T1B

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:24 pm

SaladTosser wrote:What's going on here?

A few of us are ruining some tube socks.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:47 pm

SaladTosser wrote:What's going on here?

Great. Now Luther will NEVER post here...

DiT · Post by **DiT** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:12 pm

jiminphilly wrote:
SaladTosser wrote:What's going on here?

A few of us are ruining some tube socks.

you got that right

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:21 pm

PSUFAN wrote:Rack you for squeegeeing Salad Tosser's money shots off of the mirror before cameratime.

That was a good one Dave. hahaha

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:27 am

Van wrote:Never saw that one before. Looks like you took that one only moments before you took the nude one which appears in your archived (!)Mikey....(!) thread.

Not that anyone has ever had to go to the 'chives to find it...

Just trying to imagine Ana's thought processes and the timeline here.

"Ya' know, I feel and look so pretty in this outfit... I'm a downright hottie! Hey, I bet I'd look and feel even better not leaving anything to the imagination..."

~ click

War imaginations.

trev · Post by **trev** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:36 am

Van wrote:Looks like you took that one only moments before you took the nude one

How on earth do you come to this conclusion? I have never seen a poster pull more nonsense out of the air and post it.

I say that with affection. Don't get hissy.

Van · Post by **Van** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:05 am

trev, look at the nude one, then look at the clothed one. Do they not look like they were taken only moments apart? Same timeframe-specific hairdo, same skin coloration, same grainy pic quality, and they were taken in the same room, with nearly the same pose, using the same camera.

I'm wondering how on Earth you aren't coming to that conclusion? What are you looking at?

Ana had mentioned that she was so darkly tanned in the nude pic because she was living in California at the time of that pic. She's fairly pale in most of her other pics, yet she's dark in this new, clothed pic. She looks identical to how she looks in the nude pic.

I could be wrong, and maybe those pics were taken months or years apart, but they sure do seem similar, so I'm not sure what you're getting at here.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:11 am

They are similar.

Taken in a bathroom.
Taken in front of a mirror.
Taken by a beautiful young woman.

Proudly displaying her ample bosom.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:15 am

Van wrote:trev, look at the nude one, then look at the clothed one. Do they not look like they were taken only moments apart? Same timeframe-specific hairdo, same skin coloration, same grainy pic quality, and they were taken in the same room, with nearly the same pose, using the same camera.

Same doorknobs, etc.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:18 am

Ana Ng wrote: This isn't gonna go well for me, here....

You got that right.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:18 am

WTF ?

Are you guys on Forensic Files or something ? Hey, I'm for attention to detail and all but ...

You're getting kind of creepy here.

Van: "I can tell by the door frame that the house and closet is in CA, specifically El La Leche County, as they have a very specific building code .. unique to El La Leche ....."

Just compliment the lady and move on.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:21 am

Van: "I can tell by the door frame that the house and closet is in CA, specifically El La Leche County, as they have a very specific building code .. unique to El La Leche ....."

Van · Post by **Van** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:26 am

Tom, I did compliment her. trev simply came out of nowhere and said it was nonsense that those two pics might've been taken only moments apart. All I did was point out all the similarities between the two pics.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:30 am

Just compliment the lady and move on.

Compliment what, the hole that Katy and/or LV has left in your life?

Nature and message boards abhor a vacuum and right on cue, here comes Ana to fill the void.

And here comes Tom right on cue to suckle another internet teat.

You can move on.

I want to stuff a sock in her mouth, place a bag over her head, and fuck her up the ass with my Viagara engorged cock.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:34 am

I want to stuff a sock in her mouth, place a bag over her head, and fuck her up the ass with my Viagara engorged cock.

Grow up, boy. Don't be such a crass baffoon in polite society.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:43 am

War Wagon wrote: Nature and message boards abhor a vacuum

So that explains how the shit got to where your brains were supposed to be. Gotcha.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:01 am

Wow.

There's a whole lot of "lonely" goin' on here.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:18 am

Just trying to protect Ana from herself.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:24 am

removed

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:28 am

I don't think Ana has children.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:29 am

I doubt you do either, Marty.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:32 am

removed

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:33 am

removed

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:47 am

Van wrote:Tom, I did compliment her. trev simply came out of nowhere and said it was nonsense that those two pics might've been taken only moments apart. All I did was point out all the similarities between the two pics.

What? That they were taken in the same bathroom? One might reasonably expect that she would take such pics in her own bathroom. Which, unless she was forced to move, should look pretty much the same.

Van · Post by **Van** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:57 am

Marty, why'd you remove your post?

BSmack, like I said, I could be wrong, and maybe those two pics were taken months or years apart. It's the similarity in her hair, her skin tone and everything else about the two pics which made me think that they were taken at close to the same time. Main reason being, she'd mentioned that she only looked the way she looks in that nude pic due to where she was living at the time. Everyone was speculating on her ethnicity, based on that pic, because she looked so dark. Compare those two pics with the ones we normally see of her, and they hardly look like the same person.

So, yeah, with everything else also being so similar in those two pics, it seems to me like they could've been taken at roughly the same time. It's not hard to imagine a woman taking the clothed pic, then trying on a few other outfits before ultimately ending up doing the nude shot.

If that's not what we're seeing there, oh well. It's not like it's important. It was just an observation.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:20 am

Seems I'm on semi-permanent ban here for trying to smack some sense into Ana.

If that's the case, it's been a good run and I leave my record player to 'tart.

Colts in the SB, btw.

Go Coogs' · Post by **Go Coogs'** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:23 am

I'm 1/64th jew, so it looks like I got the inside track on snuggling with Ana and that furball she calls a dog.

Van · Post by **Van** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:28 am

War Wagon wrote:Seems I'm on semi-permanent ban here for trying to smack some sense into Ana.

If that's the case, it's been a good run and I leave my record player to 'tart.

Colts in the SB, btw.

Since we can see your post, I'm guessing that's not the case, and we'll be treated to many more Foghat/bowling/Nascar/Chase Daniels touching himself in the shower extravaganzas.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:28 am

removed

Van · Post by **Van** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:30 am

Okay, now Tom (or somebody) removed his post which contained a C&P'd rip on Ana from Marty. What's up with these removed posts?

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:31 am

Witless Wagon - what in the sam hell are you on about now?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:31 am

removed

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:47 am

PSUFAN wrote:Witless Wagon - what in the sam hell are you on about now?

I don't know, but posting here has become painful. I was hoping you'd tell me.

I smacked Ana, next thing I know, I can't post here. Like I'm getting a timeout. I don't have many timeouts left.

Smack can be brutal, crude, and personal. Looks to me like Tom never got that memo... and why the fuck were you in chat looking for him two days ago? that was rich.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:56 am

Calm down, Whitey. No such thing happened.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:58 am

Wags man. Pull it together dude. I rarely run smack - if ever. Not my style. You went after me and I just came back.

But reading you, you sound - drunk - or - something ain't right.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:01 am

removed

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:02 am

Works pretty good mvscal, getting rid of the italics though ?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:05 am

removed

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:05 am

Tom In VA wrote:removed

Without a doubt you've now become the T1B eunuch.

trev · Post by **trev** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:08 am