Ben Rapelisberger at it again

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:24 pm

Don't you just love the press conferences where "We are just here to tell you we won't tell you anything."

Waste of time...

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:15 pm

Nelson Muntz from The Simpsons could beat that guy in Scrabble.

trev · Post by **trev** » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:21 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:Don't you just love the press conferences where "We're not gittin' into specific details at dis time."

Waste of time...

FTFY

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:25 pm

....this just in...hot off the high speed sportswire....A second ~~skank~~ uh..girl just surfaced in the latest Big Ben fiasco, accusing the rotund QB of sexual assault...details to follow.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:01 pm

Actually, when all is said and done, it'd be awesome if these allegations were true and something actually came of them. How badass would it be to see a star NFL QB go down for rape?

Oh, wait...sexual assault, not rape. Good enough.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:56 pm

Anything like seeing it happen to a heavyweight boxing champion?

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:12 pm

Nah. With Tyson it was almost expected. With the clean-cut image of the Steelers this one would be a shock to the NFL, especially with the league being filled with young blockheads who live to get their skank-party on in nightclubs. The Commish would shit an enchilada brick.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:14 pm

Tyson would have got off if King wouldn't have hired a bankruptcy lawyer to represent him in a felonious criminal trial.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:56 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:Tyson would have got off if King wouldn't have hired a bankruptcy lawyer to represent him in a felonious criminal trial.

Perish the thought. It was a brilliant legal strategy for Tyson's lawyer to portray Tyson as a sex crazed savage groping his way through Miss USA wannabees like they were his own personal harem.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:19 am

BSmack wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Van wrote:You have no evidence of his ever being drunk,
Shut the fuck up, idiot. Why are you even bothering to make excuses for this pathetic piece shit anyway?

You know when that picture was taken? It was in January of 2005, after Ben's Steelers had just beat the Jets in an epic overtime playoff game to seal a spot in the conference championship game. He was a rookie QB who had just authored as season for the ages like no other rookie QB ever. It was also FIVE FUCKING YEARS AGO.

Now here's how Ben looked just hours before the alleged incident courtesy of TMZ...

Now, could be back away from the Ed Hardy t-shirt rack? Hell yea. But I'd hardly say he looks wasted in that picture by any stretch.

Pretty good article by Don Banks.

The irony is once upon a time we were all so taken with Ben Roethlisberger's maturity level. Remember when he first took the field as a Pittsburgh Steelers rookie in 2004 and made everything look so easy, almost effortless? It was as if he had been there and done that, even though we knew he hadn't. For an NFL novice, Big Ben seemed years ahead of the curve in the process of winning his first 14 starts that season, setting an almost-impossible-to-beat new standard for rookie quarterback success stories.

But alas, first impressions don't always stand the test of time. The just-turned-28-year-old Roethlisberger we contemplate today isn't being celebrated much any more for his unique blend of on-field maturity, wisdom and judgment. Instead, we're questioning who he is as a person away from football, what's in his character, and what he might be capable of doing when his behavior is at its worst.

We don't know if Roethlisberger is guilty of committing sexual assault, as he now has been accused of for a second time in less than nine months. Short of any proof, this is the part of the story where I'm obligated to talk about due process running its course, the concept of innocent until proven guilty, and warn about the dangers of rushing to judgment against a person who has not been charged with any crime in either case.

But with that out of the way, here's what I think we do know about Roethlisberger at this point: At the very least, he's starting to look very guilty of serial bad judgment. He doesn't seem to know what's good for him, and he clearly doesn't respect the notion that there are boundaries of where he should be, when he should be there, and who he should be with. It doesn't take a DNA test to know that Roethlisberger is young, single and likes to party. None of that is against the law, and didn't we all help make a late-night legend out of another rust-belt-born quarterback, Joe Namath, for doing the exact same thing about 40 years ago? But if I've been falsely accused of arson in the recent past, I'm going to stop playing with matches for a while. I'm going to make sure that the wrong perception about me that might exist out there isn't reinforced or perpetuated in any way.

