Big Ten won't engage in further expansion

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Post Reply
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Big Ten won't engage in further expansion

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

According to their recent news release, anyway.

http://www.bigtennetwork.com/dpp/sports ... n-20101205
Big Ten Won't Engage in Futher Expansion
Conference does not expect to seek new members

From BigTen.org
Official website
PARK RIDGE, Ill.— The Big Ten Council of Presidents/Chancellors (COP/C) held its winter meetings Sunday in Park Ridge, Illinois. The following statement is issued by the Big Ten office on behalf of the COP/C.

This time last year, the COP/C believed that the time was right for the conference to explore the possibility of conference expansion and Commissioner James E. Delany was asked to provide recommendations for consideration over the next 12 to 18 months. The Big Ten began a thorough, deliberate evaluation and on June 11, 2010, the COP/C unanimously approved an application for membership from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Since that announcement, the conference has been actively engaged in incorporating Nebraska, both academically and athletically, into the fabric of the conference and all parties eagerly await the completed integration which will take effect in July, 2011.

During today’s meeting it was decided that it was appropriate to focus completely on conference affairs at this time. “We have been thoroughly engaged in the process since last December,” said COP/C Chair and Indiana University President Michael McRobbie. “Following detailed discussions at today’s meeting, my colleagues and I can report that we believe that this process has reached its natural conclusion. We are pleased with the addition of Nebraska and look forward to working with our colleagues there in the years ahead.”

Although the conference will continue to monitor the intercollegiate landscape, it will not be actively engaged in conference expansion for the foreseeable future and does not expect to be proactively seeking new members.
You always have to take pronouncements of this sort with a grain of salt. Or two. Or ten. Or a hundred.

But, as a fan of both Notre Dame and college football in general, if they're actually true to their word, I think this is a good thing.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
User avatar
MuchoBulls
Tremendous Slouch
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL

Re: Big Ten won't engage in further expansion

Post by MuchoBulls »

Terry in Crapchester wrote:if they're actually true to their word, I think this is a good thing.
We agree.

Sincerely,
The Big East
Dreams......Temporary Madness
Shoalzie
WingNut
Posts: 14547
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Portland, MI
Contact:

Re: Big Ten won't engage in further expansion

Post by Shoalzie »

If that's the case, then rename the league already! The Pac-10 is updating its name...the Big Ten and Big XII should do an identity swap.
User avatar
MuchoBulls
Tremendous Slouch
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL

Re: Big Ten won't engage in further expansion

Post by MuchoBulls »

Agree with Shoalzie
Dreams......Temporary Madness
Shoalzie
WingNut
Posts: 14547
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Portland, MI
Contact:

Re: Big Ten won't engage in further expansion

Post by Shoalzie »

Sudden Sam wrote:
Shoalzie wrote:If that's the case, then rename the league already! The Pac-10 is updating its name...the Big Ten and Big XII should do an identity swap.
I disagree. I like the way it is now. Makes the Big Ten and Big 12 look much more stupid than the SEC.

What I find funny is SEC is also the acronym for the Security and Exchange Committee considering all the big bread that's thrown around down there...

...ALLEGEDLY!

Most of the conference names don't make a lot of sense. Texas Christian moving to the Big East after being a part of the Western Athletic Conference? That's not a reason to change a name but the move makes no sense for either side. To me, I would've thought the Big XII should've jumped in a grabbed them and found another team to go with them to keep them at 12 teams.
TheJON
Iowa State Grad
Posts: 4546
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:11 pm
Location: Kinnick Stadium by day, Kauffman Stadium by night

Re: Big Ten won't engage in further expansion

Post by TheJON »

Shoalzie wrote:If that's the case, then rename the league already! The Pac-10 is updating its name...the Big Ten and Big XII should do an identity swap.
No way. Big Ten is a brand. Plus, why give up your brand name to a conference that won't exist in 4-5 years anyways?
User avatar
Killian
Good crossing pattern target
Posts: 6414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
Location: At the end of the pub with head in arms

Re: Big Ten won't engage in further expansion

Post by Killian »

Sudden Sam wrote:
Shoalzie wrote:If that's the case, then rename the league already! The Pac-10 is updating its name...the Big Ten and Big XII should do an identity swap.
I disagree. I like the way it is now. Makes the Big Ten and Big 12 look much more stupider than the SEC.
FTFY
"Well, my wife assassinated my sexual identity, and my children are eating my dreams." -Louis CK
Post Reply