King Crimson wrote:see, in your constant need to force your own narrative on this....you are making nonsensical statements. OK, you make argument all over the board that pre-Big 10 offer NU is a national draw, national program. Hoo boy, you betcha. Yet, now, you are claiming OU is regional? and that's it.
I didn't mean is as NU was a national draw moreso than OU. I'm curiuos as how a local TV broadcast plays nationally? You know, when say for example Barry's doing color; while that may play well in Enid and Broken Arrow, how does that translate in Chicago? I'm curiuos how university or local ETV broadcast plan on a handsome revenue share when you can watch 8 other games at the same time. Remember, you've got Iowa St. Kansas St. Baylor Kansas Misery Texas Tech Okie Lite EVERY YEAR NOW! Not to mention 2 OOC cupcakes.
have fun in the Big 10, i'm sure you guys will be kings of Chicago in no time. all the fans in Columbus will start wearing red overalls and UM fan will be smoking corn cob pipes....and who knows, maybe Sparty will start eating bugs.
I missed this I guess...but I like the thought!
your sanctimonious rantings are getting obsessively repetitive.
Ya maybe.
as far as UT screwing us again as some fate....you did see the part about OU getting an SEC offer? you are kind at odds with what's going on except what Tom Shatel tells you to think....seems. but, again, the rah rah Omaha/Lincoln sports media have always made actual sidelines cheerleading look like the Socratic method
Not so much as A&M and Bill Byrne's interest...but my question is...why not take it? Stoops is in Omaha this week and was quoted as saying he was intrigued with the PAC 10 talk..I was of the opinion OU was closer to the PAC 10 (package deal with satan) than the SEC, of course that was from the World Herald which you kindly reminded me was bullshit.