ALL TIME BEST!

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:18 pm

before the start of the new college season, lets just go over the best ever. without a doubt, 95 nebraska is the all time jauggerrnaut, period, end of story.
in fact, no team comes close to sniffing that kind of swagger or smashmouth power or speed. the blackshirts of 95, would have crippled any canes squad of any year.
as it is, the buckeyes of 02 put mcgeehee in the emergency room, and put dorsey in the hospital, and the buckeye defense were girls next to the 95 blackshirts.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:12 pm

Bradhusker is an old poster. I posted with Bradhusker. Bradhusker was a contemporary. Bradhusker tore up the English language. You sir, are not Bradhusker.

But since Bradhusker doesn't exist anymore, feel free to troll away anyway and good luck!

M Club · Post by **M Club** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:02 am

seems like someone diversified away from his schmick troll. the real brad would have submitted a treatise by now on what it means to be a corn fed stud.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:23 am

im the real bradhusker, and I can prove it. :twisted:

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:44 am

bradhusker wrote:im the real bradhusker, and I can prove it. :twisted:

because you are wearing a necklace made of Grant Wistrom's pubic hair?

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:34 am

King Crimson wrote:
bradhusker wrote:im the real bradhusker, and I can prove it. :twisted:
because you are wearing a necklace made of Grant Wistrom's pubic hair?

is that some sort of gay reference? how inappropriate. :twisted:

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:31 pm

anyhow, this was supposed to be a synopsis of the "all time best", not some half-witted op-ed on the validity of "bradhusker", is he? or, isnt he?
ENOUGH!! I am beyond a shadow of any doubt, the ONE, the ONLY, the bona-fide, CORN -FED, BARRELL -CHESTED, gorilla sized hands, 720z eating porterhouse steaks, "beat the snot out of hurricane sissies at the 95 orange bowl", BRADHUSKER!!!!!!!! dammitt!
now, that being said, can we pleese get on with the "ALL TIME BEST" debate?
thanks,

heres my top ten,

95 nebraska
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

now, I know that 2 thru ten is empty, and to be honest, its because 95 nebraska was so frightenning scary, that no other team can compare,
just sayin, :twisted:

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Jul 03, 2011 7:04 pm

Jsc810 wrote: Oklahoma 1974

team averaged forcing 6 turnovers a game. 6. averaged. for every 4 there was an 8. coaches claim Lee Roy Selmon was blocked off his feet one time in 4 years at OU.

though, if you had to choose one OU team. Wilkinson's 56 team is probably the one most OU fans would choose. that team records 6 shutouts. 3 to open the season, 4 of the first 5 games. it's October 20th before anyone scores against the 56 Sooners. and then November 3 when the next team scores.

scoring avg, 47-5. beat Texas, Notre Dame (in South Bend) and Nebraska by a combined score of 139-6.

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:34 am

Jsc810 wrote:Shut the fuck up and have some respect.

As to the #1 of all time, there is no doubt: the 1945 Army team.

Obviously you need an education, so go read up and then come back, and try to make a case for your 95 team to be #2.

Maybe your 95 team makes #5, behind
Army 1945
Miami 2001
USC 1972
Oklahoma 1974

Maybe.

Wheres 79 USC on that list? Charles White, Marcus Allen, Anthony Munoz, Ronnie Lott, Dennis Smith, Bruce Matthews. No other college football team in history had the talent that team had. Look how many are hall of famers

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:57 am

Jsc810 wrote:Shut the fuck up and have some respect.

As to the #1 of all time, there is no doubt: the 1945 Army team.

Obviously you need an education, so go read up and then come back, and try to make a case for your 95 team to be #2.

Maybe your 95 team makes #5, behind
Army 1945
Miami 2001
USC 1972
Oklahoma 1974

Maybe.

Jsc810, are you on crack? 1945 army? do you know what the average size of the man was back then? do you know that venus and serena william are bigger, stronger and faster than the men on that 1945 army team? did ya know that?
NOW, with that knowledge that I just gave you, you do understand that 1995 nebraska would not only dry fuck that army team, BUT LEAVE THEM FOR DEAD!
NEXT, I noticed you had 2001 miami up there? GUESS WHAT? I saw the ohio st. buckeyes put willis mcgeehee in the emergency ward, and knock that pussy ken dorsey THE FUCK OUT! yeah, thats right, willis was hit so hard, they made him cry like a lil' girl, and dorsey was sacked so many times, he spent the night in the hospital, so, POINT BEING, if the sissy buckeyes are gonna beat the pussy canes, WHAT WILL THE 95 BLACKSHIRTS DO? I'll tell ya, ya crap-for-brains-sissymary, 95 nebraska would hospitalize your pussy canes, as for the other teams on your list? BIG JOKE! your entire list is a JOKE, 95 nebraska was roided up, they had 6, count em' 6 convicted felons on that squad!! thats called SWAGGER!! I guess your too young to remember that the 95 nebraska football team not only beat teams, they hospitalized em! its called SWAGGER! cock and balls football! steroids, HUGE MONSTERS! the all time jauggernaut!! ya dumb moron! :twisted:

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 12:57 pm

Jsc810 wrote:brad you probably should just shut up now before you embarrass yourself further.

It is obvious that you haven't read about the 45 Army team. And oh, there was a small event going on in the world around that time. Which made the best athletes go to one school unlike as ever happened before or since.

Your point about athletes now being bigger and stronger is stupid. Yes, pretty much any major college program today probably could beat Lombardi's Packers, but that doesn't change the fact that he fielded some of the best all time NFL teams.

There is 1945 Army.

And then there is everyone else.

look, I guess we agree to disagree then, BUT, I personally watched the 95 nebraska cornhuskers play on field week after week, and you know what I learned from that experience? by halftime, opposing teams didnt want to walk back out on the field of play. by halftime, Dr. Tom Osborne put in the 3rd and 4th string. by half time, opposing squads were physically and mentally beat the fuck up.
DO you realize just how frightenning strong, BIG, fast, and mean that team was? they werent just great on defense, they had a mean streak to them, their swagger was menacing. When you talk size and strength, they had no equal. they had speed at every position, on BOTH sides of the ball they had the ability to crush you, and, this is why Dr. Tom routinely played his 3rd and 4th string.

one thing I know for sure, that 1945 army team was good, probably great, BUT, when it comes to 1995 nebraska, teams actually were scared of them.
opposing players tried to get out of suiting up for the nebraska game. can you say that for 1945 army? I dont think so.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 6:04 pm

Billy Sims should have won the Heisman twice. his ypc was much better than Charles White.

