IndyFrisco wrote:
My take on the TV is that Indy provides a "made for TV" location like Screw said. Are less people going to watch the game if it is in Chicago? I don't know. I do think it will more than likely be an ugly game due to the possible weather conditions. Put it this way: If I'm a fan who wants to attend the game, I'd rather go to Indy. If I'm a fan who wants to see a game that is not adversely affected by the weather, I'd rather watch it in Indy whether at the game or on my couch. As fans of CFB, yeah, we like to see a classic game in the snow/mud/rain. However, as a fan of CFB, I don't want to see the CCG affected by those same conditions.
i don't know, either. i'd like to see how tv ratings are affected by whether or not there's snow on the ground. i just can't imagine people sitting in their warm homes will turn the channel because the players are shivering.
as far as attendance at the actual game, midwesterners are rather hardy (read: fat). i've been to some froze ass games at michigan stadium that were sold out. if 100,000 michigan fans are willing to sit through sub-zero then i imagine nebraska or ohio state can swing 35,000 or whatever half a stadium's capacity is.
i can also see the big ten angling for an ccg in the out-of-doors just because no one else does it. part of the big ten's criticism of sec football is that they only play in favorable weather: let's see them play in the cold. a game in soldier field would be a chance for them to beat their chests.
my best guess is that the ccg will rotate locations. i'm obviously going on nothing, though.