What would those circumstances be?Jsc810 wrote:And I'll go ahead and admit it, not only am I in favor of abortion, but I'm also in favor of infantcide, at least under certain extreme circumstances.
Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Baby crying to much?Terry in Crapchester wrote:What would those circumstances be?
If it wants to live, it will fight back or shut the hell up
TheJON wrote:What does the winner get? Because if it's a handjob from Frisco, I'd like to campaign for my victory.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Well if souls are being bared, and panties being bunched, I'll reveal... the Most Scared I've Ever Been in my life....was when I had to deliver a baby!
..by Cesarean...
and as scary as it was..the real problem as it turned out was that she didn't need a Cesarean at all! She wasn't due for another two months!
Apparently the alarming cries I'd heard going by her door in the hallway of the apartment building where I'd just been jamming with a friend--were her attempts to get us to shut up! I'd thought she was dying or something and I just knocked and came in...and she really looked like she was about to give birth, she was huge and swollen--and when I turned on the lights and saw her standing naked she screamed and fell to the floor and sort of passed out... I really just wanted to help....fuck..
Anyway, the issue of abortion is potentially as divisive as the Free State anti-slavery throwdown of the 1850's--and Roeder just played the part of John Brown--executing political opponents in public, with guns and a moral mandate of Ends Justifying Means. It's the dialogue that counts in countering this fallacy. An understanding of what the other person is trying to say. And then acting accordingly as best we can.
..by Cesarean...
and as scary as it was..the real problem as it turned out was that she didn't need a Cesarean at all! She wasn't due for another two months!
Apparently the alarming cries I'd heard going by her door in the hallway of the apartment building where I'd just been jamming with a friend--were her attempts to get us to shut up! I'd thought she was dying or something and I just knocked and came in...and she really looked like she was about to give birth, she was huge and swollen--and when I turned on the lights and saw her standing naked she screamed and fell to the floor and sort of passed out... I really just wanted to help....fuck..
Anyway, the issue of abortion is potentially as divisive as the Free State anti-slavery throwdown of the 1850's--and Roeder just played the part of John Brown--executing political opponents in public, with guns and a moral mandate of Ends Justifying Means. It's the dialogue that counts in countering this fallacy. An understanding of what the other person is trying to say. And then acting accordingly as best we can.
Before God was, I am
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Did you use a ball point pen?LTS TRN 2 wrote:Well if souls are being bared, and panties being bunched, I'll reveal... the Most Scared I've Ever Been in my life....was when I had to deliver a baby!
..by Cesarean...
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
The baby killer crowd always trys to use this strawman as justification for mass murder.Mr T wrote: If your wife or daughter was raped by a black man and impregnated, would you view it as god's miracle or press ctrl-alt-delete?
Hey, what if it was a black chick raped by a white dude or better yet, a case of incest where the father was black and the mother white?
Why, there must be millions of abortions performed under just such circumstances.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Nice flailing around by everyone here...judgemental mother fucks.
Do what ever you want, but the day you take a knee before God & Jesus you damn well better be prepared to answer the questions.
Do what ever you want, but the day you take a knee before God & Jesus you damn well better be prepared to answer the questions.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Only when he is trying to gouge out his eyeballs to spite his face.War Wagon wrote:Did you use a ball point pen?LTS TRN 2 wrote:Well if souls are being bared, and panties being bunched, I'll reveal... the Most Scared I've Ever Been in my life....was when I had to deliver a baby!
..by Cesarean...
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
The way to end state sanctioned premeditated mass murder of innocents is obviously not by murder, even if the one being murdered is guilty and has the blood of thousands on his hands.LTS TRN 2 wrote:...executing political opponents in public, with guns and a moral mandate of Ends Justifying Means. It's the dialogue that counts in countering this fallacy. An understanding of what the other person is trying to say. And then acting accordingly as best we can.
I don't condone what Roeder did and he should be punished to the fullest extent the law allows. But I respect his motives and like I posted earlier in this thread, he did shut down that death factory in Wichita. Only problem is, one will open to take it's place.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
But what if Saint Neuheisel decides to call a time out after you take the knee? You might just decide to throw a bomb.Do what ever you want, but the day you take a knee before God & Jesus you damn well better be prepared to answer the questions.
