Truman wrote:I realize this may come as a shock to you, Dins, but the rest of the country doesn’t have Columbia-like rivers thick with Chinook for us to select our groceries.
No, not a shock at all -- an inevitibility.
Naw, we have to rely on the metrics of air-freight and distribution centers just to enjoy a taste of wild-caught salmon, which clearly is substitute so poor that you U&Ler’s would most likely chop it up and use it for bait.
Nah, we just call it "smoker quality." We do use the filleted carcarr for crab bait, though.
Don’t hate.
It's my web-based nature.
We don’t KNOW any better.
Of course not. Bear in mind, just about everyone here (in the urban areas anyway) is a transplant geenhorn, and doesn't know any better either.
It’s like trying to eat barbecue in Boston or Boise: Oh, sure, you appreciate the effort, but those folks have never really had good ‘cue.
Logical fallacy. A Chowd or Idahoho can learn to cue as well as anyone -- the Outlanders will
never have good salmon.
For the record, I’ve “smoked” a number of Atlantic filets indirectly over an alder and charcoal fire using nothing more than a bit of EVOO and salt and pepper, and I’ve never once had to ‘burn” anything to finish them properly. And they ‘et just fine. But then again, I don’t have U&L sensibilities on the subject, either.
I appreciate the use of quotations -- smoked salmon is an entire process, as opposed to "cooking on a smoker." Smoking involves brining, rinsing, drying, then curing at a very low (160 is ideal) temp.
And yeah, with a freshly dead, properly handled fish (yet another difference -- there's no such thing as a "properly handled" commercial caught fish. Not really possible on that scale.), we pretty much cook them so the outside is a hair pink, and the inside is essentially raw... which would be borderline-suicidal to do with a store bought fish.