Fiester Bowel.

socal · Post by **socal** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:54 am

Timeout? What is that?
Sin,
Bielsma

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:56 am

Well, at least they scored with enough time left to give up a 90-second return TD drive by Okie St and still march down and win on their final drive.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:56 am

Van wrote:Mikey, wtf is up with that Gaffney/direct snap play? Is it just a deal where they run it a couple of times knowing it'll get destroyed, then, on the third try, they actually have him throw the ball to Luck? Or something?

It's their version of the "pistol." It worked well a lot of times this season. It looks like Okie State is just ready for it. I would think after two fails they'd drop it completely.

It's up to the defense now...

socal · Post by **socal** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:57 am

Mikey wrote:These guys sure wait a long time to blow the whistle.

Is that some kind of euphemism in the Castro?

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:58 am

Nah, it'll still end up being on the offense. The defense will give up the tying score. May as well give Luck another shot by surrendering it quickly, right?

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:01 am

Wow.

Will Gundy trust his defense enough to punt here?

Nope! Bwaaaaa.

And Blackmon kills them again.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:02 am

Yep, Okie St, you left way too much time on the clock for Stanford.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:04 am

How will the Indians respond ?

socal · Post by **socal** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:04 am

Go for two!

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:05 am

helluva game keeping me up late when I have to be up early tomorrow.

No matter who wins, RACK both of these teams.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:06 am

Does this one have an overwhelming feeling of inevitability, or what?

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:08 am

Shit, Stanford, don't you go scoring too quickly too!

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:08 am

No matter what the Heisman voters say, you're seeing the best QB in the country at work right here.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:09 am

The Indians need 6 for a win.

socal · Post by **socal** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:10 am

Yards after catch.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:11 am

Mikey wrote:No matter what the Heisman voters say, you're seeing the best QB football player in the country at work right here.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:14 am

Jesus fuck.

socal · Post by **socal** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:14 am

Papa Willie wrote:And OS isn't taking their final timeout. That's just stupid.

Waiting to ice him I imagine.
The Stanford kicker. Not Mikey.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:14 am

bwhahahaha

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:14 am

FUCK!!!

OT

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:14 am

bwahahaha

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:16 am

God, what a choke by that Stanford kicker.

OT, with these two teams? This one could end up 109-103.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:16 am

M2 wrote:The Indians need 6 for a win.

m2 is the truth

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:17 am

Ummm, M2? Three would've won it.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:19 am

Van wrote:Ummm, M2? Three would've won it.

Pssst... they NEED 6 to win it.

Going for 3 didn't do it... did it ?

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:22 am

Jordan Williamson may never get laid again.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:22 am

What a fucking way to lose.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:23 am

Papa Willie wrote:Terrible play-calling by the trees. FG missed. Trees are now fucked.

M2 wrote:The Indians need 6 for a win.

Thanks for playing... shit for brains.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:23 am

Just disgusting.

Good night.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:24 am

Condolences, Mikey. Brutal way to go down. That was Mgo-esque.

(The half-yard here won't matter.)

socal · Post by **socal** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:26 am

Cruel lifeline

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:26 am

M2 wrote:The Indians need 6 for a win.

m2 is the truth

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:27 am

M2 is also wrong.

Too funny.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:29 am

Fucking kickers.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:29 am

Van wrote:M2 is also wrong.

Too funny.

Going for 3 didn't work... now did it ???

They needed to go for 6.

the truth

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:31 am

You said they "needed 6." You were wrong. You remain wrong.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:34 am

Van wrote:You said they "needed 6." You were wrong. You remain wrong.

They could have won with a 1 point play... but, they don't sell those as well.

They needed 6 or they were going to lose... and, well

m2 is the truth

campinfool · Post by **campinfool** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:39 am

Mikey wrote:No matter what the Heisman voters say, you're seeing the best QB in the country at work right here.

Wrong. He wasn't even the best QB in this game.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:39 am

Mikey wrote:What a fucking way to lose.

yeah, EAD, tree hugger.

send them back to the flyover as winners, that's what you meant to say.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:44 am

campinfool wrote:
Mikey wrote:No matter what the Heisman voters say, you're seeing the best QB in the country at work right here.
Wrong. He wasn't even the best QB in this game.

Actually, we'll never know. Only the dumbest kind of coaching would prompt what could be the best QB in a long time to call run plays up the middle to end the game and also in OT...That level of stupidity should be bottled and used as a weapon somewhere.