Tom, that fetus may have a beating heart, but it's still attached to and living parasitically off its host. Until it can survive independently, free of its host, it's still only a potential human.
It's kinda like a slacker, that way.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Of course they can. They're aren't living within the body of their host, attached by an umbilical cord as a means of sustaining life.mvscal wrote:Can an infant survive independently free of its host? Can a toddler? How about a teenager?Van wrote:Until it can survive independently, free of its host, it's still only a potential human.
Yes, we might as well be talking about tapeworms here, you thick-headed cunt. Same as the tapeworm, that fetus cannot survive without its host. The host isn't merely giving it rent money and breakfast, it's giving the fetus its very lifeblood. To compare it to a teenager is beyond pathetic, and it's why your obtuse argument always falls flat on its face.You are making one of the most insipid and extraordinarily stupid arguments that could possibly be made. We're not talking about tapeworms here, idiot.
Fully realized human beings don't live in the bodies of other human beings. Only potential human beings do that...okay, and Perk too.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
So? That's another tried and false strawman argumentVan wrote: Tom, that fetus may have a beating heart, but it's still attached to and living parasitically off its host. Until it can survive independently, free of its host, it's still only a potential human
I'm sure you have a point you're trying to make with that worthless parasite analogy. Don't bother, it doesn't work as justification for murder.
Van and Jsc, have you ever considered that maybe it's you who are the parasite? You suck up unemployment and health insurance benefits, not to mention bandwidth and oxygen.
While a pregnant woman, otoh, is a beauty to behold. Far from being a parasite, a fetus adds to her glory and her health. The act of childbirth is a formality.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Damn good thing that "being stupidcide" has not caught on yet, and we could get your resource wasting ass taken care of.Jsc810 wrote:
And I'll go ahead and admit it, not only am I in favor of abortion, but I'm also in favor of infantcide, at least under certain extreme circumstances.
Surprising attitude for some one who has dodged the Reaper a few times.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
I don't run trolls.Mr T wrote: You forgot to log in as Dan Vogel.
My whole point is - it is a gray area - why make it any more gray by bullshitting ourselves. Taking a human life is no trivial matter. Sometimes it has to be done.All I know is there is a gray area.
If someone wants to abort a fetus because it is threatening their own life, then they should have that right.
Take the case of Mrs. JSC. It had to be done. But in my opinion the operation ended a human life.
My position is clear. I've answered enough questions. If you don't understand it - reread my takes.
With all the horseshit around here, you'd think there'd be a pony somewhere.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
So a human life was terminated so that another one could survive. Not unlike justifiable homicide.Jsc810 wrote:Disclosure: years ago, my wife had a tubal pregnancy, which could have killed her.
With all the horseshit around here, you'd think there'd be a pony somewhere.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
...and is doing so, then that is when it really becomes a human being.once the baby has reached a point where medical science will permit it to survive outside of the womb
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
It's not a thread yet Todd. We're still feeding it. It won't be a thread until Van says it is.
Until then, it's a potential thread.
Until then, it's a potential thread.
With all the horseshit around here, you'd think there'd be a pony somewhere.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
So if your daughter was raped or a pregnancy was threatening her life, you would say you better not get an abortion?War Wagon wrote:The baby killer crowd always trys to use this strawman as justification for mass murder.
Hey, what if it was a black chick raped by a white dude or better yet, a case of incest where the father was black and the mother white?
Why, there must be millions of abortions performed under just such circumstances.
Somehow I doubt that.
Bad things happen. Abortions are justified in some instances. A lot of people abuse the legalization of abortions but sadly they are necessary.
TheJON wrote:What does the winner get? Because if it's a handjob from Frisco, I'd like to campaign for my victory.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
That's right, no infant, toddler or teenager has ever lost its mother and survived.mvscal wrote: Can an infant survive independently free of its host? Can a toddler? How about a teenager?
Fucking dolt.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21773
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Are you implying that a 7 month fetus has never been delivered from a dead mother and survived? Of course they have. It is a medical fact that half baked feti (well, maybe 5/8 baked) feti have been delivered and survived. This means that aborting such a fetus is pretty much murder when there is a really good chance that, if delivered either vaginally or through C section, that kid would make it.Moving Sale wrote:That's right, no infant, toddler or teenager has ever lost its mother and survived.mvscal wrote: Can an infant survive independently free of its host? Can a toddler? How about a teenager?