Sims was a much better back. White is getting 30 carries a game at USC. Sims is sharing totes with David Overstreet and Kenny King.

line up Sims in the I with 30 carries per....scary.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:23 pm

King Crimson wrote:Billy Sims should have won the Heisman twice. his ypc was much better than Charles White.

Sims was a much better back. White is getting 30 carries a game at USC. Sims is sharing totes with David Overstreet and Kenny King.

line up Sims in the I with 30 carries per....scary.

who the fuck cares about billy simms? 95 nebraska would have hospitalized him, you want to talk about a great back? Barry Sanders was the best I ever saw/
:twisted:

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:58 pm

bradhusker wrote:
King Crimson wrote:Billy Sims should have won the Heisman twice. his ypc was much better than Charles White.

Sims was a much better back. White is getting 30 carries a game at USC. Sims is sharing totes with David Overstreet and Kenny King.

line up Sims in the I with 30 carries per....scary.
who the fuck cares about billy simms? 95 nebraska would have hospitalized him, you want to talk about a great back? Barry Sanders was the best I ever saw/
:twisted:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8tcxfQ3_bs&NR=1

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 4:28 am

King Crimson wrote:
bradhusker wrote:
King Crimson wrote:Billy Sims should have won the Heisman twice. his ypc was much better than Charles White.

Sims was a much better back. White is getting 30 carries a game at USC. Sims is sharing totes with David Overstreet and Kenny King.

line up Sims in the I with 30 carries per....scary.
who the fuck cares about billy simms? 95 nebraska would have hospitalized him, you want to talk about a great back? Barry Sanders was the best I ever saw/
:twisted:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8tcxfQ3_bs&NR=1

and your point is? so what? we won the game of the century against the faggott sooners, and the mid ninties squads dry raped the sooners on a regular basis, we hung 70 and 73 pts on those faggotts.
70 and 73 pts on the sissy sooners? we brought in the 3rd and 4th string, heck, one year we let some of the girls volleyball squad in for a play or two.
we had a great time hanging 73 points on you sooner fags. :twisted:

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:31 am

Jsc810 wrote:SoCalTrjn, you stupid fuck, go find a thread that asks for the all time also rans. Or maybe a thread that asks for the college team that produced the most NFL players.

This is for the best team of all time.

The 1979 USC team didn't even win the national championship that year.

Dumbass.

The 1978 team went to Bama and kicked the shit out of them< bear cried to the press to get half a national title. The 1979 team was unbeaten but because Bear had mouths full of voter cock again Bama was given the title even though USC would have beaten them head to head again.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:49 pm

bradhusker wrote:
and your point is? so what? we won the game of the century against the faggott sooners, and the mid ninties squads dry raped the sooners on a regular basis, we hung 70 and 73 pts on those faggotts.

everybody dry-fucked OU in the mid 90's. and what of the 25 years between 71 and 95? When Dr. Tom was 5-12 against Switzer? of the Big 8 heavies, Switzer won 3 NC's and even Bill McCartney won one before Dr. Tom.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 6:52 pm

My honest to god assessment of the best ten college football teams of all time based on their era not what a team from say the 1930s would do against a team from the 1980s or 2000s because the game has changed so much over time:

1. 1945 Army - jsc is right, they were fucking unreal loaded The USMA completely obliterated their competition. Only four teams were even able to score on the Cadets. Notre Dame was easily a top ten team that season and Army used them as toothpicks 48-0, Duke who was a national power at the time got killed by five TDs. Navy was probably easily the second best team in the country that year (both Army and Navy would have wiped their dicks on Alabama's drapes and the fact they claim a title for this season is a complete joke) and Army made pretty damn short work of them in Philly. To me Army 1945 was hands down the best team in CFB history.

2. 1956 Oklahoma - For the same reasons as KC stated about the Sooner defense but something he did not mention was that Paul Hornung won the Heisman trophy only because three Sooners split the votes up among themselves basically. The 1956 Sooners are the only team in CFB history to have had three players finish in the top 5 of the Heisman voting.

3. 2001 Miami - Everyone recalls what that team had. They had players who were back ups who became pro bowlers later. They were just sick loaded.

4. 1923 Michigan - Did not a surrender a single touchdown the entire season; only one team was even able to marshal more than a single field goal.

5. 1949 Notre Dame - Only two teams came within 3 TDs of Notre Dame that season.

6. 1974 Oklahoma - Already been discussed.

7. 1995 Nebraska

8. 1913 Chicago University - Most people will have never heard this team mentioned but it was one of the most dominating defenses in College Football history. Not a single team was able to score more than a TD against them.

9. 1941 Minnesota

10. 1973 Notre Dame

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:37 am

SunCoastSooner wrote:My honest to god assessment of the best ten college football teams of all time based on their era not what a team from say the 1930s would do against a team from the 1980s or 2000s because the game has changed so much over time:

1. 1945 Army - jsc is right, they were fucking unreal loaded The USMA completely obliterated their competition. Only four teams were even able to score on the Cadets. Notre Dame was easily a top ten team that season and Army used them as toothpicks 48-0, Duke who was a national power at the time got killed by five TDs. Navy was probably easily the second best team in the country that year (both Army and Navy would have wiped their dicks on Alabama's drapes and the fact they claim a title for this season is a complete joke) and Army made pretty damn short work of them in Philly. To me Army 1945 was hands down the best team in CFB history.

2. 1956 Oklahoma - For the same reasons as KC stated about the Sooner defense but something he did not mention was that Paul Hornung won the Heisman trophy only because three Sooners split the votes up among themselves basically. The 1956 Sooners are the only team in CFB history to have had three players finish in the top 5 of the Heisman voting.

3. 2001 Miami - Everyone recalls what that team had. They had players who were back ups who became pro bowlers later. They were just sick loaded.

4. 1923 Michigan - Did not a surrender a single touchdown the entire season; only one team was even able to marshal more than a single field goal.

5. 1949 Notre Dame - Only two teams came within 3 TDs of Notre Dame that season.

