Another win for fags.

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by poptart »

The issue for me isn't more or less unusual arrangements, Phibes - because people should be free to do as they please.
I don't CARE what people want to do with their life.

The issue for me is government sanctioning of homosexual marriage.
It's preposterous.


'TARD, your thinking is deep within the current government-marriage paradigm.
Take your mind into a different paradigm, one in which the government is completely OUT of marriage, and you could find that all legal implications would find a natural resolution.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Well if you mean by "taking government out of marriage" (a very clumsy phrase), that religious based ballot prop initiatives denying people marriage rights be stricken from the books, sure. That is what you meant, right? Because these Deuteronomists are the ONLY obstacle to people marrying whomever they like. Usually Mormons, but standard loony Christers are all in as well, as Bachmann essentially bases her entire campaign on this non-issue.
Before God was, I am
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by poptart »

Well if you mean by "taking government out of marriage" (a very clumsy phrase), that religious based ballot prop initiatives denying people marriage rights be stricken from the books, sure. That is what you meant, right?
Of course.

I'm in favor or government not handing out marriage licenses to ANYONE.


But I also know that this will be happening right around... never.

That being the reality, the logical and rightful standard for marriage is MAN-WOMAN.

Any government (federal or state) which sanctions MAN-MAN marriage has lost all sense of reality and has launched itself to Planet Dipshit.
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by War Wagon »

What words in the constitution grant marriage as a fundamental right?

Probably the same words you use to justify abortion.

Once again, fuck you.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12939
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by mvscal »

War Wagon wrote:What words in the constitution grant marriage as a fundamental right?
The Constitution doesn't grant rights, dumbass. It protects them from government interference.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
The Seer
Just the Facts
Posts: 6389
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Maricopa County

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by The Seer »

Jsc810 wrote:Since it is all so logical and rightful to you, would you mind explaining why you think it is appropriate to deny a fundamental constitutional right to a class of citizens merely because your delicate sensitivities are offended?
With very few exceptions, anyone can marry anyone - of the opposite sex. Gays can marry members of the opposite sex also. Those rights are protected. If they choose not to, that is their right also....
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by poptart »

Jsc, I DON'T think the freedom to marry should have ever been denied to gays, and I've said it twice in this thread.
Marriage isn't something the gov is constitutionally called on to be involved in.

So in a correct constitutional republic - fags, go get married.
I don't care.
It's your life and it's your business.

But the gov PUT ITSELF into it, as it does in SO many areas which it clearly does not belong.
And they've set a standard: man-woman.
If the government IS going to be involved, yes, surely man-woman is the correct standard.

I don't doubt that this will go to the supreme court and that ultimately, gay marriage will be given universal equality to hetero marriage.

Conservatives ought to give up trying to block gay marriage and instead push for what is rightful and correct - which is government OUT of marriage entirely, and government staying within it's constitutional boundaries.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 9741
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Diego in Seattle »

War Wagon wrote:What words in the constitution grant marriage as a fundamental right?
The issue isn't just "rights." Try re-reading the 14th Amendment, dumbfuck.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by poptart »

Diego, the institution of marriage (man/woman) has pre-dated the U.S. legislature by a LONG time.
So a new legislature coming along and saying, "No, no... THIS is marriage," and COMPLETELY remaking it, takes absurdity to new heights.

As The Seer has said, understanding what the instition of marriage is (in it's man/woman form which has pre-dated our legislature), nobody is being denied any right.
Anyone is free to marry.


Further, government can justify it's involvement in marriage on the basis of seeking to promote family stability and procreation.

Fag marriage does neither and instead is done for the gratification of buttfucking deviants.

Only people who have become twisted and confused would support it.


Son, somewhere along the trail, you lost your mind.

Track back and see if you can find where you lost it.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Getting back to the initial thread..

