LSU and Alabama Offenses
Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc
- WolverineSteve
- 2012 CFB Bowl Jeopardy Champ
- Posts: 3754
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 5:13 pm
- Location: The D
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Are you trying to say that the over hyped game of the century was not a complete and utter abortion ? Because you'd be wrong.
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football."
-John Heisman
"Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise --- the other, loyalty." Fielding Yost
Go Blue!
-John Heisman
"Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise --- the other, loyalty." Fielding Yost
Go Blue!
- Killian
- Good crossing pattern target
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: At the end of the pub with head in arms
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
I'm just sayin', that if a #1 vs. #2 game was played in the Big 10 and the final score was 9-6, people would be bitching that the game set offenses back 20 years.
"Well, my wife assassinated my sexual identity, and my children are eating my dreams." -Louis CK
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Alabama and LSU wouldn't score a point on Cal... if Maynard wasn't playing QB...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae8e/5ae8eb6cab235996fe2d761b50a36c636ef68657" alt="Image"
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Amazing how the three best defenses in BTPCF history are all taking the field during the same season.Sudden Sam wrote: Two offenses averaging over 39 PPG thru 8 games were denutted bytwo ofthe second and third best defenses to ever play college football.
- Killian
- Good crossing pattern target
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: At the end of the pub with head in arms
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Of course. Because the Big10 is slow, and doesn't put players into the NFL.Sudden Sam wrote:If it was played in the Big Ten, a 9-6 score would more likely be the result of two inept offenses, rather than due to two defenses crammed full of kids headed to the NFL.
"Well, my wife assassinated my sexual identity, and my children are eating my dreams." -Louis CK
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Sudden Sam wrote:We'll never know, will we? I doubt LSU or Alabama will be playing in the Poinsetta Bowl or whatever POS bowl Cal makes.M2 wrote:Alabama and LSU wouldn't score a point on Cal... if Maynard wasn't playing QB...
That's right...
Cal doesn't play 4 correctional schools at HOME... and 8 games at HOME.
Hell, a Pop Warner school could be bowl eligible with that schedule in the SEC.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae8e/5ae8eb6cab235996fe2d761b50a36c636ef68657" alt="Image"
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
4 correctional schools? Leavenwoth U? San Quentin State?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
One game. From last year. Pretty weak, Sam, even by your standards. MSU currently ranks ahead of LSU in total defense.Sudden Sam wrote:Not what I'm saying. The big Ten produces shitloads of good NFL players. But defenses haven't been what they used to be in that conference.Killian wrote:Of course. Because the Big10 is slow, and doesn't put players into the NFL.Sudden Sam wrote:If it was played in the Big Ten, a 9-6 score would more likely be the result of two inept offenses, rather than due to two defenses crammed full of kids headed to the NFL.
See: Alabama - 49, MSU - 7
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Good idea... since Cal puts more players in the NFL than Alabama.Sudden Sam wrote: We won't get into a comparison of the SEC and the PAC58.
Not to mention... the BEST players...
1. Aaron Rodgers
2. DeSean Jackson
3. Tony Gonzales
4. Nnamdi Asomugha
5. etc.,
Last edited by M2 on Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae8e/5ae8eb6cab235996fe2d761b50a36c636ef68657" alt="Image"
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Which is all the proof anyone should ever need in order to know that such rankings are asburd. Is there a person in their right mind who thinks for one minute that MSU's defense is remotely as powerful as LSU's?Goobs wrote:MSU currently ranks ahead of LSU in total defense.
Pretty sure even Mgo would agree that that one's a farce.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Van wrote:Which is all the proof anyone should ever need in order to know that such rankings are asburd. Is there a person in their right mind who thinks for one minute that MSU's defense is remotely as powerful as LSU's?Goobs wrote:MSU currently ranks ahead of LSU in total defense.
Pretty sure even Mgo would agree that that one's a farce.
