Rick Perry for President!!

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:40 pm

mvscal wrote:
poptart wrote:The death penalty is an arrogant form of justice.
Why? God is a big fan of capital punishment.

God is omnipotent.

Man is petty and flawed. And shouldn't believe themselves equal to God.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:56 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:
mvscal wrote:
poptart wrote:The death penalty is an arrogant form of justice.
Why? God is a big fan of capital punishment.
God is omnipotent.

Man is petty and flawed. And shouldn't believe themselves equal to God.

I second that! RAAAACK HIM.

GOD IS REAL!

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:56 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:God is omnipotent.

Man is petty and flawed. And shouldn't believe themselves equal to God.

God told His Children to execute people for certain crimes. On a more pragmatic note, some people just need killin'. No sense keeping them around.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:06 pm

[img]http://www.bradreese.com/images/sgt-bob-barnes.jpg[/img] wrote:Everybody's gotta die sometime

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:28 pm

Everybody murders people, kills people.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:57 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:
[img]http://www.bradreese.com/images/sgt-bob-barnes.jpg[/img] wrote:Everybody's gotta die sometime

hey,
correct me if I am wrong here, BUT, isnt that the guy who plays the "substitute"???
one of the great movie series of all time, the substitute, the substitute 2, the substitute 3, and the series came to an end with the "substitute 4, failure is not an option"

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:20 am

mvscal wrote:
poptart wrote:The death penalty is an arrogant form of justice.
Why? God is a big fan of capital punishment.

God told His Children to execute people for certain crimes.

The death penalty, in 2011, isn't about God killing people - or God telling some people to kill some other people.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:24 am

Sure, it's about executing the most hideously vile and murderous scum our society has to offer. What's "arrogant" about that? It's just taking out the garbage.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:26 am

88 wrote:Personally, I've got no problem moving some people to the front of the "it's your turn to go" line, particularly when their sole contribution to the betterment of society is that they have worked up a few self-defined do-gooders into believing that they might not be completely worthless shit-stains "beyond a reasonable doubt".

You know who also used to think that way? Wolftard. It's disappointing someone who is such a "strict constitutionalist" like yourself plays fast and loose with legal thresholds when it comes to the ultimate punishment, a solution that has the smallest margin for error.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:34 am

Screw_Michigan wrote:It's disappointing someone who is such a "strict constitutionalist" like yourself plays fast and loose with legal thresholds...

As a "strict constitutionalist" (sic), 88 is no doubt aware that the "legal threshold" for capital punishment is established by the Fifth Amendment.

As an idiot, you are no doubt unaware of pretty much anything of relevance.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:33 am

mvscal wrote:Sure, it's about executing the most hideously vile and murderous scum our society has to offer. What's "arrogant" about that? It's just taking out the garbage.

They didn't give the life, so it's arrogant to take the life away, imo.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:55 am

poptart wrote:They didn't give the life, so it's arrogant to take the life away, imo.

That doesn't make any sense on any level.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:03 am

mvscal wrote:
poptart wrote:They didn't give the life, so it's arrogant to take the life away, imo.
That doesn't make any sense on any level.

When in doubt, consult the chart:

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:25 am

Marty, in all fairness to Derron I can give a simple explanation... his medulla must have damage. The damage being between his spinal cord and higher brain centers... if there is such a high level to aspire. CVA is the only plausible explanation for his stupidity and I want to leave it here and not continue wasting time on this moron.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:45 am

mvscal wrote:
poptart wrote:They didn't give the life, so it's arrogant to take the life away, imo.
That doesn't make any sense on any level.

No, what doesn't make any sense is this:

Killing is wrong.
You killed someone.
To show how wrong it is, guess what?
We're going to kill you.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:55 am

poptart wrote:No, what doesn't make any sense is this:

Killing is wrong.
You killed someone.
To show how wrong it is, guess what?
We're going to kill you.

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense either.

Fortunately, that isn't what is being said. What is being said is that murder is wrong and the penalty (for some very few of the worst murders) is death.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:45 am

Martyred wrote:

Yeah, be sure to let us know how that "You know, perhaps God is a woman" research comes out for ya, Mr. Logic.

Terry in Crapchester · Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:21 pm

88 wrote:Davis got a trial that met the Constitutional requirements of Due Process. He also got an appeal and, through subsequent habeas litigation, received an extraordinary opportunity to attempt to prove his innocence. He failed at doing that. All he was able to do was get several people to recant their trial testimony many years later and call into question, way too late insofar as the Constitution is required, whether the original conviction would have met the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard.