If I'm Roethlisberger, who's still facing last year's civil suit alleging he sexually assaulted a Lake Tahoe, Nev., casino hostess in the summer of 2008, that means I'm swearing off hanging out in college-town bars until 2 a.m., making the frat-boy rounds with my entourage. Engaging groups of college-age women while out partying isn't helpful either. Quite a sacrifice, I know, but, hey, there is a pretty fair career to think of in this case. Not to mention a reputation that is rapidly approaching the state of being irreparably damaged.

You might think that every pro athlete in this day and age watched the self-destructive Tiger Woods saga unfold in the media, shuddered twice, and saw it as a cautionary tale when it comes to the excesses of fame and celebrity and the price they can exact. Woods is married and Roethlisberger is not, so the same standards don't apply, but then, no one has accused Tiger of sexual assault either. I don't know exactly when a pattern of behavior shows itself to the point of becoming obvious, but I think by now it's safe to say Roethlisberger either doesn't get it or doesn't care. You think it can't all go away pretty quickly in a hail of bad decision-making, Ben? Talk to Michael Vick about that one. One day he was practically the young and fresh face of the NFL, and the next time we looked, he was the poster child for wasted opportunity.

If NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has made anything clear in his almost four-year tenure, it's that if you keep putting yourself in situations where you can be accused of wrong-doing -- even falsely in some cases -- you still bear some of the blame for creating the environment that led to the trouble. Once is an accident and twice is a trend is roughly Goodell's rule of thumb. The commish is very, very big on representing the NFL shield, and he doesn't give it just the lip-service routine.

When you add Roethlisberger's 2006 helmet-less motorcycle accident into the mix of questionable decision-making, this is the third offseason in five years the Pittsburgh quarterback has made the wrong kind of headlines and given us reason to question his thinking, his actions, or both. That's at least twice too many for any player, but particularly for one who carries the mantle of franchise quarterback for one of the most successful and beloved organizations in the NFL.

Whether he likes it or not, Roethlisberger is the face of the Steelers franchise. And these days, that face is not a very attractive one for Pittsburgh to put out there front and center. Some might say the captain's "C'' on his jersey now stands for "cad.'' In a statement Monday, Steelers president Art Rooney II said the team is "concerned about the recent incident'' involving Roethlisberger, and will continue to "closely monitor the situation.'' The problem is, the Steelers can't monitor Roethlisberger as closely as they need to, even though they shouldn't have to. He's apparently going to keep playing by his own rules, and going wherever he pleases, until he perhaps learns his lesson the hard way. And if he thinks it can't happen, it almost assuredly will.

As it turns out, maybe all that acclaim and success so early in his NFL career, the 14-1 rookie year and two Super Bowl rings in his first five seasons, served to make Roethlisberger believe he's bullet-proof. He wouldn't be the first star athlete to think the rules didn't apply, and to find out only too late that some of them most definitely do. Roethlisberger's maturity level has again caught our attention and made us notice him anew. The twist this time is that his on-field judgment and responsibility has now been overshadowed by his off-field recklessness and lack of foresight. The lesson here seems simple, Ben: Sometimes trouble finds you. Sometimes you find the trouble. Either way, it's trouble all the same.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:05 am

BSmack wrote:Now here's how Ben looked just hours before the alleged incident courtesy of TMZ...

Now, could be back away from the Ed Hardy t-shirt rack? Hell yea. But I'd hardly say he looks wasted in that picture by any stretch.

Just hours before? Yeah, you're fucking idiot.

Van · Post by **Van** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:12 am

What a bunch of horseshit. If Ben is innnocent of these charges, then he's done nothing wrong, period. For this clown to throw him under the bus like that with little more than a perfunctory disclaimer is nothing more than phony sanctimoniousness masquerading as journalism.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:27 am

mvscal wrote:
trev wrote:Ben has always looked pretty creepy. Now more than ever.
Maybe English isn't his first language. He might have a dodgy phrasebook where, "Stop! Get off me!" is translated as, "Please shove your cock up my ass!"

It's all just a terrible misunderstanding.

