Obviously Tiger is better

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:28 pm

If she was married with or without a prenup she would stand to make out just fine by virtue of the two kids. Re-upping at this juncture and putting a price tag on it...and her acepting terms make her a whore.

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:12 pm

Mace wrote:
WolverineSteve wrote:If she was married with or without a prenup she would stand to make out just fine by virtue of the two kids. Re-upping at this juncture and putting a price tag on it...and her acepting terms make her a whore.
If she were the one initiating the deal, I might agree with you. So what does that make Tiger for offering money to keep her there?

I definately think it falls under damage control. My question is why stay in a sham of a marriage once we've all seen the man behind the curtain? We all know the fairy tale is flawed, cut the losses and move on. Do the sponsors feel their investment looks more legit if the face of their product is married? I don't get that part myself.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:27 pm

There was nothing stopping her from proving she's not a whore, by insisting in the prenup that she receive no more than would be necessary to take care of any future children, plus a modest alimony payment, equivalent to or slightly in excess of what she could've reasonably expected to make in the life she led before she married a billionaire.

Nothing stopping her. No reason whatsoever. She could've made that gesture, to prove she wasn't marrying him for his money.

Now, she could decline any buy out money. She could decline any attempts by her gold digging lawyers to work Tiger for bribe money, or a new divorce settlement.

She could forego all of that, and that option was always there for her. Instead, nope, she went for various forms of guaranteed money, far in excess of what she could have ever hoped to earn as a normal whore, or even as a surrogate mother for some rich guy who wants to pay her to have his kids.

She's a whore...by definition. No two ways around it.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:57 pm

mvscal wrote:
poptart wrote:No, no, no ... now predictably, you want to move the goalpost.

This is what you said ...

mvscal wrote:When you marry a whore, it isn't any big deal to cheat on her. It's not like she is an equal partner in the relationship. She is an ambulatory cumrag making the equivalent of a Fortune 50 CEO for doing nothing but draining his balls.
If he had married her just to bang her you may have a point.

But he also married her to mother his two children from infancy into adulthood.

That is doing a LOT more than just draining his balls.

poptart wrote:Elin is a golddigging zero
Go fuck yourself, you sanctimonious hypocrite.

LMAO

Dumbshit, my take is that she has been a golddigging whore from the beginning.

HOWEVER, you said that Tiger was marrying a whore who is an amulatory cumrag who does nothing but drain his balls.

You're wrong, 'tard.

FACT is, he also married her to raise his two children from infancy to adulthood.

Is your mom a cumrag who did nothing more than drain your daddy's balls?

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:00 pm

Cliff notes, please?

Actually, never fucking mind. Not being a golf fan, and not expecting people to behave as saints at all times, I don't think there's anything of note here.

trev · Post by **trev** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:42 pm

PSUFAN wrote:Cliff notes, please?

Van and mvscal think Tiger's wife is a whore. I think most of us disagree.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:47 pm

Oh, there's no doubt she's a whore. That doesn't excuse Tiger from cheating on his whore, since he willingly put her in that position, but she's absolutely a whore. She allowed herself to be paid for sex, and for her womb, so she's a whore.

trev · Post by **trev** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:50 pm

[quote="Van"]Oh, there's no doubt she's a whore. That doesn't excuse Tiger from cheating on his whore, since he willingly put her in that position, but she's absolutely a whore. She allowed herself to be paid for sex, and for her womb, so she's a whore.[/quote

Paid what? Should she get a job and pay someone else to raise her kids?

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:57 pm

trev, she only allowed herself to be in her current position after being guaranteed millions and millions. When a woman allows her vagina to be bought, she is by definition a whore.

mvscal, it's a matter of definitions. When Tiger put a ring on her finger and made her his legal wife he put himself in a position of being able to cheat on a whore.

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:00 am

Van, they happen to have more money than the average Joe/Hoe. That does not discount the value of mommy being home. Believe me, I know the loss of not working for years and climbing the ladder of success. You sometimes can't have both.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:11 am

Mace wrote:
So, Van, is any woman who signs a prenup considered a whore?

