Good god, you are a miserable shit troll.Moving Sale wrote:Because Cook says so? Dolt.mvscal wrote: The dish is a product of the British Raj and whether you know that or not is totally irrelevant.
I don't give a fuck if it is served in an Ale sauce with a side of yorkshire pudding its about as British as you are straight.It is served in a tomato based yogurt sauce which could not have predated contact with the Portugese who introduced tomatoes, potatoes and chilis to India in the late 16th century.
There are all sorts of links one could post showing that it is a dish conceived by brits.
Does it have an Indian influence?
Of course.
Was it conceived in India?
Yup. By british subjects who modified an Indian dish to suit their taste, or lack there of, but, thats another thread.
The bottom line is, it was a dish made by brits. Doesn't fukking matter what influence it has or where it was made.
It's about as fukking indian as chop suey is chinese, or spaghetti w/marinara sauce is chinese. I mean, the gooks did invent the noodle, after all. So, I guess that makes spaghetti a chink dish.
Is your reading comp that fukking bad, or is it just an mvscal ankle biting deal?
I'll assume the latter as I can't imagine that even a shitty lawyer would have such poor reading comp skills.
