While Stanford played Oregon...

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Goober McTuber »

No.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31631
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Mikey »

I was switching over for updates for a while.

Alabama does look scary but I have a feeling Oregon would give them a run for the money.
User avatar
FLW Buckeye
2014 T1B FBBL Champ
Posts: 1396
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:14 am

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by FLW Buckeye »

Since nobody watched, nobody cares...at least until the end of Nov (or until someone loses a game).
“Hey! You scratched my anchor!”
User avatar
MuchoBulls
Tremendous Slouch
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by MuchoBulls »

Sudden Sam wrote:...Alabama played Florida.

Anybody watch?
I was at our home game, but I was not surprised in the least by the score. UF is not a good team. We ran the ball all over them, so I figured 'Bama would be able to do much worse.

I was glad to see the highlight of that pussy jump pass getting picked in the end zone.
Dreams......Temporary Madness
User avatar
L45B
Commanche Hero
Posts: 4367
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 4:01 am
Location: NYC - born and raised!!!

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by L45B »

Ohio State looked like shit on Saturday, so if they had played either of the other two on that day it would have been ugly.

However, I can remember a couple weekends last year in which Oregon looked unstoppable and once again, tOSU looked sluggish. But when they actually played each other in a bowl game, it was a different story.

Still lots of football to be played. tOSU has enough talent to compete with anybody. But admittedly, we're getting hit with the injury bug especially in the secondary. And if Pryor can't be a running threat, we may drop a game or two anyways.
“My dentist, that’s another beauty, my dentist, you kiddin’ me. It cost me five thousand dollars to have all new teeth put in. Now he tells me I need braces!” —Rodney Dangerfield
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Goober McTuber »

Sudden Sam wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:No.
Wow. #1 and #7 and nobody watched?

Scary to watch the Tide in action, isn't it?
No. I've seen plenty of both Alabama and Florida over the past year or so, very little of Oregon or Stanford. It's like having a little strange.

1 - Oregon should pass Ohio State right now.

2 - Alabama would beat Ohio State.

3 - Oregon would edge Alabama.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
SunCoastSooner
Reported Bible Thumper
Posts: 6318
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:07 am
Location: Destin, Florida

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by SunCoastSooner »

Sudden Sam wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:No.
Wow. #1 and #7 and nobody watched?

Scary to watch the Tide in action, isn't it?


Three questions:

1 - If things were to stay as they are now...would Oregon pass Ohio State in the polls if they both go undefeated?

2 - If Alabama remains #1 or #2...as things look now...who would win an Alabama-Ohio State matchup?

3 - Same thing: Alabama-Oregon?



Looooooong way to go. Lotsa tough games for all three remain. But it's time to think about it.

According to BCS Guru per Rivals radio it isn't Oregon that is the factor. Due to the computers he states that Alabama and Oklahoma win out they are a virtual lock for the title game. Ohio State and Boise State are the outsiders looking in. TCU, Oregon, and Nebraska are just also rans who need a lot of schools in front of them to lose. If you look at the comp polls that help determine 1/3 of the BCS about half of them have Oregon ranked 8th or lower, some as low as 11th and 14th. Alabama and Oklahoma are the only two not outside the top 3 in any. Ohio State is the only one not outside of the top five other than the fore mentioned.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
User avatar
SunCoastSooner
Reported Bible Thumper
Posts: 6318
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:07 am
Location: Destin, Florida

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by SunCoastSooner »

Sudden Sam wrote:Wow.

That's surprising as bad as OU has looked at times. But their schedule so far looks impressive, I guess.

I was surprised as well but I'll take it any day of the week.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

SunCoastSooner wrote:According to BCS Guru per Rivals radio it isn't Oregon that is the factor. Due to the computers he states that Alabama and Oklahoma win out they are a virtual lock for the title game.
I'm calling bullshit on that one.
User avatar
SunCoastSooner
Reported Bible Thumper
Posts: 6318
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:07 am
Location: Destin, Florida

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by SunCoastSooner »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
SunCoastSooner wrote:According to BCS Guru per Rivals radio it isn't Oregon that is the factor. Due to the computers he states that Alabama and Oklahoma win out they are a virtual lock for the title game.
I'm calling bullshit on that one.

