Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
So far so good stopping the run. Two three and outs.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Nice 4th down composure there.
Raiders have to do something with the ball or those 3rd and 1's are going to go the other way in the second half.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
FUCK
Charles and Jones are going to carve the defense up later on if they have to be on the field the entire first fucking half.
Charles and Jones are going to carve the defense up later on if they have to be on the field the entire first fucking half.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
I LOVE IT when Haley goes for it on 4th down...the impending melt from Wags makes it all worth it.
Here's a fucking clue ,Raydahs....go for it on 4th down in THEIR end of the field, not yours. Thanks for the kick ass field position, you losers!![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Here's a fucking clue ,Raydahs....go for it on 4th down in THEIR end of the field, not yours. Thanks for the kick ass field position, you losers!
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
So I guess DB's aren't allowed to play anymore ![Rolling Eyes :meds:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :meds:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Gotta admit, the home team got hosed on that call....but we'll take it every day of the week.
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Refs are on the sauce this game.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Cable Guy just wasted that challenge- Tucker's feet BOTH came down in-bounds in the end zone. Period.
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Didn't look like anything worth reviewing.
I guess Cable figured that anything can happen with these jackoff refs today.
I guess Cable figured that anything can happen with these jackoff refs today.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Dammit. Just fall on it.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Hey don't go grabbing each other dicks yet. This game ain't over.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Sit McFadden.
Especially after blowing that block.
Especially after blowing that block.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Fucking Cassel had Chambers WIDE ASS OPEN underneath on that play...instead he throws the motherfucker into triple coverage and gets picked.
FUCK.
FUCK.
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
KC should easily be up 3 scores by now, but they're letting them hang around. That might come back to bite them in the 2nd half, but Oakland looks so inept on offense, I doubt it. KC defense is pretty strong. Remind me of how the 'duhs scored 92 points the last 2 games?
Charles need to carry the ball more, Jones less.
Charles need to carry the ball more, Jones less.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Thank God for the Fat Kicker....and how the fuck does McGraw drop a SURE pick???
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
I've always thought that if all of the parole officers in the Oakland area would deny their parolees from spending Sunday afternoons at Raider games, that the stadium would be empty.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
That's still considered a horse collar.KC Scott wrote:Another bad call (we'll take it) on that horse collar tackle. The 'duh had the back of his jersey
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Wrong again, fuckwit.
• All players are prohibited from grabbing the inside collar of the back of the shoulder pads or jersey, or the inside collar of the side of the shoulder pads or jersey, and immediately pulling down the runner. This does not apply to a runner who is in the tackle box or to a quarterback who is in the pocket. Penalty: Loss of 15 yards.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Pulling a player down from the back or side by grabbing the inside of the pads OR JERSEY is the NFHS rule. The NFL rule may be different and, if so, that was a bad call because the defender obviously had nothing but Moeaki's jersey.KC Scott wrote:I'm glad you don't ref our gamesMace wrote:That's still considered a horse collar.KC Scott wrote:Another bad call (we'll take it) on that horse collar tackle. The 'duh had the back of his jersey
•The horse-collar tackle is an American football maneuver in which a defender tackles another player by grabbing the back-inside of an opponent's shoulder pads from behind and yanking the player down.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse-collar_tackle
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
KC Scott wrote:yea, I'm sure cable is gonna make some awesome halftime adjustments:
"D-Mac - don't fumble"
"Bushman - Break some tackles"
'"defense - make some tackles"
shit like that
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
The Primer & Soot have committed 13 penalties thus far...and we're only midway through the 3rd quarter. Keep up the good work, fellas. We'll reap the benefits.
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Upon further review, Scott............and from the Wiki link you cited.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse-collar_tackleThe rule was expanded to include the back of the jersey collar in 2006. The rule, with modifications, was adopted in college and high school football in 2008 and 2009, respectively.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
What the hell are you talking about, fat boy?Paul wrote:The Primer & Soot
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Are you really THAT stupid?Screw_Michigan wrote:What the hell are you talking about, fat boy?Paul wrote:The Primer & Soot
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
They expanded the rule in 2006 to include pulling down by the jersey collar. See my previous post. The official made the correct call...and so did I.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Shut the fuck up, asshole.KC Scott wrote:I can't find the NFL official rulebook beacuse it's not published - just wiki shit and a dozen blogs
I guess that's one way to defend any decisions they make - never actually publish the rules so anyone can read them
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/160078 ... TWRTK1F093
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Gee Raydahs...that's TOO BAD you couldn't challenge that fumble on the return.....BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
TOUCHDOWN....KANSAS CITY!!!!
Suck on THAT, Faydahs....Committment to Excrement, indeed!![hfal :hfal:](./images/smilies/flipa.gif)
Suck on THAT, Faydahs....Committment to Excrement, indeed!
![hfal :hfal:](./images/smilies/flipa.gif)
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
The Wiki page was correct on the expanded rule being adopted by college and high school rules and, since the defender clearly had only Moeaki's jersey, the Wiki page must be correct on the NFL rule as well.KC Scott wrote:That's what it says on a wiki page - but I want to see the actual wording in the NFL rulebookMace wrote:They expanded the rule in 2006 to include pulling down by the jersey collar.
Good luck finding that link beacuse it doesn't exist
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Well, since the Wiki page says the rule was expanded in 2006 to include the jersey collar, and the official called the play that way, I think any rational person would deduce that the ref was correct....especially when the NCAA and NFHS have adopted the same language in their rules, albeit a few years later. That, and the fact that absolutely no one on the field or sideline bitched about the call, even though it was totally obvious that the defender had nothing but the collar of the jersey, and no pads.KC Scott wrote:You do know how wiki works, don't you?Mace wrote: the Wiki page must be correct on the NFL rule as well.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
If that's true, you'd be right, but that's not what I saw.KC Scott wrote:That's the thing, he didn't have him by the collar, he just had a handful of of the back of the jerseyMace wrote: even though it was totally obvious that the defender had nothing but the collar of the jersey, and no pads.
In other news, the Chiefs are trying to piss this one down their legs.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Paul, are you still laughing? Is your belly still jiggling? Jani's belly is. :)
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
- ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 5532
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: The corner of get a map and fuck off.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
RACK the RedZone Channel. Pretty much got to see the last quarter + OT of this gritty game. Not exactly well played, but fun to watch nonetheless. Much more fun than watching the Patriots get their shit pushed in.
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
Looks like dried out buffet chicken is gonna be moist with tears tonight.
Suck it KC. 3-0 in division
![BODE :bode:](./images/smilies/mad_bode.jpg)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Suck it KC. 3-0 in division
![BODE :bode:](./images/smilies/mad_bode.jpg)
Re: Raiders/ Chiefs- in game
This is so funny.Paul wrote:The Primer & Soot have committed 13 penalties thus far...and we're only midway through the 3rd quarter. Keep up the good work, fellas. We'll reap the benefits.
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)