6. 1974 Oklahoma - Already been discussed.

7. 1995 Nebraska

8. 1913 Chicago University - Most people will have never heard this team mentioned but it was one of the most dominating defenses in College Football history. Not a single team was able to score more than a TD against them.

9. 1941 Minnesota

10. 1973 Notre Dame

HEY suncoast? ive jsut debunked your post, and quite easily I might add, YOU'VE got 95 nebraska at number 7? excuse me a moment,
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! thats the sound of me mocking the crap outta you.

you talk about 2001 miami because of their future NFL talent? really? 94 nebraska physically pushed around their NFL HALL OF FAME TALENT, warren sapp and ray lewis, HALL OF FAME DEFENSE? nebraska ran the friggin rock down their pussy throats in "THEIR HOUSE" no less.
you talk NFL TALENT? miami back then was the boise st. of college football, they didnt play anybody, and had to get up for 2 games, THEN, ken dorsey and willis mcgeehee got their teeth knocked down their girly throats by the ohio st university, mcgeehee was put in the hospital being the pussy he was, and dorsey spent the night in the hospital because the ohio st. defense punched him in the throat all night.

I rate the all time best by who they beat, you think its amazing that army beat notre dame 40-0?? I got that beat!! 95 nebraska beat a 12-0 gator team like they were a bunch of sissy girls!!!!
I'm talking about a gator team loaded with NFL talent, ever heard of fred taylor? huh prick? fred taylor? the guy has over 11,ooo yds rushing in the NFL!
huh punk? did ya know the gators went 12-0 that year? perfect 12-0??? and the gators had something 1945 notre dame didnt have, speed!

you are a total joke, a team is only defined by who they beat. and 95 nebraska went up against a team in the florida gators who had more speed and NFL talent than any team, and the result? 95 nebraska sodomized them, and left em for dead.
FINALLY, your entire post is a joke because no one cares about a team like 1945 army, where the average man is smaller than serena williams.
let me repeat that, the 1945 army squad was filled with players smaller than serena williams, a female tennis player.
serena williams, a girl tennis player is not only bigger than your average man on that army team from 1945, BUT, she is faster and stronger than most of the men on that 1945 army team.
also, and this is HUGE, when nebraska played 12-0 florida for the national title, Dr. Tom not only played the 2nd string, BUT, he also put in the 3rd string, and yes, believe it or not, torward the end, he put in a 4th string freshman QB, who took a knee, rather than score again.
in contrast, 1845 army played their entire first team for the entire game.
how do dem apples taste? huh? :twisted:

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Wed Jul 06, 2011 11:28 am

bradhusker wrote:
SunCoastSooner wrote:My honest to god assessment of the best ten college football teams of all time based on their era not what a team from say the 1930s would do against a team from the 1980s or 2000s because the game has changed so much over time:

1. 1945 Army - jsc is right, they were fucking unreal loaded The USMA completely obliterated their competition. Only four teams were even able to score on the Cadets. Notre Dame was easily a top ten team that season and Army used them as toothpicks 48-0, Duke who was a national power at the time got killed by five TDs. Navy was probably easily the second best team in the country that year (both Army and Navy would have wiped their dicks on Alabama's drapes and the fact they claim a title for this season is a complete joke) and Army made pretty damn short work of them in Philly. To me Army 1945 was hands down the best team in CFB history.

2. 1956 Oklahoma - For the same reasons as KC stated about the Sooner defense but something he did not mention was that Paul Hornung won the Heisman trophy only because three Sooners split the votes up among themselves basically. The 1956 Sooners are the only team in CFB history to have had three players finish in the top 5 of the Heisman voting.

3. 2001 Miami - Everyone recalls what that team had. They had players who were back ups who became pro bowlers later. They were just sick loaded.

4. 1923 Michigan - Did not a surrender a single touchdown the entire season; only one team was even able to marshal more than a single field goal.

5. 1949 Notre Dame - Only two teams came within 3 TDs of Notre Dame that season.

6. 1974 Oklahoma - Already been discussed.

7. 1995 Nebraska

8. 1913 Chicago University - Most people will have never heard this team mentioned but it was one of the most dominating defenses in College Football history. Not a single team was able to score more than a TD against them.

9. 1941 Minnesota

10. 1973 Notre Dame
HEY suncoast? ive jsut debunked your post, and quite easily I might add, YOU'VE got 95 nebraska at number 7? excuse me a moment,
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! thats the sound of me mocking the crap outta you.

you talk about 2001 miami because of their future NFL talent? really? 94 nebraska physically pushed around their NFL HALL OF FAME TALENT, warren sapp and ray lewis, HALL OF FAME DEFENSE? nebraska ran the friggin rock down their pussy throats in "THEIR HOUSE" no less.
you talk NFL TALENT? miami back then was the boise st. of college football, they didnt play anybody, and had to get up for 2 games, THEN, ken dorsey and willis mcgeehee got their teeth knocked down their girly throats by the ohio st university, mcgeehee was put in the hospital being the pussy he was, and dorsey spent the night in the hospital because the ohio st. defense punched him in the throat all night.

I rate the all time best by who they beat, you think its amazing that army beat notre dame 40-0?? I got that beat!! 95 nebraska beat a 12-0 gator team like they were a bunch of sissy girls!!!!
I'm talking about a gator team loaded with NFL talent, ever heard of fred taylor? huh prick? fred taylor? the guy has over 11,ooo yds rushing in the NFL!
huh punk? did ya know the gators went 12-0 that year? perfect 12-0??? and the gators had something 1945 notre dame didnt have, speed!

you are a total joke, a team is only defined by who they beat. and 95 nebraska went up against a team in the florida gators who had more speed and NFL talent than any team, and the result? 95 nebraska sodomized them, and left em for dead.
FINALLY, your entire post is a joke because no one cares about a team like 1945 army, where the average man is smaller than serena williams.
let me repeat that, the 1945 army squad was filled with players smaller than serena williams, a female tennis player.
serena williams, a girl tennis player is not only bigger than your average man on that army team from 1945, BUT, she is faster and stronger than most of the men on that 1945 army team.
also, and this is HUGE, when nebraska played 12-0 florida for the national title, Dr. Tom not only played the 2nd string, BUT, he also put in the 3rd string, and yes, believe it or not, torward the end, he put in a 4th string freshman QB, who took a knee, rather than score again.
in contrast, 1845 army played their entire first team for the entire game.
how do dem apples taste? huh? :twisted:

Dude, you're a fucking moron. First of all I am assuming English is not your first language since you fail to comprehend the preface of my statement.