Go look at the comp polls moron... Oregon is the lowest of the seven schools mentioned on average. Alabama and Oklahoma are heads and shoulders above everyone else. There is only one computer that either of them are not ranked #1 in. I was shocked that Oklahoma is actually #1 in three of the formats.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Goober McTuber »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
SunCoastSooner wrote:According to BCS Guru per Rivals radio it isn't Oregon that is the factor. Due to the computers he states that Alabama and Oklahoma win out they are a virtual lock for the title game.
I'm calling bullshit on that one.
No shit. It's way too early to get an accurate read on the computers and the polls are two-thirds of the formula. They all keep playing the way they have so far, it will be Alabama-Oregon.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Carson
2012 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 4956
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: NOT in The Gump

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Carson »

So poll-wise, Big Game Bob can profess he shoulda never been in the championship game after he gets hammered...again.
JPGettysburg wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
User avatar
The Seer
Just the Facts
Posts: 6335
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Maricopa County

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by The Seer »

SunCoastSooner wrote: According to BCS Guru / Due to the computers / If you look at the comp polls that help determine 1/3 of the BCS
=Everything that is WRONG with college football.
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Dinsdale »

Hmm...
Last edited by Dinsdale on Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Dinsdale »

SunCoastSooner wrote: Go look at the comp polls moron...
http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
M Club
el capitán
Posts: 3998
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:37 am
Location: a boat

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by M Club »

you mean those entirely objective coaches who never let conference bias or personal vendettas affect their voting? and that's if they even bother filling it out themselves (hola, joepa). interesting how writers and coaches polls tend to resemble one another anyhow.
User avatar
M Club
el capitán
Posts: 3998
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:37 am
Location: a boat

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by M Club »

Papa Willie wrote: Oh - I'm sorry. Even you and your semenic social status would be far more rehearsed in football knowledge than any coach or writer.

You stupid fuck - take a look at some of those ratings in the link Dins so kindly provided and tell me what you think. Dumbass...
why bother with dins' link when your response was you'll trust the coaches poll instead, as if it it's more authoratative than an aggregate of polls and computer rankings. even if the coaches were somehow better at ranking teams than the writers are, why don't you put down your plate of crisco for a minute to point out the vast difference between these two polls:

AP Top 25

* 1.Alabama (58)
* 2.Ohio St. (1)
* 3.Oregon
* 4.Boise St. (1)
* 5.TCU
* 6.Oklahoma
* 7.Nebraska
* 8.Auburn
* 9.Arizona
* 10.Utah

USA Today Top 25

* 1.Alabama (58)
* 2.Ohio St. (1)
* 3.Oregon
* 4.Boise St. (1)
* 5.TCU
* 6.Nebraska
* 7.Oklahoma
* 8.Auburn
* 9.LSU
* 10.Utah


props on the use of "semenic," though. made me look up a new word only to learn it doesn't exist.
User avatar
M Club
el capitán
Posts: 3998
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:37 am
Location: a boat

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by M Club »

Papa Willie wrote: Okay - go back and take a look at was was being said (by others). I know that's gonna be a "toughie" for you to do, but pay the fuck attention.
why don't you explain how anything any other person said beforehand changes the point. you can't because [1] you're in the middle of a heart attack and [2] you're worthless.

Secondly - do you not "get" the word "semenic"? Hint: you probably dine on it daily. God damn you're dumb as fucking shit sometimes.
oh, my bad. i don't spend a whole lot of my day thinking about semen. i suppose if it looks like crisco..
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Goober McTuber »

Papa Willie wrote:http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/ ... atpoll.htm

I'll trust this one the most. God damn those coaches for maybe knowing more than writers.
You mean the one where a lot of the coaches delegate their voting responsibilties? Other that their own teams and their opponents, how many games do you think coaches watch anyway?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

I may have been the only person on this board watching ND-Fredo, except possibly for Killian and Lax. The local ABC affiliate carried that game and relegated Stanford-Oregon to ESPN2. As an added bonus, Burnt Cheeseburger wasn't calling the game.

