Winning football? I think they'll take it.Van wrote:Welcome to your future, Bronco fans
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
and how many did he need?Van wrote: Tebow pulls one drive out of his ass
fucking crazy....the denver defense is playing lights out-von miller has got to be a strong candidate for rookie of the yearKC Scott wrote: The thing is, he did it against a good defense.
And they knew it was coming.
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
Yes.the denver defense is playing lights out
I didn't think they were going to win. I thought with Moreno going on IR and MacGahee questionable, they wouldn't be able to generate enough offense to win. That said, I'm not in the least bit surprised to see that they pulled it out.KC Scott wrote:So what's your call on this game?mvscal wrote:Prepackaging your excuse already. God, you're pathetic.Van wrote: but this game will not prove to be much of a barometer of anything.
Just something basic: who wins and a score prediction
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Probably because the game wasn't over, dumbass.trev wrote:I saw that. Elway wasn't exactly grinning that ear to ear grin of his.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
hahapoptart wrote:Does Denver have any PLAYERS (backs & receivers) which would allow for a coach to use a wide-open offensive style?Felix wrote:his (Fox) plodding offensive style is well-offensive, and ineffective in this day and age of high flying offensive attacks....you've have to have quick strike capabilities in the NFL and Denver doesn't have it.....
Not only that, but Orton is limited in what he can do... and we know about Tebow.
Fox has you guys at 20.5 pts a game - and that's pretty decent, given what he's working with.
my statement stands on it's own merits....denver has a plodding offense that doesn't have quick strike capabilities....nothing has changed my opinion on that....what has changed is my opinion of the defense...they're playing lights out....and tebow is a winner...he may be a shitty thrower but he wins fucking games...and in the final analysis, isn't that what matters?poptart wrote:hahapoptart wrote:Does Denver have any PLAYERS (backs & receivers) which would allow for a coach to use a wide-open offensive style?Felix wrote:his (Fox) plodding offensive style is well-offensive, and ineffective in this day and age of high flying offensive attacks....you've have to have quick strike capabilities in the NFL and Denver doesn't have it.....
Not only that, but Orton is limited in what he can do... and we know about Tebow.
Fox has you guys at 20.5 pts a game - and that's pretty decent, given what he's working with.
Nice job, Foolix.
have you sobered up from the drunken haze of self wallowing pity yet? look I know the blots have decided to start their annual "self-destruct party" just a little early, so maybe you'd better open another bottle of vodka--you're going to vapor lock before longtrev wrote:Stop defending that mama's boy.
LOLFelix wrote:my statement stands on it's own merits
And then you said...Joe wrote:John Fox stinks to high heaven.
You should have been kissing Fox's pinky ring, because his approach was allowing his team to remain competetive, allowing them to STAY IN GAMES.Felix wrote:yeah the game has advanced while he's remained pretty stagnant.....his plodding offensive style is well-offensive, and ineffective in this day and age of high flying offensive attacks....you've have to have quick strike capabilities in the NFL and Denver doesn't have it.....
the only problem with running that kind of an offense (plodding style), is that you need a defense that can limit your opponents to 20.4 pts per game...Denver doesn't have that kind of defense....Fox opts for a slug-it out approach and in the long run, that's just not going to work with the personnel Denver has....
and they don't....but why is it that you seemed to overlook the second paragraph of my response....poptart wrote:It's a plodding offense.
But you were bitching about it and saying it wouldn't work
And then you said...
"yeah the game has advanced while he's remained pretty stagnant.....his plodding offensive style is well-offensive, and ineffective in this day and age of high flying offensive attacks....you've have to have quick strike capabilities in the NFL and Denver doesn't have it.....
in the first four games, denver's defense was the suck, but for some reason, they've started playing really, really well....so, my original assessment stands as I wrote it....the thing that's changed is the defense.....the only problem with running that kind of an offense (plodding style), is that you need a defense that can limit your opponents to 20.4 pts per game...Denver doesn't have that kind of defense....Fox opts for a slug-it out approach and in the long run, that's just not going to work with the personnel Denver has....
that sort of an offense is not sustainable and if you'd like to present me arguments why it is, I'll be more than happy to listen to them....You should have been kissing Fox's pinky ring, because his approach was allowing his team to remain competetive, allowing them to STAY IN GAMES.
Instead you were bashing him, saying he was wrong.
come correct about what? that Fox and co. have schemed games to take advantage of Tebow's strengths and minimize his weaknesses? where did I ever say that was the wrong approach? and secondly, what approach for Denver did I propose?YOU were wrong about everything (LOLZ) and now that Fox's approach has proven out to have been correct, you're too much of a knucklehead to come correct.