Van is busy breathing deeply into a pair of soiled panties. Let him come up for air first.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:11 am

Screw_Michigan wrote: He did? How do YOU know? Not everyone subscribes to marriage under religious ideals.

Well, dude, in the eyes of civil law both parents are responsible for the children from infancy to adulthood.

Since you don't buy into a "religious" notion of morality, do you disagree with the civil aspects of marriage and the responsibilities parents of offspring must meet ?

Since we "choose" who is human or not, she obvioudly CHOSE that the "things" inside her were human, gave birth. The implied intent is there as is the acceptance of the CIVIL responsibility to raise them, the fact Tiger and her struck a civil agreement called "marriage" implies he accepted the responsibility to do so with her.

Any more childish knee-jerk responses ?

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:59 am

trev wrote:Van, they happen to have more money than the average Joe/Hoe. That does not discount the value of mommy being home. Believe me, I know the loss of not working for years and climbing the ladder of success. You sometimes can't have both.

Oh, please. Don't compare your actual sacrifice with her Machiavellian career choice. She 'sacrificed', in order to make millions upon millions, without having to do anything more than spread her legs. She made a career choice, and she did 'have both'.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:09 am

Mace wrote:So, Van, is any woman who signs a prenup considered a whore?

If a woman marries with the sole intent of improving her financial status, whether she stays with the man or not, she's a whore.

When a pauper woman marries a rich man, a man she wouldn't marry were he not a rich man, she's a whore.

If you believe Elin would've married Tiger were he a schoolteacher back in her native Sweden, or a fellow au pair for PGA players, then you're simply lying.

She married for money. She's allowing herself to be bribed to stay. She didn't opt for a prenup freeing Tiger from having to pay her millions should they ever get divorced. She's not telling Tiger now, "Don't worry about the money. Whether I stay or leave, I don't want another dime for myself. I've already lived well beyond my wildest dreams, thanks entirely to your money; none of which I earned, or helped you earn. I've got plenty in the bank now, I don't need more."

She's a whore.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:16 am

Pussy is a powerful thing.

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:32 am

Van wrote:
Mace wrote:So, Van, is any woman who signs a prenup considered a whore?
If a woman marries with the sole intent of improving her financial status, whether she stays with the man or not, she's a whore.

When a pauper woman marries a rich man, a man she wouldn't marry were he not a rich man, she's a whore.

If you believe Elin would've married Tiger were he a schoolteacher back in her native Sweden, or a fellow au pair for PGA players, then you're simply lying.

She married for money. She's allowing herself to be bribed to stay. She didn't opt for a prenup freeing Tiger from having to pay her millions should they ever get divorced. She's not telling Tiger now, "Don't worry about the money. Whether I stay or leave, I don't want another dime for myself. I've already lived well beyond my wildest dreams, thanks entirely to your money; none of which I earned, or helped you earn. I've got plenty in the bank now, I don't need more."

She's a whore.

Van CLEARLY gets it too. I couldn't agree more.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:47 am

No, she didn't need Tiger to fuck up, so that she could divorce him, in order to be a whore. She only needed to marry him in the first place, then she compounded it by not insisting on a prenup which absolved Tiger of any absurd settlements upon divorce. She simply needed to insist on the prenup saying, "I'll take $100,000 a year, and only until I remarry, and in the event of my having custody of our children, X amount will be allocated for their welfare."

She was already going to live lavishly, well beyond her means, every second she spent with him. She didn't need to also have an agreement in place which would soak him for more upon their divorce.

The fact that she did none of these things, and in fact did quite the opposite, proves she's a whore.

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:52 am

Mace wrote:Paul says that you "get it".....that should tell you everything you need to know about your dumbass stance.

