Sudden Sam wrote:Always thought Holmoe's name fit the Cal image well.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1f/99d1ffcd436e8dfc800a9b8c92c0d1bf3f377acb" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Or embarrassing, depending on one's perspective.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64c31/64c3119960d80f788222721b630862543af31de0" alt="Embarassed :oops:"
But since you brought it up (sort of), I found some of the choices curious here.
At ND, I would've given the honor to Joe Kuharich, the only coach to post a sub-.500 record at ND (17-23 from 1959 to 1962). Hal Mumme was a strange choice for Kentucky, to say the least, at least by won-lost record. I would've given Minnesota to Joe Salem (19-35-1 from 1979 to 1983). That's a slightly better record than Wacker, but I think Salem should get some extra credit for his 1983 team, arguably the worst in history of any BCS-level conference. They gave up 84 points to Nebraska, 518 for the season (average of 47 points/game), and a delta point differential of -337 (average -31 points/game). I would've gone with Ted Tollner over Paul Hackett at USC -- Hackett had a worse record, but it was Tollner who started USC's rather lengthy trek through the wilderness, and Hackett at least beat ND. Tollner lost three times to Gerry Faust.
Just a few off the top of my head.