Secondly, 1945 Army played a schedule in which every single team except one was better than .500 and that team was at .500. They played and beat four teams who finished in the top 10 of the country by a combined score of 176-33.

1945 Army beat more teams in the top 10 than Nebraska beat in the top 25. Army only only played 3 teams that did not finish the season ranked. 1995 Nebraska played five teams with losing records and three more who were either 5-5-1 or 6-5.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Wed Jul 06, 2011 12:27 pm

SunCoastSooner wrote:
bradhusker wrote:
SunCoastSooner wrote:My honest to god assessment of the best ten college football teams of all time based on their era not what a team from say the 1930s would do against a team from the 1980s or 2000s because the game has changed so much over time:

1. 1945 Army - jsc is right, they were fucking unreal loaded The USMA completely obliterated their competition. Only four teams were even able to score on the Cadets. Notre Dame was easily a top ten team that season and Army used them as toothpicks 48-0, Duke who was a national power at the time got killed by five TDs. Navy was probably easily the second best team in the country that year (both Army and Navy would have wiped their dicks on Alabama's drapes and the fact they claim a title for this season is a complete joke) and Army made pretty damn short work of them in Philly. To me Army 1945 was hands down the best team in CFB history.

2. 1956 Oklahoma - For the same reasons as KC stated about the Sooner defense but something he did not mention was that Paul Hornung won the Heisman trophy only because three Sooners split the votes up among themselves basically. The 1956 Sooners are the only team in CFB history to have had three players finish in the top 5 of the Heisman voting.

3. 2001 Miami - Everyone recalls what that team had. They had players who were back ups who became pro bowlers later. They were just sick loaded.

4. 1923 Michigan - Did not a surrender a single touchdown the entire season; only one team was even able to marshal more than a single field goal.

5. 1949 Notre Dame - Only two teams came within 3 TDs of Notre Dame that season.

6. 1974 Oklahoma - Already been discussed.

7. 1995 Nebraska

8. 1913 Chicago University - Most people will have never heard this team mentioned but it was one of the most dominating defenses in College Football history. Not a single team was able to score more than a TD against them.

9. 1941 Minnesota

10. 1973 Notre Dame
HEY suncoast? ive jsut debunked your post, and quite easily I might add, YOU'VE got 95 nebraska at number 7? excuse me a moment,
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! thats the sound of me mocking the crap outta you.

you talk about 2001 miami because of their future NFL talent? really? 94 nebraska physically pushed around their NFL HALL OF FAME TALENT, warren sapp and ray lewis, HALL OF FAME DEFENSE? nebraska ran the friggin rock down their pussy throats in "THEIR HOUSE" no less.
you talk NFL TALENT? miami back then was the boise st. of college football, they didnt play anybody, and had to get up for 2 games, THEN, ken dorsey and willis mcgeehee got their teeth knocked down their girly throats by the ohio st university, mcgeehee was put in the hospital being the pussy he was, and dorsey spent the night in the hospital because the ohio st. defense punched him in the throat all night.

I rate the all time best by who they beat, you think its amazing that army beat notre dame 40-0?? I got that beat!! 95 nebraska beat a 12-0 gator team like they were a bunch of sissy girls!!!!
I'm talking about a gator team loaded with NFL talent, ever heard of fred taylor? huh prick? fred taylor? the guy has over 11,ooo yds rushing in the NFL!
huh punk? did ya know the gators went 12-0 that year? perfect 12-0??? and the gators had something 1945 notre dame didnt have, speed!

you are a total joke, a team is only defined by who they beat. and 95 nebraska went up against a team in the florida gators who had more speed and NFL talent than any team, and the result? 95 nebraska sodomized them, and left em for dead.
FINALLY, your entire post is a joke because no one cares about a team like 1945 army, where the average man is smaller than serena williams.
let me repeat that, the 1945 army squad was filled with players smaller than serena williams, a female tennis player.
serena williams, a girl tennis player is not only bigger than your average man on that army team from 1945, BUT, she is faster and stronger than most of the men on that 1945 army team.
also, and this is HUGE, when nebraska played 12-0 florida for the national title, Dr. Tom not only played the 2nd string, BUT, he also put in the 3rd string, and yes, believe it or not, torward the end, he put in a 4th string freshman QB, who took a knee, rather than score again.
in contrast, 1845 army played their entire first team for the entire game.
how do dem apples taste? huh? :twisted:
Dude, you're a fucking moron. First of all I am assuming English is not your first language since you fail to comprehend the preface of my statement.

Secondly, 1945 Army played a schedule in which every single team except one was better than .500 and that team was at .500. They played and beat four teams who finished in the top 10 of the country by a combined score of 176-33.

1945 Army beat more teams in the top 10 than Nebraska beat in the top 25. Army only only played 3 teams that did not finish the season ranked. 1995 Nebraska played five teams with losing records and three more who were either 5-5-1 or 6-5.

dude, its you who are the fuckin moron, and a LIAR to boot, you just said that army played and beat 4 top ten teams which was more than nebraska even beat in the top 25? thats a LIE sooner, BIG LIE. did ya think I would let you get away with a lie like that?
95 nebraska played and beat 4 FINAL TOP TEN TEAMS that season, ALL four teams nebraska beat did indeed finish the season ranked in the final top ten.
BUT, and I digress, the mere fact that you bring up a team with small, slow and weak sissies compared to 95 nebraska, makes me laugh at you.

