Rose Bowl

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:43 pm

Jsc810 wrote:Hard to believe this is even close.

To nonSECBSH's who didn't have a violent bias against non-AQs, it's not a big surprise.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:46 pm

Jsc810 wrote:Hard to believe this is even close. I still think TCU will need a couple of turnovers in the 2nd half in order to win the game.

I didn't think it would be close by halftime either but we'll see if Wisconsin actually does "wear them down" in the 2nd half. I think it would be even more helpful if the Wisconsin secondary would eventually arrive at the Rose Bowl. MGO said it earlier, that the Wisconsin D is not a great defense. Pretty average. They win by controlling the clock, punching it into the endzone, and keeping your offense off the field. Great game so far.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:55 pm

Jsc810 wrote:Hard to believe this is even close.

You do know that TCU is the favorite is this game, right?

douche.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:02 am

Was that the first time they've thrown on 1st down?

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:05 am

I knew they were the favorites and now I see why. I don't get to see much MWC during the season but these guys are the real deal and are getting a chance to prove it to the entire country. A long way to go in this one but TCU has been impressive. Speed kills.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:12 am

Dinsdale wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:Hard to believe this is even close.
To nonSECBSH's who didn't have a violent bias against non-AQs, it's not a big surprise.

Rack

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:00 am

Nice drive but that 2 pt. attempt was lame.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:05 am

Props to TCU. Great gameplan on both sides of the ball. Not sure why Wisky was taking their time on the last drive.

FUCK! FUCK! FUCK!

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:06 am

Game over.

RACK TCU. They really brought their game. No more arguments about their legitimacy.

Mikey wrote:Can't afford to leave points on the field in this one.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:06 am

Oh, and regardless of what Magoo and Southern Sam say, TCU is a better team than Alabama.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:07 am

Goober McTuber wrote:Oh, and regardless of what Magoo and Southern Sam say, TCU is a better team than Alabama.

No question.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:15 am

Goober McTuber wrote:Oh, and regardless of what Magoo and Southern Sam say, TCU is a better team than Alabama.

Nah, the difference in size, speed, strength, and skill was evident.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:19 am

Props to TCU. The better team won the game.....and a hell of a game it was.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:21 am

That was a helluva' football game and I couldn't be happier for TCU gutting out a win against a bigger, stronger team. Whole lotta' heart in that squad.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:22 am

Mace wrote:Props to TCU. The better team won the game.....and a hell of a game it was.

Yeah but they still never deserve to play for a national title because they don't play anyone.

Sin,

Dumbass Sam, JustSuckCocks810

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:22 am

Goober McTuber wrote:Oh, and regardless of what Magoo and Southern Sam say, TCU is a better team than Alabama.

Hard to say if that's true or not, 'cause 'Bama would beat Wisconsin too....and Michigan State already has.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:28 am

Jsc810 wrote:I'm stunned.

If you're so stunned, why did you pick TCU?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:35 am

Jsc810 wrote:If that game is played 10 times, Wisconsin wins 9 of them.

Christ, you're retarded.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:42 am

If UConn beats OU, I'm putting a match to my pick 'em sheet and will never enter another. Okay, that's probably a lie.

Nice job out of the Big 10 today. Jeez, 0 and fucking 5 on New Year's Day. Fuck me runnin'.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:43 am

Mace wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Oh, and regardless of what Magoo and Southern Sam say, TCU is a better team than Alabama.
Hard to say if that's true or not, 'cause 'Bama would beat Wisconsin too

Sure they would, JON.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:44 am

Jsc810 wrote:Because I played lacrosse for TCU and graduated from there.

So you're betting with your heart and not your head, which I can understand and respect. I figured as much.

But that being the case, why this snobbish, imperious attitude towards these supposedly lesser schools? That I can't understand and have zero respect for.

Or maybe you're just trolling, in which case I am completely ambivalent.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:47 am

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:If that game is played 10 times, Wisconsin wins 9 of them.
Christ, you're retarded.

If that game is played ten times the score will be 21-19 ten times.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:48 am

War Wagon wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:Because I played lacrosse for TCU and graduated from there.
So you're betting with your heart and not your head, which I can understand and respect. I figured as much.

But that being the case, why this snobbish, imperious attitude towards these supposedly lesser schools? That I can't understand and have zero respect for.

Or maybe you're just trolling, in which case I am completely ambivalent.

No, he is snobbish and believes that a mid-major can never be good enough to contend for a national title.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:48 am

Goober McTuber wrote:
Mace wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Oh, and regardless of what Magoo and Southern Sam say, TCU is a better team than Alabama.
Hard to say if that's true or not, 'cause 'Bama would beat Wisconsin too
Sure they would, JON.

Yep, I think they would too....and Michigan State already did it (seems you forgot to include that part in your quote).

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:49 am

Mace wrote:Nice job out of the Big 10 today. Jeez, 0 and fucking 5 on New Year's Day. Fuck me runnin'.

But at least Iowa won, so it should all be gravy for you now. I can damn sure tell you that if Mizzou had won, I wouldn't give two shits for either the Big 12 or my picks sheet.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:52 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:the difference in size, speed, strength, and skill was evident.

