A teacher who advises colleagues on how to avoid affairs with students was caught having sex with a teenager in the back of her car.
Courtney Bowles was found by a police officer naked lying on top of the boy, who was also completely naked, from her school in Colorado.
A partly consumed bottle of vodka was also found in the car with the couple.
Her student lover initially said he was 20 years old - but later admitted he was 16.
Bowles,31,was employed at his school as a teacher's instructional coach. It was her job to trains teachers on how to maintain a professional distance from students.
Unfortunately for the teacher, the evidence of her dalliance with the student was rather overwhelming when a police patrol spotted a lone car parked in a park in the town of Loveland.
When an officer shone his torch into the car he saw they were having sex.
According to an arrest report the officer wrote: 'The female was on top of the male and she quickly jumped off of the male when she saw my flashlight shining into the vehicle.
'I told both subjects that I could see they were naked and they needed to get dressed and talk to me.'
Investigators said the boy initially told the officer he was 20 years old, but when asked for identification he produced a school ID card that showed him to be 16.
The officer also found a bottle of vodka inside the vehicle.
Bowles, a mother of two, was booked into the Larimer County Detention Centre on charges of sexual assault, sex assault of a child by a person in a position of trust and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
She was released on $50,000 bail but not allowed contact with anyone aged under 18 years of age, including her own children - both girls.
Counsellors were called into the Mountain View High School where she worked to help any children troubled by the arrest.
She faces up to ten years in jail if convicted of all the offences and placed on a sex offenders register for life.
Sounds like another great reason to get married and have kids by the time you're 24.
kcdave wrote: ↑Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
It's uncanny--as you scroll through the roster of Hot Teachers--that they tend to look alike. And this one's no exception. They're all pretty good looking, usually blond, young, nuts, and horny. The crazy bitch in New Hampshire who had the school kids whack her dim bulb hubby is a fav. An excellent Nicole Kidman flick was made in her honor--To Die For.
"Hot"???? That's one word that did not cross my mind when I viewed the pics. Instead, I wondered just how hard up that 16 year old boy had to be to nail that bitch.
Mace wrote:"Hot"???? That's one word that did not cross my mind when I viewed the pics. Instead, I wondered just how hard up that 16 year old boy had to be to nail that bitch.
Damn dude. Never pegged an old guy from Anyfuck, Iowa to have such high standards. The mug shot isn't so attractive (no shocker there) but the other two pics of her are ok. Not exactly hottie material, but I'd at least put her in the "cute" category. And certainly boneable after anywhere from 0 - 6 beers.
Ana Ng wrote:Jesus fuck. Retreat to your toy bin and find your issue of the "daily growl" to chew on, you morsel of a man.
I see, so it ok for you to call someone a pedo but not ok for me to do it. So is there a reason my post got your bedsheet sized panties in a bunch? Hitting a little to close to home? Daddy a little TOO nice to you when you were young? You a little TOO nice to the paperboy recently? Go ahead. Let it out. Tell us... errrrr me all about it. I promise not to tell.
Mace wrote:"Hot"???? That's one word that did not cross my mind when I viewed the pics. Instead, I wondered just how hard up that 16 year old boy had to be to nail that bitch.
Bwwhaaaa...a 16 year old boy gets that snatch anywhere close and he is nailing it..beats jerking off like the rest of his home boys are probably doing about now.
I mean most 16 year old's would fuck a lot uglier and fatter chick than that versus jerking off..duh...
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Mace wrote:"Hot"???? That's one word that did not cross my mind when I viewed the pics. Instead, I wondered just how hard up that 16 year old boy had to be to nail that bitch.
Bwwhaaaa...a 16 year old boy gets that snatch anywhere close and he is nailing it..beats jerking off like the rest of his home boys are probably doing about now.
I mean most 16 year old's would fuck a lot uglier and fatter chick than that versus jerking off..duh...
what i was thinking. she's not smoking hot, by any stretch, but plenty hot enough for any 16 year old to be all over.
mace, you would have been all over that as a 16 year old any you know it, assuming you are heterosexual, or even bi.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Mace wrote:"Hot"???? That's one word that did not cross my mind when I viewed the pics. Instead, I wondered just how hard up that 16 year old boy had to be to nail that bitch.
Damn dude. Never pegged an old guy from Anyfuck, Iowa to have such high standards. The mug shot isn't so attractive (no shocker there) but the other two pics of her are ok. Not exactly hottie material, but I'd at least put her in the "cute" category. And certainly boneable after anywhere from 0 - 6 beers.
