Don't taze me bro!

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue May 04, 2010 2:35 pm

RACK the Philly cop who hit paydirt.

Cueball · Post by **Cueball** » Tue May 04, 2010 2:37 pm

Pretty chicken shit. Shed a few lbs and tackle the kid like it says in baseball's unwritten rule book

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue May 04, 2010 2:43 pm

Every Philly fan deserves to be tazed.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Tue May 04, 2010 2:47 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:Every Philly fan deserves to be tazed.

Sell out your fucking stadiums and you won't have to deal with us..

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Tue May 04, 2010 2:49 pm

Cueball wrote:Pretty chicken shit. Shed a few lbs and tackle the kid like it says in baseball's unwritten rule book

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VqtPUhYdz6M&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VqtPUhYdz6M&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>[/youtube]

Philly isn't the first team to taze-

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/break ... a_fan.html

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue May 04, 2010 3:05 pm

Cueball wrote:Pretty chicken shit. Shed a few lbs and tackle the kid like it says in baseball's unwritten rule book

Yeah, it's not very "chicken shit" to think so highly of yourself that you interrupt a sporting event by running around amongst the participants ... where you DON'T BELONG.

In a case like this, and it happens so quickly, who knows what the fuck the flapping sociopath has in mind.

The taze was ok, but it would have been just a little sweeter if someone had gone Jan Stenerud and sent dipshit's tiny pair of almonds straight over the left field wall.

Fuck him.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue May 04, 2010 3:11 pm

poptart wrote: Jan Stenerud

Excellent.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue May 04, 2010 3:21 pm

That was for you, Wagon.

Only regret that I could find a way to get Ed Podolak in that take.

Next time.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue May 04, 2010 3:53 pm

poptart wrote:That was for you, Wagon.

Only regret that I could find a way to get Ed Podolak in that take.

Perhaps you could have suggested that the interloper must have been as drunk as Ed Podolak.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue May 04, 2010 4:07 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:

Damn, check out the chicklets on Noj's old lady.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Tue May 04, 2010 4:55 pm

is it possible to get more hammered looking than that dude?

must be at least a few hundred empty bud bottles just off picture.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue May 04, 2010 5:18 pm

smackaholic wrote:is it possible to get more hammered looking than that dude?

Sup bro?

Sin,

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Tue May 04, 2010 7:59 pm

BSmack wrote:

RACK the Philly cop who hit paydirt.

Philly cop? Fuck that. Rack the AZ cop taking down this illegal.

Go Coogs' · Post by **Go Coogs'** » Tue May 04, 2010 10:22 pm

I usually side with "by any means necessary" when apprehending a criminal; however, authorities need to use a little common sense when chasing down a hooligan at a baseball game. Had this been two drunkards from Chicago beating the shit out of a first base coach, then yeah, taser the fuck out of those fools and take a bat to their domes.

In this case it was an unnecessary act by the Philly cop. This was a kid not running at someone. He was just running aimlessly in shallow left. The only threat was that fat philly cop getting popped with a rally towel by said teenager. Just chase the little fucker down until he makes the wrong move and then tackle him and take him away. How hard is that?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue May 04, 2010 10:37 pm

How fucking stupid are you? Once you jump on the field, you put yourself at the mercy of authorities. It's not the cops responsibility to tackle him. He could blow out a knee or fuck himself up. Short of shooting him, the kid got what he deserved.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Tue May 04, 2010 10:48 pm

Go Coogs' wrote:I usually side with "by any means necessary" when apprehending a criminal; however, authorities need to use a little common sense when chasing down a hooligan at a baseball game. Had this been two drunkards from Chicago beating the shit out of a first base coach, then yeah, taser the fuck out of those fools and take a bat to their domes.

In this case it was an unnecessary act by the Philly cop. This was a kid not running at someone. He was just running aimlessly in shallow left. The only threat was that fat philly cop getting popped with a rally towel by said teenager. Just chase the little fucker down until he makes the wrong move and then tackle him and take him away. How hard is that?

Watch this video and note what Raul Ibanez does as the kid takes a turn towards his direction. Given that they have NO idea if this kid was on drugs or drunk or carrying anything, the minute he steps onto the field he becomes a threat and unless he gives himself up, the cop has discretion to use a certain level of force and considering the ONLY person who got hurt was the asshole who illegally entered trespassed onto the field, I don't get why people are up in arms over what this cop did.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed May 05, 2010 12:09 am

jiminphilly wrote: the ONLY person who got hurt was the asshole who illegally entered trespassed onto the field,

Except that he didn't get hurt. The fans seemed to enjoy it. I suppose the alternative would be tranquilizer darts. That would be equally amusing.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Wed May 05, 2010 1:07 am

authorities need to use a little common sense when chasing down a hooligan at a baseball game.