Feel free to GO FUCK YOURSELF....just because my opinion of the deal differs from yours doesn't mean you have to come across like a "holier-than-thou" jerkoff.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:56 am

Van wrote:If a woman marries with the sole intent of improving her financial status, whether she stays with the man or not, she's a whore. When a pauper woman marries a rich man, a man she wouldn't marry were he not a rich man, she's a whore. If you believe Elin would've married Tiger were he a schoolteacher back in her native Sweden, or a fellow au pair for PGA players, then you're simply lying.

Hard to say. Tiger is pretty yoked up. Some women like to sleep with athletic looking men who have half a brain. Quite frankly, Elin could have done FAR better financially than Tiger Woods AT THE TIME OF THEIR MARRIAGE. Even now she might be able to pull some Russian multi-billionaire and be able to live the same kind of life she's had with Tiger .

She married for money. She's allowing herself to be bribed to stay. She didn't opt for a prenup freeing Tiger from having to pay her millions should they ever get divorced. She's not telling Tiger now, "Don't worry about the money. Whether I stay or leave, I don't want another dime for myself. I've already lived well beyond my wildest dreams, thanks entirely to your money; none of which I earned, or helped you earn. I've got plenty in the bank now, I don't need more."

She's a whore.

You know none of that to be fact. All you have are third, fourth and fifth hand accounts spoon fed to you by a media machine looking to sell copy.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:14 am

BSmack wrote: Hard to say. Tiger is pretty yoked up. Some women like to sleep with athletic looking men who have half a brain. Quite frankly, Elin could have done FAR better financially than Tiger Woods AT THE TIME OF THEIR MARRIAGE. Even now she might be able to pull some Russian multi-billionaire and be able to live the same kind of life she's had with Tiger .

step away from the crack pipe, bri. she could have done better? were bazillionaires lined up for her?

wtf do you base this on? that she's a hottie?

pffftt.

the fukking globe is chock full of hotties. there are way more hotties than bazillionaires you dumb fukk. she hit the motherfukking jackpot when she landed tiger. and tiger was well on his way to becoming the super fukking duper star he is now. actually, he was pretty much already there. maybe he was just a couple hundy millionaire at the time. bfd.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:16 am

B, an au pair could have married "far better" than Tiger, financially?

Yeah, she 'settled', sheerly because of love.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:26 am

dude, didn't you know tiger stole her from a russian oil trader dude and bill gates?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:06 am

Van wrote:B, an au pair could have married "far better" than Tiger, financially?

An extremely attractive au pair with a well connected family that included members of the Swedish government? Yea, she might well have done better than Tiger. We're not talking Anna Nichole Smith here.

Yeah, she 'settled', sheerly because of love.

Who says she "settled"? Maybe she just likes the balck cock.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:13 am

B, she was an au pair, not Paris Hilton. She married the richest young man she was ever going to have a chance at nabbing.

Mace, no, not all women who sign prenups are whores, because some women sign prenups to prove they aren't whores...something Elin didn't do. She could have, but she didn't. She signed a whore's prenup, guaranteeing her many millions she would never deserve, on top of the lavish lifestyle she could never provide for herself.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:27 am

Van wrote:B, she was an au pair, not Paris Hilton. She married the richest young man she was ever going to have a chance at nabbing.

And you know this how? Because she's hot and you didn't know her name before she was linked to Tiger? Like I said before, she was not some kind of Anna Nichole Smith. She is well educated and her family is wealthy and influential in their own right. She could have very easily married some anonymous son of privilege or not. It's not like she would have been heading back to the trailer park.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:35 am

Screw_Michigan wrote:
BSmack wrote:She is well educated
Well-educated people don't become au pairs. Or, at the very minimum, au pairs don't go on to marry Russian industrialist billlionaires, which is what she would've need to have done in order to even come close to marrying as well as she did by marrying Tiger.

Yep.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:46 am

Even now she might be able to pull some Russian multi-billionaire and be able to live the same kind of life she's had with Tiger .

An extremely attractive au pair with a well connected family that included members of the Swedish government? Yea, she might well have done better than Tiger.

OK, this is starting to get a little weird :?