Shit for brains... Harvard would be in the top 5 in defense if they got to play SE Mississippi State 4 times a year at HOME... then play 8 homes games you fucking dipshit !!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae8e/5ae8eb6cab235996fe2d761b50a36c636ef68657" alt="Image"
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Hey, speaking of shit for brains...LSU has 7 home games this year, not 8. Two of their three OOC games were against ranked teams. So far, they have played and beaten 6 ranked teams, 3 of those on the road. You not too bright.M2 wrote:Van wrote:Which is all the proof anyone should ever need in order to know that such rankings are asburd. Is there a person in their right mind who thinks for one minute that MSU's defense is remotely as powerful as LSU's?Goobs wrote:MSU currently ranks ahead of LSU in total defense.
Pretty sure even Mgo would agree that that one's a farce.
Shit for brains... Harvard would be in the top 5 in defense if they got to play SE Mississippi State 4 times a year at HOME... then play 8 homes games you fucking dipshit !!!
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
No, they play teams like Clemson... which beat Wofford by 7 points.Sudden Sam wrote:SEC schools don't play Presbyterian.M2 wrote: Shit for brains... Harvard would be in the top 5 in defense if they got to play SE Mississippi State 4 times a year at HOME... then play 8 homes games you fucking dipshit !!!
Of course, that same Wofford team beat Presbyterian by 7 points in the last seconds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae8e/5ae8eb6cab235996fe2d761b50a36c636ef68657" alt="Image"
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Goober McTuber wrote:LSU has 7 home games this year, not 8.
Psst.. shit for brains...
Cal doesn't have a single home game this year.
How about Dem apples... retard.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae8e/5ae8eb6cab235996fe2d761b50a36c636ef68657" alt="Image"
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
I know you southerner's ain't too bright... but, you must have missed this...Sudden Sam wrote: Desperation and envy are apparently permanent facets of the life of a Cal fan.
M2 wrote:Good idea... since Cal puts more players in the NFL than Alabama.Sudden Sam wrote: We won't get into a comparison of the SEC and the PAC58.
Not to mention... the BEST players...
1. Aaron Rodgers
2. DeSean Jackson
3. Tony Gonzales
4. Nnamdi Asomugha
5. etc.,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae8e/5ae8eb6cab235996fe2d761b50a36c636ef68657" alt="Image"
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
And that is relevant to your numerous misstatements...how?M2 wrote:Cal doesn't have a single home game this year.Goober McTuber wrote:LSU has 7 home games this year, not 8.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Gene Wojciechowski wrote:TUSCALOOSA, Ala. -- If that was The Game of the Century, then I want my 100 years back.
Top-ranked LSU's 9-6 overtime win against No. 2 Alabama Saturday evening wasn't the game of the century, decade or season. I'm not even sure it was the game of the day.
So let's get this out of the way right now: These two teams deserve a BCS championship rematch like Kim Kardashian deserves to keep her wedding gifts.
I'm not saying LSU's victory suffered from drama deprivation. It didn't. It was the leading cause of gnawed-off fingernails at an electric Bryant-Denny Stadium. The edge of my press box seat was worn down by the time Drew Alleman's 25-yard game-winning field goal somersaulted through the uprights.
But was it a football classic? Close, very close, but no.
Classics don't have four interceptions, four missed field goals, 13 penalties, one fumble, one botched punt return and zero touchdowns. A punter shouldn't be the best player on the field in a classic.
Bottom line: Only a classic is worthy of a Jan. 9 rematch in New Orleans. And this wasn't one of them.
"I think the world wants a rematch, honestly," said LSU defensive end Sam Montgomery. "It would be lovely to play such a great, competitive team out there again. I think everybody wants a rematch: the media, the people, the fans."
Not me. Not when Oklahoma State, which played, hands down, the most entertaining game of the day against Kansas State, is still undefeated.
Not when Stanford, even with its recent run of injuries, hasn't lost a game.
Not when Boise State, which continues to roll along, remains unbeaten.
Not when 9-0 Houston -- OK, maybe not Houston. Yet.
Alabama had its chance. Actually, it had lots of chances to beat LSU in front of 101,821 hyper-geeked fans … at home … against a team that completed a grand total of nine passes.
Instead, the Crimson Tide did a belly flop when it mattered most. Five different times they grinded their way to the LSU 35-yard line, or closer, and five times they jogged back to the Bama sideline with zilch points.
"We still can go to the national championship," said Bama wide receiver Marquis Maze. "We're still a
national championship team. I feel like we're still the best team in the country. Anything can happen."
And Maze wasn't done. When I asked him if he thought Bama was the better of the two teams, he didn't hesitate.
"Yes, I think we're the best team in the country," he said. "I think if we played them again we wouldn't lose."
Unless Oklahoma State, Stanford and probably Boise State lose between now and the beginning of bowl season, it doesn't matter if Bama would win a rematch. Because there won't be a rematch.
You can make a case, a semi-decent one, that the Crimson Tide shouldn't be dismissed from the BCS championship equation. After all, they lost by only three points in overtime to the No. 1 team in the country.
"I think we definitely have a chance of seeing those guys again if we finish strong," said Bama wide receiver Darius Hanks, who added that the Crimson Tide were "definitely" superior to LSU.
And this from Bama linebacker Nico Johnson: "Oh, no, it's never over."
He's sort of right. TCU could beat Boise on the blue carpet Saturday. Oregon could do the same against the Cardinal at Stanford Stadium. Oklahoma could defeat Oklahoma State come Bedlam on Saturday in December. Things happen.
But it's going to take a lot of BCS gymnastics for Bama to jump back into the championship mix. I don't think it has enough room on the mat to nail the landing.
Hanks and Maze wouldn't admit it, but LSU's magnificent defense had a lot to do with making the Crimson Tide look ordinary. The Tigers do that.
But you can't miss four field goals, as Bama did Saturday evening, and expect anyone to want LSU-Bama -- The Sequel. You can't make costly penalties. You can't throw two interceptions (including one in the fourth quarter, when the Tide were already in field-goal range).
"To me, we didn't take advantage of the opportunities we had," said Alabama coach Nick Saban.
And then he recited the grocery list of missed chances. He knew.
If Saban is thinking about another crack at LSU, he wouldn't say so publicly.
"Whoever the folks are who make those decisions will make those decisions based on a full body of work of every team in the country and choose which teams are the best," he said. "I really can't speculate on a hypothetical situation. And it's really not our focus right now anyway."
Not now. But as he watches the film of this one, Saban is going to realize his team could have and probably should have beaten LSU. Bama's defense intercepted a pair of Jarrett Lee passes. It neutered the Tigers' passing attack. It held LSU to three field goals.
But it lost. And however you want to spell it, a capital L is going to be next to Bama's name.
"We can't let this loss affect us," said Hanks. "It hurts. At the same time, we've got to come out there on Monday and act like this loss never happened."
If only it were that easy. Bama's players might have short memories, but the BCS computers and voters remember everything. And they'll remember this as the night when the Crimson Tide lost their argument for a rematch.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
I enjoyed the game. It was Big Ten football on steroids. I would say it was 70% suffocating defense and 30% poor offense. Neither team came into the game with a poor offense, but they also didn't step up and make plays, and take advantage of the few opportunities they did have. The opposing defenses got into their heads. One of the reasons I predicted a 14-10 type game was because I didn't feel either team had a qb capable of moving them down the field vs the other's defense. McCarron, Lee and Jefferson are good, not great quarterbacks.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Bama's had their shot. I think Stanford stays unbeaten. That's the game I want to see.Sudden Sam wrote:Interesting piece, but I can find 20 columns that suggest a rematch would pair the best two teams in the country.
I'm sorry, but it's gonna happen. Y'all might as well get ready for Round 2. Stanford is going to lose to either Oregon or ND. Okie State will lose to OU. And that, my friends, is that.
The two best teams will play in New Orleans.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Sudden Sam wrote: Stanford is going to lose to either Oregon or ND.
Ummm... no they won't...
They'll lose to who they always lose too...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d577/3d5772f759d365539d567db08074884097f3d018" alt="Image"
By the way, that's the best female swimmer in the WORLD...
Cal has beaten the 'furd 8 times in the last 10 games... and it wont stop this year.
Last edited by M2 on Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae8e/5ae8eb6cab235996fe2d761b50a36c636ef68657" alt="Image"
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
I think I just made a new best friend...Sudden Sam wrote: I'll be a Cal fan that week.
By the way, the last team to beat Stanfraud at home... was, you quest it...