Fucking dolt.
This is why I believe 3th trimester abortions are murder, plain and simple and ought to be treated that way.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Have you tried that with ranch?half baked feti
-DTC
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Have you tried that with ranch?
-DTC
Eeeewwwww

Ranch sucks, Chipotle sauce would be the only way to go.
Last edited by Tom In VA on Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
With all the horseshit around here, you'd think there'd be a pony somewhere.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Nudge me into wakefulness when the Foetal Pate is served
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Kinda dreadful how some people are willing to suspend common sense. It seems absurd to me to fall back on scientific terms like fetus, embryo, etc. to argue that a human baby is not human at all. Maybe doing so makes it easier to present their arguments endorsing abortion.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
As I was laying in the hospital and at home in bed, in weeks of pain and drug induced mental haze in this colitis go, that thought came to me more than once. When you actually get a bit closer to the real thing, your view changes a bit.88 wrote:I I think every human has an absolute right to life and to end one's life if he or she so chooses. We recognize "do not resuscitate" instructions and other end of life plans. We ought to allow people to off themselves if they no longer want to be alive. I watched my father die of Alzheimer's Disease. It totally stripped him of his dignity. He saw it coming and contemplated suicide. I think he didn't do it because it was against the law. Crazy, I know. But that was how my old man rolled.
I've already told my wife that if I am ever diagnosed with AD, I'm checking out permanently as soon as it is convenient for me to do so. I'm not going to go down that path. And I think cancer patients, people who have lost the will to live etc. ought to be able to go out on their own terms, and not with a bunch of tubes rammed down their throats. My two cents.
Even completely coherent in an advanced stage of disease, I don't think I could do it. Just too much pain for my family to go through, versus just holding it out. I have a DNR, my wife knows where the line is, and is an educated medical professional.
The again, putting my family through an extended illness with no hope of recovery is not very pleasing either...so it is a tough call to make.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21773
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Save the doorway to the next dimension bullshit. don't try to sugar coat it. when you're dead, yer fukkin' dead. jabbering on about mystical after life bullshit is a bigger waste than trying to convince someone to change their mind on this subject.Jsc810 wrote:My beliefs have been reached in part because of that.Derron wrote:Surprising attitude for some one who has dodged the Reaper a few times.
There is nothing to be afraid of in death. It is just a doorway to the next dimension and the next life.
Terry, the extreme circumstances are when a baby is born incompatable with life. And instead of letting it suffer for a few hours or weeks, I think the more humane thing to do is to euthanize it. In so doing, you would be compassionate and reducing pain and suffering. And yes, I think end stage critically ill patients should be able to do the same thing if they want.
btw, my wife went through the same thing with an ectopic pregnancy. the small little detail you leave out here, is that with an ectopic, the baby is doomed no matter what you do. it is simply a case of whether you wanna sacrifice mom as well.
we are not talking about doomed ectopics or horribly deformed babies that would be sentenced to a short life of misery. we are talking about whether or not a late term baby, often one that is already capable of life independent of it's mother has any rights? too bad the "pro choice"

the pragmatic side of me says that it would be a big mistake to go back to the pre wade v roe days, but, what we have now is worse.
congress needs to realize that roe v wade is absolute bullshit and do what the have to do, a constitutional amendment, to correct it. something along the lines of protection of any viable fetus would be OK with me. the only clause would be a life of the mother one, not some bullshit "health" of the mother as it has zero teeth. this would allow potential mommies who just don't wanna be bothered, to "fix it" within the first 4 or 5 months of gestation.
as for the "incompatable" babies, that's a tough one. i think that as with those at the other end of life that are in a place where existing just means prolonged horrible suffering, there should be a way to end it, but, i would want to give that kid every benefit of the doubt before deciding to flush it down a sink.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Huh? Sounds like Tony Blair making twisted excuses for invading Iraq.smackaholic wrote: the pragmatic side of me says that it would be a big mistake to go back to the pre wade v roe days, but, what we have now is worse.
Why does no one notice that the "law" against aborting an unborn baby is nothing more than an interpretation of some religious dictum. That is, the fervent and rabid opponents of abortion--who will proudly commit murder for their "law" are really just theo-fascists.
