It’s Louisiana. Wouldn’t that cover about 80% of the pregnancies?Jsc810 wrote:This bill prohibits private insurance from paying for an abortion, even in cases of rape, incest
could a pro-lifer explain this please?
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
Guess you'll just have to kill your kids on your own dime.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
As a female, I don't see a problem with this at all. I don't see any circumstances to abort a baby.
Sorry!
Sorry!
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
Do you think trev ever has to worry about getting raped?
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
As 88 said....Jsc810 wrote:A dead fetus. You don't see the need to abort that?
A rape victim has to carry the fetus to term? Do you really want that??
And it is a personal decision.
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
The chances of that happening are small. I would make the decision if/when the time came. There would be a lot of variables to that scenario. I would probably let nature take it's course. But that's just me.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
No shit? Abortion is, and should be, based entirely on circumstance. It's funny how so many pro-lifers have such a black-and-white approach to abortion until they're put into the spotlight as to what THEY'D do.There would be a lot of variables
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
If it's a situation like Jsc describes, and it's a threat to the woman's health, then the insurance company should be compelled to cover it. If the fetus is already dead, then is it still an abortion anyway?
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
They are. Medically necessary abortions are covered. The law is only targeting elective abortions.Mikey wrote:If it's a situation like Jsc describes, and it's a threat to the woman's health, then the insurance company should be compelled to cover it.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
So? What the fuck is your problem?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
Your opinion doesn't matter. You are a male.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:No shit? Abortion is, and should be, based entirely on circumstance. It's funny how so many pro-lifers have such a black-and-white approach to abortion until they're put into the spotlight as to what THEY'D do.There would be a lot of variables
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:It's funny how so many pro-lifers have such a black-and-white approach to abortion...
Yeah, as in "If a black guy knocks up my white daughter, she's getting that abortion!"
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21774
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
It is a stupid law. The State should not be involved in setting such terms. They should not be allowed to mandate abortion coverage. They should not be allowed to ban coverage.
It's that little free enterprise thingy that used to be practiced in this country.
It has nothing to do with whether or not you think abortion should be legal. Personally, I think we should have some pretty strong laws protecting unborn people, but, until whacking your baby becomes illegal, the gubmint should but the fukk out.
It's that little free enterprise thingy that used to be practiced in this country.
It has nothing to do with whether or not you think abortion should be legal. Personally, I think we should have some pretty strong laws protecting unborn people, but, until whacking your baby becomes illegal, the gubmint should but the fukk out.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Roger_the_Shrubber
- Back-o-Matic
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:29 am
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
I said this once about 7 years ago.
Abortion should NOT be considered a birth control option. You get ....3. After that...tubes tied.
And after that, men should shut the hell up, if they are not married to the woman. Otherwise, morality aside, it's the woman's decision.
Abortion should NOT be considered a birth control option. You get ....3. After that...tubes tied.
And after that, men should shut the hell up, if they are not married to the woman. Otherwise, morality aside, it's the woman's decision.
What were we just talking about?
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
Law is nothing but legislated morality, idiot. All of it. I shouldn't have to explain that to a lawyer.Jsc810 wrote:legislate morality.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
No freebies. The only authorized form of elective abortion should be a complete hysterectomy.Roger_the_Shrubber wrote:Abortion should NOT be considered a birth control option. You get ....3. After that...tubes tied.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: could a pro-lifer explain this please?
Just keep that in mind when we're talking football.trev wrote:Your opinion doesn't matter. You are a male.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:No shit? Abortion is, and should be, based entirely on circumstance. It's funny how so many pro-lifers have such a black-and-white approach to abortion until they're put into the spotlight as to what THEY'D do.There would be a lot of variables
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim