PAC 12... best conference in the land...

[M2]

The PAC 12 could have nine teams bowl eligible... if $UC weren't a bunch of fucking cheaters.

[Atomic Punk]

How is the SEC a bunch of cheaters? You may pimp the PAC 12 for bowl eligibility... since you now say you didn't go to Cal after claiming to be a recruit. Just STFU already and start hanging out with the Boise State crowd here... and butt-hurt morons from Kansas City.

You have to be a fucking troll under this incarnation of an idiot.

Oregon vs LSU would be fun to watch. "Bama lost and I don't want a rematch. If Okie State beats Oklahoma then LSU vs Okie State would be fine. Most of these schools have these guys called "coaches." What they do is look for matchups.

Most if not all teams have OC's that may run the same-type of plays for a few series just to see how defenses lines up then adjust. Hey they do that in high school around here. Really simple stuff.

No, but you are a big time Cal RB recruit that now denies it. The only plausible explanation is you are both a fool and a fucked up shit troll.

Tell me something you fucking loser, how does the SEC cheat?

[M2]

How is the SEC a bunch of cheaters?
Tell me something you fucking loser, how does the SEC cheat?

Look, Sandusky... of the central valley Motel 6 club.

Show me where I said the SEC cheated ??? Even though they do... you fucking drunken QUEEN.


I'll only address this one question... since you are probably rolling around in your own vomit and panties now in your 6 dollar a night hotel room... and you probably won't wake up for another 24 hours.

[Go Coogs']

Nothing better than reading an idiot's response to another idiot. mtool was saying the PAC12 would have nine teams bowl eligible if USC were not a bunch of cheaters.

Thanks for the giggles, thought, AP.

Just because the PAC12 has eight bowl eligible teams doesn't mean they are the best conference in the land.

[M2]

Just because the PAC12 has eight bowl eligible teams doesn't mean they are the best conference in the land.

Prove your point or disprove my point...


You see... there's this thing the PAC has done for the last 80 years or so... it's called playing schools that don't have SE, NE, SW, NW before New Mexico State for their 3 out of conference games while the SEC plays 4 OOC games (ALL AT HOME) to go along with their 8 home games they play every year.


There's a VERY good reason why "The PAC" is called " The Conference of Champions"


It's because there isn't a conference that is even close... to " The PAC "



Hell... if I were to add Cal's Rugby team... that would be another 26 National Championships ... in a REAL MAN'S SPORT !!!







The most dominant team in College Sports History...

http://www.calbears.com/sports/m-rugby/ ... hamps.html

[Screw_Michigan]

Nothing better than reading an idiot's response to another idiot.

Bwahaha.

[Dinsdale]

Oregon vs LSU would be fun to watch... I don't want a rematch.

Tip back another one, since you're already a mess.

[Dinsdale]

If rather than representing the USA, instead PAC athletes formed "their own country," they'd be #4 all-time in Olympic medals.

[Cornhusker]

The PAC 12 could have nine teams bowl eligible... if $UC weren't a bunch of fucking cheaters.

As of today, the B1G has 10 teams eligible.

[Mace]

The PAC 12 could have nine teams bowl eligible... if $UC weren't a bunch of fucking cheaters.

As of today, the B1G has 10 teams eligible.

Are you going to start a thread entitled "Big 10....best conference in the land...?" Didn't think so.

[Cornhusker]

The PAC 12 could have nine teams bowl eligible... if $UC weren't a bunch of fucking cheaters.

As of today, the B1G has 10 teams eligible.

Are you going to start a thread entitled "Big 10....best conference in the land...?" Didn't think so.

[Cornhusker]

The PAC 12 could have nine teams bowl eligible... if $UC weren't a bunch of fucking cheaters.

As of today, the B1G has 10 teams eligible.

8. You've got to have at least 6 wins to be bowl eligible, don't you - have they changed it?

You are correct, while 2 teams are at .500 in the B1G, they would both need to win another game. So 8 as of now...my bad.

Purdue has Iowa and Indiana
Northwestern has Minnesota and Michigan St. (GO CATS beat State!)


Bowl eligibility in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) College Football is the standard through which teams become available for selection to participate in postseason bowl games. When a team achieves this state, it is described as "bowl-eligible". Under current regulations, in order for this to occur, a team must have a winning record, which may include one win against a Division I FCS scholarship-awarding[1] opponent, or win their conference, and the team must not be on probation. The NCAA allows one victory per season over a Division I FCS (formerly I-AA) team to count toward an FBS team's bowl eligibility, so long as the FCS team has supplied financial aid for football averaging out to at least 56.7 full scholarships (90% of the limit of 63 allowed to FCS schools) over "a rolling two-year period" that can include the current season

On April 26, 2006, the NCAA announced that they were relaxing the rules for eligibility starting with the 2006 season, particularly in light of the new twelve-game college football season. Now, teams with .500 records can qualify for bowl games if their conference has a contract with a bowl game. Also, teams with .500 records (i.e. 6–6) could earn bowl bids if all other FBS teams with winning records have been taken and postseason spots still remain vacant. In thirteen-game seasons (used because of conference championship games, or allowable for Hawaiʻi and any of its home opponents in a given season), a team must win seven games

[Goober McTuber]

The B1G has five teams at 8-2 and three at 6-4. Meatgrinder North.

[King Crimson]

as an Oklahoma fan living in old Big 8 territory, working at Colorado for a decade and more....I can't say I'm that impressed with the Pac up close for the first time.

UO and USC have top 5-10 talent. Wazzou, UW, U of A, Cal, Oregon State don't impress me at all....unless all but one is playing CU. ASU, we'll they've lost two in a row

now, if a Pac fan wants to roll out the standard Jon excuse, "this is a down year for the conference"....doesn't seem to be the case. what was sold hard by CU fan as
"as a better conference top to bottom"....looks more like competitive mediocrity. a bunch of 7 win teams are still a bunch of 7 win teams.

i've seen all the stats about everyone in the Pac winning the title and all that. until Petey at USC...what's there to brag about that?

i've enjoyed seeing CU play the Pac teams, looking forward to hoops....but....this year's Pac....?

i know, the Big XII North all that whatever.....but KSU, CU, NU, and KU all played in BCS games. MU should have. ISU, well....ISU.