I laugh at you for lying about nebraska not playing and beating 4 top ten ranked teams, and I laugh at you for bringing up a team which had athletes who were slow small and couldnt bench press 250 pounds.

back then, football was a JOKE, men were not strong like a girl tennis player of today. I find it extremely useless to talk about football teams who couldnt even be on the same field as teams of today, who cares if they dominated back then, when back then, football was a joke, players were so slow, they couldnt even squat 500 pounds, the athletes back then were weak jokes, the game itself was a joke, I watch films of some of their games, and I laugh at how poor the tackling is, back then players sucked, the game was primitave compared to today, PLUS, nebraska faced teams with more speed and talent and athleticism, its light years difference, not even close, and OH, nebraska routinely put in the 3rd and 4th string by halftime, army NEVER DID THAT, in fact, back then, army had to play their first team for pretty much the entire game.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Wed Jul 06, 2011 4:44 pm

bradhusker wrote:dude, its you who are the fuckin moron, and a LIAR to boot, you just said that army played and beat 4 top ten teams which was more than nebraska even beat in the top 25? thats a LIE sooner, BIG LIE. did ya think I would let you get away with a lie like that?
95 nebraska played and beat 4 FINAL TOP TEN TEAMS that season, ALL four teams nebraska beat did indeed finish the season ranked in the final top ten.
BUT, and I digress, the mere fact that you bring up a team with small, slow and weak sissies compared to 95 nebraska, makes me laugh at you.

I laugh at you for lying about nebraska not playing and beating 4 top ten ranked teams, and I laugh at you for bringing up a team which had athletes who were slow small and couldnt bench press 250 pounds.

back then, football was a JOKE, men were not strong like a girl tennis player of today. I find it extremely useless to talk about football teams who couldnt even be on the same field as teams of today, who cares if they dominated back then, when back then, football was a joke, players were so slow, they couldnt even squat 500 pounds, the athletes back then were weak jokes, the game itself was a joke, I watch films of some of their games, and I laugh at how poor the tackling is, back then players sucked, the game was primitave compared to today, PLUS, nebraska faced teams with more speed and talent and athleticism, its light years difference, not even close, and OH, nebraska routinely put in the 3rd and 4th string by halftime, army NEVER DID THAT, in fact, back then, army had to play their first team for pretty much the entire game.

Nebraska played four ranked teams the entire season, yes they all finished in the top 10. Army beat the #2 and #4 teams in the final 1945 AP poll by a combined 80-13. Nebraska gave up more points than Army by half time of the third game than what Army gave up the entire season.

Army played and beat the #2, #4, #6, #8, #9, #13, and #19 teams in the country's final AP poll and only gave up a combined 33 points in all six. Nebraska nearly gave that up to 6-5 Arizona State in 1995.

1945 Army's opponent's combined winning percentage 0.772
1995 Nebraska's opponent's combined winning percentage 0.522 (and it is below five hundred without the addition of Florida to your schedule in the Bowl).

1995' Nebraska's schedule was an outright cake walk compared to 1945 Army's. 1945 Army played one of the most brutal college schedules in the history of College football and completely demolished their opponents.

Army did not give up more than a single touch down in any game they played in 1945. Nebraska gave up at least three or more six different times in 1995.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Wed Jul 06, 2011 5:00 pm

As a neutral party to this topic, I'd say SunCoast has put forth the more persuasive argument. The fact 1945 Army couldn't hang with Northern Illinois today is irrelevant. Everyone already knows that. The only real and fair way to discuss the "all time best" is to look at what a team did within the context of the time that they played. College football, and sports in general, will continue to evolve. Athletes will continue to get better, faster, stronger. This can't be disregarded, and there will come a time when 95 Nebraska will pale in comparison to the dominant teams 50 years from now in terms of these evolving characteristics. When looking objectively at the facts laid out, 1945 Army is clearly favored in this debate over 95 Nebraska.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:05 pm

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:As a neutral party to this topic, I'd say SunCoast has put forth the more persuasive argument. The fact 1945 Army couldn't hang with Northern Illinois today is irrelevant. Everyone already knows that. The only real and fair way to discuss the "all time best" is to look at what a team did within the context of the time that they played. College football, and sports in general, will continue to evolve. Athletes will continue to get better, faster, stronger. This can't be disregarded, and there will come a time when 95 Nebraska will pale in comparison to the dominant teams 50 years from now in terms of these evolving characteristics. When looking objectively at the facts laid out, 1945 Army is clearly favored in this debate over 95 Nebraska.

HOLD ON ONE MINUTE, before you declare sooner the winner in this arguement, just wait. sooner keeps saying that army gave up fewer points, BUT, there is a reason for that, I just got thru explaining that in 1995, nebraska was so dominant, that Dr. Tom was routinely putting in the 3rd and evn 4th string, ARMY played their first team ALL THE GAME!! so its an unfair comparison, for example, in those game nebraska gave up 2 or 3 td/s, its because we were playing the scrubs, the games were over by the half, so Dr. Tom was inserting the scrubs, therefore, sooner is not being forthcoming here, if nebraska is playing their 3rd team defense, then, it is fair to assume that nebraska was more dominant then army, because army played their first team defense for the entire game back then.

are you able to muster the brain cells to follow me here sooner? when 95 nebraska went up big on teams, that was it, Osborne brought in the scrubs, and the scrubs gave up td's, making it look bad, HOWEVER, after careful research, THE first team defense for nebraska was way more dominaant, they gave up nothing, nada, squat, just like 1945 army, BUT, army's defense stayed in for the entire game, otherwise, if army had brought in their scrubs, then they too would have given up points like nebraska did. are you able to follow this logic? or, are you a true ignoramus? :twisted:

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:12 pm

bradhusker wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:As a neutral party to this topic, I'd say SunCoast has put forth the more persuasive argument. The fact 1945 Army couldn't hang with Northern Illinois today is irrelevant. Everyone already knows that. The only real and fair way to discuss the "all time best" is to look at what a team did within the context of the time that they played. College football, and sports in general, will continue to evolve. Athletes will continue to get better, faster, stronger. This can't be disregarded, and there will come a time when 95 Nebraska will pale in comparison to the dominant teams 50 years from now in terms of these evolving characteristics. When looking objectively at the facts laid out, 1945 Army is clearly favored in this debate over 95 Nebraska.
HOLD ON ONE MINUTE, before you declare sooner the winner in this arguement, just wait. sooner keeps saying that army gave up fewer points, BUT, there is a reason for that, I just got thru explaining that in 1995, nebraska was so dominant, that Dr. Tom was routinely putting in the 3rd and evn 4th string, ARMY played their first team ALL THE GAME!! so its an unfair comparison, for example, in those game nebraska gave up 2 or 3 td/s, its because we were playing the scrubs, the games were over by the half, so Dr. Tom was inserting the scrubs, therefore, sooner is not being forthcoming here, if nebraska is playing their 3rd team defense, then, it is fair to assume that nebraska was more dominant then army, because army played their first team defense for the entire game back then.