With your approach, the team would be sitting at 2-8 right now, because you're nothing more than a gibbering internet HACK.
poptart wrote:you're nothing more than a gibbering internet HACK.
absolutely, but tebow just doesn't have the throwing capability....I don't see how this is a contradiction...I still don't think this offensive approach is sustainable, but as long as the defense continues to make plays, it's working...poptart wrote:Back on October 25th, when you gave your internet hack take that Fox is way too conservative with the offense, and that it was going to prove to be ineffective, you obviously thought he should have been opening it up, right?
it's worked so far, but it's not a recipe for long term sustainable success....I'm sure there is some point you're trying to make here....lets get to itYes, of course.
That's why you were bitching like a typical Hee Hew bitch fan.
Well if anything, Fox has PULLED THINGS IN MORE and become MORE conservative since October 25th.
And it's been a recipe for success.
ah you were just waiting to drop some sort of "you don't know what your talking about" bomb.....congrats on your ability to recognize that Denver's throwback offense was going to be as successful as it has been....I'm guessing you and John Fox were the only ones that knew it would work.....Your head's so far up your ass that the jaws of life won't even save you at this point.
RIP
bud....calling me a hack is what you call "smack"?War Wagon wrote: right or wrong, good to see 'tart still has some smack in his arsenal.
Bronco's or this thread?Shoalzie wrote:What a freak show...
He's an uncloseted fan of #15's main man.Felix wrote:the way tart's defending fox's offensive approach, you could get the impression that deep down inside, he's a closet Bronco fan
No, he isn't. Why would he think that? The team was 1-4 and left for dead before Tebow took over and now they're almost certain to win the division after they beat the Chargers next week.Sudden Sam wrote:Don't you know Elway is going nuts right now?
"How the fuck can I get rid of this guy?!"
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Of course I knew that his approach was corect.Felix wrote:congrats on your ability to recognize that Denver's throwback offense was going to be as successful as it has been....I'm guessing you and John Fox were the only ones that knew it would work.....
Felix wrote:yeah the game has advanced while he's remained pretty stagnant.....his plodding offensive style is well-offensive, and ineffective in this day and age of high flying offensive attacks....you've have to have quick strike capabilities in the NFL and Denver doesn't have it.....
the only problem with running that kind of an offense (plodding style), is that you need a defense that can limit your opponents to 20.4 pts per game...Denver doesn't have that kind of defense....Fox opts for a slug-it out approach and in the long run, that's just not going to work with the personnel Denver has....
poptart wrote:Does Denver have any PLAYERS (backs & receivers) which would allow for a coach to use a wide-open offensive style?
Not only that, but Orton is limited in what he can do... and we know about Tebow.
Fox has you guys at 20.5 pts a game - and that's pretty decent, given what he's working with.
while this offense has pretty much taken all NFL experts and virtually every bronco fan I've talked to by surprise, you knew it all along.....poptart wrote:
Of course I knew that his approach was corect.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
What's known here is that you are a whiny lady fan who doesn't understand football basics.Felix wrote:while this offense has pretty much taken all NFL experts and virtually every bronco fan I've talked to by surprise, you knew it all along.....poptart wrote:
Of course I knew that his approach was corect.
amazing
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
okay, go ahead and point out where I was lobbying for Denver to throw the ball long....it doesn't exist....I said Fox brought a plodding offense and in today's professional game, that type of offense typically doesn't work because I didn't think Denver had the defense to make it work....the Detroit debacle was a perfect example of that....the defense got blown out of the water by a really good offensepoptart wrote: What's known here is that you are a whiny lady fan who doesn't understand football basics.
I knew Fox was handling things as he should, given the personnel he has.
why are you lying about this....I never said any such thing and you fucking know it....Start tossing the ball around the yard when you don't have the players for it, and you'll find yourself on the wrong end of numerous blowouts faster than one can say, "Where'd you hide that potato, pinky?"
That's what you were lobbying for, simpleton.
Tebow sounded pretty bright to me. He was able to articulate his reads on the game winning play, avoid the temptation of buying into his own hype despite repeated invitations by the NFLN talking heads to do so, talk extemporaneously about a hospital he is building in the Philippines and articulate his views about the relative importance of football versus real life. You try doing that while 1000 or so drunks are chanting your name and you are being peppered by questions from all angles. You are seriously one ignorant drunk twat if you think that what Tebow was doing in that interview demonstrated a lack of brainpower..trev wrote:OMG. No hate here. It's hilarious. His solid head of rocks will take him far. Go Tebow!
You wanted Fox to have the boys start slinging it around - because, you said, Dungver doesn't have the personnel to "slug it out" conservatively.Felix wrote:yeah the game has advanced while he's remained pretty stagnant.....his plodding offensive style is well-offensive, and ineffective in this day and age of high flying offensive attacks....you've have to have quick strike capabilities in the NFL and Denver doesn't have it.....
the only problem with running that kind of an offense (plodding style), is that you need a defense that can limit your opponents to 20.4 pts per game...Denver doesn't have that kind of defense....Fox opts for a slug-it out approach and in the long run, that's just not going to work with the personnel Denver has....
