OK, liberal sperm burpers. Are you willing to (send someone else to) fight for the raw materials necessary to build your faggoty electric cars? It appears that the 21st century is going to look a fuck of a lot like the 20th.
Good job, shitstains....
An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys. {and lithium ion electric car batteries} http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/world ... wt=nytimes
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Come now, Avi, surely you and Rusp Limpdick appreciate the "exceptionalism" which permits--nay, demands--that we secure and develop these essential transnational corporate "nutrients," (or, nutrients) etc. After all, why did we invade Vietnam? Why did 58,000 Americans die if not to attempt to secure huge mineral resources in Indochine Or what?
An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys. {and lithium ion electric car batteries} http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/world ... wt=nytimes
Those of us that were watching have known that for years. How many times are you going to beat your own self in the face with a hammer?
Moving Sale wrote:Those of us that were watching have known that for years. How many times are you going to beat your own self in the face with a hammer?
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Your link really lays it out there about the value of the lithium, eh? Potentially useful = trillion. Got it.
If you were paying attention that part of the story was reveled in the USGS results that were announced in 2007 at the 3rd annual U.S.-Afghan Business Matchmaking Conference.
Do you TRY to sound so stupid or does it come naturally?
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Your link really lays it out there about the value of the lithium, eh? Potentially useful = trillion. Got it.
If you were paying attention that part of the story was reveled in the USGS results that were announced in 2007 at the 3rd annual U.S.-Afghan Business Matchmaking Conference.
Do you TRY to sound so stupid or does it come naturally?
And this makes your shit link better... how? You do realize I was questioning the lack of anything informative in your link, right? I mean. I did use the word link, correct? Can you read?
The link was to show how old this info is. The specific point that the minerals are worth and estimated one trillion dollars was not in the link. This seemed to be a bone of contention with you so I pointed out that even that info was still at least three years old at which point you smashed your keyboard against your face and then pushed submit. You are about as dumb as a cabinet full of rusty nails.
Moving Sale wrote:The link was to show how old this info is. The specific point that the minerals are worth and estimated one trillion dollars was not in the link. This seemed to be a bone of contention with you so I pointed out that even that info was still at least three years old at which point you smashed your keyboard against your face and then pushed submit. You are about as dumb as a cabinet full of rusty nails.
Wrong. Your link should have provided proof that it was common knowledge that there's an assload of lithium in Afghanistan.
By contrast.
Your shit link told us about potentially useful deposits of lithium... and 7 other items. That's it. It didn't confirm the depth of the findings. Look, douche. You have the potential to not be the worst poster on this board, but until you provide me with something that proves otherwise... potential is all you have. Follow?
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Your link should have provided proof that it was common knowledge that there's an assload of lithium in Afghanistan.
We have been thru this you stammering fuckbucket. Even if you are right there is still the 2007 conference. This news is not new. Follow? Of course you don't.
Moving Sale wrote:We have been thru this you stammering fuckbucket. Even if you are right there is still the 2007 conference. This news is not new. Follow? Of course you don't.
Show me where I was questioning whether or not this was news. Your original post failed to deliver your intended message. I could give two fucks about the conference. You didn't mention it in the post I originally replied to.
For the last fucking time... your link sucked. Your shit rebuttle doesn't address that point, does it?
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: Your original post failed to deliver your intended message.
Well to you it did because you have your head up a gerbil's butt. Those of us that can read and have been following this have known for years that they have lots of mineral deposits. As I have said before you are right that the two links don't line up perfectly. I have already given you that. The point of my first post was that mvskkkal is a stupid fuck for acting like this new news is actually new news. Way to pound yourself in the dick and look even stoopider than a guy who is never right you vapid mis-shapen trog.