are you able to muster the brain cells to follow me here sooner? when 95 nebraska went up big on teams, that was it, Osborne brought in the scrubs, and the scrubs gave up td's, making it look bad, HOWEVER, after careful research, THE first team defense for nebraska was way more dominaant, they gave up nothing, nada, squat, just like 1945 army, BUT, army's defense stayed in for the entire game, otherwise, if army had brought in their scrubs, then they too would have given up points like nebraska did. are you able to follow this logic? or, are you a true ignoramus? :twisted:

ummm, MgoBlue? actually, from a physical point of view, the human body will not continue to evolve as you think it will, sure, from the 1940's, athletes are bigger stronger and faster, but, from the mid-nineties to today, we are nearing the end of how much muscle are skeletons can support.

according to doctors today, through strength trainning and nutrition, athletes were able to make great strides in size speed and strength, HOWEVER, there is a limit to how big the human body can get, before its not healthy, the human body cant function when offensive linemen get to the 400 pound plateau, it becomes unhealthy to the point of serious injury or death.

so, I think its fair to assume, that 95 nebraska will be safe from future athletes. I mean, deion sanders from 25 years ago, is faster than the elite athletes of today.
we, as a species are nearing the end of how fast and big we can become, and be healthy enough to actually play, without injury.
:twisted:

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Thu Jul 07, 2011 2:30 pm

bradhusker wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:As a neutral party to this topic, I'd say SunCoast has put forth the more persuasive argument. The fact 1945 Army couldn't hang with Northern Illinois today is irrelevant. Everyone already knows that. The only real and fair way to discuss the "all time best" is to look at what a team did within the context of the time that they played. College football, and sports in general, will continue to evolve. Athletes will continue to get better, faster, stronger. This can't be disregarded, and there will come a time when 95 Nebraska will pale in comparison to the dominant teams 50 years from now in terms of these evolving characteristics. When looking objectively at the facts laid out, 1945 Army is clearly favored in this debate over 95 Nebraska.
HOLD ON ONE MINUTE, before you declare sooner the winner in this arguement, just wait. sooner keeps saying that army gave up fewer points, BUT, there is a reason for that, I just got thru explaining that in 1995, nebraska was so dominant, that Dr. Tom was routinely putting in the 3rd and evn 4th string, ARMY played their first team ALL THE GAME!! so its an unfair comparison, for example, in those game nebraska gave up 2 or 3 td/s, its because we were playing the scrubs, the games were over by the half, so Dr. Tom was inserting the scrubs, therefore, sooner is not being forthcoming here, if nebraska is playing their 3rd team defense, then, it is fair to assume that nebraska was more dominant then army, because army played their first team defense for the entire game back then.

are you able to muster the brain cells to follow me here sooner? when 95 nebraska went up big on teams, that was it, Osborne brought in the scrubs, and the scrubs gave up td's, making it look bad, HOWEVER, after careful research, THE first team defense for nebraska was way more dominaant, they gave up nothing, nada, squat, just like 1945 army, BUT, army's defense stayed in for the entire game, otherwise, if army had brought in their scrubs, then they too would have given up points like nebraska did. are you able to follow this logic? or, are you a true ignoramus? :twisted:

If you were any more full of shit, fecal matter would be falling out your mouth as you spoke.

First of all . . . Nebraska points allowed by quarter over the course of the 1995 season:
1st - 33
2nd - 57
3rd - 39
4th - 45

Nebraska gave up the fewest points in the first quarter and the most in the second, not the third or fourth . . . and that number 33 which you gave up in just the first quarters is how many points Army gave up the entire season!!!

Secondly you're such a moron that you don't even know how the game was played prior to Bud Wilkinson at Oklahoma in the later 1950s revolutionizing separate offensive and defensive groups. You keep blathering on about starters on offense and defense as though there even was such a thing in the 1940s. Let me clue you in, players played both ways and by platoon in the 1940s . . . Army rotated four different platoons in 1945, at a time when most teams just hoped to be able to field two; not the same 22 players all game, they had between 60 and 70 kids they felt comfortable playing at any time. They didn't need excuses about such and such string was in at this time of the game because it didn't matter, they were going to skull fuck you as bad with the third and fourth platoon as the first and did so repeatedly.

Please, just shut the fuck up on this subject now, every time you press the submit button you show yourself even more ignorant and idiotic than the previous. Hang your head and walk the fuck away like the Fuskers are used to in this era of college football.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Thu Jul 07, 2011 8:09 pm

SunCoastSooner wrote:
bradhusker wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:As a neutral party to this topic, I'd say SunCoast has put forth the more persuasive argument. The fact 1945 Army couldn't hang with Northern Illinois today is irrelevant. Everyone already knows that. The only real and fair way to discuss the "all time best" is to look at what a team did within the context of the time that they played. College football, and sports in general, will continue to evolve. Athletes will continue to get better, faster, stronger. This can't be disregarded, and there will come a time when 95 Nebraska will pale in comparison to the dominant teams 50 years from now in terms of these evolving characteristics. When looking objectively at the facts laid out, 1945 Army is clearly favored in this debate over 95 Nebraska.
HOLD ON ONE MINUTE, before you declare sooner the winner in this arguement, just wait. sooner keeps saying that army gave up fewer points, BUT, there is a reason for that, I just got thru explaining that in 1995, nebraska was so dominant, that Dr. Tom was routinely putting in the 3rd and evn 4th string, ARMY played their first team ALL THE GAME!! so its an unfair comparison, for example, in those game nebraska gave up 2 or 3 td/s, its because we were playing the scrubs, the games were over by the half, so Dr. Tom was inserting the scrubs, therefore, sooner is not being forthcoming here, if nebraska is playing their 3rd team defense, then, it is fair to assume that nebraska was more dominant then army, because army played their first team defense for the entire game back then.

are you able to muster the brain cells to follow me here sooner? when 95 nebraska went up big on teams, that was it, Osborne brought in the scrubs, and the scrubs gave up td's, making it look bad, HOWEVER, after careful research, THE first team defense for nebraska was way more dominaant, they gave up nothing, nada, squat, just like 1945 army, BUT, army's defense stayed in for the entire game, otherwise, if army had brought in their scrubs, then they too would have given up points like nebraska did. are you able to follow this logic? or, are you a true ignoramus? :twisted:
If you were any more full of shit, fecal matter would be falling out your mouth as you spoke.