Yeah, it was.

Save for a couple of positions (sup Julio), TCU is a faster team.

Now depth, on the other hand...

Playing in a BTPCFB conference, and having some tradition (sup MA), and having a rather recent Trinket in your case has its advantages.

Bammer has a whole bunch more bodies to throw at the problem than TCU.

But 22-for-22, TCU is probably faster.

44-for-44, maybe not so much.

The only certainty in that one would be my ass in front of a TV.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:55 am

War Wagon wrote:
Mace wrote:Nice job out of the Big 10 today. Jeez, 0 and fucking 5 on New Year's Day. Fuck me runnin'.
But at least Iowa won, so it should all be gravy for you now. I can damn sure tell you that if Mizzou had won, I wouldn't give two shits for either the Big 12 or my picks sheet.

Oh, I don't really give a shit about how the games come out. My rooting interest for every game is who I picked to win...and I always pick Iowa. Wisconsin and Penn State are the only two that let me down today because they're the only two Big 10 schools I picked to win.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:02 am

Mace wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
Mace wrote:
Hard to say if that's true or not, 'cause 'Bama would beat Wisconsin too
Sure they would, JON.
Yep, I think they would too....and Michigan State already did it (seems you forgot to include that part in your quote).

That game was back in August.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:05 am

Goober McTuber wrote:[That game was back in August.

Or maybe October 2.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:10 am

Nice sense of humor, Gramps. Understandable how that would disappear during the course of the Cockeyes' season.

Montee Ball wound up 4 yards short of being the third 1000 yard rusher on the Badgers this year. Small consolation, I know. Great season nonetheless. At least we're not Iowa.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:12 am

Goober McTuber wrote:Nice sense of humor, Gramps. Understandable how that would disappear during the course of the Cockeyes' season.

Montee Ball wound up 4 yards short of being the third 1000 yard rusher on the Badgers this year. Small consolation, I know. Great season nonetheless. At least we're not Iowa.

You had only two? And here I thought Wisky had a decent running game.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:13 am

Dinsdale wrote:Save for a couple of positions (sup Julio), TCU is a faster team.

Umm, in a word.......no.

I watched both games pretty intently and TCU looked like they were going in slo mo vs Bama. Bama's speed, particularly in the trenches, was vastly more impressive and overwhelming.

Sure, TCU could beat them in an any-give-saturday type situation, but if TODAY'S TCU team matched up with TODAY'S Bama team...it wouldn't even be close. That was one ridiculously fast and physical team.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:16 am

Seen a couple of Bama games this season (OK not TODAY's Bama but the same team) where they actually looked kind of slow (maybe they just weren't in the mood?).

Maybe it depends on who they're playing. TCU looked fast against Wisky. Bama looked fast against MSU.

Hmmm...what does that say about the B10?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:16 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:Save for a couple of positions (sup Julio), TCU is a faster team.
Umm, in a word.......no.

I watched both games pretty intently and TCU looked like they were going in slo mo vs Bama. Bama's speed, particularly in the trenches, was vastly more impressive and overwhelming.

Sure, TCU could beat them in an any-give-saturday type situation, but if TODAY'S TCU team matched up with TODAY'S Bama team...it wouldn't even be close. That was one ridiculously fast and physical team.

You lost worse than we did. Neener-neener.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:17 am

Oh, and TCU #2 in the nation.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:23 am

Goober McTuber wrote:
War Wagon wrote: So you're betting with your heart and not your head, which I can understand and respect. I figured as much.

But that being the case, why this snobbish, imperious attitude towards these supposedly lesser schools? That I can't understand and have zero respect for.

Or maybe you're just trolling, in which case I am completely ambivalent.
No, he is snobbish and believes that a mid-major can never be good enough to contend for a national title.

I'd say TCU would give both Auburn and Oregon a game to remember. Too bad we'll never see that game.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:25 am

I wonder if Jsc rooted against his alma mater just to try and win an internet talking point.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:45 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I wonder if Jsc rooted against his alma mater just to try and win an internet talking point.

I don't give a shit if you went to ITT Technical Institute, you should be homering for them over anyone, including Heaven U, with God, Buddha, and Allah in the backfield, running the Eternal Option.

JSC is deplorable.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:51 am

Papa Willie wrote: Holy fuck - Mgo is SECBSHomering?

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:14 am

Mikey wrote:If you can't beat 'em, join 'em?

Oh, I hate 'em as much as I ever did, but tough not to give credit when it's due. I'm sure most of you didn't watch much of the game, and I can't blame you. Every fucking snap, Bama defenders were in the backfield. And every snap on defense, MSU couldn't get a lick of penetration. Oh, and the injuries...

MSU's starting OLB
MSU's other starting OLB
MSU's starting CB
MSU's best WR
MSU's starting QB
MSU's 2nd string QB

...all left the game due to injury. By the 4th quarter a WR was playing QB. And they weren't fluke injuries, they all got blasted out of the game. There were a couple others too, but those dudes returned. These were game ending injuries. I haven't seen a woodshed beating this bad since MSU played the 95 Huskers. But this one was even worse because they were actually supposed to be competitive.