That is, the entire anti-abortion argument is nothing more than a demand for a society governed by religious law.
And religions, as we know, are based on superstition and have no regard or connection to actual laws of nature or rational thought.
So....are you with the Taliban or not? Because this is the actual question. Sure, you're not literally some Pashtun loon in Pakistan, but....
these guys are really no different in their strict religious interpretation of how society should be ordered. And if you're a serious anti-abortion type, you're a lot closer to these folks than you might want to admit.





Go ahead, choose the religious zealots with whom you most relate in your efforts to impose--however passively--a religious design to human society.
Before God was, I am
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Pure fucking bullshit.LTS TRN 2 wrote: And religions, as we know, are based on superstition and have no regard or connection to actual laws of nature or rational thought.
With all the horseshit around here, you'd think there'd be a pony somewhere.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Really, Tom? Perhaps you're conveniently ignoring the hundreds of so-called "miracles" upon which the authenticity of the respective divinity is based--in the Jewish/Christer bible, in the Koran, in the Bhagavad Gita, the Book of Mormon, or in a thousand unwritten cultures still functioning--or having been plowed over by the various missionaries. In fact it is the claim of suspending natural law which gives a religion any claim of existence. Care to dispute this?Tom In VA wrote:Pure fucking bullshit.LTS TRN 2 wrote: And religions, as we know, are based on superstition and have no regard or connection to actual laws of nature or rational thought.
As far as rational thought---are you kidding? Have you really thought about this at all? Sure, "Proverbs" may seem like nuggets of practical commonsense wisdom for getting along in the world, but this is a borrowed set of principles (from the Babylonian culture) and has no strict laws. Perhaps you'll point out the "rational thought" in Leviticus or Deuteronomy. Go ahead, that should be amusing. Explain the "rationality" of Sharia law. As for the Mormon "thought," we're waiting.

Mainstream Mormon insisting his "rationality" is being misunderstood

Last edited by LTS TRN 2 on Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Before God was, I am
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Sorry to shit on your parade, T-Down, but Science has taken over from the religious cowards, and the truth is here--if you can take it.
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/experts01.html
Oh, and by the way...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/0 ... 46179.html
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/experts01.html
Oh, and by the way...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/0 ... 46179.html
Before God was, I am
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Exactly....people asking and praying for item specific things are often reaching.Toddowen wrote:
I began to think "if my prayers could be answered, what would be the best thing possible to ask?"
I reasoned that the best possible thing that can happen is that my faith and the faith of others grows stronger. That's the best that can happen. The best to ask.
Did I pray and ask for improved health ? Yes I did...IF it was to be God's will. Otherwise He may have other plans for me. Did others pray for me ?? Yes...IF it was to be God's will.
For the atheist and non believer ...go right ahead with your views, you are completely entitled to them. I will keep my views and faith and trust that after I die, there is a better place and situation to go to.
If not, then I guess I will never know the difference.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21773
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
i believe in some sort of white beard wearing old dude up in the clouds about as much as let's turd does, but, that ends our similarlity.
unlike him and his total loathing and ridicule of religion, i actually think it serves a purpose and to be honest, i'm a bit jealous of those that have a strong faith.
it undoubtedly helps some put up with the bullshit life deals out. it causes others to do great things. and yeah, some use it to be arseholes, but, those fukks would be arseholes without it, as best as i can figure.
unlike him and his total loathing and ridicule of religion, i actually think it serves a purpose and to be honest, i'm a bit jealous of those that have a strong faith.
it undoubtedly helps some put up with the bullshit life deals out. it causes others to do great things. and yeah, some use it to be arseholes, but, those fukks would be arseholes without it, as best as i can figure.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Well of course it "serves a purpose," smackie, but as to just what that purpose is remains a wide question. It certainly functions to provide an order to a society--where folks might otherwise feel there's no accountability for their actions in this brief desperate span of mammalian conniving we call a life. And religious faith similarly provides a properly horrified member of our chimp species some sense of consolation that after all of this suffering some sort of reward is in store. But for the vast majority of human societies from the first cave dwelling communities to the present day completion of the largest building of worship in Britain--and that's a mosque--the function of religion is to control the citizens, period. It's no surprise therefore that the Catholic church is rich beyond measure, and that disgusting fuck stains like Billy Graham types live in giant mansions. As for the some ranting religious judge in Alabama demanding the right to have the Ten Commandments displayed prominently in his courthouse, well this reveals the Mother Of All power grabs. And amazingly, few people even seem to notice. That's called being conditioned.