First of all . . . Nebraska points allowed by quarter over the course of the 1995 season:
1st - 33
2nd - 57
3rd - 39
4th - 45

Nebraska gave up the fewest points in the first quarter and the most in the second, not the third or fourth . . . and that number 33 which you gave up in just the first quarters is how many points Army gave up the entire season!!!

Secondly you're such a moron that you don't even know how the game was played prior to Bud Wilkinson at Oklahoma in the later 1950s revolutionizing separate offensive and defensive groups. You keep blathering on about starters on offense and defense as though there even was such a thing in the 1940s. Let me clue you in, players played both ways and by platoon in the 1940s . . . Army rotated four different platoons in 1945, at a time when most teams just hoped to be able to field two; not the same 22 players all game, they had between 60 and 70 kids they felt comfortable playing at any time. They didn't need excuses about such and such string was in at this time of the game because it didn't matter, they were going to skull fuck you as bad with the third and fourth platoon as the first and did so repeatedly.

Please, just shut the fuck up on this subject now, every time you press the submit button you show yourself even more ignorant and idiotic than the previous. Hang your head and walk the fuck away like the Fuskers are used to in this era of college football.

hey sooner? so, you like to make fun of a husker fan in this ERA? ok, I'll play along, since 2000, the last time bob stoops won a title, your sooners have been DRY FUCKED in national bowl games!!! for the last decade, your faggott sooners ahve been embarrassed , humiliated, dry raped, and made into lil' bitches year after year. on the national scene, faggott schools like boise st. have turned you into girls, each year, oklahoma is highly touted, YET, time and time again this past decade, your sooners are HUMILIATED on national tv. YOU GUYS are the JOKE of big time college football, and yet you choose to make fun of nebraska? next time you choose to make fun of another program, turn your eyes inward, and look at your sooner program being bitch-slapped, I mean big time BITCH SLAPPED on national tv, year after year. :twisted:

as for the faggott 1945 army team? lets just say that football from that era is a sissy joke, and leave it at that, I laugh at those slow weak sissies, I can bench press with one hand, what their strongest guy could do in his dreams.
serena williams, a female tennis player, is bigger, stronger and faster than big bad 1945 army, A FUCKIN GIRL FOR CHRIST's SAKE!!!!

im actually talking about a GIRL tennis player here, not even comparing men to men, a fuckin girl is bigger, faster and stronger than the men on that army team, your a joke, you are a joke for even bringing them up.

also, let me repeat, your sooners are a national joke these past ten years, A NATIONAL JOKE!! every year, they get their asses bleeding on national tv,
arse raped by sissy programs like boise st. come bowl time, IN THIS ERA, teams salivate to play your sooners, they have a boner the size of alaska at the mere thought of facing a bob stoops sooner team. year after year, you are a laughing stock.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:11 pm

bradhusker wrote:hey sooner? so, you like to make fun of a husker fan in this ERA? ok, I'll play along, since 2000, the last time bob stoops won a title, your sooners have been DRY FUCKED in national bowl games!!! for the last decade, your faggott sooners ahve been embarrassed , humiliated, dry raped, and made into lil' bitches year after year. on the national scene, faggott schools like boise st. have turned you into girls, each year, oklahoma is highly touted, YET, time and time again this past decade, your sooners are HUMILIATED on national tv. YOU GUYS are the JOKE of big time college football, and yet you choose to make fun of nebraska? next time you choose to make fun of another program, turn your eyes inward, and look at your sooner program being bitch-slapped, I mean big time BITCH SLAPPED on national tv, year after year. :twisted:

Jesus, you really do want to unseat Mtool as this years board bitch don't you . . .

Here I'll help. Since 2000 Oklahoma is 6-2 against the University of Nowledge in Lincoln. Since 2000, Oklahoma has a record of 132-26; Oklahoma's bitch in Lincoln since 2000's record over the same period is 102-48. Since 2000 Oklahoma is 3-5 in BCS Bowl games, and 6-5 in Bowl games period. Since 2000 Little Red is 0-1 in BCS Bowl games and was curb checked every bit as bad by Miami as Oklahoma ever has in its multiple appearances, and it is 5-4 in total bowls. I hope you paid close attention to the fact that Oklahoma's totals equal more than Nebitch in both categories; that's because we can at least get to a BCS Bowl game, and haven't had losing records during that time period to cause us to sit at home in December and January and watch the likes of Iowa State in the Weed Eater Independence Bowl. Since 2000 Oklahoma has seven conference titles. Nebitch has ZERO/Zilch/Nadda. Oklahoma has a national title this century. Nebraska has Zero/Zilch/nil national titles this century and only chance it even sniffed one it got treated like a bitch against Miami.

I love the way you insert Boise State's cock in your mouth for doing what you haven't been able to do . . . beat Oklahoma and win a BCS Bowl game but it's even more laughable that you mention that game because Oklahoma, using a black wide receiver at QB, kicked your ass all over Arrowhead Stadium in the game before that. How was that trip to Dallas against Allbarn for ya again?

The game against West Virginia wasn't fun but I have to imagine it felt a lot better than losing six of our last seven games, going 5-7, giving up more than FORTY POINTS six different times (including a 76 spot against the Fucking Jayhawks

), and only being able to beat Ball State by one point at home like Nebitch did that season.

... also, let me repeat, your sooners are a national joke these past ten years, A NATIONAL JOKE!! every year, they get their asses bleeding on national tv,
arse raped by sissy programs like boise st. come bowl time, IN THIS ERA, teams salivate to play your sooners, they have a boner the size of alaska at the mere thought of facing a bob stoops sooner team. year after year, you are a laughing stock.

Yeah, y'all have been world beaters against the likes of Miami, 7-6 Ole MIss, and 7-6 Washington . . . teams are salivating to see Nebraska, in December not January, not to win a BCS bowl, but just so they can garner a winning record at The Weed Whacker Independence Bowl or Pac Life Holiday Bowl. If Oklahoma is a national joke then Nebitch is at the butt end of the punchline.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:26 pm

I don't need to establish that I hate SuC with extreme passion.