Rack! mv

Van, admit it... you thought about Sig-nifying this, yes? I don't blame you. You freaking wanted it.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:17 am

Van wrote:What a bunch of horseshit. If Ben is innnocent of these charges, then he's done nothing wrong, period. For this clown to throw him under the bus like that with little more than a perfunctory disclaimer is nothing more than phony sanctimoniousness masquerading as journalism.

Don Banks gets it. You unfortunately don't.

Van · Post by **Van** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:29 am

In an effort to be P.C. Don Banks is behaving like a keening church harpie.

Wags, nah, that one never even registered on my Sig-O-Meter. In the pantheon of mvscal blasts that one was a check-swing dribbler back to the mound.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:37 am

Liar... you loved it.

And I liked 'pantheon'.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:12 pm

Joe in PB wrote:
Van wrote:What a bunch of horseshit. If Ben is innnocent of these charges, then he's done nothing wrong, period. For this clown to throw him under the bus like that with little more than a perfunctory disclaimer is nothing more than phony sanctimoniousness masquerading as journalism.
Don Banks gets it. You unfortunately don't.

So you've never gone out to a bar, had a few pops and hit on some girls?

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:07 pm

Read the story again Bri, and if that is all you come away with, you don't get it either.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:07 pm

Joe in PB wrote:Read the story again Bri, and if that is all you come away with, you don't get it either.

Don Banks reads like the classic sportswriter who is jealous of the guys he writes about to a fault.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:39 pm

It seems to me that you fags are arguing about 2 different things. Is Ben guilty of a crime or just guilty of demostrating a lack of good judgement. One would hope that someone who has such a great career, is 28 years old, and has a heck of a lot to lose would not put his livelihood at risk by going into the ladies room for sex with a 20 year old.... whether it was consentual or not. The guy is a colossal dumbfuck. He's not the 1st and certainly won't be the last. I've heard that this latest incident may have some actual teeth. Supposedly this chick ran screaming from the ladies room into the street and either called or flagged down a cop immediately. This is not some dumb broad waiting a year to file after the fact. Either she was really thinking on her feet for the lawsuit, or this shitstain is looking at real trouble, i.e., he did assault her. Either way, expect a civil case to be settled out of court ala Kobe Bryant whether or not criminal charges or filed.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:57 pm

BSmack wrote:
Joe in PB wrote:Read the story again Bri, and if that is all you come away with, you don't get it either.
Don Banks reads like the classic sportswriter who is jealous of the guys he writes about to a fault.

Just wondering how you came to that conclusion.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:23 pm

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:consentual

Eliminated

Van · Post by **Van** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:24 pm

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:13 pm

It has now been 5 days and still no charges.

Interesting factoid of the day. The accuser's sorority sisters have done a mass takedown of their Facebook and Twitter pages. Apparently some of the girls may have intimated that the accuser wasn't exactly telling the truth. At least that's what's being reported at PFT.com. And hey, in the absence of facts, why not just report some conjecture?

Also, in a twist of the story that is not conjecture, it appears that Ben was rolling with a Coropolis Police officer and a PA State Trooper the night of the alleged attack. Also, there's security camera footage of the bars in question that has been seized by Millageville cops. You know, you would think that they would have enough to charge him by now.

Van · Post by **Van** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:25 pm

Nah. I'd rather just assume he's guilty and throw a hissy-fit about it.

-mvscal

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:53 pm

BSmack wrote:And hey, in the absence of facts, why not just report some conjecture?

Fact: Big Ben put himself in a compromising situation again.

Fact: Where there's smoke, there's fire.

Fact: Big Ben is a great QB, but a POS as a person.

Conjecture: You've got a life sized poster of Big Ben in your bedroom that you fantasize about when taking warm showers.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:17 am

War Wagon wrote:Fact: Big Ben put himself in a compromising situation again.

He hit the clubs with a group of people that included two off duty cops. Sounds like a sensible plan to me.

Fact: Where there's smoke, there's fire.

Or maybe its just dry ice. You don't know and neither does anybody else.

