It's The Unions Who Are Bankrupting GM!!

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:06 am

Trampis · Post by **Trampis** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:04 am

Sell about 40 cars over seas and youve made that back. Im sure the former ceo can give enough info and guidance to cover that.

Unions, pfft....a license to be lazy and a racket for union organizers to make a few bucks extra.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:29 pm

Trampis wrote:Sell about 40 cars over seas and youve made that back. Im sure the former ceo can give enough info and guidance to cover that.

Unions, pfft....a license to be lazy and a racket for union organizers to make a few bucks extra.

The guy is let go after 8 months & then hired back for $39,000/month for 20 hours work per month....and you're calling the people in the trenches lazy thiefs?

Suck corporate cock much? (obviously yes)

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:32 pm

It's GM you're talking about, so wouldn't that be scuking government and union cock?

JMak · Post by **JMak** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:31 pm

Government Motors...it's Obama's responsibility. Let's have more government-owned businesses!

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:07 pm

Diego in Seattle wrote:The guy is let go after 8 months & then hired back for $39,000/month for 20 hours work per month....and you're calling the people in the trenches lazy thiefs?

Suck corporate cock much? (obviously yes)

It's a question of value. If I hire Bruce Springsteen to play Giants Stadium for 500,000 dollars an hour and he nets me 3 million in profit, I've made a great deal. Same thing with this guy. If he generates more profit back through his 20 hour week than GM is paying him, then they would be stupid not to pay him. So I guess what I would say to you is that if you're really that bent about this hiring, show us why it is a bad value.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:18 pm

BSmack wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:The guy is let go after 8 months & then hired back for $39,000/month for 20 hours work per month....and you're calling the people in the trenches lazy thiefs?

Suck corporate cock much? (obviously yes)
It's a question of value. If I hire Bruce Springsteen to play Giants Stadium for 500,000 dollars an hour and he nets me 3 million in profit, I've made a great deal. Same thing with this guy. If he generates more profit back through his 20 hour week than GM is paying him, then they would be stupid not to pay him. So I guess what I would say to you is that if you're really that bent about this hiring, show us why it is a bad value.

Exactly. He might not have the tools to be a successful CEO but may have a particular expertise in one area that will be profitable not only for himself, but, more importantly, for GM. In a sports analogy, I would equate it to a pitcher who has command of two pitches but is unsuccessful as a starter, and is then moved to the set up or closer role and is a valuable asset to the team.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:20 pm

Diego in Seattle wrote:
Trampis wrote:Sell about 40 cars over seas and youve made that back. Im sure the former ceo can give enough info and guidance to cover that.

Unions, pfft....a license to be lazy and a racket for union organizers to make a few bucks extra.
The guy is let go after 8 months & then hired back for $39,000/month for 20 hours work per month....and you're calling the people in the trenches lazy thiefs?

Suck corporate cock much? (obviously yes)

Right. I'm sure that 468K per year is bankrupting the company.

Suck prepubescent cock much? (obviously yes)

T1B

It's The Unions Who Are Bankrupting GM!!

It's The Unions Who Are Bankrupting GM!!

Re: It's The Unions Who Are Bankrupting GM!!

Re: It's The Unions Who Are Bankrupting GM!!

Re: It's The Unions Who Are Bankrupting GM!!

Re: It's The Unions Who Are Bankrupting GM!!

Re: It's The Unions Who Are Bankrupting GM!!

Re: It's The Unions Who Are Bankrupting GM!!

Re: It's The Unions Who Are Bankrupting GM!!