Yep. Do your job, keep your head down and never volunteer for shit.BarFlie wrote:i'll rack the dude for staying out of the crosshairs
D-Day Photos
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Re: D-Day Photos
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- BarFlie
- x-grunt
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 2:47 am
- Location: Beautiful Columbus North Carolina
- Contact:
Re: D-Day Photos
that's a pretty good overview in my opinion. life was different for the remfs vs the grunts but it was a dangerous place 24/7/365 no matter where you were. "adrenalin junkies high on fear" <from a book i read years agomvscal wrote:One key difference between WW2 and Vietnam and Iraq/A-stan is that while the WW2 battles were larger and more intense, there was more down time between them. Combat troops in Nam and Iraq were either patrolling or manning the perimeter almost every day they weren't involved in an op. Add the language barrier, different culture and the difficulty disthinguishing between friend and foe and you stay keyed up for a very long time. That takes a toll.
I don't think there is a whole helluva lot of difference. A dude in Vietnam could easily spend 90-100 days in combat in a 13 month tour. Barflie could speak to that more authoritatively, I'm sure. That is comparable to WW2.
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: D-Day Photos
They would laugh and kick sand in their faces.Martyred wrote: Do you think WWII vets see Iraq and Afghanistan vets as "soft,winy pussies"?
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: D-Day Photos
Like this?War Wagon wrote:They would laugh and kick sand in their faces.Martyred wrote: Do you think WWII vets see Iraq and Afghanistan vets as "soft,winy pussies"?

rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: D-Day Photos
no, nothing like that.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21772
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: D-Day Photos
I was gonna run a little reading comp smack til i realized you were asking if he was still in during nam, as were quite a few senior personnel. no, he was not. he stayed in a year or two after the end of the war in italy.mvscal wrote:Did he serve in Vietnam?smackaholic wrote:i do remember him saying that the guys in nam had it a lot easier than he in that they had helos to drop them off and bring them back wereas he and his buddies were kicked out of c-47s and were on their own.
One key difference between WW2 and Vietnam and Iraq/A-stan is that while the WW2 battles were larger and more intense, there was more down time between them. Combat troops in Nam and Iraq were either patrolling or manning the perimeter almost every day they weren't involved in an op. Add the language barrier, different culture and the difficulty disthinguishing between friend and foe and you stay keyed up for a very long time. That takes a toll.
I don't think there is a whole helluva lot of difference. A dude in Vietnam could easily spend 90-100 days in combat in a 13 month tour. Barflie could speak to that more authoritatively, I'm sure. That is comparable to WW2.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.