Elton Has a Baby

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:05 pm

I'm sure he already has a buttplug shaped pacifier and his daddys' pinkies up his asshole.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 6:26 pm

Let us, if we can, get past the fact it's two stool-pidgeons, just for a sec...

tossing aside the tosser part, does anyone find it weird that a 70-something year old dude is adopting kids?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 6:35 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:Who the hell okays a kid going to someone that age?

Well, dude has been Knighted, and has probably made at least a half billion dollars in his life -- I ain't shedding too many tears for the kid.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Tue Jan 18, 2011 6:50 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:

This child will be raped.

Because that's what ultra-rich weirdos do. They use their money and influence to cover their heinous crimes.
It's Michael Jackson all over again.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:24 pm

Martyred wrote:

Die in a fertilizer spreading accident.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:25 pm

That's the future Liberace

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:32 pm

BSmack wrote:
Martyred wrote:
Die in a fertilizer spreading accident.

Don't be h8tin' just 'cause your Stealers days are numbered...

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:24 pm

JETS JETS JETS!

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:26 pm

Jsc810 wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:Am I just an old fart who finds things like this a bit too weird?
Those who are opposed to same sex marriage had an opportunity to argue to Judge Walker that children with same sex parents would not become well-adjusted or would have developmental problems.

As the judge noted, that is not what the evidence shows.

Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

...

Michael Lamb, a psychologist, testified as an expert on the
developmental psychology of children, including the
developmental psychology of children raised by gay and lesbian
parents. Lamb offered two opinions: (1) children raised by
gays and lesbians are just as likely to be well-adjusted as
children raised by heterosexual parents; and (2) children of
gay and lesbian parents would benefit if their parents were
able to marry. Tr 1009:23-1010:4.
a. PX2327 Lamb CV: Lamb is a professor and head of the
Department of Social and Developmental Psychology at the
University of Cambridge in England;
b. Tr 1003:24-1004:6; PX2327: Lamb was the head of the
section on social and emotional development of the
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
in Washington DC for seventeen years;
c. Tr 1007:2-1008:8; PX2327: Lamb has published
approximately 500 articles, many about child adjustment,
has edited 40 books in developmental psychology, reviews
about 100 articles a year and serves on editorial boards
on several academic journals;
d. PX2327: Lamb received a PhD from Yale University in 1976.

...

The gender of a child’s parent is not a factor in a child’s
adjustment. The sexual orientation of an individual does not
determine whether that individual can be a good parent.
Children raised by gay or lesbian parents are as likely as
children raised by heterosexual parents to be healthy,
successful and well-adjusted. The research supporting this
conclusion is accepted beyond serious debate in the field of
developmental psychology.
a. Tr 1025:4-23 (Lamb: Studies have demonstrated “very
conclusively that children who are raised by gay and
lesbian parents are just as likely to be well-adjusted as
children raised by heterosexual parents.” These results
are “completely consistent with our broader understanding
of the factors that affect children’s adjustment.”);
b. PX2565 American Psychological Association, Answers to
Your Questions: For a Better Understanding of Sexual
Orientation and Homosexuality at 5 (2008): “ocial
science has shown that the concerns often raised about
children of lesbian and gay parents —— concerns that are
generally grounded in prejudice against and stereotypes
about gay people —— are unfounded.”;
c. PX2547 (Nathanson Nov 12, 2009 Dep Tr 49:05-49:19:
Sociological and psychological peer-reviewed studies
conclude that permitting gay and lesbian individuals to
marry does not cause any problems for children); PX2546
at 2:20-3:10 (video of same).
71. Children do not need to be raised by a male parent and a
female parent to be well-adjusted, and having both a male and
a female parent does not increase the likelihood that a child
will be well-adjusted. Tr 1014:25-1015:19; 1038:23-1040:17
(Lamb). ...

I would be interested in seeing the details of this study.

How large is the pool of kids of G/L couples that have already reached adulthood. And when I say adulthood, I guess I should have said something more like the age of 25-30, which would be a much better gauge of how well adjusted that person is.

I would also like to see the control group. Are they from families that had fertility issues? Such families are probably going to have more successful kids on average because the parents had to do something moer than drink too much tequila to get pregnant.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:22 pm

oh man, somebody needs to wytch that sour-faced TVO head on that baby.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:28 pm

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:30 pm

RACKETH!

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:35 pm

Oh unfucking believable.

BWAHAHAHHAAAA!

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:52 pm

This one...