Make no mistake, I'm not an atheist at all. But spirituality and religion are in fact a contradiction in terms. Religion is in fact the greatest barrier to actual spiritual attenuation. Moreover, there has never been a truly great man or woman in history who was devoutly religious. Certainly not a great scientist--Newton included.
Make no mistake, I'm not an atheist at all. But spirituality and religion are in fact a contradiction in terms. Religion is in fact the greatest barrier to actual spiritual attenuation. Moreover, there has never been a truly great man or woman in history who was devoutly religious. Certainly not a great scientist--Newton included.
Before God was, I am
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Moreover, there has never been a truly great man or woman in history who was devoutly religious. Certainly not a great scientist--Newton included.

Why do you hate Newton?
Or Galileo, or Copernicus, or Kepler....
the list goes on.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
I understand what you mean and you are kinda sort of right.LTS TRN 2 wrote: Make no mistake, I'm not an atheist at all. But spirituality and religion are in fact a contradiction in terms. Religion is in fact the greatest barrier to actual spiritual attenuation. Moreover, there has never been a truly great man or woman in history who was devoutly religious. Certainly not a great scientist--Newton included.
Not all religious sustain the spiritual base of their chosen doctrine, some use it for more corporal things such as power, money, sex, etc... But of your average schmucks, I'd say most are - in earnest - in pursuit of spiritual attenuation. Newton ? He certainly spent a lot of time in the bible.
With all the horseshit around here, you'd think there'd be a pony somewhere.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
claptrap, it's a system of orginisation - like any other. It's hierarchical, like every other system on earth. Whose fault is it that the Catholic church deals in capital, just like everyone else?LTS TRN 2 wrote:the function of religion is to control the citizens, period. It's no surprise therefore that the Catholic church is rich beyond measure
It's an aspiration, you're smarter than that LTS, you've completely opened yourself up.
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Learn to fucking read dolt.smackaholic wrote:Are you implying that a 7 month fetus has never been delivered from a dead mother and survived?Moving Sale wrote:That's right, no infant, toddler or teenager has ever lost its mother and survived.mvscal wrote: Can an infant survive independently free of its host? Can a toddler? How about a teenager?
Fucking dolt.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Die already, you drunken pedophile.Toddowen wrote:Whatever you want to call it, Tom, it's creeping me the fuck out. Abortion is one topic which I try and stay out of.
Fuck, man. Just reading through this bitch makes me feel like the guy in Eraserhead peeling away that baby's diaper.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
You clown, what are you attempting to sputter?Dr_Phibes wrote:claptrap, it's a system of orginisation - like any other. It's hierarchical, like every other system on earth. Whose fault is it that the Catholic church deals in capital, just like everyone else?LTS TRN 2 wrote:the function of religion is to control the citizens, period. It's no surprise therefore that the Catholic church is rich beyond measure
It's an aspiration, you're smarter than that LTS, you've completely opened yourself up.
The hierarchical model which most resembles the Catholic church is of course the old Cosa Nostra. That is, all the local branches shake down the villagers, and then kick the money up to the next level--all the way up to the Capo--or Pope. Yes, idiot, it's hierarchical. So? The point is that like a crime syndicate the Church in fact produces nothing--except a false sense of "security" (they after all are the threat)--while managing a real sense of terror. Get it?
Before God was, I am
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Well, you're not really attacking religion at all, you're just having a go at social privilege and its methods of achievement in a roundabout way. Religion is just a lightning rod for you because you haven't got any real answers yourself. You've grabbed on to the fact that the idyll is too noble for practice to get its head around and you think it's a form of hypocrisy.You clown, what are you attempting to sputter?
aka: IKYABWAI
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Sad Sack Murderer gets MURDER ONE
Becoming a big fan of Phibes. :doh:Dr_Phibes wrote:Religion is just a lightning rod for you because you haven't got any real answers yourself.