More than anything, I came away impressed (not really the right word for it, but a more correct word escapes me at the moment) with how horrible Fredo is on offense. At QB, they benched the 26-year-old sophomore, started a true freshman who (apparently) broke his ankle during the game, and finished up with another true freshman who was even worse than the other guy. On the defensive side of the ball, game-planning for Fredo in their current state is simple: put 8 guys in the box, and force them to beat you through the air. It ain't gonna happen.

Btw, Fredo's 13 points came courtesy of one big pass play with an obvious coverage breakdown on ND's part, plus two FG's set up by ND turnovers deep in their own territory (I'm pretty sure Fredo didn't manage a first down in either of those two scoring drives). Essentially, ND's much-maligned (and rightfully so) defense came one big play and two turnovers away from pitching a shutout.

For my money, for those who play the Pick'Em, NC State -10.5 at home vs. Fredo is this week's stone cold lock. Fredo is that bad.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
User avatar
SunCoastSooner
Reported Bible Thumper
Posts: 6318
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:07 am
Location: Destin, Florida

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by SunCoastSooner »

Dinsdale wrote:
SunCoastSooner wrote: Go look at the comp polls moron...
http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm
Massey, Sargain, and two other of the polls have to eliminate SOS from their calculations before being used by the BCS. Those are shown with SOS included.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
King Crimson
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 8978
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by King Crimson »

as far as the computers go, Colorado is ranked 8 spots higher than Cal at this point when Cal could have scored 100 on CU. While i think this is largely a shit system we have (I know, that's a controversial take around here....); but, these things take time to generate any statistically "valid" data.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
User avatar
M Club
el capitán
Posts: 3998
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:37 am
Location: a boat

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by M Club »

Papa Willie wrote:
Image
not sure if you understand the concept of hating. you have to do something worthwhile before the haters come out. still waiting for you to explain how the coaches poll fits into the discussion i apparently can't follow. of course you can't, so i dutifully await your next homo post / google image search.
User avatar
M Club
el capitán
Posts: 3998
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:37 am
Location: a boat

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by M Club »

my team's going to win the national championship this year. and next. and then three years from then.
User avatar
indyfrisco
Pro Bonfire
Posts: 11683
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by indyfrisco »

M Club wrote:my team's going to win the national championship this year. and next. and then three years from then.
Shoelace is going to be on a stretcher at some point this year. And next. It's unfortunate as he's a good kid it seems. Of course, you gotta catch up to him to lay him out, but if I was a gambling man, I'd bet he's going to get dinged up the way he runs.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
User avatar
M Club
el capitán
Posts: 3998
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:37 am
Location: a boat

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by M Club »

i don't get the assumption that he's going to get hurt. of course, it could happen because it's football, but there are similar-sized running backs who take more beating running into the line 20+ times a game. plus, he's averaging 9 yards a carry: most of the hits he takes are from defensive backs or linebackers making tackles in open space. that goes without mentioning all the other dickrod qbs who were never seriously injured or all the old school option qbs who got through entire seasons.

that said, there's a lot of michigan fans sitting around waiting for the inevitable to happen, which started right after the uconn game when we realized how important he was to making our poor little team go.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

M Club wrote:i don't get the assumption that he's going to get hurt.
Hasn't he been taken out of basically every game? And against teams with strainers for defenses. Sure, nothing serious yet, but there's at least a basis for a reasonable assumption.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Dinsdale »

M Club wrote:option qbs who got through entire seasons.

Does not compute.

Sin,
Ducksfan
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
King Crimson
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 8978
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by King Crimson »

Dinsdale wrote:
M Club wrote:option qbs who got through entire seasons.

Does not compute.

Sin,
Ducksfan
cry some more Dins,

sin,

Thomas Lott, JC Watts, Turner Gill, Phil Bradley, Jamelle Holieway*, Darien Hagan*, Tommie Frazier.......

can be done.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31631
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: While Stanford played Oregon...

Post by Mikey »

So, were Holieway* and Hagan* on PEDs, or what?
Post Reply