A gathering of First Ladies
Image
Before God was, I am
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by poptart »

User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 9741
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Diego in Seattle »

poptart wrote:Diego, the institution of marriage (man/woman) has pre-dated the U.S. legislature by a LONG time.
So a new legislature coming along and saying, "No, no... THIS is marriage," and COMPLETELY remaking it, takes absurdity to new heights.
So the government had no business abolishing slavery, as that institution had been around much longer than the U.S. legislature by a LONG time as well. Got it (not suprising for a conservative to feel that way).
As The Seer has said, understanding what the instition of marriage is (in it's man/woman form which has pre-dated our legislature), nobody is being denied any right.
Again, re-read the 14th Amendment. Rights aren't the only thing that are being protected.
Anyone is free to marry.
As long as they marry the person who you choose? Got it. That sure is equal. :meds:
Further, government can justify it's involvement in marriage on the basis of seeking to promote family stability and procreation.
So you're saying that hetero couples who are infertile should be denied the ability to marry? Got it. So if Wolfman were to be single & he met the woman that is his current wife, they shouldn't be allowed to marry because they can't procreate? Got it.
Fag marriage does neither and instead is done for the gratification of buttfucking deviants.
Based on what? Oh, that's right...you believe that this country should be a theocracy...got it. You don't have a problem with government being run by the Phelps inbreds, do you?
Only people who have become twisted and confused would support it.
Which was what was said about interracial marriages a few decades ago. Try moving your life up a few decades, dipshit.
Son, somewhere along the trail, you lost your mind.

Track back and see if you can find where you lost it.
Someone who believes in imaginary beings is saying that I've lost my mind? That's rich! :lol:
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
bradhusker
Certified Cockologist
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by bradhusker »

I guess you dont read your history much? huh dipshit? ROME started out fine, that is until they let the gays run things, then things got perverted quickly, and Rome started goin downhill fast.

read history much dipshit? torwards the end of rome, gays were fully out in the open, I mean FULL BLOWN, were talking handjobs in the street, sodomy out in the open, sick fags flaunting their openness in front of children, and of course, the open sanctioning of children into their lifestyle.

today, we here in the USA are at the beginning stages, you are slowly seeing the gay agenda creep forward, with emphasis on the word, "creep" THERE is a little known organization called, "NAMBLA" ever heard of them? heck, you probably have their "mission statement stuck to your bedroom wall with your dried up cum. BUT, I digress, we are slowly but surely going the way of the roman empire, with each passing decade, we become more and more decadent, and gays become more and more brazen.

torward the end of rome, it was not uncommon to see gays sucking each other off in broad daylight. incest was more common than normal relations. Rome wasnt built in a day, BUT, the sick queer lifestyle sure brought it to its knees. :twisted:
I'll pull you out of that one bunk hilton and cast you down with the sodomites. The warden, shawshank redemption.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 9741
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Diego in Seattle »

Yeah, homosexuality was the cause of the fall of Rome. :lol: Any other bright conclusions?

And since you're such a fan of learning from history, try looking up feudalism & how that worked out dipshit.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
bradhusker
Certified Cockologist
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by bradhusker »

Diego in Seattle wrote:Yeah, homosexuality was the cause of the fall of Rome. :lol: Any other bright conclusions?

And since you're such a fan of learning from history, try looking up feudalism & how that worked out dipshit.
hey dipshit? who said it was the ONLY cause? all I am saying is that it moved it along quite nicely.
dumb fuck! :twisted:
I'll pull you out of that one bunk hilton and cast you down with the sodomites. The warden, shawshank redemption.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by poptart »

Diego, as usual, when someone produces multiple "So you're saying..." takes, they defecate all over themself.

You didn't disappoint.


Once upon a time, the gov sanctioned slavery.
Currently, the gov sanctions marriage.

The gov should do as they did with slavery - and stop sanctioning it.

But I don't expect them to stop sanctioning marriage, so the next best thing is to maintain the obvious and rightful standard for the institution of marriage which existed LONG before the U.S. legislature came into being.