Fact: Big Ben is a great QB, but a POS as a person.

You don't know that and neither does anybody else on this board.

Conjecture: You've got a life sized poster of Big Ben in your bedroom that you fantasize about when taking warm showers.

I just threw up in my mouth. Could you possibly be any gayer?

trev · Post by **trev** » Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:49 am

Ben did something to terrorize this lady. He's scum.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:08 am

BSmack wrote:It has now been 5 days and still no charges.

Interesting factoid of the day. The accuser's sorority sisters have done a mass takedown of their Facebook and Twitter pages. Apparently some of the girls may have intimated that the accuser wasn't exactly telling the truth. At least that's what's being reported at PFT.com. And hey, in the absence of facts, why not just report some conjecture?

Also, in a twist of the story that is not conjecture, it appears that Ben was rolling with a Coropolis Police officer and a PA State Trooper the night of the alleged attack. Also, there's security camera footage of the bars in question that has been seized by Millageville cops. You know, you would think that they would have enough to charge him by now.

It took 7 days before the Duke players who were accused of raping the stripper to be charged/arrested and those players actually forked over their DNA.. unlike Ben. Oh and another reason why the girls might have been ordered to take down their FB page is because the accuser's face might be in a shit load of pictures and if they are trying to protect her identity, it's a logical step.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:07 am

BSmack wrote:He hit the clubs with a group of people that included two off duty cops. Sounds like a sensible plan to me.

so, being chaperoned by off duty cops was supposed to protect him from himself? How'd that work out?

off duty cops = 2nd job jizzmopping.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:40 am

jiminphilly wrote:It took 7 days before the Duke players who were accused of raping the stripper to be charged/arrested and those players actually forked over their DNA.. unlike Ben.

Well, for some reason Ben was released by the cops after some questioning on the night of the incident. And the cops only got around to asking for a sample yesterday. I presume that Ben's sample will be forthcoming in the not too distant future as soon as the proper arrangements can be made.

Oh and another reason why the girls might have been ordered to take down their FB page is because the accuser's face might be in a shit load of pictures and if they are trying to protect her identity, it's a logical step.

Her identity was compromised a long time ago. TMZ already has a picture of her and Ben. This Facebook shutdown has nothing to do with that anymore.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:00 pm

War Wagon wrote:
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:consentual
Eliminated

Chatman, Chapman... whatever. That didn't take you long... touché.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:48 pm

Apparently Ben's already been flapping his dicksuckers to the police, so I can't imagine that's going to help his cause out very well.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:06 am

KC Scott wrote:Bri - you know this isn't gonna end well......

I do? Shit, Kobe admitted to back dooring that woman in Colorado and he's the fucking toast of LA.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:27 am

KC Scott wrote:Remind me again..... What was your take on Kobe back then?

I honestly don't recall. As I recall, quite a few people were willing to throw him under the bus before knowing all the facts.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:44 am

Famous people fucking chicks in public bathrooms doesn't merit getting thrown under a bus?

At best, he's fucking idiot.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:06 am

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Famous people fucking chicks in public bathrooms doesn't merit getting thrown under a bus?

At best, he's fucking idiot.

Like Joe Willie Namath never nailed a chick in a bathroom? Give me a break.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:25 am

BSmack wrote: Shit, Kobe admitted to back dooring that woman in Colorado and he's the fucking toast of LA.

Does that make him any less of a scumbag?

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:25 pm

BSmack wrote:Like Joe Willie Namath never nailed a chick in a bathroom? Give me a break.

I don't know, dude... did he? Less media/fan scrutiny. Different era. You could "get away" with more things back then. Furthermore. How does comparing Ben to a confirmed drunk bolster your argument? Your QB keeps putting himself in bad situations. He's facing criminal charges and a possible suspension and you're sitting here like he doesn't have a problem. You're fucked.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:00 pm

Boris "boom boom" Becker nailed some skank in a restaurant broom closet.
That was not smart.

He ended up being taken to the financial cleaners.

Prolly best for famous people not to attempt to fuck in weird places.