
I have to agree with JON here. The wrong call was made on the field - and then upon review, the wrong call was upheld. This robbed IU of a very good opportunity to win or tie.
This is exactly the situation that replay was initiated to prevent...but some things never change. When given an opportunity to nudge UM toward a win, it seems Big 10 officials jump on it. It's extremely difficult to set aside suspicion here.
This is exactly the situation that replay was initiated to prevent...but some things never change. When given an opportunity to nudge UM toward a win, it seems Big 10 officials jump on it. It's extremely difficult to set aside suspicion here.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
-
- Iowa State Grad
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:11 pm
- Location: Kinnick Stadium by day, Kauffman Stadium by night
Re: michigan cheats
I have to agree with PSUFAN here......when do people start being suspicious that EVERY 50/50 call goes Michigan's way down the stretch? Then you figure a call where it was 100 percent the wrong call today and I gotta say- is College Football really all that legit?
-
- Iowa State Grad
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:11 pm
- Location: Kinnick Stadium by day, Kauffman Stadium by night
Re: michigan cheats
Good point. I wonder if Bill Lynch put up a hissy fit and called out the refs in his postgame. I loved his reaction to the call.
Re: michigan cheats
What I really loved was his post game handshake - that is, he did one, and it appeared to be perfectly civil and sporting. I can't help but think of Lloyd Carr and wonder if he was capable of sacking up in that way.
Fuck it, I'll say it - Carr was one of the most classless cunts ever in the profession, imo. No wondering - he wasn't capable of losing with dignity - and he NEVER got the shaft like Lynch did today.
Fuck it, I'll say it - Carr was one of the most classless cunts ever in the profession, imo. No wondering - he wasn't capable of losing with dignity - and he NEVER got the shaft like Lynch did today.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Re: michigan cheats
I'm not sure how a ref blowing a call equates to Michigan changing. Someone help me out here. Maybe bitter hawkeye fan was feeling a little anxious before the game tonight and got a bout of stupid?
Re: michigan cheats
That was a shit call, it was obvious they both had possession when it went to the ground. The Mich-guy wrestling it away five minutes later should've been moot.
That's two scabdicks now for RR's guys that were ref-aided. Ya chances are fair Mich would've won it anyway but sucks that bad officiating took their last opportunity away.
That's two scabdicks now for RR's guys that were ref-aided. Ya chances are fair Mich would've won it anyway but sucks that bad officiating took their last opportunity away.
You gonna bark all day little doggie or are you gonna bite?
Re: michigan cheats
we have one good db and 1.5 good d linemen. you're making things up.Screw_Michigan wrote:Where is this new and improved defense scU-M fan has been crowing about since they walked Schafer off the plank? Fucking pathetic.
Re: michigan cheats
fucking wahhhh, homie. michigan never has a shite call go against them. our db's have been flagged for pi if they've even been on the field. why don't you bitch about that on our behalf?PSUFAN wrote:I have to agree with JON here. The wrong call was made on the field - and then upon review, the wrong call was upheld. This robbed IU of a very good opportunity to win or tie.
This is exactly the situation that replay was initiated to prevent...but some things never change. When given an opportunity to nudge UM toward a win, it seems Big 10 officials jump on it. It's extremely difficult to set aside suspicion here.
- WolverineSteve
- 2012 CFB Bowl Jeopardy Champ
- Posts: 3754
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 5:13 pm
- Location: The D
Re: michigan cheats
Yeah Shafer had the worst statistical defense in the history of UM football with a senior laden squad. He sucked. Robinson is part of a team that has already won more games that the one Schafer was on.
Would it kill you to know what the fuck you're talking about cheese dick?
Would it kill you to know what the fuck you're talking about cheese dick?
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football."
-John Heisman
"Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise --- the other, loyalty." Fielding Yost
Go Blue!
-John Heisman
"Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise --- the other, loyalty." Fielding Yost
Go Blue!
-
- Iowa State Grad
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:11 pm
- Location: Kinnick Stadium by day, Kauffman Stadium by night
Re: michigan cheats
Bitter about what????? Iowa is 4-0 dipshit and just beat the #5 team. Damn, sure sucks man!JMak wrote:I'm not sure how a ref blowing a call equates to Michigan changing. Someone help me out here. Maybe bitter hawkeye fan was feeling a little anxious before the game tonight and got a bout of stupid?
Re: michigan cheats
The one time I can remember some bad calls going against UM was the bowl game they played against Nebraska a few years ago. They are far more frequently the beneficiaries in these situations.M Club wrote:fucking wahhhh, homie. michigan never has a shite call go against them. our db's have been flagged for pi if they've even been on the field. why don't you bitch about that on our behalf?PSUFAN wrote:I have to agree with JON here. The wrong call was made on the field - and then upon review, the wrong call was upheld. This robbed IU of a very good opportunity to win or tie.
This is exactly the situation that replay was initiated to prevent...but some things never change. When given an opportunity to nudge UM toward a win, it seems Big 10 officials jump on it. It's extremely difficult to set aside suspicion here.
I'm not sure there's any justification whatsoever for the call against IU yesterday. I can see failing on the field...but the replay booth?
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Re: michigan cheats
no, you haven't recalled correctly. as steve already suggested, try not talking out of your arse.Screw_Michigan wrote:Weren't you one of the tards who blamed all of the previous season's defensive faults on Schafer? Yes, as I recall correctly, you were.M Club wrote:we have one good db and 1.5 good d linemen. you're making things up.Screw_Michigan wrote:Where is this new and improved defense scU-M fan has been crowing about since they walked Schafer off the plank? Fucking pathetic.
Re: michigan cheats
michigan's had horrible calls go against them in the past that have led directly to losses. if you're going to make a claim about how much more frequently they benefit in these situations then break out the charts and detailed analysis. it's the oldest, weakest, and easiest unsubstantiated claim to make: that a specific team gets preferential treatment from the refs. calls go for and against both teams. that doesn't mean it was necessarily our turn to get a break, but that's how it worked out.PSUFAN wrote: The one time I can remember some bad calls going against UM was the bowl game they played against Nebraska a few years ago. They are far more frequently the beneficiaries in these situations.
I'm not sure there's any justification whatsoever for the call against IU yesterday. I can see failing on the field...but the replay booth?
as for your allusion to conspiracy in favor of michigan... uh, sure. thinking about the situation for five whole seconds will explain the poor call. by the time warren and the iu dude rolled over and into the official's view, warren had the ball cleanly, so he called it an int. makes sense to call it that way if he didn't have a clean view of them fighting for the ball. i'd [and everyone else] think that an understanding of football and what most likely transpired would override the fact he only saw warren come up with the ball, but i guess not. as far as the replay, same thing. yes, we all know, and the replay officials probably knew, but was there ever a point on video you could point to and say wrong call?
Re: michigan cheats
M Club wrote:thinking about the situation for five whole seconds...
i think the part about thinking is where you fail. also, what excuses? i don't think i ever said it wasn't a shit call. you probably follow me around because you like the taste of my asshole, tosser.Screw wrote:....
Re: michigan cheats
um, good enough for me?
the proof
the proof
-
- Iowa State Grad
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:11 pm
- Location: Kinnick Stadium by day, Kauffman Stadium by night
Re: michigan cheats
So we're all in agreeance that Michigan cheats? Right? M Club??? :D
Re: michigan cheats
speaking of cheating, i like the freeze frame on that youtube video i posted where it looks like mark snyder's a booger warren's flicking. snyder's one of the authors of the free press piece about practice violations. he looks like a desperate weasel when he runs up on warren with his microphone.