Equating government sanction of slavery to government sanction of marriage makes you a cataclysmic 'tard.
No, seriously - you're an honest to goodness 'tard, 'tard.


What is it about the 14th amendment that has your face turning blue?


Diego wrote:you believe that this country should be a theocracy...got it
Link?


So you're saying that hetero couples who are infertile should be denied the ability to marry?
Of course not.
Alan Keyes will answer this question VERY well for you right here.





Jsc, I know what the Bible says about the subject.
Greg Carey didn't show me anything there except the reality that he apparently has a VERY poor understanding of Scripture.

There is NO Scriptural support for homosexuality and there obviously is no support to be found for homosexual marriage.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by poptart »

Jsc, homosexual marriage is not be something that ---> I <--- would do.

But as I've said, I think free people should be free to do it if they want to.
Now given the fact that we are NOT free, and that our government is sanctioning marriage, the correct thing to sanction is male/female marriage only, imo.

If a pastor, for example, wants to look at Scripture and then conclude that it seems fine for him to marry a homosexual couple, that is his call to make.

As a pastor, I would not marry a homosexual couple.


In Genesis, we see that God created man and woman to be together - and in their union together, they even become ONE flesh. Genesis 2:20-25.
There is NEVER any indication in any portion of Scripture that God has granted man/man this sort of relationship, and the ability to be ONE flesh together.
And quite to the contrary, there are numerous places where we see that homosexual behavior is very clearly... troubling and detrimental.

Romans 1:1-32 - Paul explains about how people have chosen to push God away, that it has led them to worship idols ---> and how this has led to sexual perversions, most notably homosexuality.

I don't find any Scriptural basis for concluding that two homosexuals can stand before God and make a ONE flesh union.

It's a folly
A farce.




Now if you want to ask me if a homosexual can be a Christian, it is MY answer that it is certainly possible.
User avatar
indyfrisco
Pro Bonfire
Posts: 11684
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by indyfrisco »

Per the bible, I guess it is ok if they get married as long as they don't have sex.
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Goober McTuber »

poptart wrote:Now if you want to ask me if a homosexual can be a Christian, it is MY answer that it is certainly possible.
Image
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
indyfrisco
Pro Bonfire
Posts: 11684
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by indyfrisco »

Jsc810 wrote:I honestly want to understand where he's coming from, Biblically speaking. Whatever he cites as support for his position, I will go read. I want to make sure that I'm getting all of it, that's why I'm asking.
Why do you even care how he interprets a book you don't believe in? I swear...some people around here seem to enjoy having the exact same arguments with the exact same people over the exact same issues over and over and over. You're not going to change his mind. He's not going to change yours.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

poptart wrote:Now if you want to ask me if a homosexual can be a Christian, it is MY answer that it is certainly possible.
Well, duh. Jaysus himself was roaming the desert and draining ballsacks like they were refreshing bottles of Dasani.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Dinsdale »

IndyFrisco wrote:I swear...some people around here seem to enjoy having the exact same arguments with the exact same people over the exact same issues over and over and over.


Miracle Whip sucks.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Yeah, but not as much as Thousand Island.
User avatar
indyfrisco
Pro Bonfire
Posts: 11684
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by indyfrisco »

I got some fresh salmon at Walmart today.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Dinsdale »

War Wagon wrote:What words in the constitution grant marriage as a fundamental right?

As mv stated, there's no rights granted anywhere in the Constitution.

And the Constitution doesn't mention marriage anywhere, which tends to lean towards the poptart stance that it's none of the Fed's business.