Sin,
heterosexuals
She's neither "hot" OR "cute".....but maybe boneable after 8-12 beers. I'll give you that.
smackaholic wrote:that's boneable material for most any sober heterosexual.
It might be if you're looking for your first piece of ass. Otherwise, I'd have to be intoxicated to hit on something that looks like that at closing time.
i suspect that when she's dressed up and not uner arrest, she's reasonably hittable.
Uh, yeah. Such a pic is in this very thread. There's nothing wrong with that chick. I mean, they can't all be perfect 10s. I guess Mace managed to pull the only super model in Bumfucktown, Iowa.
smackaholic wrote:dude, you are looking at jail mugshot pics. these tend to not be so flattering.
i suspect that when she's dressed up and not uner arrest, she's reasonably hittable.
Should I ever see those pics, I might change my opinion. Or maybe if she has a knock out body that we can't see from the pics. Whatever, she's definitely not a hottie.....which is probably why she had to settle for a 16 yr old boy. If she's so hot, why'd she marry that ugly fucking doucher?
Nobody said she was "so hot" (except for maybe LTS), we're saying she's boneable. Big diff. Boneable generally = reasonably cute, no glaring deformities, and not a complete heffer. Unless you're into that sort of thing.
I didn't say she was butt ugly either, but she's not hot by any means. And, yes, LTS is the one who referred to her as "hot", and my initial response was to his post. I'd need to see some better pics before I described her as boneable without being intoxicated. To each his own, I guess.
i'd like to ask that cop to truthfully answer what would he have done were he that 16 year old?
we all know that pretty much every 16 year old hetero male on the planet, even mace would have kncked the bottom out of that, given the chance and would have worn an ear to ear grin for the rest of the year. they would have also told all their pals and anyone else who would listen for say, ohhh, prolly the rest of their lives.
so, rather than just let this kid live out his dream, he cock blocks him and ruins the career and maybe life of some broad.
fukk that cockblocking bastard.
and anyone that says what if it was a 31 year old dude and 16 year old chick, my reply would be, "it wasn't". and yes, there is a big fukking difference.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
and anyone that says what if it was a 31 year old dude and 16 year old chick, my reply would be, "it wasn't". and yes, there is a big fukking difference.
No, there is absolutely no difference, but I'd like to hear your explanation of why you think it is.
smackaholic wrote:and anyone that says what if it was a 31 year old dude and 16 year old chick, my reply would be, "it wasn't". and yes, there is a big fukking difference.
No, there isn't. A 16 year old knows whether or not she wants to suck a dick. As long as there is no force or coersion involved I really couldn't care less.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
smackaholic wrote:and anyone that says what if it was a 31 year old dude and 16 year old chick, my reply would be, "it wasn't". and yes, there is a big fukking difference.
No, there isn't. A 16 year old knows whether or not she wants to suck a dick. As long as there is no force or coersion involved I really couldn't care less.
And in both cases the adult goes to prison.....as they should.
A teacher using their position/power over a student to manipulate them into having sex is wrong on many levels. Despite what you say, a 16 year old boy isn't mature enough to consider the consequences and is only looking to get laid by anything with two legs and a pair of tits. The adult in that position has to be responsible enough to recognize the consequences of such an act and should be held accountable when they cross the line.
Moving Sale wrote:Remember Mace you typing to a guy who thinks Sgt Simpson did no wrong. Tread lightly.
Yeah, and he's also a guy who thinks it's okay to shoot politicians, so I'm not really expecting the moron to grasp what's wrong with a teacher having sex with a student. Kind of an uphill battle for him to grasp common sense and decency....let alone the law of the land.
Mace wrote:A teacher using their position/power over a student to manipulate them into having sex is wrong on many levels.
Certainly unethical, unprofessional and worthy of termination but criminal? That's ridiculous.
Despite what you say, a 16 year old boy isn't mature enough to consider the consequences and is only looking to get laid by anything with two legs and a pair of tits.
And?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
KC Scott wrote:He also doesn't seem to grasp the meaning of statutory since age of consent is 17 in most states
Ever had a blow job in the state of Missouri prior to 2006? Guess you didn't grasp the meaning of stautory either. It's OK, though. Your hypocrisy is well known.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
"And" it's against the law. "And" it carries a mandatory prison sentence in Iowa. That's reason enough....along with the reasons I've already given you. If you think it's okay for a 29 year old to have sex with a 16 year old, fine, go out and pick up a teenager.