He received Due Process. And his sentence was carried out this evening in a Constitutional manner.

Of course, seven of the nine witnesses against him at trial subsequently recanted. Those witnesses further stated that they were coerced into giving testimony inculpatory of Davis by the police, and that the actual killer also testified against Davis.

Terry in Crapchester · Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:33 pm

bradhusker wrote:Adam? By the way, michelle bachmann is one hot MILF. can you imagine a hot 3 way with michelle and sarah? why is it that prominent democratic women are ugly and lesbo?? And prominent republican women are sexy and hot?

dems, janet reno, madeline albright, hilary, claire mcaskill, shelia jackson lee, maxine waters, chelsea clinton, ugly ugly ugly

repubs, michelle bachmann, sarah palin, monica crowley, the bush daughters, condy rice, halle berry, the very hot blonde who was bush's press secretary? hot hot hot.

Halle Berry, a Republican? I think not . . .

Berry took part in a nearly 2000-house party cell-phone bank campaign for Barack Obama in February 2008,[87] and said that she will "collect paper cups off the ground to make his pathway clear."[88]

. . .

87.^ Halle Berry, Ted Kennedy: 'Move On' for Obama". (February 29, 2008) Chicago Tribune.
88.^ Why Women Back Barack Obama, (March 31, 2008) 'North Star Writers'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halle_Berry#Personal_life

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:50 pm

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
88 wrote:Davis got a trial that met the Constitutional requirements of Due Process. He also got an appeal and, through subsequent habeas litigation, received an extraordinary opportunity to attempt to prove his innocence. He failed at doing that. All he was able to do was get several people to recant their trial testimony many years later and call into question, way too late insofar as the Constitution is required, whether the original conviction would have met the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard.

He received Due Process. And his sentence was carried out this evening in a Constitutional manner.
Of course, seven of the nine witnesses against him at trial subsequently recanted. Those witnesses further stated that they were coerced into giving testimony inculpatory of Davis by the police, and that the actual killer also testified against Davis.

That’s the night that the lights went out in Georgia

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 8:06 pm

Funny how there were no media and anti-death penalty coverage of the "other" execution last night.
I wonder why?

you said 7 of the 9 recanted? well that leaves 2 who didnt then, I guess the corrupt lawyers couldnt get them to lie.

oh, Halle berry is so fuckin hot though, she pretends to be democratic, but, in reality she is a dyed=in=the=wool repub.

she has got to be the fuckin hottest black female on the face of this earth.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 8:23 pm

bradhusker wrote:oh, Halle berry is so fuckin hot though, she pretends to be democratic, but, in reality she is a dyed=in=the=wool repub.

she has got to be the fuckin hottest black female on the face of this earth.

brad,

I thought all of you right wingnuts were slobbering over Condi Rice?

BTW, this statement is obviously directed at you:

John Stuart Mill wrote: Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:43 pm

88 wrote:
John Stuart Mill wrote:The most cogent reason for restricting the interference of government is the great evil of adding unnecessarily to its power.

don't mean what the tea party think it means

me and jeremy bentham down by the schoolyard

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:46 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:
88 wrote:
John Stuart Mill wrote:The most cogent reason for restricting the interference of government is the great evil of adding unnecessarily to its power.

don't mean what the tea party think it means

The meaning is plain but, by all means, apply your libtard, pretzel logic to the statement and tell us what it "really means." I'm guessing you're too much of a pussy to even try.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:52 pm

mvscal wrote:I'm guessing

don't guess. try facts instead.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:59 pm

My guess was correct. You can run along now.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:46 am

88 wrote:
John Stuart Mill wrote:The most cogent reason for restricting the interference of government is the great evil of adding unnecessarily to its power.

I like that one, too.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:20 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
bradhusker wrote:oh, Halle berry is so fuckin hot though, she pretends to be democratic, but, in reality she is a dyed=in=the=wool repub.

she has got to be the fuckin hottest black female on the face of this earth.
brad,

I thought all of you right wingnuts were slobbering over Condi Rice?

BTW, this statement is obviously directed at you:

John Stuart Mill wrote: Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.

actually , that is FALSE, most stupid people are liberal and vote democrat every time. Have you seen the folks who voted for Obama? food stamps? pants down below their genitals? gangsta clowns?
dont know their ass from a hole in the ground? I guess john stewart forgot about the bulk of Obama voters, huh?

the bulk of Obama voters cant even speak in complete sentences, they are drug users, and, they mainly dine on lucky charms and cocoa pebbles, and not just for breakfast either/

get ur facts straight opie.

