BCS Title game

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

User avatar
Atomic Punk
antagonist
Posts: 6636
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
Location: El Segundo, CA

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Atomic Punk »

Goobs, trust me... I know what every team schedule is and have seen many of the contenders play. It's just I don't see them actually play for a month or two.

I've always said Boise plays nobody except when they have time to prep. The Boise fans don't travel well for games so they get snubbed from a BCS game. Notice they are joining the Big lEast for football only?

Look at Iowa State's results. Boise State would kill Iowa State without a month of prep time but Okie Lite lost to ISU. The BCS got it right this year.

Georgia exposed LSU's defense, however they folded after the dropped balls in the 1st half. Did you see Georgia's defensive line dominate LSU's O line? It's all about match up ups. What is idiotic about that?

Don't forget to show up 15 minutes early for your next Brazilian wax. Even I wouldn't do that.
BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.

Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Truman »

Sudden Sam wrote:
M2 wrote:We've seen that game ...
So you'd rather see LSU - 42, OSU - 14?
Color me a scenario where that's even possiblity, Sammie.

Three Mattieu punt returns for touchdowns? Gotta think that even the Pokes would be sharp enough to start kickin' 'em out-of bounds after the first one.

Regardless, it wouldn't make any difference with LSU lookin' up at 56.

Did it ever occur to you that Oke State's D has such a poor showing because they're up 40 every game? 9-6 games would be a bit out of reach for most anybody when you're in prevent after the first quarter.

LSU's O blows goats. Hell, those people don't even know which quarterback to play half the time. And 'bama's aint any better. Send SEC offensive game film to Gitmo and we wouldn't be bombed for ten years.

The voters did us a disservice. Enjoy your circle-jerk, Sam.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Goober McTuber »

Jsc810 wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:Georgia exposed LSU's defense
:lol:
Come on. They were 20-51 passing with 2 ints, averaged 2.3 yards per rushing attempt. Now that’s how you expose a defense. And AP knows a bit about exposing.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
M2
GOAT
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: "Baghdad by the Bay"

Re: BCS Title game

Post by M2 »

I think we all can remember when Jsc was asked to name 3 players on the LSU team... and he couldn't come up with it.

Thats all you need to know about... ( guy with 42 favorite teams ) .
Image
User avatar
Atomic Punk
antagonist
Posts: 6636
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
Location: El Segundo, CA

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Atomic Punk »

Goober McTuber wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:Georgia exposed LSU's defense
:lol:
Come on. They were 20-51 passing with 2 ints, averaged 2.3 yards per rushing attempt. Now that’s how you expose a defense. And AP knows a bit about exposing.
Georgia had LSU early and since they couldn't make 1+1=2 in the passing game they started running the ball against the 2nd best defense in the country. Don't play "Stats Guy" with me as it's about match ups. If you've watched the game you would have seen Georgia defensive linemen running through LSU's offensive line during the game.

Have you figured out why the previous LSU - 'Bama game was a defensive battle yet? If you've watched them actually play and not read stats then it may click for you.
BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.

Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Goober McTuber »

Atomic Punk wrote:Georgia had LSU early and since they couldn't make 1+1=2 in the passing game they started running the ball against the 2nd best defense in the country. Don't play "Stats Guy" with me as it's about match ups. If you've watched the game you would have seen Georgia defensive linemen running through LSU's offensive line during the game.
So are you now changing your argument to "Georgia's defense exposed LSU's offense?

Atomic Punk wrote:Have you figured out why the previous LSU - 'Bama game was a defensive battle yet? If you've watched them actually play and not read stats then it may click for you.
Because Alabama wasn't able to "expose" LSU's defense the way Georgia did? You do understand that Georgia averaged less than 3.5 yards per offensive play against LSU? You are just a complete fucking mess.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Atomic Punk
antagonist
Posts: 6636
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
Location: El Segundo, CA

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Atomic Punk »

Goobs, why are you intellectually dishonest?
BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.

Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Goober McTuber »

Atomic Pantload, why are you shitfaced at 1:30 in the afternoon? Please point out what was dishonest?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Atomic Punk
antagonist
Posts: 6636
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
Location: El Segundo, CA

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Atomic Punk »

Goober McTuber wrote:Atomic Pantload, why are you shitfaced at 1:30 in the afternoon? Please point out what was dishonest?
Because trev is serving some fine drinks and wearing high heels with a short maid's uniform. She's not very good at cleaning this place but I appreciate the service, if you will.

I've already laid it out in this thread and you throw stats at me. Did you even watch the games I've mentioned? If so, then you are intellectually dishonest. I can't wait for 'Bama to beat LSU and I'll remind you of this thread and you'll be a bigger jackass than you are now.

Listen to me dummy, Jim McElwain will figure out what went wrong the 1st time around on the offensive side. 'Bama's defense is a bit better than LSU's, so that creates a stalemate on the defensive side. Did you watch the Georgia - LSU game and see how Georgia blew apart the LSU O-line? It's all about match-ups with personnel on any level.

Hey trev, bring me another one. I need to keep this buzz going.
BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.

Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: BCS Title game

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

So Georgia "exposed" LSU up until the point they started getting their asses kicked. Umm, good for them? Does that mean they cracked AP's top 5 because they played one good quarter of football? I sure hope Georgia can expose Michigan State in the same way.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: BCS Title game

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

I think it will be a good game, but who knows. I feel much better about MSU's D vs Georgia's O than I do MSU's O vs Georgia's D. MSU really struggled against the 3-4 the last couple times they faced it (Bama, ND).
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Goober McTuber »

Atomic Punk wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Atomic Pantload, why are you shitfaced at 1:30 in the afternoon? Please point out what was dishonest?
Because trev is serving some fine drinks and wearing high heels with a short maid's uniform. She's not very good at cleaning this place but I appreciate the service, if you will.

I've already laid it out in this thread and you throw stats at me. Did you even watch the games I've mentioned? If so, then you are intellectually dishonest. I can't wait for 'Bama to beat LSU and I'll remind you of this thread and you'll be a bigger jackass than you are now.
Bama could beat LSU 50-0 and that would not change the fact that you are a complete idiot who posts absolute nonsense. Does Victoria's Secret have a Big and Tall section, you drunken cross-dressing tard?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Python
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 1073
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:04 pm

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Python »

Goober McTuber wrote: Does Victoria's Secret have a Big and Tall section?
Yes.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Goober McTuber »

Python wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote: Does Victoria's Secret have a Big and Tall section?
Yes.
Wow. Do you have a big and tall wife?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: BCS Title game

Post by Goober McTuber »

Python wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote: Does Victoria's Secret have a Big and Tall section?
Yes.
Does AP know about this?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Post Reply