Tuesday retention vote on Supreme Court Justices
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Tuesday retention vote on Supreme Court Justices
Lots of press/media hype both pro and con on the retention vote coming up for 3 Iowa SC Justices primarily because of their vote to allow gay marriages. There's some other personal stuff on the Chief Justice that hasn't come up in the conversations but it will be interesting to see how this vote goes on Tuesday. Judges need 51% of the vote to remain on the bench and I think it's going to be a very close vote.
-
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Tuesday retention vote on Supreme Court Justices
...and then, if they sink to the bottom, you know they're not witches.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Re: Tuesday retention vote on Supreme Court Justices
I vote no on every judge.
Let them go out and earn an honest living for a change
Let them go out and earn an honest living for a change
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
Re: Tuesday retention vote on Supreme Court Justices
They can't, they're lawyers. :)Cuda wrote:Let them go out and earn an honest living for a change
-
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Tuesday retention vote on Supreme Court Justices
Mace wrote:They can't, they're lawyers. :)Cuda wrote:Let them go out and earn an honest living for a change
Is Shrubber writing your material?
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Re: Tuesday retention vote on Supreme Court Justices
No, 88 wrote that one. :) Shrubber wrote this one.Martyred wrote:Mace wrote:They can't, they're lawyers. :)Cuda wrote:Let them go out and earn an honest living for a change
Is Shrubber writing your material?