EDIT: it's like someone next to Bsmack farted in the theatre during princess bride

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:08 am

Dr_Phibes wrote: EDIT: it's like someone next to Bsmack farted in the theatre during princess bride

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:32 am

Mace wrote:Call her a whore all you want, but Tiger is the one who fucked up, not her.

Yep.

And one can make the argument that it is Tiger who has fucked her life up.

She could have married an "ordinary" bloke, not plopped two kids out for a guy who betrayed her, not tied herself down to a piece-of-shit of a man, not been humiliated in a high profile way, etc. ...

"That little whore is lawyering well, and she's screwing him well. She's doing everything it takes to win."

Meanwhile Tiger's (alleged) skanks keep coming out of the woodwork.

A pancake house mistress and another slunt are claiming affairs.

Pretty soon ladies will be showing up at PGA events wearing shirts that say, "I DIDN'T sleep with Tiger Woods."

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:06 am

Okay, dammit, I missed that whole "S-M was a jizzmopper" story. Can someone clue me in on that one?

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:34 am

1) mvscal sucking a black man's dick is further proof that he is really just a shill for the military/corporate complex and isn't even a good racist.

2) Van you are a full blown idiot. What you know about contracts and family law would fit on the head of a pin. And you wouldn't know a whore from a pile of warm mashed potatoes.

3) Any time Mace and I see eye to eye and you are on the other side of the argument you can pretty much bet you are dead fucking wrong.

Freaking vapid fuckstains.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:55 am

Jesus, a TVO sighting! Dude, where have you been? Long time, no vapidity.

Terry in Crapchester · Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:45 am

Paul wrote:
Van wrote:
Mace wrote:So, Van, is any woman who signs a prenup considered a whore?
If a woman marries with the sole intent of improving her financial status, whether she stays with the man or not, she's a whore.

When a pauper woman marries a rich man, a man she wouldn't marry were he not a rich man, she's a whore.

If you believe Elin would've married Tiger were he a schoolteacher back in her native Sweden, or a fellow au pair for PGA players, then you're simply lying.

She married for money. She's allowing herself to be bribed to stay. She didn't opt for a prenup freeing Tiger from having to pay her millions should they ever get divorced. She's not telling Tiger now, "Don't worry about the money. Whether I stay or leave, I don't want another dime for myself. I've already lived well beyond my wildest dreams, thanks entirely to your money; none of which I earned, or helped you earn. I've got plenty in the bank now, I don't need more."

She's a whore.
Van CLEARLY gets it too. I couldn't agree more.

Over/under on how long it takes KFC&Paula to C&P this take and claim it as his own? I'm going with 4 days.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:21 am

Van wrote:Long time, no vapidity.

HA!

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:04 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Van wrote:Okay, dammit, I missed that whole "S-M was a jizzmopper" story. Can someone clue me in on that one?
When I moved to DC, I did so without a job lined up here. Hence, my voyage into the wonderful world of jizz-mopping.

Meaning...?

Did people here simply make jokes that in the absence of a job you must've taken to working in porn shops, or something? Or, is that what actually happened, and you did take a job in a porn shop, mopping jizz?

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:Okay. So now it's 9-10 women? Porn stars?

Might lose an endorsement or two after all.

Easily replaced with:

pron · Post by **pron** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:27 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:Okay. So now it's 9-10 women? Porn stars?

If you could, wouldn't you? :o

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:09 am

WolverineSteve wrote:. Three broads at the time of this post. There are more, a lot more you'll see. .

sayin.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:15 am

The only number Tiger is concerned about at this point:

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:53 am

I've actually read this entire thread and see the differing points of view.

One is legal and the other is moral. Those are the 2 points. I think one of Perk's 3 shit trolls said something funny a few pages back.

To be cynical, if a US male citizen gets married, he is at risk for divorce and the complications thereof. Fuck off Tiger Woods! I hope she gets the money because you are stupid. I hope she gets custody and I hope your career spirals into the tank you closet TVO.