That said, I'd take their '72 squad vs any comers.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:50 am

SunCoastSooner wrote:
bradhusker wrote:hey sooner? so, you like to make fun of a husker fan in this ERA? ok, I'll play along, since 2000, the last time bob stoops won a title, your sooners have been DRY FUCKED in national bowl games!!! for the last decade, your faggott sooners ahve been embarrassed , humiliated, dry raped, and made into lil' bitches year after year. on the national scene, faggott schools like boise st. have turned you into girls, each year, oklahoma is highly touted, YET, time and time again this past decade, your sooners are HUMILIATED on national tv. YOU GUYS are the JOKE of big time college football, and yet you choose to make fun of nebraska? next time you choose to make fun of another program, turn your eyes inward, and look at your sooner program being bitch-slapped, I mean big time BITCH SLAPPED on national tv, year after year. :twisted:
Jesus, you really do want to unseat Mtool as this years board bitch don't you . . .

Here I'll help. Since 2000 Oklahoma is 6-2 against the University of Nowledge in Lincoln. Since 2000, Oklahoma has a record of 132-26; Oklahoma's bitch in Lincoln since 2000's record over the same period is 102-48. Since 2000 Oklahoma is 3-5 in BCS Bowl games, and 6-5 in Bowl games period. Since 2000 Little Red is 0-1 in BCS Bowl games and was curb checked every bit as bad by Miami as Oklahoma ever has in its multiple appearances, and it is 5-4 in total bowls. I hope you paid close attention to the fact that Oklahoma's totals equal more than Nebitch in both categories; that's because we can at least get to a BCS Bowl game, and haven't had losing records during that time period to cause us to sit at home in December and January and watch the likes of Iowa State in the Weed Eater Independence Bowl. Since 2000 Oklahoma has seven conference titles. Nebitch has ZERO/Zilch/Nadda. Oklahoma has a national title this century. Nebraska has Zero/Zilch/nil national titles this century and only chance it even sniffed one it got treated like a bitch against Miami.

I love the way you insert Boise State's cock in your mouth for doing what you haven't been able to do . . . beat Oklahoma and win a BCS Bowl game but it's even more laughable that you mention that game because Oklahoma, using a black wide receiver at QB, kicked your ass all over Arrowhead Stadium in the game before that. How was that trip to Dallas against Allbarn for ya again?

The game against West Virginia wasn't fun but I have to imagine it felt a lot better than losing six of our last seven games, going 5-7, giving up more than FORTY POINTS six different times (including a 76 spot against the Fucking Jayhawks ), and only being able to beat Ball State by one point at home like Nebitch did that season.

... also, let me repeat, your sooners are a national joke these past ten years, A NATIONAL JOKE!! every year, they get their asses bleeding on national tv,
arse raped by sissy programs like boise st. come bowl time, IN THIS ERA, teams salivate to play your sooners, they have a boner the size of alaska at the mere thought of facing a bob stoops sooner team. year after year, you are a laughing stock.

Yeah, y'all have been world beaters against the likes of Miami, 7-6 Ole MIss, and 7-6 Washington . . . teams are salivating to see Nebraska, in December not January, not to win a BCS bowl, but just so they can garner a winning record at The Weed Whacker Independence Bowl or Pac Life Holiday Bowl. If Oklahoma is a national joke then Nebitch is at the butt end of the punchline.

thank you sir, may I have another?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 1:26 pm

Third time's a charm.

l to r
SunCoastSooner, bradhusker

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 2:42 pm

No need for the troll to slink away. He and his corn filled shits can continue to get buttfucked in the mouth by the XII Southerners just like they did going out this past year in every sport.

Still wondering why people feel the need to feed the trolls though....especially when we all know the handler.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 2:55 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:Still wondering why people feel the need to feed the trolls though....especially when we all know the handler.

We do? :?

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 3:16 pm

He outed himself long ago....in the same thread as SEC Ballsucking Homer did.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 3:19 pm

Sorry, I missed that one.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:04 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:No need for the troll to slink away. He and his corn filled shits can continue to get buttfucked in the mouth by the XII Southerners just like they did going out this past year in every sport.

Still wondering why people feel the need to feed the trolls though....especially when we all know the handler.

really indy? buttfucked in the mouth? you mean like in the big 12 title game against texas? really? funny, I saw SUH physically punch texas in da mouth all game long, and when time expired, we beat texas, that is until the ref with ties to texas decided to put time back on the clock, so texas could win.
so, what game were you watching? cause SUH beat the shit snot outta texas the entire game.

oh, and keep talkin, cause this season in the big ten, nebraska is gonna run all over the fruits in that conf.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:26 pm

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:24 pm

Our pal with the streak hasn't posted since early May....could it be the pus?

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Jul 09, 2011 6:40 am

Papa Willie wrote:I've said it before and will say it again, but that 2001 Miami team was the total fucking package. Best I've ever seen.

but papa? ive told you time and time again, 1995 nebraska would have put dorsey in the hospital, just like pussy ohio st. did.

papa, do you understand who fred taylor was? in college, he was way way better than any runner in miami history, and he put up bigger numbers in a much tougher conf.. Now , miami's runners get the benefit of running against temple every week. Taylor plays against sec defenses, and still out rushes miami's backs!!
NEXT, we go to the NFL, fred taylor has over 11000 yds in the NFL, no miami runner has yet to reach that lofty plateau, NOW, the reason I bring fred taylor up, is to show you that if the 1995 blackshirts shut him down? we would put frank gore and willis mcgeehee in the fuckin emergency room.

see, I was at the orange bowl when nebraska physically ran the football down ray lewis and warren sapps throats. so, what makes you think pussy vilma is any better than ray lewis?
he's not.

POINT BEING, 95 nebraska had more swagger than your canes did, 1995 nebraska had more convicted felons than you did, so in short, we were more BAD ASS!!

any questions? :twisted:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:16 pm

Fuck it. I'll admit 95 Nebraska is the best team I've seen in my lifetime, but I was only born in 1982. Though the 2001 Miami team is obviously more recent, that 95 Husker team left a greater impression on me. That team didn't care if they were playing Pacific or Florida -- they were going to drop at least 50 on you and you couldn't do a damn thing about it.