LTSTRN2's Take On This One, Please

[mvscal]

A. They stole nothing.

B. They didn't offer to sell anything on the black market.

C. Negotiations with South Africa, assuming this report is accurate, were not illegal for either party.

Why do continually lie about this subject? What's in it for you?

[R-Jack]

What's in it for you?

Berkeley street cred

[LTS TRN 2]

Of course it was illegal. Why do you suggest such a top secret deal would be legal?

Why would any nation presume to sell illegal nukes to the apartheid regime of South Africa in the first place?

Both of these artificial fascist states--created in 1948--realized they were in the same boat. They were each others number one trading partners for years.

You obviously didn't read the full article on the ZioNazis' nuclear program. Read it and quit your desperate squirming..

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cpc-pubs/farr.htm

[mvscal]

Of course it was illegal.

What law was broken? This is about the third time I've asked and you have done nothing except duck and squirm.

[LTS TRN 2]

Vanunu has proven an honest witness to history. Can you name a single neocon or AIPAC fuckstain or Israeli official of whom the same can honestly be said? Who?

In July 2004 Vanunu claimed in the London-based Al-Hayat newspaper that the state of Israel was complicit in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He claimed there were “near-certain indications” Kennedy was assassinated in response to “pressure he exerted on Israel’s then head of government, David Ben-Gurion, to shed light on Dimona’s nuclear reactor".