...I don't even know what to say. I'm sure God will punish me just the same, though.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:29 pm

Martyred wrote:
BSmack wrote:
Martyred wrote:
Die in a fertilizer spreading accident.
Don't be h8tin' just 'cause your Stealers days are numbered...

Wrong choice Marty. Then again, you've been wrong every week. On second thought, keep the lid. It looks good on you.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 11:07 pm

Sudden Sam wrote: And as the kid hits 10-12, EJ and "partner" won't even GARA about it.

What are you talking about? That is when their little hand raised meat puppet will start to become "interesting" to them.

Of course you do have a point. This kid is nothing more than a prop for two old queens playing house together.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:12 am

Papa Willie wrote:
Little kid will be fucking tormented for the rest of time he's in school.

The first junior high school post fight meeting they have to go to after the little one slaps somebody because his friends asked him which of his Daddy's gets in the ass from the other one.

But me thinks that kid never sees a school where that shit would be allowed to go on. That behavior from a well paying student is not going to be tolerated at some high brow limey school.

But the musical background is going to be pretty good though.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:36 am

That child will have gone through more packages than Fed Ex at Christmas before he ever walks his first steps.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:52 am

I doubt Sir Elton will be around when he's in junior high. By then he'll have some evil gay step daddy.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:33 am

Papa Willie wrote:God damn. Rack Marty. :D

Thanks.

I could have also gone with:

The poor kid will have emptied more bags than the TSA by the time he hits kindergarten.

...but I decided not to.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:11 am

The really weird part that I heard when I saw this story on the news a couple of weeks ago was that the child was born on Christmas Day.

So I'm sure you can guess what Sir Elton named him.

Yup, Levon.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:05 am

You seem pretty excited, Gayboyblo. Are you hoping for some sloppy thirds after Sir Elton and his husband have their way with the little knipper?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:12 am

Diego in Seattle wrote:The really weird part that I heard when I saw this story on the news a couple of weeks ago...

Do you use RSS Feeds for these bizarre adult/child sex stories or is it strictly Twitter?

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:50 am

Sudden Sam wrote:Am I just an old fart who finds things like this a bit too weird?

Not any weirder than driving a Hyundai or Kia... or posting the cover of some gossip mag, Supermarket Sam.

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:30 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:I shoulda stuck with the exposed tit pic.

Meh. Either way, it seems you managed to get a boob involved in the thread...

War Wagon wrote:Not any weirder than driving a Hyundai or Kia... or posting the cover of some gossip mag, Supermarket Sam.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:13 pm

Ana Ng wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:I shoulda stuck with the exposed tit pic.
Meh. Either way, it seems you managed to get a boob involved in the thread...

Why don't we get both of yours involved.

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:33 pm

I think what I'm supposed to post here is....

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:33 pm

War Wagon wrote:...Supermarket Sam.

~giggle~

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:44 pm

Ana Ng wrote:I think what I'm supposed to post here is....

What you're supposed to post here is a fresh photo of your magnificent ta-tas.

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:07 pm

Here. I took this last Sunday while I was watching the Jets game. Believe it or not, I was trying to show off my green argyle socks.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:30 pm

Those socks go really swell with your sweater meat. Très chic...

.
.
.

I think. Or perhaps I am just imagining the socks.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:33 pm

Ana Ng wrote:Here. I took this last Sunday while I was watching the Jets game. Believe it or not, I was trying to show off my green argyle socks.

If you could have tucked feet behind your ears, I think it might have worked. Maybe next time.

Thank you, Ana.

pron · Post by **pron** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:39 pm

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:46 pm

WHOA!

HOLY GUACAMOLE!

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:14 pm

Hey, thanks.

Tell me what # wife you're on, and I'll tell you if SHE was the one that was "crazy".

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:17 pm

No beergoggles needed there.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:28 pm

Ana Ng wrote:

The only 2 DNA suspect "males" that would be offended by this nice wholesome pic would be TiVO and Pedo.

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:09 am

Papa Willie wrote:I'd probably just get an erection and chase her around with it. I don't think she'd have any idea how fast I can move, either. :D

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Tue Jan 25, 2011 12:39 am

Ana Ng wrote:Here. I took this last Sunday while I was watching the Jets game. Believe it or not, I was trying to show off my green argyle socks.

You could be fatter, but not by much, but you could not be any uglier.

Thanks for ruining my dinner.

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Tue Jan 25, 2011 12:49 am

How much do you charge to haunt a house?

I wish I had your nose full of nickels.