Should Michael Vick EVER
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Should Michael Vick EVER
be allowed to own a pet? More specifically a dog?
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
I suggest that they start by allowing him a pet rock. If he goes say a year or two without organizing rock fights, then he can have a gold fish or a guppy. Anything higher that that on a taxonomic scale is out.
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
Nice Wolfie. :D
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21785
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
I would have him run (and fund) a pet rescue program. I would stipulate that if he was caught abusing any of these animals, he'd be put away for a at least 10 years which would be long enough to ensure he never ade another dime playing football.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
Tucker Carlson said he should have been executed.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
Are we asking the question from a legal perspective, or from a moral perspective? Because my answer is different, depending.
From a legal perspective, he shouldn't be allowed to own a pet while he's under parole supervision. If the parole board did not include that as a condition of parole, shame on them. Once his parole supervision ends, though, he's free, at least from a legal standpoint, to do anything that wouldn't otherwise be unlawful.
From strictly a moral standpoint, I don't think he should. Then again, that's just my personal opinion, and there's no way to force it on him.
From a legal perspective, he shouldn't be allowed to own a pet while he's under parole supervision. If the parole board did not include that as a condition of parole, shame on them. Once his parole supervision ends, though, he's free, at least from a legal standpoint, to do anything that wouldn't otherwise be unlawful.
From strictly a moral standpoint, I don't think he should. Then again, that's just my personal opinion, and there's no way to force it on him.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
Should a convicted pedophile have sole custody of his young children?
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
For the record I would hope Vick is never able to own a dog, cat or any four legged pet ever again. That being said, I don't see where animals are granted the same rights as humans. I would hope Vick would back off this absurd request and instead use it as a valuable teaching lesson to his kids as to why animal cruelty is wrong. I doubt it.IndyFrisco wrote:Should a convicted pedophile have sole custody of his young children?
I also wish he would learn how to read where a blitz is coming from.
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
So if you had a sister whose pedo husband had shared custody of the little ones, you'd be ok with that? Or only if he played for the fucking eagles? It would be a hell no no brainer. Animals do not deserve the rights as humans, but they don't deserve to be owned by animals which Vick barely qualifies as.jiminphilly wrote:For the record I would hope Vick is never able to own a dog, cat or any four legged pet ever again. That being said, I don't see where animals are granted the same rights as humans. I would hope Vick would back off this absurd request and instead use it as a valuable teaching lesson to his kids as to why animal cruelty is wrong. I doubt it.IndyFrisco wrote:Should a convicted pedophile have sole custody of his young children?
I also wish he would learn how to read where a blitz is coming from.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
- FLW Buckeye
- 2014 T1B FBBL Champ
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:14 am
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
C'mon, he'll make an excellent dog sitter for Ana.
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
Not quite the same, certainly from a legal standpoint.IndyFrisco wrote:Should a convicted pedophile have sole custody of his young children?
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Should Michael Vick EVER
Reading comprehension much? Where the hell am I defending pedo's rights? I'll leave that for Diego. I'm simply talking about the absurd association of humans rights to dog rights. They're not in any way related since there is no equal protection under the law. But to make sure my own my own person view point on the matter was clear I started withIndyFrisco wrote:So if you had a sister whose pedo husband had shared custody of the little ones, you'd be ok with that? Or only if he played for the fucking eagles? It would be a hell no no brainer. Animals do not deserve the rights as humans, but they don't deserve to be owned by animals which Vick barely qualifies as.jiminphilly wrote:For the record I would hope Vick is never able to own a dog, cat or any four legged pet ever again. That being said, I don't see where animals are granted the same rights as humans. I would hope Vick would back off this absurd request and instead use it as a valuable teaching lesson to his kids as to why animal cruelty is wrong. I doubt it.IndyFrisco wrote:Should a convicted pedophile have sole custody of his young children?
I also wish he would learn how to read where a blitz is coming from.
Did you miss that? I'm not defending Vick. Never have, never will.For the record I would hope Vick is never able to own a dog, cat or any four legged pet ever again.