That's exactly what they did. This is not your run of the mill "hooligan." This is Philly Fan.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Wed May 05, 2010 2:00 am

Any liberal faggot who says what the cop did was out of line can continue to donate their hard earned cash to illegal immigrant health care.

The ballplayers are considered assets. VERY EXPENSIVE ASSETS! Bomb strapped to his waist so what, right libtards!?!?

Oh come on...NO reason to beleve there could possibly be a terrorist threat in the USA! Sin, Times Square

Van · Post by **Van** » Wed May 05, 2010 2:10 am

Swear to god, we live in a completely retarded society. Our people are so goddamn comfortable that they've lost all sight of reasonable common sense. The only reaction any overly comfortable, whinging liberal ever seems to have about anything anymore is that enforcing laws is bad, no matter what.

Coddle the fuck out of everyone, that seems to be their knee-jerk response to each and every issue.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed May 05, 2010 2:15 am

IndyFrisco wrote: The ballplayers are considered assets. VERY EXPENSIVE ASSETS! Bomb strapped to his waist so what, right libtards!?!?

Question: Why are taxpayer funded cops doing security in a private venue protecting private assets?

This is a very libertarian argument. Tread lightly.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Wed May 05, 2010 2:17 am

Van wrote:Coddle the fuck out of everyone, that seems to be their knee-jerk response to each and every issue.

Well, the CRIMINAL in quesion was a pure-bred Beantown Spic. Hence the liberal defense of said fuckstick. Had it been a white trash parker, he got what he deserved.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Wed May 05, 2010 2:19 am

Martyred wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote: The ballplayers are considered assets. VERY EXPENSIVE ASSETS! Bomb strapped to his waist so what, right libtards!?!?

Question: Why are taxpayer funded cops doing security in a private venue protecting private assets?

This is a very libertarian argument. Tread lightly.

You think the cops are being paid at the venue by the taxpayers?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed May 05, 2010 2:20 am

IndyFrisco wrote:
Martyred wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote: The ballplayers are considered assets. VERY EXPENSIVE ASSETS! Bomb strapped to his waist so what, right libtards!?!?

Question: Why are taxpayer funded cops doing security in a private venue protecting private assets?

This is a very libertarian argument. Tread lightly.
You think the cops are being paid at the venue by the taxpayers?

I don't know how your ridiculous sports circuses work down there. Sorry.

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Wed May 05, 2010 2:34 am

Go Coogs' wrote: Had this been two drunkards from Chicago beating the shit out of a first base coach, then yeah, taser the fuck out of those fools and take a bat to their domes.

So the security guards job is to remove the drunken shitbag as quickly as possible to protect the safety of the players, umpires and coaches, but he should really see how it plays out first? They can still use force, just once things get out of hand?

We didn't ask to be told of the exact moment your gelatinous hog of a wife pummeled your privates into a fully functioning labia. Please keep that to yourself next time.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Wed May 05, 2010 2:38 am

Martyred wrote:I don't know how your ridiculous sports circuses work down there. Sorry.

Unlike in Canada where every service is paid by taxpayers, police detail in America at sporting events is paid by the owner of the team. Sometimes, the owner is the city rather than an individual or a group of individuals, but that is the exception, not the rule.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed May 05, 2010 3:00 am

I'm pretty sure neither the Ontario provincial gov't nor the Canadian federal gov't uses taxpayer dollars for extra police protection at Jays or NHL games. They might be a little more left leaning, but I'm sure not enough to just roll over and spend taxpayer dollars to give billionaires free security work.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed May 05, 2010 3:01 am

Martyred wrote: Question: Why are taxpayer funded cops doing security in a private venue protecting private assets?

This is a very libertarian argument. Tread lightly.

It's called moonlighting, Marty.

I've yet to know a cop or fireman who doesn't have a 2nd job trying to afford that nice house in the suburbs. They damn sure can't make it otherwise.

Cueball · Post by **Cueball** » Wed May 05, 2010 4:04 am

KC Scott wrote:I was drinking with some buddies and discussing this when the subject of Morganna came up:

I sure as hell don't remember the Cops ever tackling or Stun gunning this sow.

