Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins...
Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins...
...or Donovan McNabb has an 8x10 glossy of Allen in a gimp suit with a zippered mouth.
There's no other way to explain this:
McNabb signs $78 million extension
And $40 million guaranteed?!
There's no other way to explain this:
McNabb signs $78 million extension
And $40 million guaranteed?!
Moving Sale wrote: I could easily have an IQ of 40
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
OCmike wrote:...or Donovan McNabb has an 8x10 glossy of Allen in a gimp suit with a zippered mouth.
There's no other way to explain this:
McNabb signs $78 million extension
And $40 million guaranteed?!
Pretty simple to explain actually. When McNabb feels like his vagina has been bruised he makes his current team pay him. Eagles did it and now the skins did.. they just added a few extra zeros to the deal.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
78 million with 40 million guaranteed for 33 yr old DUHnovan McNubb is HILARIOUS.
Yeah, you're the boss, Dan, we get it.
Rat = one and done.
Yeah, you're the boss, Dan, we get it.
Rat = one and done.
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
Unbelievably ludicrous.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
McNabb has two good years left. If you cut him after two, that's $20 mill per season. Now watch them not improve the OL and let their investment go to waste.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
Sounds about right for the 28th rated passer in the league.
:paul: :paul: :paul:
:paul: :paul: :paul:
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
Skinnies taking it up the shitpipe right now. Way to come out flat, assholes.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
All that commitment to some washed up lowlife POS.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
maybe he's got McDaniels lined up to trade for himpoptart wrote:78 million with 40 million guaranteed for 33 yr old DUHnovan McNubb is HILARIOUS.
Yeah, you're the boss, Dan, we get it.
Rat = one and done.
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
Well since you put i that way...it's still stupid. To put it in perspective, Peyton Manning's cap number for 2010 is $21 million.Screw_Michigan wrote:McNabb has two good years left. If you cut him after two, that's $20 mill per season.
Moving Sale wrote: I could easily have an IQ of 40
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
Exactly. I'm not making excuses for the decision, trust me.OCmike wrote:Well since you put i that way...it's still stupid. To put it in perspective, Peyton Manning's cap number for 2010 is $21 million.Screw_Michigan wrote:McNabb has two good years left. If you cut him after two, that's $20 mill per season.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
Update from PFT: Looks like only $3.5 mil is guaranteed if Skins cut him loose after the season.
On Monday, ESPN’s Michael Smith reported that McNabb and the Redskins “have agreed to a five year extension, worth 78 million, 40 guaranteed.”
No one believed that McNabb was getting $40 million guaranteed. But since Smith and ESPN wanted to be first to report the news of the extension, they passed along the phony contract numbers on a don’t ask/don’t tell basis.
Now, Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that McNabb’s deal includes only $3.5 million in guaranteed money.
So Smith and ESPN were wrong, to the tune of $36.5 million. And now Schefter and ESPN are right.
McNabb can get another $10 million in the form of a 2011 option bonus, if the Redskins opt to pay it. If the team that decided to bench McNabb for Rex Grossman only 15 days ago decides after Week 17 that Donovan isn’t the long-term answer, McNabb will be traded or cut.
Beyond that, McNabb has non-guaranteed base salaries of $2.5 million in 2011, $12.75 million in 2012, $13 million in 2013, $13.75 million in 2014, and $13.55 million in 2015. The total base salaries for No. 5 over five years? $55.55 million.
He can also earn roster bonuses of $250,000 in 2010, $750,000 in 2011, $750,000 in 2012, $1.5 million in 2013, $3 million in 2014, and $2.25 million in 2015 if he’s on the active roster for each game in each year. That’s another $8.5 million. To get to that number, however, McNabb has to not miss a single game due to injury. In five years.
So it’s not a $78 million contract. And it’s not even close to $40 million guaranteed.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
3.5 million or 40 million...who really cares? Just a rounding error, right? Solid journalism from Smith (who should be unemployed this morning).Screw_Michigan wrote:Update from PFT: Looks like only $3.5 mil is guaranteed if Skins cut him loose after the season.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
You kidding? This is ESPN we are talking about. Who cares if it's sensationalistic bullshit? They got to "break" the story twice. The punishment in Bristol for journalism like that is your own collumn and/or a guest host spot on PTI.mvscal wrote:Solid journalism from Smith (who should be unemployed this morning).
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
I would consider it punishment to have to appear on a show with Jay Marriotti and Woody Paige.R-Jack wrote:You kidding? This is ESPN we are talking about. Who cares if it's sensationalistic bullshit? They got to "break" the story twice. The punishment in Bristol for journalism like that is your own collumn and/or a guest host spot on PTI.mvscal wrote:Solid journalism from Smith (who should be unemployed this morning).
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
Are you kidding me? Around the Horn rules!
Sin,
MgoTardTimeSpecial
Sin,
MgoTardTimeSpecial
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
Redskins-Eagles pregame scuffle only fired up Philadelphia and exposed Washington
...the Redskins topped themselves on Monday night when several of them went out of their way to pick a yelling, shoving match with the Eagles long before kickoff. Eventually both teams were one big scrum on the Eagles' sideline.
By the time the insults, curses and pushes had been broken up by officials, with some Redskins like DeAngelo Hall and Santana Moss still screaming as if they'd driven an enemy off their sacred turf, the Eagles went to their locker room with smoke coming out of their ears.
Like they say in the schoolyard, the Redskins started it, but the Eagles finished it. One play into the second quarter, the Eagles led 35-0.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 00023.html
![Shakes head :pickle:](./images/smilies/pickle.gif)
The usual suspects, I see. Just when you thought that beatdown couldn't have been any more embarassing...
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
Outside of being Jay Cutler's favorite reciever, DeAngelo Hall is utter shit in every aspect of life.
He can't even pick a fight without fucking it up.
He can't even pick a fight without fucking it up.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
I saw the fight. They were showing it on the local pre-game show. It was all Landry. DeAngelo came out of the tunnel to help out.R-Jack wrote:Outside of being Jay Cutler's favorite reciever, DeAngelo Hall is utter shit in every aspect of life.
He can't even pick a fight without fucking it up.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
Oh, you mean the dumbass who got scorched by an 80 yard bomb on the first play of the game?Screw_Michigan wrote:I saw the fight... It was all Landry.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
![Image](http://i55.tinypic.com/2nhf4no.gif)
Another "great" signing by the Skins. Had this fat fuck gotten off the ground he might have kept Herrimeans engaged long enough for the other guy to sack or hurry Vick and prevent a TD.
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
well Jim, he had a great initial burst.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
If I didn't know better, I'd think the Skins are trying to overtake the Lions as the worst NFL franchise. If you can't beat 'em, become them.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
No kidding, but still not the Lions.Shoalzie wrote:If I didn't know better, I'd think the Skins are trying to overtake the Lions as the worst NFL franchise. If you can't beat 'em, become them.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
At least the Lions never had any delusions of relevance.Shoalzie wrote:If I didn't know better, I'd think the Skins are trying to overtake the Lions as the worst NFL franchise. If you can't beat 'em, become them.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Either Bruce Allen really hates working for the Redskins
mvscal wrote:At least the Lions never had any delusions of relevance.Shoalzie wrote:If I didn't know better, I'd think the Skins are trying to overtake the Lions as the worst NFL franchise. If you can't beat 'em, become them.
No, that's LionFan. I think the phrase "Turning the Corner" is crocheted on a pillow in every delusional fan's house. I think they're better than before but before, they were the worst team in NFL history. You can only go up from there but they've got several atmospheres to pass before the Lions are relevant again. I think they've improved from god-awful to just being flat out bad.