As far as marriage being a "fundamental right," JSC cited the multiple SCOTUS decisions that confirm marriage as a fundamental right.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
bradhusker
Certified Cockologist
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by bradhusker »

IndyFrisco wrote:I got some fresh salmon at Walmart today.
umm.. sorry to burst ur bubble Indy, but, that salmon you got at walmart? its farm raised and not wild, therefore, you might as well be eating a McDonalds filet-O-fish, yes, I said it, the McDonalds famous filet-O-fish is flaky north atlantic COD, mild and tasty, with a creamy tartar sauce that is to die for, OH, and a freshly steamed and impossibly billowy soft bun, the only drawback on this cullinary work of art as I see it? the processed american cheese, they should have used smoked gouda instead,
oh well, gotta cut back somewhere I guess.

but seriously, next time, get fresh wild norweigan salmon instead, omega 3's cancer fighter. :twisted:

oh, and stay away from mcdonalds, its a cancer trap for your colon. :twisted:

unless you are LTS, and your colon is shot to hell :twisted:
I'll pull you out of that one bunk hilton and cast you down with the sodomites. The warden, shawshank redemption.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

bradhusker wrote:...you might as well be eating a McDonalds filet-O-fish, yes, I said it, the McDonalds famous filet-O-fish is flaky north atlantic COD, mild and tasty, with a creamy tartar sauce that is to die for, OH, and a freshly steamed and impossibly billowy soft bun, the only drawback on this cullinary work of art as I see it? the processed american cheese, they should have used smoked gouda instead,
oh well, gotta cut back somewhere I guess.

Filet-o-fish or anything else from McDonalds is a delicacy for you?
That explains so much.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
bradhusker
Certified Cockologist
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by bradhusker »

Martyred wrote:
bradhusker wrote:...you might as well be eating a McDonalds filet-O-fish, yes, I said it, the McDonalds famous filet-O-fish is flaky north atlantic COD, mild and tasty, with a creamy tartar sauce that is to die for, OH, and a freshly steamed and impossibly billowy soft bun, the only drawback on this cullinary work of art as I see it? the processed american cheese, they should have used smoked gouda instead,
oh well, gotta cut back somewhere I guess.

Filet-o-fish or anything else from McDonalds is a delicacy for you?
That explains so much.
oh really marty? it explains so much for you? this, coming from a guy who eats breakfast and lunch at 7-11.
what the hell do u know about north atlantic cod anyway? :twisted:
I'll pull you out of that one bunk hilton and cast you down with the sodomites. The warden, shawshank redemption.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Goober McTuber »

bradhusker wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote:I got some fresh salmon at Walmart today.
umm.. sorry to burst ur bubble Indy, but, that salmon you got at walmart? its farm raised and not wild, therefore, you might as well be eating a McDonalds filet-O-fish, yes, I said it, the McDonalds famous filet-O-fish is flaky north atlantic COD, mild and tasty, with a creamy tartar sauce that is to die for, OH, and a freshly steamed and impossibly billowy soft bun, the only drawback on this cullinary work of art as I see it? the processed american cheese, they should have used smoked gouda Tillamook Cheddar instead,
FTFY.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12939
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by mvscal »

bradhusker wrote:ROME started out fine, that is until they let the gays run things, then things got perverted quickly, and Rome started goin downhill fast.

read history much dipshit? torwards the end of rome, gays were fully out in the open, I mean FULL BLOWN, were talking handjobs in the street, sodomy out in the open, sick fags flaunting their openness in front of children, and of course, the open sanctioning of children into their lifestyle.
WRONG.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Goober McTuber »

mvscal wrote:
bradhusker wrote:ROME started out fine, that is until they let the gays run things, then things got perverted quickly, and Rome started goin downhill fast.

read history much dipshit? torwards the end of rome, gays were fully out in the open, I mean FULL BLOWN, were talking handjobs in the street, sodomy out in the open, sick fags flaunting their openness in front of children, and of course, the open sanctioning of children into their lifestyle.
WRONG.
What?!? The shittiest shit troll in recent memory doesn't have a complete grasp of history? Say it ain't so!
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 9741
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Diego in Seattle »

Not suprising that the crowd that selectively forgets the part of the 2nd Amendment that goes "in order to form a well-regulated militia can't seem to acknowedge that privileges are protected by the Constitution just as much as rights.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12939
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by mvscal »

Diego in Seattle wrote:I fuck small boys in the ass.
Nobody cares.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Dinsdale »

Diego in Seattle wrote:Not suprising that the crowd that selectively forgets the part of the 2nd Amendment that goes "in order to form a well-regulated militia can't seem to acknowedge that privileges are protected by the Constitution just as much as rights.