Pretty he has a reverse sexual discrimination case here

You are a wise one grasshopper

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed May 05, 2010 5:09 am

Cowardly twisted bullshit by gun happy crypto fascists...the guy was running onto a baseball field saying hey, look at me! (sure, might have a propane tank and a mickey mouse watch detonator in his pocket! :D )...so the fat closet homo rent-a-cop tazers him like a serious criminal?

And it's not just overly exuberant fans at baseball games...

A deer that was lost in an East Oakland residential neighborhood was shot seven times and killed by Oakland police this past weekend.

According to a San Francisco Chronicle report, the young deer was lost and had jumped over a fence into a backyard. Officials said the deer was shot because "it was acting disoriented in an urban environment" and that it was a public safety issue with children present.

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Wed May 05, 2010 5:19 am

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Cowardly twisted bullshit by gun happy crypto fascists...the guy was running onto a baseball field saying hey, look at me! (sure, might have a propane tank and a mickey mouse watch detonator in his pocket! :D )...so the fat closet homo rent-a-cop tazers him like a serious criminal?

And it's not just overly exuberant fans at baseball games...

A deer that was lost in an East Oakland residential neighborhood was shot seven times and killed by Oakland police this past weekend.

According to a San Francisco Chronicle report, the young deer was lost and had jumped over a fence into a backyard. Officials said the deer was shot because "it was acting disoriented in an urban environment" and that it was a public safety issue with children present.

Finding the right route to Jack London Square is a bitch

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed May 05, 2010 6:10 am

Looks like a good takedown to me given the facts, but I would say that the cops probably should not be involved in the first place. Why are cops chasing people around the field in the first place? No cop = no tazer.

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Wed May 05, 2010 7:00 am

Why are cops chasing people around the field in the first place?

Because "just maybe"..they're not supposed to be there in the first place and are breaking the Law?
no way...

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed May 05, 2010 12:57 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:
Van wrote:Coddle the fuck out of everyone, that seems to be their knee-jerk response to each and every issue.
Well, the CRIMINAL in quesion was a pure-bred Beantown Spic. Hence the liberal defense of said fuckstick. Had it been a white trash parker, he got what he deserved.

Beantown Spic? I believe he was a Philadelphia Dago.

And that seemed a perfect use for a taser. Apparently players were holding their gloves over their faces to hide their laughter.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed May 05, 2010 1:10 pm

Moving Sale wrote:Looks like a good takedown to me given the facts, but I would say that the cops probably should not be involved in the first place. Why are cops chasing people around the field in the first place? No cop = no tazer.

Last I checked, tazers were legal to buy and carry in PA. So no, it didn't HAVE to be a cop.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Wed May 05, 2010 1:13 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:
Martyred wrote:I don't know how your ridiculous sports circuses work down there. Sorry.
Unlike in Canada where every service is paid by taxpayers, police detail in America at sporting events is paid by the owner of the team.

In the case of the Phillies, Indy is correct. It's the ONLY reason the Philly PD is asking the Phillies if they want the police officer to be engaged in chasing fans on the field.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Wed May 05, 2010 1:37 pm

BSmack wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:Looks like a good takedown to me given the facts, but I would say that the cops probably should not be involved in the first place. Why are cops chasing people around the field in the first place? No cop = no tazer.
Last I checked, tazers were legal to buy and carry in PA. So no, it didn't HAVE to be a cop.

Actually it did- you can not own a tazer in Philly (but somehow the Philly PD circumvents this law).

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed May 05, 2010 2:02 pm

jiminphilly wrote:
BSmack wrote:Actually it did- you can not own a tazer in Philly (but somehow the Philly PD circumvents this law).

That sucks. Why bother owning a tazer if you can't use it on the people who deserve it most?

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Wed May 05, 2010 2:12 pm

BSmack wrote:
jiminphilly wrote:
BSmack wrote:Actually it did- you can not own a tazer in Philly (but somehow the Philly PD circumvents this law).
That sucks. Why bother owning a tazer if you can't use it on the people who deserve it most?

Mets fans? I agree.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Wed May 05, 2010 3:18 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote:
Van wrote:Coddle the fuck out of everyone, that seems to be their knee-jerk response to each and every issue.
Well, the CRIMINAL in quesion was a pure-bred Beantown Spic. Hence the liberal defense of said fuckstick. Had it been a white trash parker, he got what he deserved.
Beantown Spic? I believe he was a Philadelphia Dago.

And that seemed a perfect use for a taser. Apparently players were holding their gloves over their faces to hide their laughter.

I didn't mean beantown boston. Beantown as in beaner...Beantown Spic in my meaning was more redundant than anything else.