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:24 pm

John Stuart Mill wrote: Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.

bradhusker wrote:john stewart

the bulk of Obama voters cant even speak in complete sentences, they are drug users, and, they mainly dine on lucky charms and cocoa pebbles, and not just for breakfast either/

Not to run grammar smack or anything, but if you can't form an actual sentence accusing someone of not being able to speak in complete sentences, you don't deserve air.

I'm sick of your stupidity. Consider the next four shit threads you start TROTS'd.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:57 pm

R-Jack wrote: I'm sick of your stupidity. Consider the next four shit threads you start TROTS'd.

Don't forget what they say about message boards and tards.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:10 pm

Mikey wrote:
R-Jack wrote: I'm sick of your stupidity. Consider the next four shit threads you start TROTS'd.
Don't forget what they say about message boards and tards.

You're talking about an übertard. Kind of like Kaley but with a higher level of ADHD.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:49 pm

R-Jack wrote:
John Stuart Mill wrote: Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.

bradhusker wrote:john stewart

the bulk of Obama voters cant even speak in complete sentences, they are drug users, and, they mainly dine on lucky charms and cocoa pebbles, and not just for breakfast either/

Not to run grammar smack or anything, but if you can't form an actual sentence accusing someone of not being able to speak in complete sentences, you don't deserve air.

I'm sick of your stupidity. Consider the next four shit threads you start TROTS'd.

Jack, im not pretending to be brilliant, far from it. BUT, I am sick and tired of liberals trying to paint conservatives as stupid, WHEN, the fuckin vice president of the USA, joe "plugs" Biden says the dumbest things this side of HEE HAW.

Liberals have been calling conservatives dumb since Reagan, YET, if you look at the cockroaches who voted for Obama? Pants below the privates, vocabulary below 35 words,
cocoa pebbles as a mainstay food, lucky charms for a complete dinner.
ITS FUNNY AS HELL how stupid the voters for Obama really are.
HELL, I dont pretend to be smart, I come in here and type really fast, make errors, BUT, at the end of the day, my point not only gets across, but IT RINGS TRUE, fuckin true.

Have you ever spoken to an ACORN worker? I have, and let me be the first to point out, that they are on about the same level as a cockroach.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:49 pm

Jsc810 wrote:Yeah, about that.

Not someone who belongs in public office.

30 inches of rain that never fell. Wow. That's a real doozy right there.

Personally, I'm a little more concerned about the two and a half million jobs that never fell after we spent 800 billion dollars trying to "make it rain." That is the person who really doesn't belong in public office.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:56 pm

How about the far bigger chuck of cash we tossed to the banks right before that? The one that McCain suspended his campaign to lobby for? Sure, let's get that party into the oval office again right away.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:03 pm

PSUFAN wrote:How about the far bigger chuck of cash we tossed to the banks right before that? The one that McCain suspended his campaign to lobby for?

You mean the one that then Senator Bankrupt Odowngrade voted and lobbied for?

Sure, let's get that party into the oval office again right away.

You did exactly that. And guess what? We got more of the same...a lot fucking more. Now you're choking on failure.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:37 pm

Why would red staters have an issue with slow witted, word fumblers? I'm not talking about the smart republicans, but the majority.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:20 am

mvscal wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:Yeah, about that.

Not someone who belongs in public office.
30 inches of rain that never fell. Wow. That's a real doozy right there.

I don't get why you seemingly support Perry....if there was a redeeming quality about him, I might understand, but this dude is a fucktard of the highest magnitude....

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:29 am

He is the only one with any track record of economic success on the big stage. That's because he's the only one smart enough to get the fuck out of the way. The more DC tries to "fix things" the more fucked up they get. Perry understands that, if nothing else.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:47 am

R-Jack wrote:
John Stuart Mill wrote: Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.

bradhusker wrote:john stewart

Maybe I shouldn't scroll thru husker's posts so quickly and miss gems like that.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:37 am

mvscal wrote:
R-Jack wrote:
John Stuart Mill wrote: Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.

bradhusker wrote:john stewart

Maybe I shouldn't scroll thru husker's posts so quickly and miss gems like that.

come on, be nice fellas, nobodys perfect, we are all prone to mistakes now and then, HECK, half the time I come in here and type, im dozing off, I have narcolepsy, I fall asleep at the drop of a hat.
Ive been known to drive while half asleep, thats how good my hand/eye coordination is.