The Big Game...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae8e/5ae8eb6cab235996fe2d761b50a36c636ef68657" alt="Image"
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Don't forget Georgia Southern. I'm pretty sure their offense is rated higher than Alabama's.Sudden Sam wrote:
I'm sorry, but it's gonna happen. Y'all might as well get ready for Round 2. Stanford is going to lose to either Oregon or ND. Okie State will lose to OU. And that, my friends, is that.
The two best teams will play in New Orleans.
Of course, Bama sure as hell better beat Miss State and Auburn.
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Oh hell no.Sudden Sam wrote:Interesting piece, but I can find 20 columns that suggest a rematch would pair the best two teams in the country.
I'm sorry, but it's gonna happen. Y'all might as well get ready for Round 2. Stanford is going to lose to either Oregon or ND. Okie State will lose to OU. And that, my friends, is that.
The two best teams will play in New Orleans.
Of course, Bama sure as hell better beat Miss State and Auburn.
You people set offense back 70 years. I appreciate good defense as much as the next fella, but can anybody in that league actually throw a ball? Much less kick it? Some of the worst quarterback play I've seen in years. Y'all might want to raid Texas for an arm-or-three, now that A&M has provided you the bridgehead. Providence, please spare us a repeat of that a-bore-tion.
Last edited by Truman on Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
I most certainly did, and it was 10 times the more entertaining game.Sudden Sam wrote:If you weren't enjoing that, you shoulda flipped over to watch the Okie State-KSU circus.
You're like the doting father of a mongoloid child.
And there's nothing wrong with that, except when you start showing pictures off at work for the 10th time.
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
^^^^^^^^^^
This. I kept flipping back just to see if either side had crossed the 50 yet....
This. I kept flipping back just to see if either side had crossed the 50 yet....
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Well, SOMEBODY had to hand the ball to Mark Ingram... BTW, the good quarterback from Southlake Carroll spent his Saturdays playing in Columbia and is now backing up Drew Brees in New Orleans.Sudden Sam wrote:
Shit, Truman, we just had a Texas QB (McElroy) and everyone in here belittled him. All he did was win a MNC for us.
Wonder what kind of thrower McElroy would've been had he not backed out of his commitment to Taco Tech?
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
+1MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I enjoyed the game. It was Big Ten football on steroids. I would say it was 70% suffocating defense and 30% poor offense. Neither team came into the game with a poor offense, but they also didn't step up and make plays, and take advantage of the few opportunities they did have. The opposing defenses got into their heads. One of the reasons I predicted a 14-10 type game was because I didn't feel either team had a qb capable of moving them down the field vs the other's defense. McCarron, Lee and Jefferson are good, not great quarterbacks.
As far as Stanford goes, I fear that injuries will prevent them from going undefeated. Even with all hands on deck Oregon might have beaten them anyway, but now they are far from being ready to finish the season at anything approaching full strength.
If they somehow get past Oregon, though, yep, barring an injury to Luck they'll run the table. They will not lose to Cal or ND if a shot at the national title game is at stake.
Besides, Cal's defense still has to give up 32 to Stanford in order to hit the 105 I set for the three-game Over/Under total in the Oregon/USC/Stanford trifecta. Does anyone see Cal holding this year's Stanford squad to 31 or less while also scoring 32 or more? I mean, other than the M2 troll's latest handler.
Anyone?
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
This.Jsc810 wrote:If Arkansas beats LSU (which certainly can happen), then I believe that Alabama wins the tie breaker and would go to the SEC championship game.
I think 88 must have forgotten that an Arkansas victory in Baton Rouge would create a three-way tie in the West, with each team having gone 1-1 against the other two.
Jsc, by what method does the SEC break a three-way Divisional tie? Do they go with the team ranked highest in the BCS at season's end—in which case Alabama definitely stands a chance of coming out on top—or do they go with some other method such as awarding the CCG berth to the team that had least recently been there?
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
My fanatical LSU buddy tells me that the SEC uses the BCS ranking system to break three-way Divisional ties, but I was hoping you'd know for certain. Oh well. I'll try to look it up.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 3257
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:25 pm
Re: LSU and Alabama Offenses
Why are people clamoring for a rematch of that epic baseball game but in 2006 no one wanted to see OSU v Michigan again?