I see you're still struggling with the phrase "well regulated militia."

Since no one here (or anyone else) seems to be able to explain it, maybe you should crack a book sometime.

Federalist Paper #29 would be a good start... or #2. Several of the people who... wrote the fucking Constitution made the definition pretty clear. You know, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington... they were all quite clear about it.

I guess it's too bad they're all dead, so you can't tell them what they meant, eh?

But fortunately, they did a great deal of writing on the subject -- you should check it out sometime. You could then realize you've been quite wrong this whole time -- not up for debate.

The SCOTUS thinks you're wrong, too.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12939
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by mvscal »

Dinsdale wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:Not suprising that the crowd that selectively forgets the part of the 2nd Amendment that goes "in order to form a well-regulated militia can't seem to acknowedge that privileges are protected by the Constitution just as much as rights.

I see you're still struggling with the phrase "well regulated militia."

Since no one here (or anyone else) seems to be able to explain it, maybe you should crack a book sometime.
The phrase is irrelevant. The right of self-defense is the most fundamental right of them all.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by poptart »

Jsc, you can see Genesis 18:20-33 through Genesis 19:1-38.
It's God's destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, where people had turned from Him and gone to their own wickedness ---> which led to sexual perversions, and homosexuality was rampant.

Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, also.

These are Old Testament Scriptures, and believers in Christ are not bound by these laws, and the judgements called for are no longer binding, seeing as Christ has come as the one-time blood sacrifice for all sin.

But certainly, it is clear that if a person is into homosexuality, he is in an area which is not desirable or beneficial.



I cited Romans 1 (the whole chapter) before, which is in the New Testament.

Even after Christ came as the one-time blood sacrifice for all sin, we are still taught about the perils of homosexuality (and other sexual perversions).

See 1 Corinthians 6:9-10.



I value it as most important to note the Scripture I posted earlier - Genesis 2:20-25 (you could see Genesis 1:26-28, also).

Genesis 1 and 2 is speaking of God's creation state for mankind (before the fall of Genesis 3) - and it surely involves Man/Woman together as a unit - and even becoming ONE flesh.
I can think about that when I get angry at my wife - that is MY flesh I am angry at.

All of the problems and perversions came to mankind after the event of Genesis 3, which you might read, also.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by Dinsdale »

mvscal wrote: The phrase is irrelevant. The right of self-defense is the most fundamental right of them all.
Irrelevant or not, it was clearly defined at the time.

And not once was"sporting/hunting purposes" ever mentioned.

They did however mention that the People (aka "Militia") must have the ability to overcome any domestic standing army, and should have personal arms equivalent to those of any standing army that might be formed.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Saddle up, Dins, and don't forget your Depends. :wink:

"Who we fightin', by the way?"
Image
Before God was, I am
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12939
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by mvscal »

Dinsdale wrote:They did however mention that the People (aka "Militia") must have the ability to overcome any domestic standing army, and should have personal arms equivalent to those of any standing army that might be formed.
I don't know about that but the 2nd amendment is explicit in stating that the People armed are necessary to maintain order. Certainly our inner cities are in desperate need of armed citizens' militias to patrol the streets and keep their neighborhoods safe.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Another win for fags.

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Sure, Avi, those milita types are gonna keep us safe from....corporate plutocrats? Radical activist right wing supreme court justices? Sociopathic Hebrews stalking little child Hebrews for at home butchery class? Christo/fascist moronic Tea Baggers?

C'mon..be clear in your ignorant lisping..
Before God was, I am
Post Reply